Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive- Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) Summer 2006 and Winter 2007 – Planned possible.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Questions How is the chemical composition* of the aerosol burden in Northern Europe modulated? –What are the chemical properties of the burden.
Advertisements

A EUROPEAN AEROSOL PHENOMENOLOGY: TOTAL CARBON, ELEMENTAL CARBON AND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT Fabrizia Cavalli European Commission – DG Joint Research Centre.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
A Project to Characterize The Effects of Transient Air Pollutants on the Health of African-Americans in Atlanta, Georgia John H. Hall Morehouse College.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Introduction & Outline Particulate Measurement 1) PM10 – Particulate Matter < 10 microns 2) PM2.5 – Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns - Measured with different.
COPERT 4 Training (5. PM) 1 COPERT 4 Training 5. Exhaust and non-exhaust PM.
Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands – A year-long radiocarbon study Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
R&P 8400S and 8400N Ambient Particulate Sulfate and Nitrate Monitors: Performance during PMTACS-NY Intensive Field Campaigns and Routine Measurements (Poster.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber,
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
MAOS (Mobile Aerosol Observing System) and the G1 Aircraft at Cape Cod Allie Marquardt Collow.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Russian Soot Measurement Methodologies Alexander Romanov Scientific Research Institute for atmospheric air protection St.Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Investigation of Decadal Changes in Aerosol and Asthma Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Chemistry of Particles and Selected Trace Gases at Whistler, BC A.M. Macdonald, K.G. Anlauf and W.R. Leaitch.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Size-segregated analysis of PM10 at a tandem urban – rural site combination J. K. Gietl 1*, T. Tritscher 1,2, and O. Klemm 1 1 University of Münster, Institute.
Comparison of gravimetric PM data from the Harvard Impactors and Gent Stacked Unit PM 10 Samplers in Prague 2004 M. CIVIŠ 1, J. HOVORKA 1 and J. SCHWARZ.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Proposal for a Research Infrastructure for Advanced Aerosol Observations and Capacity Building in China Alfred WIEDENSOHLER Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric.
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC.
25/05/20071 About comparability of measured and modeled metrics Jean-Philippe Putaud Fabrizia Cavalli DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
Black Carbon Measurements at Whistler Sarah Hanna (UBC)
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
For further information please contact: Ivonne Trebs Tel.: Fax: ONLINE MEASUREMENTS.
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
FINE AND COARSE AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A STUDENT CLUB BEFORE AND AFTER A SMOKING BAN J. HOVORKA, M. BRANIŠ, P. GADAS, T. VALCHÁŘOVÁ
Canada’s Physical Geography Climate and Weather Part I Unit 2 Chapter 2.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
1 The roles of H 2 SO 4 and organic species in the growth of newly formed particles in the rural environment Wu Zhijun Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric.
Overview of the Canadian Contribution to INTEX-B Randall Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Thomas Walker, Tom Duck Dalhousie University Richard Leaitch, Anne.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
Novel Sampling Techniques for Measurement of Turbine Engine Total Particulate Matter Emissions Office of Research and Development National Risk Management.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Size-segregated characterization of PM10 with five stage BERNER-impactors at Melpitz (Germany) – a six year study G. Spindler, A. Grüner, K. Müller, Y.
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
Concentrations of particulate matter in France : results and key findings Olivier Le Bihan, François Mathe, Jean-Luc Houdret, Bertrand Bessagnet, Patrice.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009
Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive-
About comparability of measured and modeled metrics
Rationalizing the differences between thermo-optical OC/EC methods.
Rami Alfarra, Urs Baltensperger: Paul Scherrer Institute, CH.
Urban and Airborne Measurements with a PILS Desi Toom-Sauntry, Kathy Hayden, Gang Lu, Shao-Meng Li, Jeff Brook, Walter Strapp, Richard Leaitch Meteorological.
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
MEASUREMENT OF PM2.5 SEMI-VOLATILE MATERIAL WITH THE FDMS TEOM MONITOR
Challenges with Integrated Measurements of OC and BC (or EC)
DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE CARBON
EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07
EC/OC – monitoring within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive- Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) Summer 2006 and Winter 2007 – Planned possible measurements for 2008 and 2009 G. Spindler 1, L. Poulain 1, E. Brüggemann 1, T. Gnauk 1, A. Grüner 1, K. Müller 1, Th.M.Tuch 3, M.Wallasch 2, B. Wehner 1, A. Wiedensohler 1, H. Herrmann 1 EMEP/TFMM workshop: specification of the next intensive measurement campaign and future plans related to the EMEP monitoring strategy, Dublin 23 rd October Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig, Germany 2 UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig, Germany 3 Umweltbundesamt, Wörlitzer Platz 1, Dessau, Germany National contributions to EMEP Database

View from aircraft to the rural Melpitz site Fotos: Bange September 2001 TU-Braunschweig N Klitzschen (village) Melpitz (village) measuring field

Evolution of half-hourly PM 10 -mass concentration and precipitation in winter (November until April) and summer (May until October) at Melpitz site in the least 14 years. The half yearly precipitation sum is plotted as inverse. Three years of intensive investigation

Location of the IfT research site in the state of Saxony (Germany) (12°56‘ E, 51°32‘ N, Altitude 86 m above see level) maritime air masses continental air masses Melpitz

Mean PM 1, PM 2.5 and PM 10 mass concentrations, the concentrations of the main ions (nitrate, sulfate and ammonium) and organic and elemental carbon content (OC and EC) in winter and summer. Only days with air mass transport explicitly from West (blue frame) or from East (green frame) are considered. The error bars are the standard deviation for the particle mass concentration. “n” is the number of days. Averages of three winters (2004/05, 2005/06, 2006/07) and three summers (2005, 2006, 2007) are shown. Results DIGITEL Sampler

Time series of daily particle mass concentration PM 1, PM 2.5 and PM 10 (May 2004 until October 2006) with indicator for air mass origin and time-slots for the EMEP winter- and summer-campaign (2006 and 2007) Summer-campaign Winter-campaign

Meteorological parameters during the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site Difference from normal climate ( ) for daily mean temparature at the Meteorological Institute of the Leipzig University® Temperature and relative Humidity at Melpitz site June 2006 January/February until April 17

MAAP, Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (Model 5012) TOF-AMS, Particle-Mass-Spectrometer (Aerodyne, USA) Berner, 5-stage-BERNER-type-impactor (mass, water soluble ions, organic and elemental carbon, OC, EC) GRIMMType ESVC 265, optical detection of PM 1, PM 2. 5 and PM 10 TDMPSTDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer) in combination with a thermo-denuder █ no data X data availableFor the AMS also data for 9.,10.,11. and 12. February and for the Berner data also for the 7. February available Overview of data for the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site

Summer(1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days32 days PM PM PM PM PM PM Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM 10, PM 2.5 and PM 1 Mass-concentration

Comparison of half-hourly PM 10 -measurements of an optical device (Type ESVC 265, Fa. GRIMM, Germany) with daily PM 10 data from the DIGITEL June 2006 N=30

January/February 2007 Comparison of half-hourly PM 10 -measurements of an optical device (Type ESVC 265, Fa. GRIMM, Germany) with daily PM 10 data from the DIGITEL N=32

5-stage-BERNER-type-impactor at Melpitz site Five-stage low-pressure cascade impactor, flow rate 4.5 m 3 /h Aluminium impaction foils pump from inlet aerodynamic particle diameter [µm] foil from stage 3

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (1) Structure of the Boxplot minumum lower Quartile upper Quartile mean value maximum Mass

Time profiles and mass fraction

Comparison with PM 1 DIGITEL daily filter samples

PM 10 Particle mass concentration [ng/m³] Measurements with the MAAP, Example for 10 days in June 2006, minute-means

June 2006January/February 2007 Evolution of number size distributions of ambient aerosols (upper figures) and of non-volatile particle fractions behind the thermodenuder (lower figures) as a mean for the EMEP-summer- and -winter-campaign.

We provide data for both EMEP-Intensive campaigns in 2006 and 2007 DIGITEL High Volume Sampler (daily means, PM 1, PM 2.5 and PM 10 ) MAAP, Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (Model 5012) (Minute means) Berner, 5-stage-BERNER-type-impactor (mass, water soluble ions, organic and elemental carbon, OC, EC) (daily means for selected days,13 during summer and 15 during winter campaign) GRIMM Type ESVC 265, optical detection of PM 1, PM 2.5 and PM 10 (half-hourly means) TDMPS TDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer) in combination with a thermo-denuder (10 minute means and daily contour plots) TOF-AMS, Particle-Mass-Spectrometer (data in winter campaign available) (5-minute-means) This measurements can be done at Melpitz site also for 2008 and 2009 Plus …

Possible new and modified measurements for the future campaigns in 2008 and 2009 at Melpitz AMS measurements in both campaigns with more focus also on organic speciation (HOA, OOA) (5 minute means) Quasi continuously measurements of OC and EC with the SUNSET LABORATORY’s Carbon Aerosol Analyzer (hourly means for OC/EC) Artifact free sampling of OC/EC (following EUSAAR) – Analysis of OC and EC with C-mat 5500 (VDI 2465 page 2) (daily mean every second day) Monitor for Aerosols & Gases in Ambient Air MARGA (commercial vision of SJAC) for NO 3 -, NH 4 +, SO 4 –, Cl - /HNO 3, HCl, NH 3, SO 2 in PM 2.5 (hourly means) (MARGA can be integrated in the 2009 campaign) TEOM® FDMS for nearly artifact free measurements of PM 10 mass concentration (10 minute means) NH 3 -Measurements by photoacoustic (TGA 310) (10 minute means)

Especially the time slot of the winter campaign shows only situations with westerly winds and the Winter 2006/2007 was in Germany extremely mild. The comparison of both campaigns therefore give very untypical results for the Melpitz site. They are differ from that of long-time-observations. ! The particle mass concentration PM 10 decreased up to the end of the 90-ies and remains constant for the last years. The inter annular winter variations are much higher than those of the summers. The Melpitz site is located in the lowlands of Eastern Germany and may be influenced episodically by air masses from Eastern Europe transporting aerosol in the EU with a lot of sulphate, OC and EC especially in winters. Such air masses are the reason for high PM 10 concentration episodes in large areas with a typical high PM 2.5 /PM 10 ratio (detection of long-range-transport). The results for Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site for 2006 and 2007 and the future campains for 2008 and 2009 can be integrated in longtime measurements for PM. Suitability of Melpitz site

reasons actions We would like to thank Jörn Hanß, Eveline Neumann, Annelie Thomas, Helga Mamczak, Brigitte Gerlach and Anett Dietze. Particulate Matter We acknowledge the support from the Umweltbundesamt in Germany for the 2006 and 2007 EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns (project ) and continuation of measurements in 2006/07 (project )

SUPPLEMENTS

Time-slots of the summer and winter EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-campaigns in the daily long-time PM 10 -Mesurements at Melpitz site Campaigns in Winter and Summer

Meteorological parameters during the EMEP intensive campaigns at Melpitz site (2) Global radiation and wind velocity at Melpitz site June 2006January/February 2007 Wind direction and precipitation at Melpitz site

Summer(1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days32 days PM PM PM PM PM PM Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM 10, PM 2.5 and PM 1 Nitrate-concentration

Summer(1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days32 days PM PM PM PM PM PM Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM 10, PM 2.5 and PM 1 Sulphate-concentration

Summer(1. June – 30. June 2006) Winter (8. January – 8 February 2007) 30 days32 days PM PM PM PM PM PM Time series and mean values for Summer- and Winter-campaign. Results from the daily DIGITEL-Samples for PM 10, PM 2.5 and PM 1 Ammonium-concentration

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (summer) June

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements (winter) January/February 2007

Comparison of black carbon determination from DIGITEL- Filters as EC (VDI-2465, page 2) and an optical determination with an Multi Angel Absorption Photometer (MAAP, Model 5012) for the EMEP summer and winter campaigns 2006 and 2007 Database daily means TC = OC + EC

Evolution of number size distributions of ambient aerosols (upper figures) and of non-volatile particle fractions behind the thermodenuder (lower figures) January/February 2007 June 2006 Example for one day in TDMPS (twin-differential-mobility-particle-sizer) with APS (aerodynamic-particle-sizer)

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (2) Sulphate Ammonium

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (3) Nitrate Chloride

Results of BERNER-type-impactor measurements for all 13 measured days in Summer and 15 measured days in Winter (4) OC EC