Looking Back – Looking Forward Implementation of the Assessment System Presentation to: California Institute for School Improvement (CISI) Sacramento –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illinois Learning Standards: Incorporating the common core The Illinois State Board of Education has adopted new math and ELA academic standards for K-12.
Advertisements

Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
Achievement Level Descriptors & College Content-Readiness Webinar 1 November 15, 2012.
Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Smarter Balanced Assessment Update California Mathematics.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Interim Assessments and Formative Assessment Practices Pete.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning.
Introduction Understanding “The Why”
Presented by Julie Joseph Charlene Stringham Diana Ruiz February 17, 2011.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC/CDE Joint Meeting May 16, 2013 Update on Key Smarter.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Assessment Update California Mathematics Council.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Overview of the Partnership for Assessment of College and Career Readiness (PARCC) September 2010.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC September 11, 2014 Pete Callas, Administrator Support.
Changes in Community Informational Meeting March 10, 2014.
Introduction and Overview Rapid City Area Schools May 2011.
Key System Features and Next Steps. Features: Computer Adaptive Testing Adaptive assessment provides measurement across the breadth of the Common Core.
Transition to Smarter Assessment January Why did Delaware need new academic standards?
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Exploring SBAC August 2, 2013MCLA. A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Overview of the Smarter Balanced Assessment System CTA Pre-Good.
Oxford Preparatory Academy Scholar Academy Parent Social Topic: Changes in State Testing May 4, 5, and 6, 2015.
Exploring SBAC August 2, 2013MCLA. A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Smarter Balanced Assessment System Summative Assessments 2015–16.
1 Less Testing, More Learning November MASS/MASC Conference.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome to the 2015–16 CAASPP Institute! California Assessment.
Smarter Balanced Fengyi Hung, Ph.D. Assessment Director Angie Neville Elementary Assistant Director Marie Verhaar Assistant Supt. Teaching and Learning.
29 States $176,000,000 for development Includes formative, interim & summative Governed and controlled by states Co-chairs, Judy Park, Utah; Tony Alpert,
Implementing SBAC Pilot Items Rowland Unified School District Leadership Meeting November 6, 2013 Brian Huff.
Smarter Balanced assessment. What is the Smarter Balanced assessment?  The new state assessment, based on state standards in English language arts and.
The Smarter Balanced System USING THE DIGITAL LIBRARY OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Riverside COE November 21, 2014 Gina Koency Senior Assessment.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Educational Research Association Conference Learning.
Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.
What about the Assessment System?
Language Arts Assessment Update
Illinois Learning Standards:
PARCC Assessments Overview
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
Presentation transcript:

Looking Back – Looking Forward Implementation of the Assessment System Presentation to: California Institute for School Improvement (CISI) Sacramento – May 26, 2015 Presented by: Deb Sigman, Deputy Superintendent, Rocklin Unified School District National Chair – Smarter Balanced Executive Committee

Overview of Presentation Reflection on testing California climate and context Making the assessment better Looking forward – getting ready for results Page 2

Smarter Balanced Update

Update on Testing in Smarter Balanced States As of May 15: Over five million (5,167,421) students have started the Smarter Balanced assessments. Of those, 5,075,321 have completed at least one part. Page 4

Update on Testing in California As of May 20 — 52 testing days: Local educational agencies where testing has begun: 1,779 Number of students that started a summative assessment: 3,133,866 Summative assessments completed: – English language arts/literacy test: 2,365,983 – Mathematics test: 2,307,580 Tentative results streaming into districts Page 5

California vs. National Context

California Picture By all accounts, successful implementation Students are testing The large majority of students on-line Minor episodes of slowing of the system Some minor technical log-in and pausing issues Pockets of opt-outs Page 7

National Picture Large scale opting out of assessment – Kentucky – New York – Washington – North Dakota – Delaware – Florida Ban on Common Core – Wisconsin Ban on Smarter Balanced – Maine Page 8

National Picture Technical difficulties –Nevada –North Dakota –Montana –Wisconsin –Missouri –Michigan Page 9

Making the Assessment Better

Enriching the Item Bank Field testing approximately 12,000 items Not all items will be available. Quality checks prevent items from moving forward when: –Not enough responses overall –Not enough responses at each level of the rubric for constructed response items –Item statistics indicate item would not be fair to all students (item behaves poorly) Page 11

Enriching the Item Bank Items that are calibrated and pass quality checks will be included in spring 2017 tests Consortium beginning to write new performance tasks and items Teachers will be recruited for item writing, editing, sensitivity/bias review, content review and accessibility reviews Investigating using illustrations for translated items Page 12

Improving the Test Administration Manual States use the template from the Consortium but have some degree of discretion regarding editing the manual. States will be making some changes to their sections. The consortium will improve sections that were confusing based on feedback from states The consortium is considering opportunities for streamlining and adding flexibility where possible Page 13

Improving the Digital Library The digital library is getting enhancements to the application including a new landing page that will better help direct educators to the resources they are seeking Additional members for the State Network of Educators (SNEs) are being recruited Additional modules are being procured and will be included as part of additional Spotlight Forums Page 14

Other Enhancements Under Development for Digital Library Page 15 NotificationsLive FilteringUser ExperienceMotivation for Contributors/ReviewersReports

Looking Forward – Getting Ready for Results

Results – What We Know Baseline for future, not comparison to past Will need to reframe the conversation Scale scores on Smarter Balanced assessments Four-digit number Range roughly from 2000-to-3000 Measures of performance Measures of growth Meaningful information for students, teachers and parents Reliable and valid information for “accountability” systems Page 17

New Expectations – Describing English Language Arts Performance Students who perform at the College Content- Ready level in English language arts/literacy demonstrate reading, writing, listening, and research skills necessary for introductory courses in a variety of disciplines. They also demonstrate subject-area knowledge and skills associated with readiness for entry-level, transferable, credit-bearing English and composition courses. Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

New Expectations – Describing Mathematics Performance Students who perform at the College Content- Ready level in mathematics demonstrate foundational mathematical knowledge and quantitative reasoning skills necessary for introductory courses in a variety of disciplines. They also demonstrate subject-area knowledge and skills associated with readiness for entry- level, transferable, credit-bearing mathematics and statistics courses. Page 21

Page 22

Page 23

Celebrating Our Successes Over 3 million students successfully assessed on summative assessment Digital library being accessed by hundreds of thousands of California educators Over a million students accessing interim assessments Page 24

Setting the Stage for Future Success Remember the purpose Assessment for learning Assessment of deeper skills Preparing students for college and career Focus on teaching and learning Learn from other states Proactively change the conversation about effective schools Accountability at the local level Multiple sources of data Schools are more than a single number Aligning resources to need Measures of growth in addition to measures of performance Page 25