The Use of Usage Michael J. Kurtz Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Collaborators Johan Bollen Edwin Henneken Alberto Accomazzi
Literature all in arXiv 2013 Kurtz & Henneken, “Finding and Recommending Scholarly Articles” in Bibliometrics and Beyond, MIT Press 2010 Kurtz & Bollen, “Usage Bibliometrics” Ann Rev Information Science & Tech 2005 Kurtz et al. “Bibliometric Properties of Article Readership Information” J. Am Soc Information Science & Tech
Four Types of Readers Researchers (=authors?) Practitioners Students General Public
General Public (Google)
Students (Google Scholar)
Co-Usage Recommendations – What are people like me reading – What are people who read this also reading Queries – Sort by most downloaded – Sort by filtered downloads
Scholarly Articles Are Different Scholarly Articles are MUCH denser than films Netflix ~ 25,000 films ADS ~ 10,000,000 articles – 172,000 contain the word “cosmology” – >12,000 in 2012
Scholarly Articles Are Different Scholarly Articles are read by scholars Typically they have subject matter doctorates Their needs are often highly specific There are not many of them
Usage vs Age – 90 weeks
Aggregation Articles Readers Enhance Signal to Noise Engineering Issues – What are you trying to achieve – Who are you doing this for – How fast must it be
What Can Be Measured The Interconnectedness of Science Fields of Study Countries Journals Organizations People Instruments Articles
Usage map 200M usage events 2006 usage only JCR journals ( ) Red, orange= psych, cogn Green = phys, chem Olive = material science Blue = biology Purple = pharma Bollen et al, 2009a
Networks - ADS
Weak Lensing (84)AGN Spectra (101) Comparing Sub-Fields
Measuring Countries Authors are from countries, reads as a function of author’s country has yet to be studied Readers are from countries, their activities allow one to measure the Scientific Wealth of Nations
ADS use vs per capita GDP
Astronomy is representative ADS predicts average of Cites+articles better than cites predicts articles
Measuring Changes
Measuring Journals Beyond the Impact Factor Reads vs Cites differences will be important here The New York Times would have a low Impact Factor
Standard Usage Measures COUNTER David Nicholas, Ian Rowland & collaborators University College, London CIBER-Research
Bollen et al, 2009b
Measuring Departments
Department Size Can Matter
BerkeleyPrinceton
Measuring Individuals The number of times one’s articles are read is a valid measure of one’s scientific impact, similar to citation counts Use has different properties than cites, together they form a two dimensional view of productivity
The Read-Cite Diagram
Professional Astronomers
2 dimensional productivity model
Different productivities - histories
Productivity vs Age - Cites
Productivity vs Age - Reads
Reads and Cites History for M. Kurtz
Papers, Reads, and Cites for Hectospec
Papers, Read, Cites for NAG5-4445
Reads, Cites for 1998PASP K
Final Thoughts Much remains to be done – Implement “best” methods – Develop standard data Problems abound – Privacy – Open Access – Who exactly is reading this paper? – Why do I care? (not money)