1. Publishing strategies – A seminar about the scientific publishing landscape Peter Sjögårde, Bibliometric analyst KTH Royal Institute of Technology, ECE School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE), Unit for Publication Infrastructure ARC – 2014-11-25

2. Outline 1.Introduction to bibliometrics 2.Publishing strategies

3. What is bibliometrics and why bother about it? Is someone reading and building on your results? Statistics on publications and citations Measuring Impact on research society Used for evaluation of research Publication level Individual level Organizational level

4. Research Publication A Reader Writer Publication B with Reference to the publication A Citation

5. Impact? On society On industry On research community As measured by the use of bibliometrics (citations)

6. Citation indicators > Research Quality Correlation between peer review assessments and bibliometric indicators. High quality necessary to receive high citation scores at aggregated levels. But not enough There are research groups who get good judgments by reviewers but has low citation scores. Applied research and research for which the bibliometric methods are insufficient. Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel, “Selection of Research Fellowship Recipients by Committee Peer Review. Reliability, Fairness and Predictive Validity of Board of Trustees’ Decisions,” Scientometrics 63, no. 2 (April 1, 2005): 297–320, doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0214-2; A. F. J. van Raan, “Advanced Bibliometric Methods as Quantitative Core of Peer Review Based Evaluation and Foresight Exercises,” Scientometrics 36, no. 3 (July 1, 1996): 397–420, doi:10.1007/BF02129602; Charles Oppenheim, “The Correlation between Citation Counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise Ratings for British Research in Genetics, Anatomy and Archaeology,” Journal of Documentation 53, no. 5 (December 1, 1997): 477–87, doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007207; Fler studier är refererade i Bornmann and Daniel, “What Do Citation Counts Measure?”; och i Blaise Cronin, The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and Its Rewards (Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2005), 125–129

7. Differences between research fields affecting bibliometric indicators Publication pace (time for publishing and peer review process) Size of research field Coverage of publications in citation database Number of references Length of publications Document type (e.g. reviews get more citations, proceedings papers are often excluded)

8. Field normalized citation rate Same research field same year same document type Same research field same year same document type Average = 1

9. Bibliometrics at KTH Research Assessment Exercise (research groups, UoA) Yearly indicator report Funding allocation Journals’ mean field normalized citation rate Multiplied with the number of faculty Reports and analyses on demand from management and schools Consultancy work for other universities

10. New bibliometric indicator for funding allocation at KTH Why? Incitement to publish in highly cited journals indexed by Web of Science. Field normalized journal impact Average of the citation rate of the journals in which KTH:s researchers have published the last three years. Calculated for each department. Multiplied with the number of faculty at each department. Aggregated to Schools and used for allocation to the Schools.

11. Outline 1.Introduction to bibliometrics 2.Publishing strategies

12. What should a researcher think of when publishing? 1.Quality of the research and publication 2.Making the research visible -Reaching other researchers (citers)

13. Research Publication A Reader Writer Publication B with Reference to the publication A Citation

14. From paper to reader/citer

15. Publishing strategies 1.Planning the publishing of the research results 2.Choosing publishing channel and making the research available 3.Collaboration, networks and communication 4.Open Access

16. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication

17. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication -Choosing publication type

18. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication -Choosing publication type -Quality vs. Quantity

19. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication -Choosing publication type -Quality vs. Quantity -Publishing the same results in multiple publications

20. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication -Choosing publication type -Quality vs. Quantity -Publishing the same results in multiple publications -Search-ability

21. 1. Planning the publishing of the research results -Formal/Informal communication -Choosing publication type -Quality vs. Quantity -Publishing the same results in multiple publications -Search-ability -Language

22. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area

23. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication

24. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication -The permanency of the availability of the publication

25. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication -The permanency of the availability of the publication -The indexing of the channel in databases

26. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication -The permanency of the availability of the publication -The indexing of the channel in databases -Citation rate of journals

27. Journal Impact Factor (JIF) Citations/Paper Thomson Reuters description http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/ Citations from 2012 Papers from 2010-2011

28. SNIP and SJR Alternative to JIF Scopus data - Different coverage Normalized to field Find Journal indicators: https://www.kth.se/kthb/publicering/bibliometri/faq- biblimetrics/faq/journal-impact-factor-and-alternative- journal-metrics-1.436351

29. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication -The permanency of the availability of the publication -The indexing of the channel in databases -Citation rate of journals -Availability of meta data

30. 2. Choosing publishing channel and making the research available -The subject relevance of the publishing channel and the outreach within the research area -The availability of the publication -The permanency of the availability of the publication -The indexing of the channel in databases -Citation rate of journals -Availability of meta data -Using DiVA for dissemination of publications

31. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area

32. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area -Participation in conferences

33. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area -Participation in conferences -Collaboration with other researchers (Internationally)

34. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area -Participation in conferences -Collaboration with other researchers (Internationally) -References as means of communication

35. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area -Participation in conferences -Collaboration with other researchers (Internationally) -References as means of communication -Digital social networks

36. 3. Collaboration, networks and communication -Participation in the communication within the research area -Participation in conferences -Collaboration with other researchers (Internationally) -References as means of communication -Digital social networks -Research profiles in Google Scholar, ResearcherID, Orcid, KTH´s web

37. 4. Open Access -OA to research publications

38. Open Access Green – Parallel publishing Gold – Publishing in Open Access journals

39. Open acccess and the publishing infrastructure

40. More impact/citations with Open Access? Some studies show that OA articles get more downloads and more citations - Other show no advantage - debate is still going on More possible citers Easier access Easier indexing for web crawlers Better visibility outside the research community Easier to share in social media and other networks

41. Traditional, subscription accessed high impact journal or new Open Access journal? No contradiction between OA and high impact factor journals If choosing to publish in OA journals the same recommendations apply –Check outreach and impact –Check the peer review process –Relevance –…

42. 4. Open Access -OA to research publications -OA to research data and/or software

43. Further information www.kth.se/kthbwww.kth.se/kthb > Publishing For publishing strategies see p.37 in ”Projektrapport – Fördjupande studie av KTH:s publikationskultur med högre citering som mål” (in Swedish) https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.508323!/Huvudrapport_KT Hs_publiceringskultur.pdf

44. Thank you! Peter Sjögårde, Bibliometric Analyst pi@ece.kth.se KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE) Unit for Publication Infrastructure