Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
The Role of Dynamic Pricing in Fostering the Efficient Use of Electric Sector Resources Presented to Kansas Corporate Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency.
1 Ruminations on demand response – a view from Chicago Bob Lieberman Illinois Commerce Commission Presented to Restructuring Roundtable October 28th, 2005.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
VPP: Converting Capacity in the Home into Valuable Energy Reserves Wayne Callender.
Regulatory Proposal December We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Residential Real-Time Pricing Is The Real-Deal Anthony Star Director of Policy and Evaluation Transforming the Electricity Market Institute for Regulatory.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Retail Real-Time Pricing for Mass Market Customers: Experience, Perspectives, And Implications For A Post-2006 Policy Framework Bob Lieberman, Center for.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
Real-time Pricing for Illinois Consumers Anthony Star Community Energy Cooperative Demand Response Coordinating Committee Webinar December 15, 2006.
Time-Varying Retail Electricity Prices: Theory and Practice by Severin Borenstein.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Cutting the Electric Bill for Internet-Scale Systems Andreas Andreou Cambridge University, R02
What Drives the Response in Demand Response? Craig Boice Boice Dunham Group Metering, Billing, CRM/CIS America 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada April 13, 2005 BOICE.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
A New View on Energy Efficiency An Introduction for Public Power Utilities (Approximately 30 minute presentation)
Putting Customers in the Driver’s Seat! Shaping Loads through Inverted Block Rates APPA Business & Financial Conference September 24, 2007 Austin, Texas.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Cutting the Electric Bill for Internet-Scale Systems Kevin Leeds.
Residential Real-Time Pricing: Bringing Home the Potential Kathryn Tholin Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs The Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness Jackie Berger 2008 ACI Home Performance Conference April 8, 2008.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Kathleen King, Ph.D. Vice President SMART METERING WEST COAST 2007 CONFERENCE, Los Angeles, California August 21, 2007 The Importance of Demand Response.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
The Power of Data October 2013 Abhay Gupta 1.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
 Learn -  About the technical, financial, and environmental decisions involved with offering electronic billing and websites for consumers to monitor.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Leverage Smart Grid Technology into Tangible Results
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
Pay-As-You-Go Update November Program Overview Paying advance for electricity Flexibility and Customer benefits Make as many payments as necessary.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Pay As You Go - Draft Executive Product Development Meeting 3/29/2013.
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well

Christensen Associates
Presentation transcript:

Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL

Key characteristics of ESPP’s Real Time Pricing for Residential Customers  Unique consumer/utility partnership  Straight-forward program  Provides pricing and information  It’s low tech and low cost  People are saving money  People are changing behavior  People like it!

Purposes of Program  To incent efficient use of energy and reduction of peak demand  To provide benefit to small customers from deregulation  To provide options that can significantly reduce energy costs for households

The Conventional Wisdom: Why Retail Real-Time Pricing For Mass Market Customers Won’t Work  The market is too volatile and risky  There is no value for mass market consumers  The meters are too expensive  Mass market consumers won’t respond to price signals, are unable to manage risk and volatility and need to be protected ….Our experience to date runs counter to each of these

Community Energy Cooperative The Energy-Smart Pricing Plan SM

Community Energy Cooperative  Formed in 2000 by the Center for Neighborhood Technology  Supported by ComEd and other funders  The Cooperative has developed and managed a range of community- based demand reduction pilot programs

Energy Pricing  Rate RHEP: distribution charge plus variable energy charge based on wholesale prices  Models bundled rate/market rate differential in Illinois’ post-2006 environment  Day-ahead prices and RTO load shape used to create next day hourly prices  Cooperative created price cap at $0.50/kwh for energy

49,080 Hours Of Market Prices 89.5% of hours are below 5¢/kWh. Average Price is 2.51¢/kWh 98.5% of hours are below 10¢/kWh. Average Price is 2.86¢/kWh

Program Components  Interval recording meters  Prices available through web and phone  Energy management/price response tools  Information about usage  Instructions and tips on how to reduce usage during peak periods  Ongoing energy efficiency information  High price alerts via phone,

Web Access to Detailed Energy Use Data

Participant Demographics  750 participants in 2003; 1100 in 2004  A variety of air conditioning types:  40% Window air conditioning  40% Central air conditioning  20% No air conditioning  56% from the city of Chicago, rest suburban  10% speak Spanish  80% single-family homes and two-unit buildings  (average monthly use 658 kWh)  20% multi-family homes  (average monthly use 406 kWh)

Hourly Prices

One Member’s Response: Changing Thermostat Set Point In Response To Price Notification

Central Air Conditioner Users Respond To Price Alerts

Key Findings 1. Participants respond to peak period prices  Price elasticity of.042 across full range of prices  Over half of all participants showed significant response to high price notifications  Vast majority of participants showed some response  Aggregate demand reduction was as high as 25% during notification period  Over 80% of participants modified their AC use  Over 70% of participants reported modifying their clothes-washing patterns

Key Findings, cont. 2. Participants liked the program  Found it easy to understand and manage  82% said program was “quick and easy”  Participants were happy with the financial results of the program—average savings to date are approximately 12%  In addition to saving money, participants valued:  Bill control  Environmental impact  Greater understanding of energy use

Other Findings  Lower income participants were disproportionately represented in “high responder” group  Households with window ACs maintained their price-responsive behavior better across multiple high-priced hours  2004—overall price responsiveness increased; notification response reduced (likely due to weather effects)

Contrary to conventional wisdom--  Simple, understandable RTP program for residential customers is possible  Residential customers can and do respond to price signals.

For further information  Lawrence Kotewa, Project Manager 