Race and Ethnicity in CA: a minority majority state.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter Sixteen Equality and Civil Rights. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved Conceptions of Equality Americans want equality,
Advertisements

Civil Rights in the Courts
Warm-Ups 02/18 These need to go in UNIT III Warm-Ups Section What Supreme Court decision stated “separate but, equal?” What Supreme Court decision decided.
26-3 NEW APPROACHES TO CIVIL RIGHTS. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION  Legal discrimination gone, little improvement in daily lives  Problems  lack of access to.
Stratification, Minorities, and Discrimination Chapter 12 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights Legal basis for civil rights Enforcing the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment Critical Supreme Court ruling in the battle.
Chapter 16.  Seattle Schools Integrated Busing Case  Seattle had not shown that the goal of racial integration justi9fied the method it used White v.
14 th amendment All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
Diversity: Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans.
 Civil Rights  Definition: policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals 
Civil Rights “Equal Protection”. 14 th Amendment (1868) Forbids any state to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Chapter 1 We the People Section 1: Civics in Our Lives
Ch. 10 Civil Rights “Equal Protection” American Government.
Race and Ethnicity Native Americans Hispanics Asians.
Chapter 1.3 The Diversity of Americans. A Nation of Immigrants All of today’s more than 300 million Americans are descended from immigrants. Many scholars.
Equal Rights: Struggling Toward Fairness Chapter 5.
WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES PAST AND CURRENT DISCRIMINATION.
Chapter 5 The American Political Landscape. Unlike most nations, the United States has an incredibly varied mix of ethnicities from every part of the.
Objective What is a citizen? What makes somebody a good citizen?
Chapter 15.2 Diversity and Equal Protection for Immigrants Fact: – Your ancestors immigrated to the U.S. from another country. – Question: How did they.
Civil Rights “Equal Protection”. 14 th Amendment (1868) Forbids any state to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 1.
Civil Rights – Chapter 5 “Equal Protection”. Race, the Constitution, and Public Policy The Era of Slavery Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) – African Americans.
Civil Rights and Discrimination. Vocabulary prejudice-a negative opinion formed without just grounds or a reasonable investigation of the facts. racism-discrimination.
Lecture 7: Race--African Americans History of slavery and discrimination Civil Rights Movement Integration Affirmative Action.
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2006 Key Question for the 21 st Century Should Americans give up some civil liberties in order to protect the country.
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Lecture Three The (Racial) History of the US. Who is American? When you hear the word “American” who do you think of?  Describe this person. Why do we.
This presentation was adapted from Equality: Are Some More Equal than Others?
Copyright, 2000 © Prentice Hall Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Civil Rights: Equal Justice under the Law Chapter 21.
Race and Ethnicity Native Americans Hispanics Asians.
Civil Rights Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights.
New Approaches to Civil Rights Chapter 26 Section 3.
Chapter 11 Review Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Forbids any state to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Sex,
ETHNICITY Unit 4: Political Geography Chapter 7.1.
Mt8: The Civil Rights Movement
Chapter 11: Civil Rights. The Constitution is designed to guarantee basic civil rights to everyone. The meaning of civil rights has changed over time,
Copyright, 2000 © Prentice Hall Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Ch. 5 – Civil Rights & Public Policy. Civil Rights: – Policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by govt officials.
Chapter 5. Congress had no authority to ban slavery in the territories.  1857 – Chief Justice Taney declared that Congress had no authority to ban.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 1.
What is “Judicial Activism?” Today … (1) The “Warren Court” (2) Economic Situation of Minorities 1950’s – 1970’s.
Chapter 11: Civil Rights Section 1: Civil Rights & Discrimination (pgs )
Social Movement of the 1960s
Politics in States and Communities (15 Ed.)
Chapter 28 Our Enduring Constitution
Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
Equal Rights: Struggling Toward Fairness
Civil Rights “Equal Protection”.
Civil Rights CP Government Chapter 21.
The Geography of Identities
The Geography of Identities
New Approaches to Civil Rights Ch. 21 Sec. 4 Pgs
OUR LIVING CONSTITUTION
Chapter 5- Civil Rights Objective – Students will be able to answer questions regarding civil rights. SECTION © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
AP Government “Civil Rights Movement”
Chapter 18-3 new Approaches to Civil Rights:
New Approaches to Civil Rights
The Geography of Identities
The Geography of Identities
Civil Rights: Equal Justice under the Law
Citizenship in the United States of America
Civil Rights “Equal Protection”.
Civil Rights Equality of rights for persons regardless of race, sex, or ethnic background.
Ch. 21—Equality Under the Law
Chapter 11: Civil Rights Under the united states constitution, Americans have both rights and responsibilities.
26-3 New Approaches to Civil Rights
Civil Rights.
Presentation transcript:

Race and Ethnicity in CA: a minority majority state

Native Americans CA native population fell by 90%, almost totally disposessed “slavery” legalized for CA native Americans 1879 CA granted them the right to vote, although they were not given US citizenship until 1924

Native Americans Cont’d 1969 Alcatraz--native radicalism Today about 1% of CA is Native American, mostly urban, mostly from out-of-state Who is an Indian? What is a tribe?

Casinos 1980s Indians began running Casinos on reservations 2000 CA passed Proposition 1A enshrining right to establish casinos in CA constitution CA negotiates terms Today tribes take in over $5 billion annually--unequally among tribes tribes are biggest single political donors in CA

Hispanics 1849 Constitution officially bilingual, recognizing large percentage of Californios bilingualism dropped in Constitution of 1879, as CA continues to “Europeanize” 1960s Growing Mexican immigration 1980s Central American immigration Today about 1/3 CA, after 2010, larger percentage than whites

Hispanic political power socially conservative, fiscally liberal traditionally politically weak some not citizens, young, low registration 1986 IRCA--one time amnesty and path to citizenship increase in citizenship 1994 Pete Wilson helps pass Prop limiting services for illegals % of hispanic registered voters more than doubles since 1990 Hispanic erosion towards Republicans reverses L.A. Mayor, Lt. Governor, Assembly Speaker, etc.

English Only--Prop 227 In 1986 CA voters made English “official language” Between 1987 and 1997, number of CA students with limited English tripled Bilingual ed better? majority of Hispanic parents opposed bi-ed Prop 227 passed in 1998, bilingual ed largely disappeared

.

African Americans Some black slaves prior to constitutional abolition in 1849 Great migration during and after WWII Riots of 1965 and 1992 Visibly represented in CA politics-- although now less so stallwart Democrats a stable 7% of population

Asian Americans--the internment issue 1913 Alien Land Law Japanese internment Korematsu vindicated in 1982 CA and US give reparations

Asian Americans 1965 Immigration Act ended national quota system, allowed family sponsorship Cold War tensions and partnerships lead to immigration from Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc.

Asian Americans CA about 10% Asian/ PI Economically various: Indian-Americans on average wealthier than Caucasians, Laotians, Hmong, Khmer poorer. Politically: -growing in political strength--% reg voter doubled in 15 ys -Asians in CA mostly Dem, voted for Gore and Kerry, but often more conservative than other minorities/neighboring whites -differences between nationalities/ethnicities

Whites (Euro-Americans) Aging Declining as a percentage of the population (46%) Still a majority of registered voters (67%), but declining

Mixed race 1948 CA first state to abandon ban on mixed race marriages 2000 Census the first to allow choosing multiple racial categories Only Hawaii & Alaska have higher %, CA nearly 5%, 2x nat’l avg, and growing by 3rd generation, most Asians and Latinos marry outside ethnicity

Segregation 1874 Ward v Flood CASC ruled that segregated schools do not violate the 14th Amendment--later cited in U.S. favoring “separate but equal” conditions Until 1920s segregation frequently paracticed in CA for Blacks, Asians, Mexicans

End of Legal Segregation 1946 CASC throws out segregated schools for Mexican students 1947 Governor Earl Warren signs law abolishing segregated schools 1954 USSC Chief Justice Earl Warren writes Brown v Board Ed--ending US legal segregation

CA desegregation post-Brown In CA, most segregation was not de jure but de facto--what to do? Especially in LA, forced busing led to white flight to suburbs and private schools 1979 Prop 1 passes--no mandatory busing for de facto segregation

Desegregation in SF SF 1983 Consent decree: no more than 45% of any race at any school 1999 Ct struck down decree today: “race neutral” diversity index resegregation: top schools White/Asian, bottom Hispanic/Black

Affirmative Action Beginning in 1960s -preferences for minorities and women for govt hiring, contracts, and govt funded education -voluntary preferences in private sector Bakke v Regents of UC (1978) -no quotas, but as a factor OK California’s Prop 209 (1996) -race-blind admissions, but not quite sweeping the country