Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

WVDE Online SB-IEP A System for Analyzing and Prioritizing Instruction for Students with Exceptionalities.
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advanced Learning Program Greenwich Public Schools Setting the Standard for Excellence in Public Education Grade Two Fall/Winter Score Interpretation Procedures.
What is Assess2Know ® ? Assess2Know is an assessment tool that enables districts to create high-quality reading and math benchmark assessments for grades.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Benchmark Assessment Item Bank Test Chairpersons Orientation Meeting October 8, 2007 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Best Practices When Constructing.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Principles of High Quality Assessment
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Principles of Assessment
IGP Reflection: Evaluate Please update your tracking charts based on the implementation of the paragraph planning from last week. IGP Reflection Questions:
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
DataDirector: Creating Exams Winter/Spring 2011 Stan Masters Lenawee ISD.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
4th & 5th Grade Coffee January 27, Levels are determined by benchmarking, MAP testing, anecdotal notes and MCAS. Assessment informs instruction.
1 REACH Performance Tasks SY14-15 Library Science June 16, 2014.
The Revised CSOs Lou Maynus, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Out with the Old, In with the New: NYS Assessments “Primer” Basics to Keep in Mind & Strategies to Enhance Student Achievement Maria Fallacaro, MORIC
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
ERead and Report. What is... Independent eBook Reading with a Vocabulary and Comprehension Assessment Focuses mainly on Reading Informational Texts Aligns.
Assessment Specifications Gronlund, Chapter 4 Gronlund, Chapter 5.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Reading Strategies To Improve Comprehension Empowering Gifted Children.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Work Sample Seminar1 Developing a Pretest & Posttest for the Literacy Work Sample Portland State University.
Summer 2012 DataCamp June/August, Everyone is using standards…
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Welcome Opening Prayer. Content Objectives: 1.I will review the definition of texts and the teacher’s responsibility in choosing classroom materials.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Welcome Parents! FCAT Information Session. O Next Generation Sunshine State Standards O Released Test Items O Sample Test.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Materials FCAT Achievement Levels Test Content and Format, pg. 12 (FCAT Skills Assessed) Examples of Reading Activities Across Cognitive Complexity Levels,
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Assessing the Common Core Standards
STAAR: What do we notice?
Preplanning Presentation
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Norman L Webb.
Assessment In Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Building Effective Assessments

Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building the assessment

Building Effective Assessments Using

Formative Assessment Content Assess2Know  Reading grades 2 – 11  Mathematics grades 2 – 11  Science grades 3 – 11  Social Studies grades 9 – 11 NEW

Formative Assessment Content High Quality Content  Rigorous development process  Tight alignment with Michigan State Standards  Highly trained and experienced assessment development staff

Formative Assessment Content Rigorous Requirements  Clearly and simply written; no “trick questions”  Appropriate vocabulary for the grade level being tested  Functions independently; does not provide information that may be used to answer other items  Requires students to read the passage in order to answer the question  Does not use “all of the above” or “none of the above”  Presents answer options in a logical order

Formative Assessment Content Reading  Passages are commissioned works by well- known authors  Lexiles and Flesch-Kincaid  Genres  Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive Difficulty Levels  Maps, Charts, Graphs, Images, and Primary Sources

Flesch-Kincaid Formula FKRS = (0.39 x ASL) + (11.8 x ASW) FKRS: Flesch-Kincaid Readability Score ASL: average sentence length in words or average number of words in sentence (number of words divided by the number of sentences) ASW :average number of syllables per word (the number of syllables divided by the number of words)

Assess2Know Lexiles Lexile measures are considered to be the most accurate measure of readability because they are the only formula which applies a psychometric formula to the assignation for establishing readability. Since 2005, Metametrics assigns each A2K passage a Certified Lexile Measure.

Assess2Know Reading Items To determine grade level placement of passages, Riverside uses readability guidelines to place passages at each grade level. In addition, passage structure, interest level, topic, and word count are among some of the things used to evaluate where a passage should be placed for grade level benchmarking. District level committees review passages and items and if they had felt a passage was not appropriate, Riverside replaces it and the items at the review. –Advantage to onsite committee reviews because educators in the field are affirming what is appropriate for each benchmark.

Assess2Know Readability Limits GradeFlesh-KincaidLexile minimummaximumminimummaximum L850L L950L L1050L L1075L L1100L L1150L L1200L L1300L L1300L L1300L

Formative Assessment Content  Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies  Real world context  Unique  Scenario Based Science Items  Bloom’s Taxonomy, Difficulty levels  Use of Tools  Maps, Charts, Graphs, Images, and Primary Sources

Research Efforts The Research and Measurement Services Department analyzes data from multiple users of the Assess2Know Benchmark item bank from across the country to monitor the performance of the items in the bank. Goal is to ensure that the item bank provides users with strong quality items with a range of difficulty. Results look at average ranges for statistics such as p-values, discrimination statistics, and point-biserials for each item. This information is used to plan for refresh and future development of our item banks.

High Quality Assessment

Why do we give assessments?

Importance of Designing High Quality Assessments Assessments measure what is being taught in the classroom Align to the district curriculum –Curriculum Maps –Scope and Sequence Results of the assessment are used to report on student achievement –Used to make decisions about student growth, interventions and program placement

Characteristics of High Quality Assessments Design curriculum based assessments that measure student achievement to the state standards Report assessment results at the individual student, class, school and district level Provide achievement information that can be compared from year to year Construct assessments that are valid and reliable

Characteristics of High Quality Assessments Assessment design allows for a variety of assessment types: selected response, open ended items, constructed response and rubrics Delivered in a timely manner Easy to administer

Purpose of Assessment Evaluate students overall achievement and growth in a content domain Diagnose students strengths and weaknesses in and across content domain Plan educational interventions and to design individual instruction

Purpose of Assessment Place students in appropriate educational program Select applicants into programs with limited enrollment Certify individual achievement or qualifications from Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

What Do We Ask Ourselves Before Building an Assessment? What do we want to measure? What information do we want to gather? How long do we want the assessment to take? How will we determine which standards we want to assess? How will we use the results?

Guiding Principles to Keep in Mind When Building Formative Assessments A minimum of three items for every standard you want to measure. Spread items measuring an individual standard across the assessment. Range of overall assessment difficulty and for each standard measured. Begin assessment with easier items, build to more difficult and conclude with easier items.

Guiding Principles to Keep in Mind When Building Formative Assessments How many passages will be used for reading assessments? What item types will be used? How many items per passage? Total number of items? Can this be completed in the allotted time?

Guiding Principles to Keep in Mind When Building Formative Assessments Spread items with graphics across test. Readability levels for reading passages; genres needed. A minimum of five items per passage. Even spread of answer choices across assessment when possible; spread them out across the form. Check items for appropriateness to use online, paper, or both. Check for clueing

Formative Assessment Content Level 1Basic Skills  recall of information such as fact, definition, term, or simple one-step procedure. Level 2Conceptual Understanding  includes the engagement of some cognitive processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. A conceptual understanding item requires students to make some decisions as to how to approach the problem or activity and may imply more than a single step. Level 3Extended Reasoning  requires problem solving, planning, and/or using evidence. Items require students to develop a strategy to connect and relate ideas in order to solve the problem while using multiple steps and drawing upon a variety of skills. Cognitive Difficulty Levels

Importance of Content Complexity Vastness of Content Alignment Validity Clarity Teacher Guidance Truth in Advertising

Level One: Basic Skills Recall of information such as fact, definition, term, or simple one-step procedure. Support ideas by reference to details in text Use dictionary to find meaning Identify figurative language in passage Solve a one step word problem Perform a specified procedure

Level 2: Conceptual Understanding Includes the engagement of some cognitive processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. A conceptual understanding item requires students to make some decisions as to how to approach the problem or activity and may imply more than a single step. Predict logical outcome Identify and summarize main points Represent a situation mathematically in more than one way. Interpret a visual representation

Level 3: Extended Reasoning Requires problem solving, planning, and/or using evidence. Items require students to develop a strategy to connect and relate ideas in order to solve the problem while using multiple steps and drawing upon a variety of skills. Determine effect of author’s purpose on text elements Summarize information from multiple sources Provide a mathematical justification Describe, compare and contrast solution methods

Building Effective Assessments Questions