MARCELO L. BRANDON G. ADITYA B. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability and Safety Analysis. Abstract Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the.
Advertisements

Read Digital input Turn on sensor board Convert to Temperature & Humidity Wake Up CC430 Sleep CC430 Timing diagram ① P.2.4
Left to Right: Michael Kelton, Ethan Hall, Greg Wegman, Vashisht Lakhmani.
The Incredible HUD ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S.
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips Group Nine Reliability and Safety Analysis DART.
1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Cam Proctor Ramsey Khudairi Tom Gilbert Chad Young Project Orion TekBand.
Team Impact Intelligent Helmet Impact System Preliminary Design Review January 29 th, 2008 Amanda Brodbeck Wei-Chu Liao Wei-Shen Liao Chris Mintle.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Personal Heads-Up Display Ivan Bercovich Radu-Andrei Ivan Jeff Little Felipe Vilas-Boas Faculty: Dr. Tilman Wolf Preliminary.
The purpose of this project was to develop a portable G-Meter, roughly the size of a cell phone. Potential applications of the product include logging.
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS, ANDREW LOVELESS, CAROLINE TRIPPEL.
ECE 477 Design Review – Spring 2010 Team 15. Team Members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 5 – myATM Xue Yuan Wong.
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger Formal Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
 Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design  Schematic and theory of operation.
Shiv Yukeun Donghan Robert.  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.
MARCELO L. BRANDON G. ADITYA B. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2010 Jigar Gandhi Chandler Wall John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny.
By: Khalid Hawari Muath Nijim Thaer shaikh Ibrahim Supervisor: Dr. Jamal Kharousheh Dr. Nasser Hamad 27 December 2010.
Development of a wireless telemetry system for model rocketry.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall 2006 Sumanth Peddamatham Alex Tucker Chris Arges Radhika Mulani.
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
P ROJECT PRINT TCSP 8 – R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 8 – Siddharth Bhosale.
Text Message DJ – Reliability & Safety Team 22 Garrett Strzelecki The Text Message DJ allows party guests the opportunity to choose which songs they want.
Team 13 Michael Stuckenschneider Loren Garby Arin Chakraverty Janell Niekamp.
Team /02/28 1. Chun Ta Huang Xirong Ye 2 Libo Dong Zongyang Zhu.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW FEST – FALL OUTLINE  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
Solar Telematics System
Colin Graber Jason Kohl Jacob Varnau Cameron Young ECE 477 Design Review Team 2 - Spring 2015 R.I.S.K.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
Team 9 - Scribacious Rabble Safety and Reliability Analysis Mitchell Erdbruegger (presenting) Paul Rosswurm William Hess Ben Kobin.
RCD Laser System Corey Lane, Ryan Scott, Danny Barjum.
Grant Thomas Anthony Fennell Justin Pancake Chris McCord TABLEGAMES UNLIMITED.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring 2010 Fred Grandlienard Andrew Gregor Kevin Mohr Ryan DeFord.
Matt Waldersen (Presenting) TJ Strzelecki Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria.
V i t a l i s Wireless Biometric Sensor ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate.
Wall-E Prototype I TCSP #8 Safety and Reliability Analysis Team 1 Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie Zelun Tie.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
Josh Marchi, Jeff King, Paul Rosenberger, Dan Chambers – RM&S Analysis–
Closed Loop Temperature Control Circuit with LCD Display Mike Wooldridge ECE 4330 Embedded Systems.
Self-Sustainable Electric Golf Bag Final Presentation Group 19 Jon Kinney, Cory Edwards, Harrison Kantner 30 April 2013.
ISA CLICK CONTROL #38 – FALL 2014 ERIC BRUNNGRABER DRAKE ISABIRYE.
TRANSMISSION LINE MULTIPLE FAULT DETECTION AND INDICATION TO EB
ECE 477 Design Review Team 12  Spring 2007
ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S.
Reliability and Safety Analysis
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Fall 2005
ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S.
ADITYA B. BRANDON G. MARCELO L. NIKHIL S.
TCSP #1 – PSSC Presentations
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING 2010
Presentation transcript:

MARCELO L. BRANDON G. ADITYA B. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD

Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component failure calculations  Failure Groups  High/Medium-Level Failures  Software design/development status  Project completion timeline  Questions/Discussion

Project Overview  Helmet-based heads-up display  Displays telemetry data such as speed, direction, temperature, and G-force  Displays image from web camera to implement a “rear view mirror”  The user can select different display modes  An accelerometer, GPS module, and thermometer will generate telemetry data  Data will be recorded onto SD card to allow for future review  The battery pack, motherboard and primary PCB will be located in a secondary backpack enclosure

Project-Specific Success Criteria 1.An ability to display critical system information via a heads-up-display (HUD). 2.An ability to measure telemetry information (speed, acceleration, temperature, and GPS) and store it to flash memory. 3.An ability to maintain portability through the use of a rechargeable battery system. 4.An ability to enable/disable important features within the display (full information, minimal, on/off). 5.An ability to plot recorded GPS data on a map while overlaying telemetry information on a computer.

Block Diagram 12V

Microcontroller C1C1 Die complexity bit πTπT Temperature coeff.0.19Junction temperature = 40°C C2C2 Package failure< 0.068Pins = 128 πEπE Environment factor4.0Ground mobile πQπQ Quality factor10Unknown πLπL Learning factor1.0>2 years in production λPλP Failures/10 6 hours3.784 MTTFMean time to failure264,271 hrs Battery Charging IC C1C1 Die complexity bit πTπT Temperature coeff.0.84Junction temperature = 80°C C2C2 Package failure< 0.01Pins = 22 πEπE Environment factor4.0Ground mobile πQπQ Quality factor10Unknown πLπL Learning factor1.0>2 years in production λPλP Failures/10 6 hours5.104 MTTFMean time to failure195,925 hrs Component Failure Times 5V Switching Regulator λbλb Type.012Assume MOSFET πTπT Temperature coeff.3.7T = 100°C πAπA Application2.02-5W Power FET πEπE Environment factor9.0Ground mobile πQπQ Quality factor10Unknown λPλP Failures/10 6 hours7.992 MTTFMean time to failure125,125 hrs

4 Failure Groups: A.battery charging circuit B.fuel gauge circuit C.oscillator and line-level converter D.sensors Failure Groups

A B C D

A-2Battery overheats and/or catches fire/explodes Battery fuse shorted and/or internal safety measures to battery fail AND charging IC fails to detect battery charge level (battery and battery charging IC failures) Battery overheats and potentially catches fire (explodes) Intense heat followed by potential flaming / exploding battery HighAbsolute worst case scenario for this device A-3Battery does not charge to proper level or at all Battery charging IC failure, LM7809 failure Battery will not charge or will not charge to full 8.2 volts, possibly no/low voltage on 9v rail Measure battery voltage, measure 9v output rail, measure voltage across R22 MediumR22 is a 0.1Ω sense resistor that detects current output to battery. High/Medium Level Failures

Charging Controller

B-3Battery charge level reported at levels inconsistent with actual levels Fuel gauge IC failure or R18 short, R12/R19 short/open, microcontroller I 2 C failure Battery charge level reported at levels inconsistent with actual levels Measure R18, R19, R12 values, test micro I 2 C comm., test replace fuel gauge IC MediumThis could indicate a fuel gauge failure that might result in attempts to overcharge the battery. High/Medium Level Failures

5 - 3V Regulator Fuel Gauge Circuit

Software Design / Development Status Peripheral Name Comm. StatusAlgorithmAlgorithm Status PC RS232 Comm. 1xUART Tested OK Functions to send data packets and receive interrupt Implemented Tested OK GPS1xUART Tested OK Interpretation of packets received + config if necessary Unimplemented (medium priority) Accelerometer3xADC Tested OK Conversion of data into g-force measurements Implemented Tested OK Thermometer1xADC Untested Conversion of data into temperature measurement Unimplemented (low priority) Charge Counter1xI 2 C Tested OK Configuration setup and interpretation of sent packets Implemented 90% Complete Buttons7xGPIO 1 Tested Sampling of buttons + assignment to actions 1 Implemented Tested OK GUI elements on Atom 1xRS232 Tested OK Display GUI, receive/interpret packets from PIC32 In development ~20% Complete

Project Completion Timeline Week #Objectives and Milestones Week 08Finish PCB adjustments pending Design Review & Course Staff feedback, prototype battery management circuitry, mockup helmet GUI – 100% complete Weeks Complete PCB Design & send for fabrication, begin intensive motherboard software development, backpack unit specification – 100% complete Week 11Receive PCB and begin population, procure backpack unit housing, further develop motherboard software and helmet GUI – 100% complete Week 12PCB population should be nearly complete, Debug PCB, begin testing on a system level, begin software testing, begin ‘companion application’ development (for logged data) Week 13Debug software and hardware, continue system level testing, continue companion application development, GPS and thermometer algorithms Week 14Debug software and hardware, continue system level testing, continue companion application development Week 15Debug software and hardware, continue system level testing, continue companion application development Week 16Demonstrate PSSCs and submit final report and poster

Questions ?