Solid Waste Coordinator mailto:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debby Valin FDEP - Central District. What is P2 Why do P2 How to P2 Means to P2 Continuing with P2 P2 in Buildings P2 in Offices P2 in Operations and.
Advertisements

NC Recycling Issues NC Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance.
J enny H alpin Recycling Information Specialist (209) , ext. 315
Integrated Waste Management Reduce, Reuse & Recycle Your Name Your Title Your Organization.
Chapter 24 Solid and Hazardous Wastes
Chapter 24 Solid and Hazardous Waste
TOTAL RECYCLING SOLUTIONS ~48% COMPACTOR LANDFILL REDUCTION FOR JULY 2013 Our mission is to reduce Club Car’s waste handling/landfill costs, reduce carbon.
Melissa Cadwell SU Sustainability Division. SU Overview Large Can be 24,000 people on campus Private 4-year, graduate, professional degrees Urban Highly.
Composition of Municipal Waste
Performance Dashboard Recycling Performance Period Total September 2012 – September % of Campus Waste was Recycled during the performance period.
Rensselaer’s Sustainability Charrette Environment – Economics – Education Envision – Explore – Exchange Operations Steve Angle Carbon Footprint.
WASTE AUDITING 101. What Direction Are You Going?
ISU Recycling Vision Statement
Waste Reduction In Rhode Island Hotels and Restaurants Presented by: Timothy Byrne February 24, 2010.
Worcester State College On Campus Recycling Strategies.
Recycling at CDPHE Patrick Hamel, Sustainability Division (303)
Foundations of Real Estate Management BOMA International Module 4: Building Operations II Solid Waste Management and Recycling ®
Helen Lee, LEED GA Zero Waste Coordinator American University 1.
1 Technology Consumption Using and Servicing Products and Structures.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
4-H Vermicomposting A fifth-grade school enrichment program.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Put your school Name and logo here Don’t forget to put in photos of people who did the audit ….. and the date.
San Juan County Solid Waste Program Rate Workshop 12/10/02.
Recycling Plan and Analysis Summary Report PowerPoint Presentation: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting December 2005 Fairbanks North Star Borough.
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
The District School Board of Collier County Recycling Program.
RECYCLING IN SCHOOLS BY BRITTANY JACKSON
Slideshow B19: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. What can we do to help?
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright
1 Environment Engineering I Dr. Amal Hudhud Dr. Abdel Fattah Hasan AnNajah National University Civil Engineering Department Solid Waste Management Chapter.
Waste Chapter 19.
Remanufacturing: Links to Sustainability Matt Bogoshian Senior Policy Counsel Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention U.S. Environmental Protection.
G OING G REEN AND SUSTAINABILITY Unit 6: Sustainable Design STEM.
Nitty Gritty Recycling Stillwater Your Home Recycling System Solid Waste Management Hierarchy Recycling & Composting Resources Ilda T. Hershey OSU Coop.
R E C Y C L I N G.
Recycling involves processing used materials into new products in order to  prevent waste of potentially useful materials  reduce the consumption of.
Paper Recycling Helps the WORLD. What is Recycling? Recycling happens when old, discarded materials are used again to make other new products. For example,
New Terminal/Concourse Recycling Program Sacramento International Airport Presented by Ryan Bailey July 9, 2007.
1 CELEBRATING 20 YEARS OF RECYCLING Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners October 19, 2010.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
Waste Management: Sustainability and Recycling Woodland Rotary February 4, 2009.
SHARP an Eco-Progressive Company Having a positive impact in reducing greenhouse gases and facilitating recycling.
Environmental Management Systems Awareness Training January 24, 2008 Mr. Earl Griffin Safety, Health and Env. Manager Ms. Beth Anderson Environmental Protection.
Keeping our community clean. WHO IS SECCRA? Formed in 1968 by citizens of southern Chester County 10 members initially, 24 today Operated the Kennett.
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the U.S. for 2006 U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste November 2007.
Renee Chapman Walden University PUBH Environmental Health August 2010.
Single Stream Recycling Material Recovery Facilities
Waste Prevention Includes:
Chapter 18.2 Solutions to the Solid Waste Problem source reduction defined by EPA as “the practice of designing, manufacturing, purchasing, or using materials.
Board of County Commissioners October 16, 2012 Solid Waste Study Update.
Session 1: Initial Steps May 19, Why Don’t People Recycle???? Recycling? Who Cares! Recycling? Where Can I Recycle? Recycling? How am I Going to.
Buying Recycled and Environmentally Preferable Products Sarah Ketchem NC Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance (919) ;
Ellen Lorscheider Solid Waste Section Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Management Annual Report Environmental Review Commission February 18, 2010.
Solid Waste In the US 98.5% of the solid waste comes from mining, oil production, agriculture, sewage sludge, and industry The remaining 1.5% is municipal.
A Fairfax County, VA, publication Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Working for You! Return to Source Separated Recyclables Fairfax.
HICKAM AFB, HI Sustainable Recycling Programs. Sustainability Definitions Wikipedia: “the ability to maintain balance of a certain process or state in.
Recycling of Solid Waste February 10, 2016 Russell Schreiber, P.E. Director of Public Works.
General Pollution Prevention Practices 13-1 Options for Pollution Prevention Practices n Buy in Bulk n Buy reusable or refillable product instead of disposable.
1 Recycling At EPA Sustainable Facilities Practices Branch July 16, 2009.
Understand the Basics of Commodities and Their Markets
Chapter 24 Solid and Hazardous Waste
Recycling Basics for Memorial Medial Center
CITY OF GAINESVILLE SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Making sustainability a reality: materials, energy and value
Control of Waste.
City of Durham Solid Waste Management
Objectives of Recycling
Recycling and Howard County Businesses
Waste Disposal / Zero Waste to Landfill
Reduce, Reuse, RECYCLE! Dorthea Brown, MPH Student Walden University
Presentation transcript:

Solid Waste Coordinator mailto: aakrause@ufl.edu University of Florida Solid Waste Management Office Albert A. Krause Solid Waste Coordinator Bldg. 809 SW Radio Road P.O. Box 117745 Gainesville, FL 32611-7745 TEL (352) 392-7396 FAX (352) 392-3044 mailto: aakrause@ufl.edu http://www.ppd.ufl.edu/grounds-refuse.html

Solid Waste Reduction Program University of Florida Solid Waste Reduction Program As of: July 1, 2005

Decreasing Solid Waste Reduce Consumption of Materials Conservation pays . . . Up front and afterward. Repair/Reuse Products Consider both replacement and disposal costs. Buy Repairable/Recyclable Products We can’t reuse the unusable. Recycle Used Products and Materials Recycling, where practical, can reduce our need for raw material, reduce energy needs by 30 to 90% and cut down on pollution and the demand for disposal sites.

State Goal (1988) Reduce landfill disposals by over 30% through recycling. Include paper, OCC, cans. University Objective Minimize operating costs through waste reduction and improved efficiency. Solid Waste Mission Minimize overall waste disposal costs while maintaining a recycling rate of at least 30%. Note: Initially, the objective was to totally minimize costs and recycling was largely limited to products that could be recycled more cheaply than if landfilled. To expand recycling, this tasking was modified to permit recycling of products provided the average cost of recycling, per ton, did not exceed the average cost of alternative disposal. This allowed the program to expand into less “profitable” products and areas. Further impetus to recycling has been provided by environmental regulations which raised the ante on the costs of disposing of many sensitive materials, like electronics.

Enrollment vs. Waste Production (Waste Includes Health Center/Shands) 48765 36243 During past 15 years: Enrollment grew 34.5% Gross Square Footage grew 45.3%, mostly for medical & research facilities Total Solid Waste grew only 17.7%, thanks to waste reduction initiatives Landfilled Waste grew by only 1.5%, thanks to recycling efforts NOTE: figures for total waste in FY 2004-2005 are adjusted to discount 2500 tons of hurricane debris. 15013 19428 13396 17667 11404 11571

Annual Recycling Rate 34.4% 17% Adjusted for Hurricane Debris  Reduced Construction Activity  34.4% Generally, recycling tonnages increase as in-house construction/renovation activity increases. Demolition products are heavy, and contribute disproportionately to the recycling rate. Secondarily, construction and faculty relocations force office cleanouts, with a major impact on paper disposals (along with furniture disposals). Overall, recovery from the 2004 hurricanes added 2500 tons of yard debris and reduced our normal construction recycling by about 500 tons, neither of which is reflected above. If hurricane debris is included, UF’s recycling rate for FY 2004-2005 was actually 42.7%, but UF’s real “normalized” recycling rate remains about 37%. GOAL= >30% 17%

UF Recycling Includes: Office Paper (all kinds) Newsprint Cardboard Phone Books Magazines Junk Mail Soft-Cover Books Cotton Goods Cans (all types) Glass & Plastic Jars & Bottles Auto Batteries Ni-Cd, Li & Hg Batteries Used Oil & Filters Used Antifreeze Toner Cartridges Chemicals & Solvents White Goods Scrap Metal Precious Metals Wastewater Solids Used Pallets Yard Debris Masonry & Concrete Fluorescent Tubes Used Lumber Recycling activity is a mixture of centralized programs administered by the University Physical Plant, Environmental Health and Safety, and Surplus Property staff and de-centralized programs run by individual departments and activities. Centralized programs focus on products that constitute major portions of our waste stream and products that require central controls due to legal or environmental concerns. Decentralized programs handle unique or low-density materials like toner cartridges, used student furnishings and clothing, and used cotton goods (from laundry).

Scope of Recycling On-site support at over 350 major buildings and complexes. Over 1800 scheduled services per week at 1300+ locations for paper products and beverage containers alone. Central drop-offs for scrap metal, white goods, beverage containers, and used shipping pallets. Central drop-off plus curbside collection of yard waste. Central drop-off facility supplemented by on-site collections for hazardous/environmentally sensitive recyclables (operated by Environmental Health &Safety Division). Central drop-off facility supplemented by on-site collections for electronics (operated by Surplus Property Office). Dispersed departmental collections of low-density/low frequency products (toner cartridges, clothing, etc.). Overall, over 100,000 collection service/year to manage. Over 1800 scheduled services per week at 1200+ locations for paper and beverage containers alone. 800+ indoor paper collection sites. 400+ exterior collection sites for paper, cans & bottles

(Adjusted for ~ 2500 tons Hurricane Yard Debris) Recycling (FY 2004): 6,096 + tons (Adjusted for ~ 2500 tons Hurricane Yard Debris) tons Yard Waste: 3,224 Paper Products: 1,936 Masonry/Concrete: 485 Scrap Metal: 351 Sludge: 272 Cans, Bottles & Jars: 128 (About 200 tons of other products were recycled, but were not centrally tracked.) Overall, hurricane recovery added 2500 tons of yard debris which is not reflected above. At the same time, hurricane recovery diverted many in-house projects, reducing our normal recycling activity by about 500 tons for the year. A more representative recycling figure would be about 6500 -6600 tons for the year.

Waste Costs Facilities / Space Containers and Equipment Maintenance Processing Collection Transport Disposal Several iterations may be involved, e.g., user to recycle bin, custodian to area dumpster, collector to processor, hauler to buyer, buyer to manufacturer.

Approx. Costs Per Ton – FY2003/04 (to Refuse Account) Product Collection Cost Disposal Total Cost* General Refuse (Loose - Dumpsters) 71.50 43.50 115.00 Compacted Refuse (Compactors) 49.00 92.50 Construction Debris (Rolloffs) 40.00 80.00 Yard Waste - 22.50 Paper Products* 177.50 -22.50 155.00 Concrete/Masonry -- 7.00 Scrap Metal* 14.00 -30.00 -16.00 Pallets 56.00 Beverage Containers (Metal, Glass, Plastic) 2,000.00 25.00 2,025.00 Due to changes in University financial software, discrete financial costs for refuse & recycling were not available for July 2004-December 2005. This problem has been corrected and more current information will be available in July 2006. * Excludes external (e.g., custodian, client) costs and savings.

General Observations The greater the amount of a product in your waste stream, the more likely it is that separation and recovery or diversion will be cost effective. Costs increase dramatically for separating and managing low density and mixed-component materials. Often the difference between #1 and #2 is dependent on the level at which waste is managed. It’s a factor of scale.

Reducing Solid Waste Costs 1. Reduce Waste Reduce consumption: buy less, discard less. Reuse, repair, re-sell or donate used items. Recycle waste materials into useful products. 2. Improve Efficiency Consolidate collection sites. Reduce waste volume through compaction. Reduce waste weight by pre-processing. Separate wastes of different classification or handling characteristics.

Recycling Benefits to UF Smaller environmental footprint. Lower overall disposal costs. Smaller custodial workload. Secure document destruction. Enhanced public image. Improved morale.

Major Recycling Problems: Composite end items. Irregular production rates. Container placement/space. Contamination of products. High colIection costs. Lack of local markets. Composite products are nearly impossible to separate and market – engineered wood products, laminates, paper-plastic mixes, and multi-material manufactured goods. Irregular production rates make it difficult and expensive to efficiently equip and routinely collect materials – especially under service contracts. Contamination of Products hurts recovery efforts, including: garbage in recycling bins recyclables into wrong bins food/beverage residues, packing materials Low-density products and dispersed products mean high colIection costs Un-flattened boxes, un-crushed bottles & cans, fluffy shredded paper require more container and transport space, more trips. Widely-dispersed products entail more travel time & fuel per service.

Recycling and Sustainability Issues Landfill space is cheap and virtually unlimited. We are victims of our own technologic success. Waste reduction is inseparable from local, national, and global economics. Eventually, resource constraints and population growth will make goods expensive and services cheap – but it will require drastic changes in lifestyles. Despite claims to the contrary, landfill space is plentiful and cheap. This makes the extra costs of material separation, processing and recovery difficult to surmount as long as fuel and raw materials remain cheap. Our complex, multi-material construction and consumer products are made for low initial cost and one-time use. They are difficult, if not impossible, to repair, disassemble, or recycle without huge expenditures of time and energy. Even wood products (plywood, particle board, laminates, and treated lumber) have impractical to re-use or compost. Our economy is increasingly dependent on cheap goods and expensive labor, while most of the world is geared toward cheap labor and expensive goods (though ever more of the population is working toward the American model). In the short run, the pursuit of cheap goods favors local consumption and weighs against local recycling activity – but the balance is shifting in the competition for jobs and resources. The great socio-economic shift will come when resources become scarcer and people are more willing to spend money on re-use, repair, and recovery than on consumption and retailing. That day is pretty much at hand.

Directions for the Future Think long-term, think total life-cycle. Buy durable, repairable, recyclable products. Design for repairability. Design for economic material recovery. Make resource recovery (recycling) a front-office, not back-office activity. Promote volunteerism, individual responsibility.