Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Addition Facts
Advertisements

Water Year 2013: Current Conditions and Early Season Outlook in the Colorado River Basin CRFS November 14, 2012.
National Weather Service Spring 2014 Flood Update March 28, 2014 Craig Schmidt, Service Hydrologist.
Course Introduction: Overview of Water Supply Forecasting Practices Kevin Werner, CBRFC.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Week 1.
Brian McInerney Hydrologist National Weather Service Hydrologic Outlook April 2006.
1 North Central River Forecast Center: An Overview of Operations and Mission Wisconsin River Post-Flood Meeting November 16, 2010.
Upcoming Changes in Winter Weather Operations at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Great Lakes Operational Meteorological Workshop Dan Petersen, Wallace.
Jim Noel Service Coordination Hydrologist March 2, 2012
Northwest River Forecast Center Seasonal Volume Outlook Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2012 Water Year Steve King, Sr. Hydrologist Northwest.
Northwest River Forecast Center Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2011 Water Year Steve King, Hydrologist
Hydrologic Outlook for the Pacific Northwest Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering for Washington Water.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
Climate-Change Impacting Hydrologic Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service Eastern Region, Chief Hydrologic Services Division.
Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2008 Water Year Ray Fukunaga, Senior Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for River Management in the Puget Sound Region Richard Palmer Matthew Wiley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2007 Water Year Kevin Berghoff, Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center.
Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2006 Water Year Steve King, Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center.
Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2007 Water Year Steve King, Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center.
Mid-Range Water Supply Forecasts for Municipal Water Supplies Matthew Wiley, Richard Palmer, and Michael Miller Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for Water Supply Management in the Puget Sound Region Matthew Wiley Richard Palmer October 26, 2005.
Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2008 Water Year Steve King, Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center.
NWS ~ NorthWest River Forecast Center Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2006 Water Year Kevin Berghoff, Hydrologist.
NOAA/NWS Water Supply Web Page
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Seethu Babu Marketa McGuire Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil Engineering University.
Western Water Supply Kevin Werner, Andrew Murray, WR/SSD Jay Breidenbach, WFO Boise Cass Goodman, Steve Shumate, CBRFC Alan Takamoto, Scott Staggs, CNRFC.
Western Water Supply Kevin Werner, Andrew Murray, WR/SSD Jay Breidenbach, WFO Boise Cass Goodman, Steve Shumate, CBRFC Alan Takamoto, Scott Staggs, CNRFC.
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
CPC’s U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook & Future Plans April 20, 2010 Brad Pugh, CPC.
Water Supply Forecast using the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Model Kevin Berghoff, Senior Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center Portland, OR.
Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.
CBRFC April 2014 CUWCD Briefing/Meeting 1:30pm April 8, 2014 Ashley Nielson.
Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop Des Moines, IA – March 3, 2011 Andy Wood NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Also: John Schaake,
Drought in California How Did We Get Here and What Can We Expect This Year? November 7th 2014 APWA Sacramento Chapter Meeting Alan Haynes Service Coordination.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Stakeholder Forum NOAA’s National Weather Service Welcome to the Colorado Basin RFC Logistics & Introductions Office.
Mississippi River Tri-Agency Meeting National Weather Service 1 COE/NWS/USGS Tri-Agency Meeting Mississippi River Basin AHPS UPDATE COE/NWS/USGS Tri-Agency.
Hydrology in the National Weather Service Mark Fuchs Service Hydrologist National Weather Service St. Louis, MO Presentation to local Media Partners November.
National Weather Service Application of CFS Forecasts in NWS Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction John Schaake Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA National.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
Toward Probabilistic Seasonal Prediction Nir Krakauer, Hannah Aizenman, Michael Grossberg, Irina Gladkova Department of Civil Engineering and CUNY Remote.
NOAA’s National Weather Service 2010 Spring Flood Outlook #2 March 5, 2010 By: Darrin Hansing ILX Service Hydrologist.
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
NOAA National Weather Service Missouri River Forecaster’s Meeting Kansas City, Missouri November 2010 Ross Wolford Senior Operations Hydrologist Missouri.
CBRFC Stakeholder Forum February 24, 2014 Ashley Nielson Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Forecast Verification.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and Drought Related Forecasts Kevin Werner.
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
Hydrologic Forecasting Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and the Department.
A Modeling Framework for Improved Agricultural Water Supply Forecasting George Leavesley, Colorado State University, Olaf David,
Focus areas of the NWS Missouri/Souris River Floods of May-August 2011 Service Assessment – Per the NOAA and NWS Strategic Plans, gather stakeholder input.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
Pearl River Coordination Meeting October 7, 2009 Dave Reed Hydrologist in Charge Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
Probabilistic Forecasts - Baseline Products for the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services (AHPS) Dave Reed HIC – LMRFC 2006 NWA Annual Meeting October.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Greg Smith Senior Hydrologist National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center January 25, 2011 Navajo.
Ensemble Forecasts Andy Wood CBRFC. Forecast Uncertainties Meteorological Inputs: Meteorological Inputs: Precipitation & temperature Precipitation & temperature.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Salt Lake City, Utah 11 The Hydrologic.
Long-Range Streamflow Forecasting Products and Water Resources Management Applications in the Columbia River Basin Alan F. Hamlet, Andy Wood, Dennis P.
Andrew Wood, Ali Akanda, Dennis Lettenmaier
Improving Drought Forecasts: The Next Generation of Seasonal Outlooks
Challenges in western water management: What can science offer?
UW Civil and Environmental Engineering
Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Andrew W. Wood, Ted Bohn, George Thomas
Hydrologic Forecasting
Long-Lead Streamflow Forecast for the Columbia River Basin for
Alan F. Hamlet Andrew W. Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Alan F. Hamlet Andrew W. Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Presentation transcript:

Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop Jim Noel Senior Hydrologist NOAA/ National Weather Service Ohio River Forecast Center March 4, 2008

Outline History of Flood Outlooks Why change now? Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) Climate Forecasts within ESP Experimental Water Resources Outlooks Expansion of Climate Products – Examples Summary

History Subjective in nature Only produced in flood season Based on series of text products Subjective in nature Only produced in flood season Not a continuous water watch for high and low flows From Hydrologic Information Center – April 14, 2006

Why Change Now? Need for continuous water watch Need to collaborate with our partners more Technology advances allow us to provide more useful information Innovate or dissipate

Ensemble Streamflow Prediction River Forecast Centers capture soil moisture using SAC-SMA (Sacramento) hydrologic soil moisture accounting model and capture snow using SNOW-17 model Good estimations of soil moisture and snow pack water contents are critical to accurate hydrology (RFCs) and meteorology and climate (NCEP) forecasts. To get good soil moisture estimations requires good precipitation inputs Two main zones, an upper and lower

Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Manual Calibration Program (MCP) Operational Forecast System (OFS) Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) MCP ESP OFS

Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) necessary component used to take short range deterministic SAC-SMA model into short term climate predictions of rivers Similar in concept to the ensembling approach used for atmospheric modeling RFC NWSRFS/ESP/Probabilistic The continuous models feed short term deterministic and longer term probabilistic forecast to the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service. Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service

Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Multiple streamflow scenarios with historic meteorological or forecast weather/climatic data Possible scenarios Flow Scenario 2 Scenario 1 Scenario 3 Saved model states reflect current conditions Time So how does the ESP technique work? You begin by having the hydrologic model save the model states at a particular time. By comparing the model results to observed conditions, the model states can be adjusted to reflect the current conditions. Once saved, a model state acts as a starting point for future simulations. Since observed precipitation and temperature data haven’t happened yet, multiple scenarios using historic or forecast data can be used as input to the model. From each set of inputs, a possible streamflow hydrograph can be generated. Taken together, an ensemble of possible hydrographs are produced. Once several scenario hydrographs are calculated, the results can be used to generate probabilistic streamflow values. Results used in statistical analysis to produce forecasts with probabilistic values ©The COMET Program

Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Future Now Past Low chance of this level flow or higher Medium chance of this level flow or higher Flow High chance of this level flow or higher In another example, past observations are use to adjust the hydrologic model. The current time is when model states are saved. The future will use forecast or historic data as input to the model to produce possible hydrographs. Here, a series of hydrograph traces are generated, each based on a particular set of input values. The resulting traces give an idea of the range of possible flows. For this case, because all of the traces are above this point, the probability that this flow will occur is very high. For the this second case, there is a medium chance flows at this level will occur since some of the traces were above and below this point. For the third case, chances of this flow are low, since all of the trances are lower than this particular value. Time ©The COMET Program

Climate Forecasts Within ESP Pre Adjustment Technique Weight/Modify on Input Side 71 72 73 74 75 Post Adjustment Technique Weight On Output Side We can use the pre-adjust technique by modifying the traces based on CPC outlooks before running each trace. The conditional trace versus historical trace. We can also generate all the historical traces and then weight certain years based on things such as ENSO, the post adjust technique.

Climate Forecasts Within ESP Historical MAT and MAP Adjustment System Adjusted Historical MAP and MAT Weather Forecasts Climate Forecasts This is the pre adjust technique where we generate each historical trace and then modify based on HPC 5 day QPF and CPC 30 and 90 day temperature and precipitation outlooks

Climate Forecasts Within ESP Long range seasonal water supply Spring snowmelt volume forecasts Spring snowmelt peaks Minimum flows for navigation, irrigation, environmental, recreation, etc Water Resources Outlooks

Climate Forecasts within ESP 90-day probability of exceedance Blue line is an historical simulation based on climatology Black line is the conditional simulation with CPC inputs Conditional simulation based on CPC inputs yield lower potential for flooding and high flows. This is the result of ESP for AHPS that the NWS currently uses. This is the 90-day probability of exceedance. The historical simulation is in blue. I think of this as the current states plus normal conditions. The black line is the conditional simulation with CPC outlooks. CPC outlooks made this 90-day outlook drier at the high end and wetter at the lower end.

Water Resources Outlooks Uses NWSRFS SAC-SMA and ESP Uses HPC/CPC Outlooks Can generate a whole host of products An experimental product of NOAA/NWS Being develop for the 30 to 90 day period A new continuous water watch product is in development. It is the WRO product for the Ohio Valley by OHRFC using ESP. SERFC is also working on WRO stuff.

Water Resources Outlooks Partner with USGS/USACE Utilize USGS streamflow percentiles Verify product based on USGS 28-day mean flows Experimental has ended, waiting for operational approval GOAL: Slowly expand nationwide

Water Resources Outlooks Based on basins and point forecasts 159 of 266 OHRFC points have 30, 60 and 90 day expected streamflows 20 more USGS points could be used but incomplete data

Water Resources Outlooks 30-day Verification August 2006 through January 2008 POD above normal flows = 0.78 FAR above normal flows = 0.30 POD below normal flows = 0.65 FAR below normal flows = 0.09 Percent of forecast basins in correct category = 78%

Water Resources Outlook Other Approaches Use analog years (year weighting technique in ESP (Post-Adjustment) based on atmospheric and oceanic response (ENSO/NAO etc) Run ESP with CPC outlooks and analog years approach Research on this is being done by OHRFC and hopefully Michigan Tech

Expansion of Climate Products - Examples Probability of reaching flood stage Uses NWSRFS SAC-SMA and ESP Generated at NCRFC for minor, moderate and major flooding An experimental product of NOAA/NWS Being expanded at other RFCs A new continuous water watch product is in development. It is the WRO product for the Ohio Valley by OHRFC using ESP. SERFC is also working on WRO stuff.

Expansion of Climate Products - Examples Link WRO for each of our points to probability function images Allow customers to drill down into the WRO further Allow customers to modify risks based on ENSO as a starting point This work is being driven by NWS Western Region A new continuous water watch product is in development. It is the WRO product for the Ohio Valley by OHRFC using ESP. SERFC is also working on WRO stuff.

Summary Technology (ESP) has advanced to allow subjective text based flood outlooks to be replaced by a more objective based water resources outlook Climate forecasts are integrated into hydrologic forecasts mostly through adjustments to the inputs in the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Water Resources Outlooks would provide a continuous water watch for streamflows in the 1-90 day period for expected flows Water Resources Outlooks would not only be for high flows but ALL flows

Summary Streamflow categories are based on USGS percentile categories Verification is based on USGS data Designed to promote NWS/USGS/COE and help us and other partners and customers in their missions! The climate products can be used in providing necessary information on flood and drought potential during the coming months.