South Africa – Verification Lessons Learned from the Dismantled Nuclear Weapons Programme Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US-India Civil Nuclear Relations ITRN 603 International Trade Relations Kristin Isabelli Slide 1.
Advertisements

Implications of the NPT on a Coordinated Approach to Triple S Dr M. S. Draper C.B.E. Past head – Non-Proliferation Policy UK Department of Energy and Climate.
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.
1 Technical Meeting on Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power SECURITY STATUS IN CHILE Mauricio Lichtemberg Chilean Nuclear.
Nuclear Suppliers Group: Its Origins, Role, Structure and Activities
NTP Radioisotopes SOC Ltd
International Safeguards VTC Lecture Series Building a Safeguards Facility Approach David H. Hanks SRNL Program Manager Safeguards Initiatives Global Security.
Excellences, allow me first to remind you of some relevant information on the present status of peaceful use of nuclear energy within global energy strategy.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Planning with clear goals and objectives How the State-Level concept and objectives based safeguards are essential.
Session 3.1 Overview of the Additional Protocol
Material Control & Accountancy Robert Bean, PhD Idaho National Laboratory LLNL-INL Safeguards Training Program 2009 INL/CON
“ABACC and the interaction with its partners” Kevin Veal, PhD
International Safeguards and the Role of SSACs and RSACs Tom Ellacott Director-International Safeguards Division Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 11.
Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.
Determining the Irreducible Elements of an Interim Agreement with Iran: A Freeze Plus David Albright ISIS November 5, 2013.
The Regulation of International Trade in Enriched Uranium in a New Build Era Maxine Symington.
Laser Isotope Separation – The Genie is out of the Bottle Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Oslo, 4 March 2005Managing Nuclear Material Stockpiles in the 21 st Century 1 Nuclear Material Security and Multilateral Agreements Stephan Klement Office.
NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE PLANTS OF ENEA AND FN TO BE DECOMMISSIONED NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE PLANTS OF ENEA AND FN TO BE DECOMMISSIONED FN INDUSTRIAL FUEL FABRICATION.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Sweden and the Nuclear Security Summit Process Jan A. Lodding Deputy Director Disarmament.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Cooperation in Nuclear Security David Ek Office of Nuclear Security.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
EXPLORATION: South Africa Brita Sands Derek Siddoway Erika Mariano Matt Booth Matt Thomas.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.
ESARDA Working Group Training and Knowledge Management 1 Nuclear Material Subject to Safeguards G. Janssens-Maenhout ESARDA Course March 2015:
National Radioactive Waste Disposal Institute Bill Presentation to the NCOP Select Committee on Economic and Foreign Affairs October 2008.
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
Report on the recent IAEA Workshop on Antineutrino Detection for Safeguards Applications Andrew Monteith Division of Technical Support Department of Safeguards.
Origins of International Safeguards Fred Wehling Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies Thanks to: NNSA NA-243.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
Assessment of Iran’s Nuclear Program Press Event Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Science and Technology Fellow.
1 NMMSS Orientation Brian Horn Nuclear Regulatory Commission Peter Dessaules Department of Energy.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Infrastructure Development Bridging the National & International Levels: The Euratom Experience and expertise Sotiris Synetos, Euratom.
Milestones or Millstones Alex R. Burkart, Deputy Director Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security United States Department of State.
The Middle East Free Zone: “Building Blocks & the Way Forward” Ambassador Dr. Sameh Aboul-Enein NATO Defense College Rome, 9 th of October 2013.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E LashCIE Presentation 1/98 1 Recent Accomplishments and Future Directions Dan Giessing U.S. Department.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF SAFEGUARDS IMPLEMENTATION IN IRAQ PRIOR TO THE GULF WAR Iraq was an original signatory of the NPT (July 1968) and became a party.
El Cabril near surface disposal facility
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Jean Maurice Crete Division of Concepts and Planning, Safeguards Training Section Capacity Building for Safeguards.
U.S. HEU Disposition Program Robert M. George HEU Disposition Program Manager Office of Fissile Materials Disposition.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.
The State Evaluation Process Therese Renis Section Head Division of Operations B Department of Safeguards 08 February 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Summary of Scientific Studies The environmental consequences of a “regional” nuclear war would cause massive global famineThe environmental consequences.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop on Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for.
1 Sixth ROK-UN Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues 3-5 December 2007 CONTROLLING SENSITIVE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ACTIVITIES Mr Jeff Robinson,
LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
STOCKTAKING OF ARF COOPERATION ON NON-PROLIFERATION 1 st ARF Inter-Sessional Meeting on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (ISM on NPD) Beijing, 1-3 July.
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
Russia and Iran’s Nuclear Program M.A. in Nonproliferation Studies
Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Energy
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
Ensuring Nuclear Safety Culture in Ghana: Regulatory Perspective
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification
Safeguards Milestones
The Nuclear Weapons Convention
National Radioactive Waste Management Agency Bill
9995 Overloaded Drum Incident
Submarines & Safeguards
GNI Advanced Reactors Safeguards Analysis & Findings
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Dr. Hany Sallam & Regulatory Activities
Presentation transcript:

South Africa – Verification Lessons Learned from the Dismantled Nuclear Weapons Programme Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 18 October, 2013

Path to Nuclear Weapon Capability Nuclear weapons programs took place parallel to civilian programs. Nuclear power alone is not a stepping stone to weapon capability, but mastering of sensitive technologies is: - Reprocessing - Uranium enrichment (South Africa considered both, but opted for the uranium enrichment) Nuclear know-how ; technologies cannot be un-invented and special skills fade away slowly.

South Africa’s Nuclear Milestones – A committee to study peaceful nuclear explosions for mining – R&D for nuclear explosives starts – Pilot uranium enrichment plant starts the operation – Armscor takes the responsibility the development for a deliverable nuclear weapon Pilot uranium enrichment plant ends the operation – President de Klerk instructed to terminate the production of weapons and dismantle them and the infrastructure.

South Africa’s Nuclear Milestones July 1991 – South Africa accedes to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). 16 September 1991 – A comprehensive safeguards agreement with the IAEA enters into force. 25 March 1992 – South Africa submits the complete inventory of its nuclear material holdings to the IAEA. 24 March 1993 – President de Klerk announces that South Africa has had nuclear weapon program, which had been dismantled before joining the NPT.

Nuclear Weapons Program The development and production of a number of deliverable gun-type devices. Lithium-6 separation for the production of tritium for possible future use in boosted devices. Studies of implosion and thermonuclear technology. Research and development for the production and recovery of plutonium and tritium.

IAEA Safeguards in South Africa Under INFCIRC/66 safeguards before September 1991: - SAFARI-1 research reactor, Pelindaba. - Hot cell complex, Pelindaba. - Koeberg nuclear power reactor units 1 and 2. Note: These installations had not contributed to the weapons program.

IAEA Safeguards in South Africa Additional installations from September 1991 under a INFCIRC/153-type agreement - Uranium conversion plant (UF6). - Pilot enrichment plant (HEU). - HEU metal/alloy production plant. - HEU fuel fabrication. - Semi-commercial enrichment plant (LEU). - MLIS laser enrichment R&D facility. - LEU fuel fabrication plant. - Natural uranium/depleted uranium metal plants. - Decontamination plants and waste storages. Note: Also R&D on centrifuge enrichment, but without using nuclear material.

Verification Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. Nuclear Weapons Free Zone in Africa. The Treaty requires the dismantlement of nuclear weapons programs in a verifiable manner. Resolution of the IAEA General Conference

NPT Safeguards NPT model safeguards agreement (INFCIRC/153 Corrected): -Purpose: verifying that nuclear material is not diverted. -Verify that State declarations about their nuclear material holdings are correct and complete. –Technical objective: timely detection and deterrence of diversion of significant quantities of nuclear material. –Focus on declared facilities and material. –Fundamental safeguards measure is nuclear material accountancy, with containment and surveillance as complementary measures.

Verification - 1 Taking into account the past weapons program, the objectives of the IAEA inspections were to: - Gain assurance that all nuclear material used in the program has been placed under IAEA safeguards and is in peaceful use. - Assess that all non-nuclear weapons specific components of the devices had been destroyed, all laboratory and engineering facilities had been fully decommissioned and abandoned or converted to non-nuclear or peaceful nuclear usage, all weapons-specific equipment had been destroyed and that all other equipment had been converted to non- nuclear usage or peaceful nuclear usage.

Verification - 2 Assessment of the completeness of the declared nuclear inventory: -The inventory was first evaluated with respect to production, imports, and usage of uranium, and then the isotopic balance of the inventory was calculated and compared with the use of natural uranium. - Entire operating history of the enrichment plants was assessed by analyzing of data from several thousand operating records including detailed the plant status, on a daily basis. - All nuclear wastes were characterized, repacked and verified.

Verification - 3 The objectives of the IAEA inspections were to: - Assess the completeness and correctness of the information provided with respect to the timing and scope of the program, and the development, manufacture, and subsequent dismantling of the nuclear weapons. - Maintain assurances that the nuclear weapons capability would not be restored. These objectives were based on the IAEA's rights and obligations under the safeguards agreement and on the stated policy of the South African Government for full transparency with respect to the country's former nuclear weapons program

] Implementation of Safeguards Full and complete initial declaration: - Scientific seminars and visits conducted to explain the scope and content of the civilian and military elements of the nuclear program. - All nuclear material and facilities including test and dismantled facilities were declared and verified. - Verification proceeded in steps as nuclear material and information became available.

Dilemmas of Verification - 1 The overlap between the equipment, knowledge and materials required to develop nuclear weapons and to conduct civilian nuclear research or develop nuclear defense limits the effectiveness of verification measures and complicates information acquisition and analysis.

Dilemmas of Verification - 2 Dismantlement includes access to proliferation sensitive information. It takes time. It requires access to sites and information of importance to national security.

Dealing with Discrepancies First analysis revealed discrepancies with respect to HEU produced by the pilot enrichment plant,and with respect to LEU produced by the semi- commercial enrichment plant indicating that substantial amount of uranium-235 was unaccounted for. Re-examination of records, and further sampling lead to adjustments of nuclear material in wastes, tails, and hold-ups; problems were resolved.

Keys to Success Openness and Cooperation: - Unfettered access to relevant people and sites - Visits: Any time, any place with a reason Cooperation. Trust and verify. Each country is an unique case; no one size fits all. Special verification teams.

Reading Material Waldo Stumpf, Birth and Death of the South African Nuclear Weapons Program, 50 Years after Hiroshima, Castiglioncello, Italy, 28 September Zondi Masiza, A Chronology of South Africa’s Nuclear Program, The Nonproliferation Review Fall 1993, p Adolf von Baeckmann, Gary Dillon, and Demetrius Perricos, Nuclear Verification in South Africa, IAEA Bulletin, 1/1995, p David Albright, South Africa’s Secret Nuclear Weapons, A Report of the Institute for Science and International Security, 1 May 1994.