DAC Back-to-School Training 2015-16 Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators (KAAC) Office of Assessment and Accountability 10/23/12 1 Assessment and Accountability Update.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Create by KAAC Modified by Kenna Williams.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
2014 FALL DAC TRAINING College and/or Career Readiness 1 KDE:OAA:DSR:cw, pp: 8/20/2014.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
ALTERNATE K-PREP Fall KDE:OAA:DSR:ko:8/20/2014.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
DAC Back-to-School Training WIDA-ACCESS Placement Test™ (W-APT), ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 ® and Alternate ACCESS for ELLs ® Presented By: Chris Williams 1 KDE:OAA:DSR:cw:7/17/15.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2014 FALL DAC TRAINING English Learners KDE:OAA:DSR:cw:8/20/
School Year. Unbridled Learning Next Generation Learners (100%) Next Generation Support (23%) Next Generation Professionals (10%) Next Generation.
1. 2  Based on test results and data  The same data calculations and reporting rules used as those in fall 2014 with two exceptions: removal.
DAC Back-to-School Training College and Career Readiness Presented By: Joy Barr KDE:OAA:DSR: jb:7/17/
BUILDING ASSESMENT COORDINATOR BACK-TO-SCHOOL TRAINING Overview Presented By: Erica Thompson 1.
Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
END OF COURSE (EOC) Fall BAC Training END-OF-COURSE  Over the summer, ACT acquired Pacific Metrics.  ACT dissolving contract with Vantage.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets 2015 Workbook.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Rhonda L.. Sims, Director Office.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
703 KAR 5:240 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Student Growth Percentile & Categorical Growth Presented by Pamela Powers Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp:
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
2016 FEBRUARY DAC MEETINGS Regulations, Accommodations and Text Reader KDE:OAA:DSR: 2/4/
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
SDRR Student Data Review and Rosters Application KDE:OAA:DSR: 2/4/
Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.
2015 Assessment and Accountability Update Scott Trimble Workshop October 20, Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Kentucky.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Texas State Accountability
Unbridled Learning: College/Career for All Accountability System
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Presentation transcript:

DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015

Overview Topics Testing Changes Accountability Test Security Additional Training OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 2

TESTING CHANGES OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 3

Explore/Plan Statewide administration - Fall 2015 cancelled (Grade 8 and 10) Transition Attainment Record for Alternate Students also cancelled (Grade 8 and 10) State Requirement – Not Local Requirement Districts may purchase directly from ACT for local use Future plans are in discussion (K-PREP) OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 4

Compass ACT phasing out Compass Continue current eCompass system for Future plans are in discussion OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 5

End-of-Course Over the summer, ACT acquired Pacific Metrics. ACT dissolving contract with Vantage. – Vantage system closes on August 31, computer based testing (CBT) only. Software is unavailable for testing statewide in September. Pacific Metrics software system will be available in October. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 6

End-of-Course (continued) Aug. 1-31—CBT only available in Vantage Sept. 1-30—all testing unavailable Oct. 1- Dec. 18—CBT and P/P available Dec. 19-Jan. 3—all testing unavailable Jan. 4 – July 15—CBT and P/P available July 16-July 31—all testing unavailable OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 7

Science Norm-Referenced Test (Grades 4 and 7) – Continue to take assessments to meet federal requirement, not included in accountability K-PREP Alternate K-PREP End-of-Course (High School ) – Continue to take Biology and included in accountability OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 8

Online Systems End-of-Course – Vantage System closes in August – New System from ACT (Pacific Metrics) ACT Online – Pilot state testing for the ACT ACCESS 2.0 – Choice of online (some grades) or paper OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 9

ACCOUNTABILITY OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Fall 2015 Reporting data Next-Generation Learners (77%) – Achievement – Gap – Growth – Readiness – Graduation Rate Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support (23%) – Writing, Arts & Humanities, Practical Living/Career Studies, and K-3 (elementary only) OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Fall 2015 Reporting Timeline Late August – Data Cleanup Opportunity Mid-September – QC Day for DACs Early October – Public Reporting OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 Performance Measures for Next-Generation Learners Grade Range AchievementGapGrowth College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Elementary Tests: reading, mathematics, social studies and writing Reading and mathematics N/A Middle Tests: reading, mathematics, social studies and writing Reading and mathematics College Readiness N/A High End-of-Course Tests** and on-demand writing PLAN to ACT Reading and mathematics College/Career Readiness Rate Cohort Model

Accountability without Explore/Plan Growth: Plan-to-ACT data lagged one year – Plan data from Fall 2014 will be reported in Fall 2016 Still in Discussion – College Readiness at middle school (K-PREP) – Writing/Editing at high school When components or categories of data are unavailable, the weight or value of the missing piece is distributed across remaining pieces of the system. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Changes to Accountability Regulations 703 KAR 5: KAR 5: KAR 5:240 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

703 KAR 5:240--Accountability Administrative Procedures and Guidelines Early Graduates Exempt from 100-Day Rule – Early Graduates will count in the school’s accountability calculations. Alternative School Track Back – Direct placements will go to the district accountability rather than the school. All previous rules for accountability tracking apply except for students who are directly placed in an alternative program without entering an A1 school. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Next-Generation Learners Achievement – Unchanged Gap (equally uses two calculations) – Non-duplicated gap group percentage scoring Proficient and Distinguished in all content area tests – Annual novice reduction targets in reading and mathematics for individual student groups (African American, Hispanic, American Indian, Limited English proficiency, students in poverty (free/reduced lunch), students with disabilities) and non-duplicated gap group; Points awarded based on percent of target met OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Next-Generation Learners Growth (equally uses two calculations) – Student growth percentile in Reading and Mathematics – Categorical growth model sums the number of students moving from a student performance level (NAPD) to a higher level, the number remaining at proficient and distinguished divided by total number of students OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Next-Generation Learners Readiness – Unchanged (No Grade 8 Explore) Graduation Rate – Adjusted Cohort OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

703 KAR 5:225 School and District Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) is calculated from the total score of the Next Generation Learner’s component only. Graduation Rate is increased from 60 to 80. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

703 KAR 5:225 School and District Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences (cont.) Focus calculation will be based on two years of data except for new and reconfigured schools. Focus calculations for new and reconfigured schools shall use one year of data. If a school has a Focus designation, it cannot be named a School of Distinction. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

703 KAR 5:225 School and District Accountability, Recognition, Support and Consequences (cont.) The 3rd Standard Deviation model for a Focus School is replaced with a lowest 5% model in each individual gap group by subject. (The lowest 10% calculation on the Non-Duplicated Gap Group remains in effect.) Schools labeled as Priority Schools have an overall score in the bottom 5% of overall scores by level for all schools that have failed to meet the AMO for the last three consecutive years. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Support Writing, Arts & Humanities, Practical Living/Career Studies, K-3 (elementary only), and World Language/Global Competencies (high school only) 24 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015

Next Generation Professionals Educator Effectiveness is still in discussion. It is a topic at the KBE meeting in August. More details will be provided. OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

TEST SECURITY OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Test Security: Process Processes – Receiving and distributing secure materials – Controlling inventory of secure materials – Monitoring appropriate administration of state- required tests – Packaging and returning secure materials OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Test Security: Training Requires annual training on regulations  Administration Code  Inclusion Regulation  28 Administration Code 703 KAR 5:080 Inclusion of Special Populations 703 KAR 5:070 All persons involved with testing in any way Anyone assisting with testing accommodations Requires signature to confirm individual has read, understands and will abide by document Documentation of training required (who, what, when, where and how) OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015

ADDITIONAL TRAINING OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

More Trainings Back-to-School Trainings (available now) Testing Overview Access College/Career Readiness Compass Testing Special Populations In-depth Training (coming this fall) – End-of-Course – Access – Text Reader – Alternate Assessment – Data Review and Reporting (SDRR) OAA:DSR:js:07/22/

Division of Support and Research Jennifer Stafford, Director Casey Duvall, Branch Manager Joy Barr, Program Consultant Kevin O’Hair, Program Consultant Pam Powers, Systems Consultant IT Cindy Warren, Program Consultant Chris Williams, Program Consultant Teresa King, Support Staff 31 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015 (502)