UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
E-tutoring : promoting active learning online within the field of languages, linguistics & area studies Shirley Bennett University of Hull.
Evidences collection Audio-video tools : Class 08/10/2004 ERT production of educational formats.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
2000 International Conference on Engineering Education1 The Web-Based Learning Environment for Creative Design Course S. S. Hsiau, J. C. Wu, T. L. Yeh.
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
1 Management and Skills Development of Professional Roles Involved in Distance Learning D. Giuli M.C. Pettenati E. Palmisano L. Baldini University of Florence.
Cognitive Science Overview Design Activity Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory Cognitive Flexibility Theory.
A Master Course on-line Operative notes Irkutsk 5 October 2005 Irkutsk GIGP 2005 Agostino Marengo University of Bari Italy.
DEVELOPING ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES Anna Uhl Chamot Jill Robbins George Washington University.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
ICT Scope and Sequence Sekolah Ciputra 2010.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
1 Integrating Google Apps for Education to Business English Student Trainees’ On-the-Job Training English Reports Asst.Prof. Phunsuk Kannarik.
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
Instructional System Design
Welcome to Unit 6 Seminar: Learning The Language Learning and Assessment Strategies 1.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
P28.  Educator provides the learners with content.  It is a educator approach  Examples : lectures and demonstrations  Educators must keep the following.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Teaching Learning Strategies and Academic Language
Company LOGO Presenter: Hlengiwe Mfeka – 03 July 2013.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June 2005.
An introduction to the Care Act Learning and Development Programme Staffordshire Managers Quality Network Forum Olivia Redgrave, Area Officer, Skills for.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
PLANNING ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Lec. Junaid Arshad 1 Lecture#03 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Facilitate Group Learning
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
IC&IC eLearning solutions Bucarest, 2 September 2010.
Identifying Assessments
“Teaching”…Chapter 11 Planning For Instruction
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology WebCT Executive Seminar EDEN.
Faculty Development Models
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
Application Individualization and Differentiation in Czech Primary Schools - One of the Characteristic Features of Inclusion Application Individualization.
指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Tsai, Yu-ting 報告日期: 2006/12/19 Kathleen, I. & Deborah, C. (2004). Scenario-based e-learning design. Performance Improvement,43(1)16-23.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Team Building Project Design and Development Storyboard 1.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
Open Math Module 3 Module 3: Approaches to Integrating OER into Math Instruction Planning Instruction with OER 1.0 Introduction.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
What are Training Paths and how to construct them
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Many definitions exist for instructional design 1. Instructional Design as a Process: 2. Instructional Design as a Discipline: 3.
A community of learners improving our world
Amit Varma Bundhun Resource Person, CODL
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
Module 4 Challenge Engagement by Design.
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
THE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Presentation transcript:

UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009

The aims of this short presentation are to…  … introduce the model of Instructional Design implemented by Univirtual to maximize the effectiveness of its online courses;  … show how practical model is applied to our courses, emphasizing meaning and purpose of the various steps with reference to the planned activities;  … underline the phases that characterize an online working week, to understand its typical structure and organization.

Main Features This trademark has the following features: Specifical and consequential phases; Customized solutions; With this model is possible to foresee and capture a wide range of training solutions.

FOUR-LEAF CLOVER TAXONOMY MODEL Univirtual Taxonomy mixes the theory of social constructivism Bruner with the fundamental characteristic of distance learning of third generation (socio-cognitive). Knowledge become "located" and "distributed" and it is achieved through cooperation and negotiation of meanings. The model is integrated and collects the best indications emerging from previous taxonomies (Bloom, Guilford, R. Gagné, E. Gagné) paying particular attention to social and group interaction activities (Bruner). The model is new because proposes as first a taxonomy for blended training. It is divided into four stages (Information, Laboratory [interaction], Check, Customizing (personalization) and 18 training functions.

Four-Leaf clover Taxonomy ® Margiotta 2006

This first step is characterized by the following training events:  Introduction of the module/unit's learning goals;  Timing of the online work programme;  Arrangement of a short abstract to introduce module/unit's contents;  Provision and linkage to specific glossaries in order to promote acquiring of a specific vocabulary required by the course;  Contextualization of the training path;  Content’s presentation; WHY IT IS IMPORTANT?  Because it represents a first important approach to the content meaning;  Because it outlines the sense of the training path and its complexity;  Because it gives a clear idea of the route to be followed and of the practices that characterize the participation.

Course Presentation What the courseware aims to achieve Abstract content of the module and specific learning goals Propaedeutic tools Learning contents

The laboratory is the second stage of the model, the one designed to improve social interaction. This phase must be understood in two ways: 1. as online activities and as a way to perform the personal knowledge of the course's objects; 2. as a way of social construction of knowledge. In this phase the follow activities are relevant :  questions about key concepts;  specific topics in order to promote discussions;  case studies;  improving the problem solving's capacity. WHY IT IS IMPORTANT?  It represents an important approach to the social construction of knowledge;  It allows a personalization of the learning process;  Throughout the laboratory phase, it is possible to promote an active role in discussions and of course a meaningful approach to knowledge;  It allows the development of a meta-cognitive dimension of learning processes.

The example shows a typical online discussion in the presentation’s forum. This represents a very important area where, starting from team building, it is possible to promote the social construction of knowledge.

This is a typical example where the tutor suggests to the online classroom a topic of a discussion on a specific theme

Evaluation is the third step of the model and it includes three significant educational functions ranging from the knowledge's evaluation to the test of the problem solving capacities. Specifically this phase includes the following actions:  Knowledge evaluation (Contents of Learning or Declarative Knowledge);  Skills assessment (Rules of Problem Solving or Procedural Knowledge);  Examination for the capacity of problem solving (transversal skills) WHY IT IS IMPORTANT?  Because through a systemic way of information's collection it can provide specific answer and compensation procedures;  It allows to set up new scenarios for action;  It makes possible to observe the interaction between all the elements involved in the courseware and if necessary to correct them with a customization process or with a new course set-up.

Evaluation activities play a very important role in the learning experience because they drive students to reflect in different ways on their own learning. Usually the evaluation activities of a module are: -Multiple Choice Questions; -Short Open Questions; -Essay Questions or study case

Self evaluation: thanks to Self-evaluation students can make judgments about their own work and reflect on their strengths and weaknesses.

Open questions: open questions’ aim is to understand the mastery level of the contents.

Essay Questions and Study Case: formative evaluation focuses on the process, collecting continuous feedback from participants in order to improve the contents.

Customization is the fourth stage of the model. It is built on the results collected through the evaluation process. Teachers have the opportunity to customize the learning of each student thanks to the following training activities:  Provision of specific bibliography;  Suggestion of alternative training paths;  Setting up of additional documents and training material. WHY IT IS IMPORTANT? The customization is relevant because it allows to move from a teaching centered approach to one more focused on learning.

Video presentation: the video presentation can be used to deepen particular topics. The integration of different media (audio, images, written text…) maximizes the learning opportunities and may be useful to fix some key concepts. Movie: using film to fix learning's concepts is another fine example of training's customization Readings: The suggestion of further readings is another way to promote the training's customization. Recommended readings can be useful to be used with different levels of knowledge: to promote the study's deepening or to bridge the gap detected.

Monday is the week's day when usually students can download contents to be studied. Each module is arranged as a file or as learning objects (Scorm). In the days from Monday to Friday there is the start up of all the activities, both individual and laboratory. A wide range of the whole activities planned required the interaction within group and tutors inside the online forum. On Saturday is the day on which activities are usually delivered. Deliveries will be evaluated at the end of the module.