2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Transportation Conference August 29-30, 2006, NCTC Rob Draper, Federal Highway Administration Pat Fisher, Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Transportation Enhancement in Oregon Pat Rogers Fisher TE Program Manager Oregon Dept. of Transportation (503)
Trisha White, Director Habitat and Highways Campaign Defenders of Wildlife.
1 M ISSOULA 2012 L ONG R ANGE T RANSPORTATION P LAN U PDATE S EPTEMBER 24, 2012.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Transportation Enhancement Activities Expanding transportation choices, increasing recreation opportunity and access, revitalizing economies.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Designated by US DOT Publication of Draft PFN for Comments - Spring 2013 Initial Designation of the PFN – Fall 2013 National Freight Network Primary Freight.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
Transportation Enhancements: California’s Past, Present, & Future Stephanie M. Stoermer FHWA California Division.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program February 18, 2014.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
Federal MAP-21 Programs 1 Module 7 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) National Historic Trails Workshop, October
Webinar: August 28, Transportation Alternatives Program Webinar: August 28, 2013 Introduction: Shari Schaftlein, Director, FHWA Office of Human.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) International Snowmobile Congress — June
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Federal Transportation Funds for Snowmobile Trails Christopher Douwes Trails and Enhancements Program Manager.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
Innovative Finance for Freight Transportation Jennifer Mayer FHWA Resource Center “Talking Freight” Webinar September 2006.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
SUCCESS OF INDIANA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS Indiana TE Committee Gerald Nieman, INDOT, TE Program Manager Tom Beck, INDOT/Railroad Glenda Seal, INDOT/Seymour.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS. OVERVIEW  The CRTPA coordinates the annual submission of priority project lists (PPLs) to the FDOT for annual funding consideration.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
CTEP – FROM START TO FINISH MDT Engineering Conference Hilton Garden Inn – Missoula, MT February 8, 2007 Mike Wherley David C. Larson LeRoy Wosoba.
Transportation Enhancement Funds Workshop April 19, 2004 MAG Saguaro Room.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
SAFETEA-LU Elderly & Persons with Disabilities (5310) Job Access Reverse Commute (5316) New Freedom (5317)
RALPH COMER TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION January 19, 2010 THE ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTANTS TDOT's Approach to Economic Stimulus Funding:
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Federal Highway Administration programs build partnerships with Pedestrians and Bicyclists.
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) PROGRAM. Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program What is the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program? What is the Transportation.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’’ or ‘‘MAP–21’’ Signed into Law July 6, 2012 Implications for Infrastructure Asset Management, Pavement.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
LPA Certification Riverton, WY November 20, 2014.
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) April 7, 2016.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
Department of Transportation and the Corporation for National and Community Service: Engaging Corps.
TITLE PAGE: Project Title
Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership Primer Welcome
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Federal-aid Highway Program
Presentation transcript:

2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process

Project Selection How Much Money Do I have? What Kind of Money is it? What are the Match Requirements? What projects do you already have commitments to (carry-over projects)?

Project Selection What programs are in place to commit funding to? What Kinds of Projects are Eligible for the Kind of Money that I Have? How do I make sure that I have met all of the requirements for project selection (PP, project eligibility, etc.)?

Project Selection What are your policies regarding distribution of funding to your member agencies? When do you do a Call-for- Projects?

Project Selection How Much Money Do I have? Annual Estimates for 2012 FTIPs: CMAQ from $700,000 to $280 M RSTP from $640,000 to $230 M TE is roughly 10% of the RSTP

Project Selection What Kind of Money is it? There are 89 fund streams listed in SAFETEA Federal Aid programs. MPOs manage about 7 of them (this does not include special circumstance funds e.g. Coordinated Border Infrastructure – which, in CA, is only available to SANDAG).

What are the Match Requirements?  Generally Federal funds have an 80/20 fund split.  Special circumstances the federal portion can go up to 100%.  In CA, for Hwy funds, 88.53% Fed/ 11.47% non-Fed.

Project Selection What projects do you already have commitments to (carry-over projects)? This will decrease you project selection flexibility by decreasing the available funds for new programming. The remaining content will be covered as they apply to the fund streams.

When do you do a Call-for-Projects? Work backwards from September 3, 2012 to include the time for application notice/ submittal/review, project approval, PP, and final programming.

Project Selection Scope: We will concentrate on the big three FHWA funds CMAQ, STP and TE (crossover with STIP). We can talk about RIP funds after the other three if we have time, As far as measure funds; these are specified in your measure expenditure plan and are considered local funds. FTA funds will be discussed in another section. Exempt v non-exempt projects are covered in another presentation.

Project Selection - CMAQ Eligibility : Capital Investment: to establish new or expanded transportation projects or programs that reduce emissions, including capital investments in transportation infrastructure, congestion relief efforts, diesel engine retrofits, or other capital projects. Operating Assistance: limited to new transit services, intermodal facilities, and travel demand management strategies; and the incremental cost of expanding existing transit services. OA is limited to three years Emission Reduction: reductions must contribute to the area’s overall clean air strategy and can be demonstrated by the assessment that is required. Planning and Project Development: Activities in support of eligible projects (e.g., preliminary engineering and FTA Alternatives Analyses). General studies that fall outside specific project development do not qualify for CMAQ funding.

Project Selection - CMAQ Programming Criteria: 1. You must have a standardized, published project selection criteria (PP). 2. The MPO is responsible for the final determination of project eligibility for their region. 3. The selection criteria must contain an emissions benefit analysis (either quantitative or qualitative) (Eligibility).

Project Selection - CMAQ Selection Methods:  100% Competitive  Mixture of Competitive/focused  Project driven  Program Driven  NO FORMULA DISTRIBUTION

Project Selection - RSTP Eligibility: RSTP is the most flexible funding stream of all of the highway money. Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for highways and bridges, any construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other transportation modes Capital costs for transit projects Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways

Project Selection - RSTP Selection Methods : (See 1 & 2 on CMAQ) Population/Roadway miles Pavement Management Program (PMP) Congestion Management Program (CMP) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program/Project Driven

Project Selection - TE Eligibility: This list is exclusive. Only these activities are eligible to be accounted for as Transportation Enhancement activities. They are: 1.Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. 2.Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists. 3.Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites. 4.Scenic or historic highway programs (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities). 5.Landscaping and other scenic beautification. 6.Historic preservation.

Eligibility (cont): 7.Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals). 8.Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). 9.Control and removal of outdoor advertising. 10. Archaeological planning and research. 11. Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity 12. Establishment of transportation museums

Project Selection - TE Selection Methods : (See 1 & 2 on CMAQ) SB 286 TE Prioritization of Conservation Corps Implemented Projects In an effort to increase Conservation Corps participation on Transportation Enhancement projects, the Legislature approved SB 286 (2008, Lowenthal), which directs regional agencies to prioritize TE projects that partner with the Conservation Corps. Caltrans, in consultation with state and local Conservation Corps, CTC, and regional agencies, developed criteria for the prioritization of such projects (dated July 6, 2009). Regional agencies are now required to select TE projects based on the following criteria:

Selection Methods (cont): 1. TE eligible projects whose sponsor is partnering with or has agreed to employ the services of the state or local conservation corps, shall be selected first for funding; 2. After all TE eligible projects described in paragraph (1) have been selected for funding, the remaining eligible TE projects may be selected.

Resources FHWA Legislation, Regulations, & Guidance FHWA Guide to Federal Aid Programs & Projects FHWA Metropolitan Planning FHWA CMAQ Under SAFETEA-LU Final Guidance