1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

Invest in Children Child Care Quality Fund: Accreditation and Literacy
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant: FY13 Planning Summary Presentation January 2012.
1 Inclusive Classrooms and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding April 2, 2012.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) December 2009.
A Guide to Implementation
PORTFOLIO.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Kindergarten Readiness:
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) May 6, 2013.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
1 EEC Board Meeting June 11, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Review of Standards Removal Board Vote Feb 12, 2013.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Primary Years Programme FLIBS PYP: PYP Chair: Sandy Wesson PYP Chair Elect: Rachel Goodnow PYP Secretary: Gayle Baisch Grants Committee: Cynthia Doyle.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
1 Early Education and Care Advisory Council September 20, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) UPDATES.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
New Employee Induction Program
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 Massachusetts’ Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS): Overview and Update.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Revisions Overview
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
World’s Best Workforce Update:
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant

2 Coaching and Mentoring Coaching supports the development of specific skills and practices; it is focused on a performance-based outcome(s)

QRIS and Coaching Quality Rating Improvement Systems (QRISs) commonly offer on-site coaching to help early care and education settings achieve quality improvements and a higher QRIS rating. 3

QRIS Skills and Standards Coaching Benefits 4 Examples of criteria on the MA QRIS that offer educators opportunities to use effective practices and receive feedback from coaches Language and Literacy CBSB 1B.3.1 and FCC 1B.4.1 Educators engage children in meaningful conversations, use open- ended questions and provide opportunities throughout the day to scaffold their language to support the development of more complex receptive and expressive language, support children’s use of language to share ideas, problem solve and have positive peer interactions.

QRIS Skills and Standards Coaching Benefits 5 Interactions ASOST 1B.3.1 Educators provide a variety of activities that support students in developing positive relationships with adults in the program. Leadership CBSB 5B.2.2 Staff are given feedback on instructional practice on a monthly basis FCC 5B.2.1 If FCC has assistance, scheduled meetings each week to ensure Assistant receives feedback

QRIS Skills and Standards Coaching Benefits 6 Family Engagement CBSB 4A.2.1 and FCC 4A.2.5 and ASOST 4A.2.4 Program completes Strengthening Families Self- Assessment and uses data to engage in continuous improvement Environments ASOST 2A.3.1 and FCC 2A.3.1 and CBSB 2A 2.1 Demonstrates quality indoor and outdoor environments

Research on Coaching and Mentoring Child Trends review of the literature on coaching: aimed at the full range of program types Found that coaching is related to an improved observed quality and practices with children positive outcomes for mentors and mentees 3

PAC Coaching Model Developed in the early 1980s in Toledo, OH Jointly managed by local district union and district administrators School districts rely on “Toledo Plan” as their model, adapting it to meet their local needs. 6

PAC Roles Panel: typically assist with decision making and help oversee the program Consultant Teachers (CTs): support and evaluate teachers in the program. CTs provide detailed feedback and support to help their novices meet the standards and they assess their progress 8

Harvard’s Graduation School of Education Review Findings Study highlighted Peer Coaching in seven districts Findings: Although expensive, benefits far outweighed costs Costs include training, materials, stipends to CTs and substitutes for time away from classroom, travel Administrators felt it was a worthwhile investment in teachers Cited the importance of the planning team 9

Planning Team Planning team helps make decisions about How program is structured How to align with standards and other initiatives How to launch successfully How to maintain 10

Rochester Model 60 % of Rochester’s CTs are school- based (in classrooms), working with one or two teachers on top of a full-time teaching assignment Each earns an additional salary stipend of 5% (for one teacher) or 10% (for two teachers) Rochester’s CTs frequently shuttle between the roles of classroom teacher and CT within the same school 11

Rochester Coaching CTs Aspiring CTs apply for positions: complete and submit five letters of reference, participate in interviews, and attend training CTs need to have seven years of experience and they serve for two years Must reapply every two years No limit on how long they can serve 12

PAC K-12 Program Elements Joint labor-management committee (PAR Panel) Expert teachers (often called Consulting Teachers, or CTs) PAR serves as the “induction” program for new teachers and a “support” program for experienced teachers that are having difficulty 7

PAC Elements in MA Design and Development Focus on Birth to Age 8 Framework Includes entire mixed delivery system Teachers of varying skills and experience levels Linked to helping teachers improve their skills and abilities which will enable them to meet criteria on the QRIS Specifically those criteria that enable educators to support whole child development measured by children’s school readiness and academic success Use of an observational tool such as CLASS tool 7

Peer Assistance and Coaching Observational Tool CLASS Helps identify areas in which improvement is needed Will be used to evaluate effectiveness Covers three crucial domains of high quality teacher–student interaction: Emotional Support Classroom Organization Instructional Support 7

PAC in Massachusetts Development Stakeholders including educators, directors and other leaders in the state to replicate Advisory panel to help make decisions about Qualifications and role of consultant teachers (CTs) CT selection process Caseload of CTs Training of CTs Selection of mentees Data collection Evaluation process 13

PACin Massachusetts CT Training Consultant Teachers training will include CLASS training Content Training (QRIS, Educator Competencies, Early learning standards etc) Coach specific training Effective coaching practices and relationship-based coaching training Learning Focused Consultation: Consulting, collaborating and coaching stances to develop colleagues’ capacities to reflect upon practice, generate ideas and increase professional self-awareness. 13

PAC in Massachusetts Timelines Year One: May 2012 through December 31, 2012 Hire consultant to work with EEC Create Advisory (PAR Panel) Decision and Development with input from PAR Advisory Select CTs for Pilot CT Training Select Mentees Pilot begins November 2012 Evaluation process development 14

PAC in Massachusetts Timelines Year Two: January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 Complete CT training Implement Evaluation Process Year Three: January 2014 through December 31, 2014 Gather feedback from pilot program to improve training of CTs and other aspects of PAR model Expand cadre of CTs through recruitment, selection and training Expand pool of possible Mentees 15

PAC in Massachusetts Timelines Year Four: January 2015 through December 31, 2015 Gather Feedback to refine training of CTs and other aspects of PAR model Bring model to scale, including expanding cadre of CTs through recruitment, selection and training 16