Chapter 10 1 Chapter 10. Public Mass Transportation 1. Design rail service in a corridor with respect to station spacing and vehicle capabilities 2. Calculate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Airport Forecasting. Forecasting Demand Essential to have realistic estimates of the future demand of an airport Used for developing the airport master.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) CMT4Austin.org. SOLUTION: Cellular Mass Transit Circulator Routes would converge on each Transit Center.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Uniform Motion Speed & Velocity.
Travel and Transport By Sophie and Annabelle. What are the problems of transport? Some of the problems that we have with transport now is that... 1.Lots.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Vehicle Flow.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Public Expenditure Analysis May 4, 2007 Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment Your presenters: Annie Gorman Hazel-Ann Petersen.
Travel and Transportation © Allen C. Goodman, 2009.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 11 Mass Transit.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
EQ 1: What is motion? How do you know you are in motion?
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
CE 353 Lecture 6: System design as a function of train performance, train resistance Objectives: –Choose best route for a freight line –Determine optimum.
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Recent Evidence on Mass Transit Demand Ian Savage Northwestern University.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Exploring Engineering
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Airport Forecasting NOTE: for HW, draw cash flow diagram to solve and review engineering economics.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Public Infrastructure Management Public Transit. What is public transit? Modes.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Vehicle Flow. Homework Ch 3 # 1,4, 7, 15 Vehicle Flow How do vehicles operate in the system –capacity –speed –headway –density.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
MODULE 4, LESSON 4 Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service.
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Airport Forecasting NOTE: for HW, draw cash flow diagram to solve and review engineering economics.
Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 10 1 Chapter 10. Public Mass Transportation 1. Design rail service in a corridor with respect to station spacing and vehicle capabilities 2. Calculate changes in transit ridership in response to changes in fare or service 3. Measure and compare the performance of public transportation operations 4. Discuss public transportation’s role in addressing certain public issues Chapter objectives covered in CE361: By the end of this chapter the student will be able to: Section 10.5 not covered in this course. Heavy Rail Transit (HRT)

Chapter Transit Modes Objectives of 10.1 Objectives of 10.1 Name different transit modesName different transit modes Explain the niches of different transit modesExplain the niches of different transit modes By the end of this section, the student will be able to...

Chapter Transit Modes Three characteristics of public mass transportation: 1.A common carrier 2.Fixed route and fixed schedule 3.The area served is limited to an urban area or a rural area (Intercity service is called “intercity mass transportation”) NJ Hudson-Bergen LRT NYCMTA Staten Island Ferry Others: Paratransit Long Island RR/Jamaica Sta. JFK Airport

Chapter 10 4 Portland’s Max Portland Airport Portland Downtown Bike racks Light Rail Transit (LRT)

Chapter 10 5 France’s TGV Heavy Rail Transit (HRT)

Chapter 10 6 Japan’s Shinkansen Heavy Rail Transit (HRT)

Chapter 10 7 Shanghai’s Maglev

Chapter 10 8 Japan’s Maglev (test) Japan, France, China, Germany: Their governments invest in public transit. How about the US? Test speed reached 500 kph (313 mph) recently.

Chapter 10 9 Public transport system classified by routing and scheduling types Scheduling (frequency of service) Routing (degree of coverage and access)

Chapter Prof. Vucan Vuchic’s classification BRT Front Runner TRAX

Chapter Munich Augsberg Ulm Karlsruhe Heidelberg Cologne Berlin Dresden Bamberg Visiting public transit agencies in Germany

Chapter Public Transit: Keys to Success Intermodality (transfer from a mode to another mode is simple and easy) Intermodality (transfer from a mode to another mode is simple and easy) Convenient ticket pricing and vending Convenient ticket pricing and vending Multiline coverage of major areas of a city Multiline coverage of major areas of a city Service to passengers Service to passengers Munich

Chapter Public Transit: Keys to Success (continued) Cologne

Chapter Modern Airport-like RR Station Berlin Central

Chapter Designing Rail Transit Line Objectives of 10.2 Objectives of 10.2 Explain the trade-offs available for dealing with accessibility and mobilityExplain the trade-offs available for dealing with accessibility and mobility Determine transit vehicle travel regimes in terms of travel distance and timeDetermine transit vehicle travel regimes in terms of travel distance and time By the end of this section, the student will be able to...

Chapter Designing Rail Transit Line (with respect to station spacing and vehicle capabilities) Transit Vehicle Travel Analysis Goal of providing service: (a) increase access to as many riders as it can, and at the same time (b) Minimize the time it takes to carry passengers from their origins to their destinations. The trade-off to achieve these two conflicting goals becomes: A. Increase the number of stops along a route B. Reduce the number of stops (Increase travel speed) Section 10.2 focuses on Strategy B: B1. Determine the best distance between transit stops on a route to make the best use of the performance characteristics of the transit vehicles assigned to the route B2. Determine the best performance characteristics for transit vehicles assigned to a particular route, given a specified spacing between transit stops on that route

Chapter Trax vs. Commuter Rail (Trade off example)

Chapter FrontRunner in Utah County

Chapter Transit Vehicle Regimes The goal of strategies B1 & B2: Maximize the average operating speed along the route (& at the same time save energy as much as possible). Acceleration, deceleration, and maximum speed are the three key vehicle performance characteristics. Diagram of Five Transit Travel Regimes: Station Standing Time Acceleration & Deceleration: 3-4 mph/s (4.42–5.9 ft/s 2 ) Jerk (Rate of change of accel or decel rate): m/s 3 (3.6– 8.79 ft/s 3 ) Travel Regime Diagram

Chapter Equations for Transit Vehicle Travel Regimes Examine these equations carefully. Eq (shown below) does not contain the constant speed regime. S = s a + s c + s b,c

Chapter Examples 10.1 – 10.3 We will walk through these examples. We will walk through these examples.

Chapter Predicting Transit Ridership Changes Objectives of 10.3 Objectives of 10.3 Define elasticity.Define elasticity. Tell the difference between “elastic” and “inelastic” demand.Tell the difference between “elastic” and “inelastic” demand. Determine elasticity values, such as fare elasticity of transit, service elasticity, etc.Determine elasticity values, such as fare elasticity of transit, service elasticity, etc. By the end of this section, the student will be able to...

Chapter Predicting Transit Ridership Changes Elasticity = (% change in quantity of service purchased)/(% change in price of service) Elasticity = (% change in quantity of service purchased)/(% change in price of service) Transit Elasticity with respect to Fare Shrinkage Ratio = Elasticity The value of the shrinkage ratio is one way of measuring the demand elasticity of transit ridership with respect to fare. When the sign of the shrinkage ratio is negative, the quantity of service purchased decreases. The number of passenger will decrease. A typical value for public transit is – 0.33 (meaning 1% (10%) increase in fare will cause 0.33% (3.3%) decrease in ridership). Pay attention to the sign of the shrinkage ratio

Chapter Mythaca Bus Company case If the value of the shrinkage factor is -0.33,

Chapter Recent study on fare elasticity Fare Elasticity-Bus Services Average (all hours all cities) Fare Elasticity-Bus Services Average (all hours all cities) (apparently greater than mentioned in the textbook). Fare Elasticity - Bus Services Cities/Areas with Population of more than 1 millionless than 1 million All hour average Peak hour average-0.23 Off-peak hour average-0.42 Peak hours Off-peak hours Source: APTA website

Chapter Fare elasticity Fare elasticity = Elasticity of transit ridership with respect to fare. Fare elasticity = Elasticity of transit ridership with respect to fare. Before: $0.75 x 10,000 = $7,500 After: $1.00 x8,750 = $8,750 If revenue will increase, despite a fare increase, the demand is “inelastic,” which is the case above. If revenue will increase, despite a fare increase, the demand is “inelastic,” which is the case above. If revenues will decrease as the fare increases, the demand is “elastic.” If revenues will decrease as the fare increases, the demand is “elastic.” This concept is very important when transit agencies consider fare hikes. In the case above, MBC ridership is fare elastic or fare inelastic?

Chapter Transit Elasticity with Respect to Service Elasticity of transit ridership with respect to service Elasticity of transit ridership with respect to service We will walk through Examples 10.4 & Typical headway elasticities are during peak hours and in the off-peak. How do we express “service”  by headway or frequency

Chapter Performance Measures in Public Transportation Objectives of 10.4 Objectives of 10.4 Evaluate a transit system’s operation using performance measures.Evaluate a transit system’s operation using performance measures. Distinguish longitudinal analysis from peer group analysis.Distinguish longitudinal analysis from peer group analysis. By the end of this section, the student will be able to...

Chapter Performance Measures in Public Transportation Effectiveness (do the right thing) vs. efficiency (doing something well) Effectiveness (do the right thing) vs. efficiency (doing something well) Transit performance measures Need to have a set of performance measures and their criteria to compare the performance level of a transit system with the performance levels of similar systems (of a peer group). For example, ridership is an effectiveness measure, while cost per mile is an efficiency measure.

Chapter Transit Performance Measures - samples Average travel time Average trip length Percent of population within x miles of employment Percent of population that can reach services by transit, bicycle, or walking Percent of transit dependant population Percent of transfers between modes to be under x minutes and n feet Transfer distance at passenger facility Percent of workforce that can reach worksite by transit within one hour and with no more than two transfers Percent of population within access to transit service Percent of urban and rural areas with direct access to passenger rail and bus service Access time to passenger facility Route miles of transit service Route spacing Percent of total transit trip time spent out of vehicle Existence of information services and ticketing Availability of park and ride Accessibility related PMs:

Chapter Mobility related PMs Percent on-time performance Percent of scheduled departures that do not leave within a specified time limit Travel time contour Minute variation in trip time Fluctuations in traffic volumes Average transfer time/delay Dwell time at intermodal facilities Proportion of persons delayed In-vehicle travel time Frequency of service Average wait time to board transit Number of public transportation trips

Chapter Performance measures - samples See Table 10.4 TVM Revenue vehicle miles Ridership Cost/mi Cost/trip Fare box recovery ratio % Labor See Example 10.6

Chapter What’s longitudinal analysis? It’s an analysis method that compares the performance measures of then and now. Used when peers are not available. It’s an analysis method that compares the performance measures of then and now. Used when peers are not available. Must compare performance measures taken under similar conditions. (Before and after analyses must be done in a similar environment, meaning, if the before data were taken in January, after data may need to be taken January of the following year. Must compare performance measures taken under similar conditions. (Before and after analyses must be done in a similar environment, meaning, if the before data were taken in January, after data may need to be taken January of the following year. Review Example It is straight forward. (P )