IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
C and S band BPM system update A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, S. Molloy, C. Swinson 5/25/20151ATF2 Software meeting.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Ron Johnson Beam Position October 29-31, Beam Position Monitors FAC Review October 29-31, 2007 Stripline BPM.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
PEDM Review 12/7/091 Beam Position Monitors William Morse.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM April 20, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status and Plans.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Analogue BPM data analysis Calibration & resolution results.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
C/S-band cavity BPMs A. Aryshev (KEK), S. T. Boogert G. Boorman, F. Cullinan, J. Frisch, A. Heo, Y. Honda, J.Y. Huang, S.J. Hwang, N. Joshi,
Cavity BPM processing and hardware upgrade plans A. Lyapin, S. Boogert, E. Yamakawa.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
Tomoyuki Sanuki, Daisuke Okamoto, Yosuke Honda, Toshiaki Tauchi TB&SGC meeting.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
High resolution cavity BPMs in the context of the European XFEL
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP-BPM Schedule Siwon Jang KNU. IP-BPM Schedule IP BPM schedule –Reference cavity (middle of October) Frequency tuning parts –Electronics (middle.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
STF phase 2 plan H. Hayano, STF phase 2 Accelerator Layout cavities: 2 capture cavities with short ILC-cross-section cryomodule + 26 cavities.
ATF2 Tuning Summary Nov & Dec 2010 Glen White, SLAC 11 th ATF2 Project Meeting, SLAC Jan
BPM for FF test (ATF2) Vladimir Vogel KEK 2nd Nano Workshop, KEK, December 12, 2004.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
High precision phase monitoring Alexandra Andersson, CERN Jonathan Sladen, CERN This work is supported by the Commission of the European Communities under.
1 ATF2 Q-BPM Magnet Movers & 1 st Pulse Calibration Progress from May 7-11 J. May, D. McCormick, T.Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH)
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Philip Bambade, Pierre Barillon, Frédéric Bogard, Selma Conforti, Patrick Cornebise, Shan Liu, Illia Khvastunov Journée PHIL
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
V Review SPARC Diagnostic & Control Status G. Di Pirro On behalf control and diagnostic group.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Diagnostic & Control Status
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
IPBPM test results at the LINAC end
KNU IP-BPM and Reference cavity
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Presentation transcript:

IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU)

11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed frequency X-port: GHz Y-port: GHz Full size : 11cmx11cm (to install IP-Chamber) Light weight: 1 kg (Single cavity) 2 kg (Double cavity)

Results of HFSS simulation Portf 0 (GHz) β Q0Q0 Q ext QLQL τ (ns) X-port Y-port cm AL ver. Output signal for Y-port (11cm AL ver.) 2nm offset ParameterValueUnit q (charge)~ 1.6nC Beam energy 1.3GeV Bunch length 8mm

RF measurement data Portf 0 (GHz) β Q0Q0 Q ext QLQL τ (ns) V_out (uV/2nm) Designed X-port Designed Y-port Double_1 X-port Double_1 Y-port Double_2 X-port Double_2 Y-port Single_1 X-port Single_2 Y-port The double block of IP-BPM was used for November beam test at the end of Linac.

Test end of Linac  Distance between each elements  In this test, we used two BPMs (Double block).  Beam test performed during two shift  The beam position at Low-Q IP-BPM was estimated by using two strip- line BPMs. 313cm154cm 68cm BPM2BPM1 ML2P Strip-line BPM ML3P Strip-line BPM Linac-Chamber For linac test 68cm ZH1P Steering magnet ZV1P Steering magnet ZH2P Steering magnet ZV2P Steering magnet beam

Tested Double block IP-BPM  Made by Aluminum (2kg for double block)

Simplified schematic of new electronics Simplified schematic of the IP-BPM signal processing electronics GHz(X) 6.426GHz(Y) Total conversion Gain: 54dB->35dB To get the more wide Dynamic range at the IP-region

Phase shifter remote control  In November beam test, the phase shifter was controlled remotely at the ATF control room.  The phase shifter was connected to RC LAN plus to control due to digital signal. The LO signal phase was controlled from 0 degree to more than 360 degree. Ethernet Hub ATF Local server PC software RC LAN plus: Signal converter Digital signal Analog signal ATF control room Test region

Results of Nov. beam test  Calibration Run was made under 40 dB, 30 dB, 20 dB attenuation cases. This is to enlarge dynamic range of the electronics, in order not to saturate while sweeping the beam. 20dB 30dB 40dB BPM1 Y-port BPM2 Y-port

Results of Electronics sensitivity  Calibration slope for calibrating the I signal to actual beam position is summarized in Table.  Operation condition: 1.1GeV  ICT monitor 0.2~0.4*10^10 (during beam shift) [uV/nm]w/o20dB30dB40dB BPM BPM Even though the beam orbit was unstable at that time and beam current also unstable, the result values of calibration slope shows too small. (0.17~0.38 during data taking). (14bit ADC noise = 366uV) 14uV/nm= 0.1count/nm 366uV/(14uV/nm) = 26 nm (Limit of Elec.)

The reason of Nov. beam test results  For the Jan. beam test, the electronics total conversion gain was 54dB. In the Jan. beam test, the wrong value of reference cavity calibration factor was used. It make higher sensitivity results.  The actual sensitivity results was 450~270uV/nm. It means we can get the 2nm beam position resolution with wide dynamic range.  Therefore, current total conversion gain of the electronics (35dB) will be modified to 54dB, again. [mV/nm]w/o20dB30dB40dB Y-port Ex. Y-port [mV/nm]w/o20dB30dB40dB Y-port Ex. Y-port The Jan. (2012) beam test resultsThe Jan. (2012) beam test results after re-analysis 1/10 = reference cavity cal. factor

Results of IP-BPM y-port sensitivity At November beam test - IP-BPM sensitivity (For y-port) = [mV/um] (one-port measurements of BPM1) = [mV/um] (one-port measurements of BPM2) - Designed sensitivity = [mV/um] (BPM1) = [mV/um] (BPM2) ICT monitor: 0.36~0.38 *10^10 (at LNE) BPM1 BPM2

Further more works  Preparation list until Apr. install  RF test of reference cavity  Electronics modify Conversion gain should be more higher as before case. Ref. signal detecting system modify  Crystal diode detector calibration check 8472B Crystal Detector - Agilent Technolo gies 8472B Crystal Detector - Agilent Technolo gies

Power divider for Ref. signals  The ref. cavity output is just one port, therefore the output signal should be split to connect LO signal port of each electronics and power detector. Ref. Cavity Power detector LO input ADC Electronics Will be fabricated. 8472B Crystal Detector

Apr. beam test plan  IP-chamber install at the IP-region  Reference cavity sensitivity calibration  Electronics sensitivity check again with IP-chamber  Total conversion gain will be changed to 54dB, again.  BPM sensitivity check at the IP-region with piezo- mover.