Assessing Teachers’ Performance in Newport News, VA Presenters: Saundra C. Boatwright & Susan A. Piland National Conference on New Directions in Teacher.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.

Advertisements

Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.

NNPS Teacher Performance Assessment System The Framework.

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.

Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.

Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model

Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs

Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.

Differentiated Supervision

New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.

Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.

Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.

OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.

Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.

 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.

Literacy Achievement for Secondary Students Exemplary teaching behavior Domains of expertise Anne G Liguori.

Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?

Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.

{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.

CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.

Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.

Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.

Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.

Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.

Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL

Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.

Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.

Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.

Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.

1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.

Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

Align Combine Design.

Personal Growth and Professional Development

Is there a way to increase the critical thinking skills of students?

Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.

Twenty Questions Competency 10.

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Presentation transcript:

Assessing Teachers’ Performance in Newport News, VA Presenters: Saundra C. Boatwright & Susan A. Piland National Conference on New Directions in Teacher Compensation December 7, 2000

NNPS Performance Assessment Goals Define teaching for the 21st century (Phillip Schlechty) Set district standards Maximize fairness and minimize subjectivity Connect teaching with student engagement and learning Expect professional development

Why incorporate C. Danielson’s Framework for Teaching? The Framework offers a standards-based, data-driven method for the assessment of performance.

Performance Assessment Cycle © Susan A. Piland Rubric (Performance Scale) Evidence of Performance Assessment of Performance the standard the data the judgment

RUBRICS… describe both teacher & student performance. Set the standard at four levels (unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, and distinguished) Honor the complexity of teaching (four domains) Facilitate continuous improvement

EVIDENCE… is authentic performance data. Personalizes the rubrics Demands reflection Drives the discussions in assessment conferences Empowers the teacher to lead assessment dialogue

What are special features of the NNPS Teacher Performance Assessment? Teachers As Leaders Agendas for Conferences Support Teams Formative Summative

“Teachers As Leaders” (Dr. Phillip Schlechty) Raises The Framework standards for Leadership Fosters self-directed professional autonomy Is critical to achieving the district mission… “academic success for all students regardless…”

Agendas… discussion points for conferences Minimize surprises Promote preparation Offer security Keep discussion on task Put emphasis on quality of dialogue, rather than paperwork

Support Teams… teachers collaborating on their assessment Meet monthly (2 to 5 teachers) Maintain minutes Define resources needed Share & reflect on evidence Discuss instructional strategies and results

NNPS Teachers’ Beliefs and Values Desire to be treated as Professionals. Appreciate 1-on-1 discussions with evaluator. Feel valued and respected when evaluator prioritizes time for reflective dialogue. Do NOT want responsibility of evaluating their peers. Have grown to respect the ideas and expertise of peers. Appreciate and use peer support.