Regulating for quality in assessment AAIA Conference 2010 Isabel Nisbet 15 September 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An introduction to Ofqual
Advertisements

Employability and Employer Engagement
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Quality management in corporate language training Lincq Workshop November 2013.
NEW STATUTORY REGULATIONS FOR TEACHER APPRAISAL AND CAPABILITY 2012 Mary Higgins, Advisor.
1 Copyright © 2010 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. Introduction to the new specification GCSE Computer Science Paul Varey.
The School Leadership Role
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling and Profiles Sheila Quigley.
Improving functional skills qualifications Bryan Horne Friday 13th February 2015.
GCSE Science Cath Jadhav 15 July Who we are and what we do Independent regulator of qualifications, tests and assessments Established in 2008 Legislation.
Centre Quality Assurance Briefing for AIVs January 2013.
Strategic Leadership of ICT
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
The reform of A level qualifications in the sciences Dennis Opposs SCORE seminar on grading of practical work in A level sciences, 17 October 2014, London.
Reforms to GCSE, AS and A level qualifications September 2014.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
Meeting the Needs of the Customer: to ISO 9001 Standards Michael Donohoe, Operations and Systems Manager (CYQ)
New qualifications, assessment & quality assurance to support the Senior Phase of Curriculum for Excellence.
Overall Teacher Judgements
GCSE mathematics pilot qualifications for 2010 September 2009.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
New Opportunities The new Secondary Curriculum: A curriculum for the future.
Centre Quality Briefing September Agenda topics 1.The Regulatory Framework 2.Centre Monitoring 3.New and Revised Policies.
GCSE and A level reform Phil Carr and Laura Dougan Reform Managers, Ofqual.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Principles for the regulation of e-assessment An update on developments Andrew Boyle Regulations and Standards division QCA.
Helen Groves.  Ofsted’s view of the landsacpe  Main Elements of the Sept 2012 CIF & updates  Implications for Providers emskills.org.uk.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
National Assessment Arrangements – Changing Times Stephen Anwyll, Head of 3-14 Assessment 14 th September 2011 AAIA Conference, Bournemouth.
European Standards and Guidelines – ESG 2015 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Head of Higher Education Evaluation Unit, FINEEC Former Vice-President of ENQA Vi flyttar.
The QCF is dead; long live the RQF Bethany Hughes Senior Manager – Regulatory Policy & Vocational Qualifications Policy.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
Miranda Stephenson Getting to know the reformed GCSEs and new National Curriculum for science.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Assessment Information Evening 17 th September 2015.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Regulatory framework Julie Swan Associate Director, Regulatory Policy and Vocational Qualification Policy.
Vocational qualifications and HE entry in England Jeremy Benson.
AS and A level Reform HE Admissions Seminar 8 March 2016.
AQA’s GCE Science Specifications Presentation to Lancashire Heads of Science Conference 
What makes for good standards in Apprenticeships? Jeremy Benson – Executive Director for Vocational Qualifications Bryan Horne - Associate Director, Standards.
Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
The Future of Functional Skills: The Regulatory Picture Now and Beyond Ian Pursglove, Associate Director, Literacy and Numeracy Qualifications 8 March.
Qualifications Wales Update. -To ensure that qualifications and the qualification system in Wales are effective for meeting the reasonable needs of learners.
Regulation of Statutory National Assessments l. Contents ■Ofqual Responsibilities ■Regulation at GCSE ■The Regulatory Framework □Statutory Objectives.
When local assessment initiatives are turned into national policies: The case of formative assessment in England Gordon Stobart Institute of Education,
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Right grade, first time, on time Cambridge School Conference
UK National Qualifications Framework Stirling Wood, TVET Specialist
European integration of medical education
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Priority areas Teaching School & College Ethos Curriculum Assessment
Monitoring and compliance update
Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven decision making
IDTA level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Wales’ New Qualifications BACH National Annual Conference – March 2019
Presentation transcript:

Regulating for quality in assessment AAIA Conference 2010 Isabel Nisbet 15 September 2010

Summary  Ofqual  Responsibilities for assessments  Reliability  Standards  Our approach in action - GCSEs and A levels - Checking that standards are maintained  Innovation and E-assessment and on-demand testing

Overview Ofqual’s role in relation to qualifications and [National Curriculum] assessments:  encourage and support the development and implementation of [qualifications] [regulated assessments] that give a reliable indication of achievement, and that indicate a consistent level of attainment (including over time) between comparable [qualifications] [assessments]  promote public confidence in [regulated qualifications] [assessment arrangements]

Ofqual’s Reliability Programme “..As the regulator of qualifications in England I believe that it is essential for us to understand better the reliability of assessments in our national systems… Ofqual will undertake an in-depth programme of work – call it a health check – on the reliability of tests, examinations and teacher assessments in this country.” Kathleen Tattersall, May 2008

A perfect assessment? "We have really got to begin to engage with the public in a dialogue about the nature of the examination system. "There's a broad expectation that assessment should be absolutely perfect and accurate, that a mark of 50 is a mark of 50, regardless of who marks, the time at which it is marked and so on. "Would a student have received the same result if she happened to have taken a different version of the examination, on a different day, with a different examiner marking her work?” Kathleen Tattersall, 2008

Reliability  Reliability is an indicator of the quality of an assessment  Reliability work in England has generally been - Isolated - Partial - Under-theorised - Under-reported - Misunderstood  Ofqual’s reliability programme will help to improve the situation

To gather evidence for Ofqual to develop regulatory policy on reliability of results from national tests, examinations and qualifications Aims

Strand 1: Generating evidence of reliability Strand 2: Interpreting and communicating evidence of reliability Strand 3: Developing reliability policy Strand 3a: Exploring public understanding of reliability Strand 3b: Developing Ofqual policy on reliability Programme structure

Work in progress  AQA: The reliabilities of GCSE and GCE components  Cambridge Assessment: The reliabilities of GCSE and GCE components and qualifications  City & Guilds: The reliabilities of vocational qualifications:  Assessment Europe: Quantifying and interpreting component reliability using G-theory analysis  Assessment Europe: Literature review of reliability studies of teacher assessments  TAG Report: Summary, further study and advice  Ofqual: Quantitative investigation of public perceptions using online questionnaire

Reliability – lessons  Concept of “error” misunderstood - Variability doesn’t mean “mistakes”  Public concerns but understanding about use of judgement  Issues around implications for progression and accountability of small differences in marks  Limits to reliability of other methods of assessment too - Pre-university selection tests - Interviews/vivas

Standards – some provocative remarks  Tired old arguments about standards over time  Important new arguments about whether qualifications (academic, professional or vocational) are FIT FOR PURPOSE  Time to challenge: –Unevidenced prejudices » against some qualifications » against some awarding organisations –Urban myths –National inferiority complexes –Unattainable ideals about reliability

Maintaining standards in practice – GCSEs and A levels  Ofqual sets conditions awarding organisations must meet to be recognised – governance; expertise; quality assurance  Ofqual recognises awarding organisations that show they can meet the conditions  Ofqual sets criteria for specific groups of qualifications (eg “GCSE history”)  Ofqual accredits qualifications that meet these criteria  Ofqual makes sure that different versions of the same qualification are comparable  Ofqual issues codes of practice - principles, processes and practices to be followed by organisations developing and delivering GCSEs and A levels  Ofqual makes sure that action is taken in real time to ensure that each set of awards is consistent and fair and that standards are maintained over time

Checking standards in all regulated qualifications  Monitoring the questions set and the marking of examiners  Checking that awarding organisations carry out their roles correctly, through - scrutiny programme - code of practice monitoring programme - audits of awarding organisations  Comparability studies (reviewing qualification standards over time, across organisations and between subjects)  Planned international comparison study  ALL qualifications, selected by risk

Innovation  Ofqual aims to facilitate innovation – e-assessment? On- demand?  Need for valid assessments of 21 st Century learning  What might drive innovation? - Efficiency - Demand - Quality - Changes in teaching and learning - Technological change  Ofqual has published principles to govern E-assessment to support innovation while protecting standards and integrity

Regulatory principles for e-assessment  Validity and reliability  Security  Data integrity  Access to e-assessment  Business continuity and disaster recovery  Use of e-portfolios

The extent of e-marking across Awarding Bodies: 2007  36% of GCSE and A level scripts electronically marked (wide variation across awarding bodies)  Awarding Body trials found: - Reliable - Timely - Scanning and supporting technologies did not fail - Accurate assembly of results and archiving - (Senior) Examiner satisfaction -No extra admin burden on centres  No link to concerns over quality of marking

The big step  From E-marking to E-testing

Over to you  How we can help you - Providing essential information on assessments - Providing information on what we require from those involved in delivering assessments  How you can help us - Give us your view on what assessments should deliver - Help us to make assessments as fair and accurate as possible  Contact us:

Summary  Ofqual  Responsibilities for assessments  Reliability  Standards  Our approach in action - GCSEs and A levels - Checking that standards are maintained  Innovation and E-assessment and on-demand testing

Thank you