Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana www.missouladowntown.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Advertisements

Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Presentation Outline What is a Healthy Neighborhood? Planning Trends and Impacts on Health Planning Tools for Healthy Communities.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Communities In Motion Blueprint for Good Growth Preferred Growth Scenarios March – April 2005.
Capital Financial Plan and Physical Design Framework DRAFT Committee on Grounds and Buildings May 2010.
A POLICY PLAN FOR NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE AND THE SURROUNDING DISTRICT 2013 IDA ACHIEVEMENT AWARD SUBMISSION: PLANNING CATEGORY.
Urban Systems Collaborative #urbansystems April 19, 2012.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Tampa Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Affordable Housing Policies.
WAYNESBORO BROWNFIELDS ASSESSMENT & REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROJECT May 20 th, 2015 Reuse Planning: Environmental (Prime):
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
Center City 2020 Vision Plan Update. Agenda IntroductionMark Hahn Mecklenburg County OverviewHarvey Gantt 2020 Plan Co-Chair Community Engagement Michael.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Why is Downtown Important?. The mission of the Asheville Downtown Association is to be a voice of the downtown community and to promote and support quality.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Advisory Committee Meeting October 1, 2013 – 1 pm to 3 pm.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
Marcy-Holmes Master Plan Update Introduction. Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth A visioning document to guide public/ private growth and land development.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
What Makes a Local Redevelopment Plan Megan Coler Carmen Lethig.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
CITY OF SEAFORD IMPACT & OVERVIEW OF OUR DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Public Open House Thursday, March 19, 2009 TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride Location Study Village of Montgomery, Illinois Public Open House TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride.
SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.
Village of Villa Park Comprehensive Plan Update CPAC Meeting December 2 nd, 2008.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
COG Activity Center Update Climate, Energy, & Environment Policy Committee May 23 rd, 2012.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Ford Site Open Space Work Group An advisory group to the Ford Site Planning Task Force Meeting #1 June 30, 2010.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
C ENTRAL E STUARY P LAN A V ISION F OR O AKLAND’S W ATERFRONT Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND’S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
Stockton Redevelopment Agency August 22, 2006 Agenda Item 8.01.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
Carson City Redevelopment Workshop Office of Business Development.
Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
 Overview of Project  Economic Development Tools  Municipal Management Districts  Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones  Session Review, Q&A.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
The City of Colorado Springs Recognized a Unique and Powerful Window of Opportunity: Linking Expansion of its Knowledge and Innovation Capacity (UCCS)
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan 2040 Mapping Our Future
American Planning Association APHA Built Environment Institute
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Presentation transcript:

Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana

 A comprehensive planning tool to provide framework for your downtown or city center.

 Provide reasonable certainty and predictability for potential investors  Provide direction for positive change  Indicate how much and what type of development is appropriate  Guide day-to-day decision making  Suggest the impact of change over time  Provide visual definite of your downtown  Reduce blight and outlines historic character and preservation  Define obligation of stakeholders

 Future-oriented  Focused on physical development  Geographically inclusive  Designated or permitted land uses  Development of public facilities  Analysis of transportation and circulation patterns

 Survey and analysis of current baseline data  Projections of future growth and change  Development of goals for future growth  Establishment of planning policies based upon goals

 In Missoula:  Downtown Streets Plan  Riverfront Triangle Plan  West Broadway Corridor Plan  Arts & Culture Plan  Northside/Westside Neighborhood Plan  Southside Neighborhood Plan  Champion Mill Site Plan

 Amenities & Streetscapes  Arts & Culture (Entertainment)  Business  Development  Downtown Parks & Open Spaces  Historic Preservation  Parking  Bike/Ped (Trails)  Public Markets & Gathering Spaces  Residential  Safety/Cleanliness  Tourism  Transportation  Urban Design  Vehicles  Wayfinding/Signage

 Define the vision  Direct appropriate growth  Plan for future development  Draw public and private investment to downtown  Draw community interest and ownership  Improve efficiency and effectiveness of downtown organizations  Maintain and improve character and experience  Improve marketing position  Enhance quality of life for all

 Identify Stakeholders & Opinion Leaders  Define Elements of Your Plan  Land Uses Retail Residential Office Arts & Entertainment Governmental Educational Medical & Institutional  Riverfront Development  Historic Preservation  Parking  Parks, Trails & Recreation  Public Spaces, Markets

 Urban Design & Streetscapes Sidewalks Street Furnishings & Landscaping Street Lighting Signage & Wayfinding  Infrastructure Pedestrian Circulation Vehicular Circulation Technology Utilities  Design Guidelines  Market Analysis  Redevelopment Opportunities  Business Recruitment & Retention  Tourism Development  Implementation Strategies, Costs & Timelines

 In Missoula  Funds for Planning = $450,000  Fundraising = 96 contributors  Lead Organization = Downtown BID  Development of Steering Committee & Technical Advisory Committee  RFQ Process = 34 Firms  RFP = 17 of 34 invited  Interviews = 6 Firms  Successful Team = Crandall Arambula of Portland, Oregon + 4 Secondary Firms  12 months = Successful Firm Selection

 In Missoula  12 Months  Four Public Workshops  35 Public Presentations  85 Stakeholder Meetings  1,200 Individual Attendees

 Complete streets, sidewalks and bikeways  Safe places  Services and destinations within ¼ mile  Trails and connectedness  Access to parks, recreation sites & green spaces  Vital mixed-use city centers  Well-designed density  Appropriate mix of housing that is affordable  Opportunities to reduce vehicle miles traveled  Access to mass transit  Green buildings and design

 Base Map & Written Overview of Existing Conditions  Overview of Opportunities & Constraints  Potential Land Use & Circulation Options  Draft Build-Out  Community Balloting  Summary of Preferences

 Strategies for Development  Transportation System  Parking Development & Management  Retail Recruitment & Retention  Housing Development  Employment Development and Retention  Implementation Methodology  Regulatory Needs & Implementation  Approval

 Downtown Organizations  Missoula Downtown Association  Downtown BID  Missoula Parking Commission  Missoula Redevelopment Agency  Economic Development Organizations  Planning Board  City Council  County Commission  Other Organizations  Housing  Tourism  Transportation

 Mission Pillar for MDA with VP  MP Implementation Team  All Stakeholders Responsible  Each component taken up by different organizations  Strategic Advocacy  Front and center at all times  Annual Reports to Council & Others

 A good, solid understanding of where the future of Downtown Missoula is headed.  A guiding tool for decision-making that helps our organization understand what we will and will not take up.  More investor and developer inquiries than ever before.  A better understanding of roles and responsibilities for many entities and a road map to get there.  Predictability & community awareness.

Linda K. McCarthy Missoula Downtown Association