Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Purpose : To create a fail-safe system of literacy so that all students have equal access to a standards based curriculum Result: Joyful, independent readers,
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 1 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 1.
Rachel German Mar. 13, 2013 INTERVENTION REVIEW: READING IN K-2.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 3 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 3.
Using the PMER &PMBR Overview of Progress Monitoring and the assessments available 1
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 4 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 4.
A Review of Instructional Methods in Reading (Based on the NRP Report summary by Shanahan) Shanahan, T (2005). The National Reading Panel Report: Practical.
Developing Literacy in English- language Learners: Key Issues and Promising Practices Diane August David Francis Claude Goldenberg Timothy Shanahan.
Teaching Reading Comprehension in the Middle School
Assisting Struggling Readers and Writers: Using Evidence-Based Resources to Support Adult Learners Michigan Conference 2014 Kathy Houghton-- LINCS.
Report of the National Reading Panel TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Differentiating Instruction: Planning with the 2/3 Team.
Case management – building student achievement and teacher capacity Robert Dunn November 1, 2012.
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Ten Foundations of Literacy Success Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago.
Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Georgia March, 2004.
Adolescent Literacy Peggy McCardle, Ph.D., MPH National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH Archived Information.
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Struggling Adolescent Readers Sharon Eric Melissa David.
REWARDS In the Trenches Sycamore Elementary School K-5 School Enrollment: 335 and growing Free and Reduced Lunch Percentage: 27% 98% Caucasian.
Staying Current in the Changing World of Reading: Suggestions for Busy Administrators Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 1: Rationale and Discussion Formats Cynde Snider.
Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Professor and Director, School Psychology Program National Louis University, Skokie, IL Evidence-Based.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Maine Department of Education 2006 Maine Reading First Course Session #12 Fluency Instruction.
Case Study Presentation
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
THE BIG PICTURE “Teaching Reading Sourcebook, 2 nd Edition” Jana L. Jones June 3, 2009.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Get Ready to Huddle! Discover Intensive Phonics (4 th - Adult) Huddle 2 nd Tuesday of each month at 2 pm MT Please Call Passcode #
Balanced Literacy Training
ABE/ASE Transitions Academy Virtual Session Central, Coastal, & South GREAT Centers January 29, 2011 Reading Instructional Strategies Presenter: Barbara.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
1 Effective Interventions for Struggling Readers Comprehension: The Essence of Reading Dr. Melissa Comer Tennessee Tech University.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.
FCRR Reports: A Resource for Selecting Reading Programs
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
© 2013 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency Using Collaborative Instructional Log information to develop an Individual Transition Plan Pamela.
A Parent’s Guide to Balanced Literacy. Balanced Literacy is a framework designed to help all students learn to read and write effectively.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
Fountas and Pinnell Resources Christ Our Holy Redeemer 2015.
GOING DEEPER WITH INDEPENDENT READING AND FURTHER THAN INDEPENDENT READING.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
1 Secondary Content Area Reading An introduction.
Schoolwide Reading: Day Instructional Priorities
DEVELOPING READING FLUENCY A Project LIFT Training Module CORE - Center at Oregon for Research in Education Module 4 – Part 2.
Reading/ English Language Arts Curriculum of the Woodland Hills School District Presenter: Celeste Covington, Curriculum Coordinator *Information based.
IMPLEMENTING RTI Critical Features: Practices & System Components.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Literacy In the Content Areas
Strengthening Reading Instruction at all Levels Using EBRI
Emergent & Early Readers
Creating an Active Learning environment
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Model Demonstration Projects
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 1: Rationale and Discussion Formats Cynde Snider.
Presentation transcript:

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 CHOOSING THE BEST INTERVENTION FOR YOUR STUDENTS 4.3.1

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Session Overview  Unit 3, Session 1 Questions:  What should your approach to literacy intervention include?  How do you evaluate the programs & tools that exist to assist in intervention?  Unit 3, Session 1 Objectives:  Understand how to choose effective literacy interventions  Be exposed to existing literacy programs that can assist students with specific deficits 3

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Warm-Up: Student Literacy Assessment  Complete the questionnaire to decide which literacy skills are weakest for your students. 4

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Intervention Decisions  Use of a prescribed program with fidelity to prescribed instruction? OR  Flexible use of a prescribed program’s resources in correlation with teacher-generated materials? OR  Unique, individualized teacher-generated materials? 5

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Selecting a Literacy Program  Consider 4 elements: 1.Program’s target audience: Does it focus on struggling readers? Adolescents? 2.Strength of literacy focus: Does its vision match the goals of your TI plan? 3.Resources: Are there adequate instructional & assessment materials for teacher & student? 4.Research-base: Is there evidence to support reliability? 6

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Evaluating Literacy Programs  Does the program offer the school…  Clear goals and benchmarks?  Professional development opportunities?  Assessment tools?  Motivation to read?  Technology components?  Cross-curricular application?  Flexibility of use? 7

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Discussion: Available Programs  What resources, materials, and/or programs already exist within the school building to aid literacy interventions? 8

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 What is Decoding? 9

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Decoding Strategies  Knowledge of individual phonemes  Combination of phonemes to make sounds  Phonetic patterns  Syllable types  Syllable blending  Irregular patterns  Prefixes, suffixes, endings, and roots 10

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Decoding Program Examples  Lindamood-Bell: Phonemic & orthographic awareness  Intensive, one-on-one or group  Assessment-driven  Print & web resources  Professional development opportunities  Significant research base 11

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 What is Fluency?  Reading orally with…  Appropriate speed  Pronunciation accuracy  Proper expression 12

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Fluency Strategies  Provide corrective feedback through…  Modeling reading  Repeated reading  Partner reading  Reader’s theater  Recorded reading 13

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Examples of Fluency Program  Read Right:  1978, basis in neurology  Small group modeling & practice oral reading  900+ book library & student management systems  Assessment & progress monitoring tools  Intensive teacher training offered  Frequently replicated, rarely externally studied 14

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 What is Comprehension?  The ability to discern meaning from text  Stated or implied…  Main ideas  Details  Purpose  Audience  Increasingly important at the secondary level because of the demands of content curriculum. 15

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Comprehension Strategies  Effective pre-reading  Learning & applying background knowledge  Assessing text structure  Answering questions  Taking active reading notes  Summarizing  Visualizing a text  Creating questions  Critical thinking & analysis 16

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Example of Comprehension Program  Disciplinary Literacy: Professional development program devised by the Institute for Learning at the University of Pittsburgh  How to read/think in each discipline  Rigorous teacher training course  Administrative guidance skills  Direct application to lesson plans  No packaged student materials  No research base 17

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 What is Vocabulary?  Knowing the definitions of words that are essential to the comprehension of a text. 18

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Vocabulary Strategies  Prefixes, suffixes, endings, and roots  Context clues  Memorization through repetitive practice  Visualization  Etymology  Application to content 19

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Example of Vocabulary Program  Vocabulary Improvement Program: Devised for Spanish ELLs, but applied to all students  Text-based 18-week curriculum  Context clues, morphology, cognates  Books & assessment tools  Available Professional Development, but thorough manual is enough  Several positive longitudinal studies 20

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Program Summary  Many programs address several areas of literacy at once  Program choice depends on student need & school plan 21

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Important Considerations  Level of reading independence  Areas of greater deficit  Age/maturity level of student  Interests (as related to reading motivation) 22

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Wrap-Up  Things to Remember:  Literacy interventions should address reading holistically, but focus on areas of student weakness.  Evaluate and research programs before deciding on which one to implement.  Keep student needs in mind when choosing programs.  Be flexible and patient. 23

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 Wrap-Up Activity  Use the evaluation of literacy programs in Shanahan (2005) to examine one program and evaluate its effectiveness for the student indentified in the warm- up activity. 24

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 For Next Time  Keep in mind…  The student whose profile you used during the warm-up activity  The program you evaluated during the wrap- up activity  Evaluate how effective the program would be for this student. 25

Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 References Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Murray, C. S., & Kosanovich, M. (2008). Effective instruction for adolescent struggling readers: A practice brief. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Denton, C, Bryan, D, Wexler, J, Reed, D, & Vaughn, S. (2007). Effective instruction for middle school students with reading difficulties: The reading teacher’s sourcebook. University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., and Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A Practice Guide (NCEE # ). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from Shanahan, C. (2005). Adolescent literacy intervention programs: Chart and program review guide. Retrieved from Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 3, 290 