1 Presentation from public consultation meetings held 21 April – 1 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Green Growth, Green Economy and the SEEA 17 th London Group Meeting Stockholm, Sweden September 2011.
Advertisements

Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
Overview of Environment Agency Decommissioning and Clean up programme – delivering Nuclear site restoration Peter Orr, decommissioning and clean up programme.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Victoria’s Towards Zero Waste Strategy and Waste Management Reform SA Local Government Waste Forum 10 February 2006 Jenny Pickles Manager Strategy & Regional.
NDIS: Preparedness Now and Going Forward Griffith University Symposium December 2014.
High Level Sub-regional Consultation on Advancing Action on Short Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP) in Southeast and Northeast Asia 19 August 2014, Bangkok,
Why collect organics? FACTSHEET 1 Food and Garden Organics Best Practice Collection Manual.
Garma Festival of Traditional Culture Tom Calma Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner 7 – 8 August 2008 Indigenous Climate.
EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.
Implementing ESD in Major Infrastructure Projects Jo Moss - Senior Principal.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Derek Eaton Division of Technology, Industry & Economics Economics & Trade Branch Geneva, Switzerland “Designing the Green Economy” Centre for International.
Sustainable Nova Scotia An Overview FMI February 20, 2008.
Overview of Printing Industries Environmental Initiatives Presentation by Hagop Tchamkertenian Manager, Industry & Commercial Policy Printing Industries.
Resource Recovery Legislation Dave Gordon MWA Spring Workshop May 2015.
Somerset County Council Climate Change Strategy Abigail Stretch Sustainable Development Officer.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
Responding to a changing climate Tasmanian Climate Change Office Department of Premier and Cabinet.
Applying the Federal Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation Regulatory Craft in Nova Scotia Conference 2007 Halifax, Nova Scotia November 20, 2007.
WHAT’s NEXT 15 TH OCTOBER DAVID CARTER PRESIDENT PACKAGING COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND ACCORD? AFTER THE PACKAGING.
One Land – Many Stories: Prospectus of Investment Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities December
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Reforms to Victoria’s native vegetation permitted clearing regulations.
Kent Local Nature Partnership – realising the value of nature.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Department of Planning and Community Development Corporate Plan: Government priorities we contribute to Building friendly, confident and safe.
Experiences and Problems with the climate change levy in the UK from a political point of view Sue Doughty MP Liberal Democrat Shadow Minister for the.
Screen | 1 Support for Waste Reduction in South Australia Vaughan Levitzke Acting Chief Executive Zero Waste SA.
CSR Summit – Belief / Action / Results Scott Delzoppo October 31, 2007.
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Financing climate-friendly projects in the Balkan region DAC PROJECT CAPACITY BUILDING IN BALKAN COUNTRIES IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE Prepared.
Retro-fitting Commercial Buildings A Financing Perspective Date: April 2011 Prepared by: Carbon Solutions Group.
Environment (Wales) Bill Legislation to sustainably manage Wales’ resources.
Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Policy TIANA NAIRN November 08.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Low Emission Strategy for Oxford Building on successful Partnership working between Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council following recent.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Mining Industry Response Presented by Mr N Lesufi Ms S Mudau.
Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Policy TIANA NAIRN March 2007.
SPC Presentation 24/06/15. National Policy- A Resource Opportunity “ local authorities undertaking their waste management planning responsibilities, guided.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Financing Eco-Innovation: A critical perspective on the Austrian experience of financial support programmes Wolfram Tertschnig Federal Ministry of Agriculture,
Closing the loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
AUSTRALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION. Local Government’s Role in Fostering National Productivity and Innovation Mayor Troy Pickard, President Australian.
Research Councils UK and the research funding landscape Name Job title Research Councils UK.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
The National Framework for Waste Management in Norway Conference on Waste Management, Sibiu, 3-4 November 2009 Barbro Thomsen, Senior Adviser.
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
UK Climate Policy.
Closing the loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
The European Strategy for Circular Economy – Plastics Strategy and revised Waste Legislation Joanna Drake – Deputy Director-General DG ENV, European Commission.
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
INNOVATION DEALS: A NEW APPROACH TO REGULATION
Presentation transcript:

1 Presentation from public consultation meetings held 21 April – 1 May 2009

Overview  November 2008 Australian environment ministers agreed to develop a national waste policy to provide a coherent, efficient and environmentally responsible approach to waste management in Australia  The Australian Government is leading the process  A taskforce has been formed in the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts to consult widely and develop a draft national waste policy

The last statement of national waste policy  1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) agreed by Council of Australian Governments (COAG)  Included national approach to waste minimisation and management “To improve the efficiency with which resources are used and reduce the impact on the environment ofwaste disposal, and to improve the management of hazardous wastes, avoid their generation and address clean-up issues.”

Since 1992…  All Australian governments have introduced a range of legislative and policy instruments for waste management and resource recovery which work towards COAG’s objectives  The evolution of policies, legislation and programs across jurisdictions over the last decade or more has resulted in a diversity of approaches across Australia

State and territory role (Please note, further state/territory specific information can be found at the end of this presentation)  All States and Territories have waste strategies and legislation to protect the environment and conserve natural resources  A wide variety of measures have been adopted

 A lot has changed institutionally, socially, economically and in our environment  Sustainability needs increasing –Climate change –Water scarcity and quality –Energy conservation  Seamless National Economy (COAG 2008)  Time to consider where next with national waste policy The 1992 COAG agreement still stands but..

Waste generation is increasing…  Waste generation up by 28 % 2002/03 to 2006/07 - from 32 to 41 million tonnes  Even with the significant increase in recycling - 49% of the waste we generate is diverted into resource recovery activities (2008 Hyder Report)

 Is this level of generation acceptable - how do we decide?  How can (and should) we address this level of waste generation?

Recycling and disposal rates per waste sector in (kilo tonnes) From Waste and Recycling in Australia, Hyder Consulting, 2008 (p. 3)

Predicted growth in generated waste by sector to 2020 From Waste and Recycling in Australia, Hyder Consulting, 2008

Contribution of waste to economy WasteResource Management sector (Source: ABS ) recovery sector 2006 (Source: Australian Council of Recyclers 2009) GDP $1.3 billion (0.2 %) $11. 5 billion (1.2 %) Jobs14,00038,600

Local government role (Please note, further state/territory specific information can be found at the end of this presentation)  Important role as –direct service provider –purchaser of waste services –contributor to aggregated approaches to waste management

Australian Government role  Commonwealth has responsibilities for  international agreements  specific legislation  participation in national activities through the Environment Protection & Heritage Council (EPHC)

National action so far…  Commonwealth activities under international agreements and specific legislation  Regulatory action by all jurisdictions through national environment protection measures (NEPMs) under the NEPC Act  Activities by all jurisdictions under the banner of the EPHC  Voluntary action by business and community organisations

Solutions – where and how to intervene?  How can Australia better capture the value in waste?  What mix of incentives and regulation are needed for the waste management and resource recovery sectors  How can this stimulate innovation, jobs and deliver good environmental outcomes ?

What do we want to achieve? A policy that will:  clearly articulate the objectives of waste management and the respective roles of governments  set out the basis for collaboration between jurisdictions  provide the basis for effective and efficient approaches to domestic waste issues

What do we want to achieve? A policy that will:  ensure that waste management remains aligned with Australia’s international obligations, including the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes  complement the Commonwealth’s approach to climate change and sustainability

Potential benefits  Stimulate economic activity and innovation from our growing waste stream  Create jobs  Improved sustainable management of our resources and materials  Greater transparency and certainty for business and the community  Simplified waste management approaches across Australia

Potential benefits  Reduced regulatory and cost burden on business  Greater awareness of waste related issues and potential solutions  Pursuit of collaborative action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save energy and water  Capacity to monitor performance of key waste and resource recovery indicators at a national level

Policy development timeline 7 AprilConsultation Paper released 28 April – 1 MayPublic meetings & a stakeholder workshop 13 MaySubmissions close 22nd MayEPHC Meeting – discuss future directions NovEPHC Meeting – agree a national waste policy

How can you contribute?  Share your ideas, insights, knowledge and information at this session.  Make a submission on the national waste policy by 13 May –The consultation paper poses a range of questions to help frame the issues –Send submissions or refer queries to –More information is available at:

22 State, territory and local government roles

State role in Victoria   This diagram summarise the roles and of the state government agencies involved in waste management in Victoria.

Local government role in Victoria   Local governments play an important role in waste management in Victoria in the following ways: – –As service providers (either directly or via contractors) – –As landfill operators (most often in rural and regional Victoria) – –As contributors to best practice approaches to waste management via Regional Waste Management Groups (rural and regional Victoria) or the Metropolitan Waste Management Group (in Melbourne).

State role in NSW   The role of the NSW government is to ensure a healthy and clean environment by reducing impacts on the community and the environment of waste and waste related activities and ensuring the efficient and effective use of resources (energy, water, materials).   NSW does this through a comprehensive regulatory framework and through innovative tools and programs that aim to mitigate impacts from waste disposal, minimise resource use, increase resource recovery and ensure the appropriate disposal of harmful waste.   Regulatory measures include: – –State-wide planning controls – –Licensing of waste and resource recovery premises and facilities – –Providing clear guidelines on waste classifications and exemptions to assist with resource recovery – –Tracking of hazardous waste – –Collection of a waste and environment levy on waste going to landfill in the regulated areas – –Collection and reporting of waste related data – –Prosecution of littering and illegal dumping

State role in NSW   NSW also runs a broad range of waste-related programs, which are aimed at achieving the targets in the state’s Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy.   Examples of programs include: – –Improving resource recovery infrastructure – –Gathering information to guide priority setting and investment – –Trials of new approaches and recycled content materials – –Working with industries on product stewardship initiatives – –Grants for Councils on litter and illegal dumping and a suite of other programs for Councils – –Providing chemical clean-out services for households – –Support for businesses to tackle waste – –Government leading by example through its Sustainability Policy and Waste Reduction and Purchasing Policy – –Sustainable Schools program – –Aboriginal clean up grants

Local government role in NSW  Local Government is primary interface between community (households, businesses) regarding waste management services.  Local Government very influential regarding behaviour change, effective waste management / recycling practice.  Local Government has a great deal of “purchasing power” which can impact waste and sustainability outcomes.  Local Government deals with a wide variety of types of wastes, not just domestic: organic (food and garden), inert, packaging, e- waste, hazardous, home administered clinical, public place, commercial, industrial, illegally dumped waste.

  Local Government operates to best of ability at “end of pipe”, with a limited ability to influence volumes and types of waste that come into the system.   Local Government is firmly committed to the principles of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR).   It’s not just about recycling   Local Government waste management is increasingly being used to raise revenue through levies, which should be applied back to waste / environmental initiatives. Local government role in NSW Supportive of a national waste policy, one that delivers

State role in WA   Waste Authority role   Department of Environment and Conservation role   The Waste Strategy: – –Better landfill – –More recycling – –Fostering alternative waste treatment

State role in WA   Tools available – –Funding – Strategic Waste Initiative Scheme; Community Grants Scheme; Regional Funding Program; – –Partnerships, education, information – –Landfill levy – –Regulation in some areas   Tools we lack – –Regulatory tools for product stewardship   Look to the national level for this

Local government role in WA  All Australian governments have introduced a range of legislative and policy instruments for waste management and resource recovery which work towards COAG’s objectives

State role in SA   ZeroWaste SA provides leadership to define policy settings for waste-resource recovery   State Waste Strategy – –Mid term review against Strategy – –Draft strategy being prepared   Five key strategies – –Foster sustainable behaviour – –Avoiding waste to landfill – –Establish effective recovery systems – –Enact policies – –Encourage cooperation   Regulatory (operational and policy) focus by EPA   Draft Environment Protection Policy   Specific reform work for resource recovery sector – –Waste to urban fill; refuse derived fuel; waste to soil enhancer; stockpile management   Regulatory function – state and national requirements (ie NEPMs)

State role in QLD   The Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management is the lead Government department for waste management in Queensland.   Current waste management framework: – –Environmental Protection Act 1994 – –Environmental Protection Regulation 2008 – –Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Policy 2000 – –Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation 2000

State role in QLD   Where is Queensland up to? – –Public discussion paper released in October 2007 – –Consultation summary released in April 2008 – –Annual publication of State of Waste and Recycling Report – –National Packaging Covenant program funding and enforcement of NEPM provisions, including Public Place Recycling – –Internal and external stakeholder working groups established to begin work on definitions – –Department of Public Works Whole-of-Government Recycling Policy for Buildings and Civil Infrastructure   Considerations include… – –New waste strategy – –Strengthening the regulatory framework, including increased regulation and enforcement – –Mechanisms to address data gaps – –Improved management of priority wastes   No waste levy is proposed for Queensland at this stage

Territory role in ACT   TAMS manages waste operations in the ACT   DECCEW manages the policy aspects of waste management.   Recycling has increased from 42% in 1996 to 74% in 2008, primarily from households, and the construction sector.   Waste to landfill has decreased from 252,000 tonnes in 1996 to 207,000 tonnes in 2007/2008.   ‘No Waste by 2010’ is due for renewal.   Opportunities exist in:   commercial and industrial sectors   Organic material   E-waste