Introduction Larger streams and rivers in the Piedmont, Southwestern Appalachians, Ridge and Valley, and parts of the coastal plain ecoregions of Alabama.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Studies Mr. Skirbst Science Topic 28.
Advertisements

Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2015 Field Season.
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2012 Field Season.
Volunteer Monitoring Aquatic Macroinvertebrates. Why Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Makes Sense  Helps communities make informed decisions and improve.
Standard Operating Procedure WWSOP04001 Effective Date: 04/01/2013 KENTUCKY WATERSHED WATCH LOW GRADIENT STREAM HABITAT ASSESSMENT.
Weirs and Canal Intakes By: Nell Kolden and Taylor Barnett Thursday April 12, 2012 CIVE 717.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
River Studies. Outline of Events During your river field work you will be visiting two different sites in the lower course of the river. At each site.
Rapid Bioassessment for Volunteers SALMON RIVER WATERSHED.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility DRAFT Module 4: Water and Biodiversity Unit 2: Assessing Biodiversity.
Sampling diatoms from running waters 3: Sampling macrophytes Martyn Kelly and Marian Yallop © The DARES consortium.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
The Use of Benthic Macroinvertebrates to Assess Water Quality in an Urban WV Stream Laura Canton and Thomas Ford, PhD Concord University Brush Creek ~Originates.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Stream Sampling Assessing water quality through the collecting of macro-invertebrates found on woody debris.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Vegetation Transects San Pedro Creek Study.
Alabama’s Water Quality Assessment and Listing Methodology ADEM QA Workshop February 13, 2006.
Soil Testing Methods Chapter 8.
FIELD METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY GEOS 3110.
Monitoring and Assessment for Watershed Plans November, 2007 Estimating Monitoring Costs.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 3 – Hydrologic Assessment.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Standards and Assessment Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) Sampling Method October 2012.
Discharge Measurement Concepts September 2012 – Glen Hess,TESNAR, Oregon (Many slides from USGS Surface Water Field Techniques May 2008 Class)
A performance-based system (PBS) approach is a process that can be used to measure quality control characteristics of various aspects of field sampling.
Central Valley Regional Data Center Field Data Entry Training.
Relationship between Water Flow and Animal Size. Variables Control variables: Water depth, river bed substrate composition, light intensity, water temperature.
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
Nutrient impact experiment. Activity Learning intention: - Create a model nutrient flow between land and water Success criteria: -Read about the transfer.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Swimmer’s Itch Survey 2015 Volunteer Sampling Protocols.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Sources Quantities/ Flow rates Stream types Chemistry Temperature Habitat Kimmins 1996.
Basinwide Visual Estimation Technique BVET
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
NSW Water Bug Survey Gunnedah High School Year 8 Science 1 & 2 with Miss Scholberg & Miss Feodoroff.
Group members: Neely Alison Tre Darin Chris Jordan Sante.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling. Sampling -WHAT All available invertebrate taxa in the entire 200 foot stream reach -WHERE All available habitats in.
What is the Bio health of Skunk creek R.M. 0.1? Raymond Hoekstra Forks high school What is the bio health of skunkcreek at R.M. 0.1? If I test the macro.
Measuring velocity profiles above different substrates on the Glinščica stream Maja Koprivšek 1, Mitja Brilly 1, Mihael Jožef Toman 2 1 University of Ljubljana,
Sampling Biodiversity Using macroinvertebrates
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
Additional Primary Headwater Habitat Stream Parameters.
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
Biological Health Inquiry (What is the health at Dry Creek 0.8?) Justine Jangula Skills Center Biological Health can be determined by catching macro-invertebrates.
Gennaro Cioffi. Field evidence for rapid downstream fining of river gravels through selective transport Ferguson, R.I, Hoey, T., Wathen, S. and Werrity,
Criteria Measure temperature (⁰C), pH, dissolved oxygen (mg/L), electrical conductivity (uS/cm), and turbidity (NTU) Cost
Standard Operating Procedure WWSOP03000 Effective Date: 11/01/2015 KENTUCKY WATERSHED WATCH BIOLOGICAL STREAM ASSESSMENT High Gradient.
TITLE OF YOUR POSTER GOES HERE Student Names go here Science And Math Institute, Tacoma, Washington Abstract Introduction MethodsMethods Continued Discussion.
Comparison of Two Artificial Cover Object Grid Densities for Sampling Terrestrial Salamanders JohnRyan A. Polascik and Brian P. Mangan King’s College,
Biology October 6, 2016 Class: Post River Study Homework: Test on Water properties, Water cycle, Macroinvertebrates, Watershed Next week.
HYDROLOGY Lecture 7 Measurements
4. How much litter at sea? Rabat, 8-13 september 2014
Diversity of Life – Activities 1, 4, 6 & 8
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Macroinvertebrates Sampling
Testing water quality through Bio-Assessment
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
EVPP 110 Lab Freshwater Streams 1-2 Diversity of Life 12
Using Dichotomous Keys
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
What are we going to do at the field trip?
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
The Macroinvertebrate World
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Larger streams and rivers in the Piedmont, Southwestern Appalachians, Ridge and Valley, and parts of the coastal plain ecoregions of Alabama are characterized by large but relatively shallow riffles separated by long, non-wadeable pools and runs. Prior to 2010, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) used its Intensive Multi-habitat Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment (WMB-I) protocol to sample a 300-foot reach established in shallow riffle and shoreline areas of these stream types. In 2010, a non-wadeable macroinvertebrate sampling protocol was developed and implemented to increase sampling reach length for collection of more representative samples from non- wadeable rivers and streams (Figure 1 and 3). In general the criteria are >70mi 2 in area, >50ft wide, and >3.5ft. in depth. For the field seasons, ADEM has conducted a total of seven non-wadeable macroinvertebrate bioassessments. ADEM’s sampling period has not been determined. Samples have been collected during both our “normal” sampling period (May-June), as well as later in the year (July- October) due to inability to complete all sampling by the end of June. Total reach length for the non-wadeable protocol is 500 meters, and total area sampled is approximately 54ft 2. This is a slightly larger area than is sampled as part of our WMB-I bioassessment (45ft 2 ). An optimal crew consists of four members; however sampling can be successful with a two person crew. Sampling time with a four member crew is approximately 3-4 hours, but with a two person crew sampling may take as long as 6-8 hours. Equipment and SuppliesMethods Transects and bank sampleability Sampling is conducted within a 500 meter reach of the stream and consists of six transects 100 meters apart. Transect one is usually the downstream most transect and six is usually the upstream most transect (Figure 2). The latitude and longitude of the first and last transect are recorded on the field sheet (see handout). Samples are collected using two boats, with two crew members in each boat. While traveling upstream, one boat collects all samples on the right bank and the other boat collects all samples on the left bank. Both boats use a GPS to measure the 100 meter distance between transects while traveling upstream. One bank is sampled at each transect. In general, the bank sampled alternates between transects. Exceptions are made if conditions at the bank prevent collection of a representative sample. Each bank is sampled an equal number of times in the 500 meter reach to reduce bias (Figure 2). Collection of WMB-I Samples Only one bank (the bank with the most productive habitat) is sampled at each transect. Six samples are collected at each transect, and the number of samples collected from each habitat reflects the availability of each habitat. Currently, each sample is stored in a separate container. All six samples are collected within ±5 m upstream and downstream of a transect, if practical. Samples are collected at a depth of ≤1 m, and sample collection should not extend past the middle of the stream. After sample collection, the habitat availability portion of the field data sheet is completed for the bank sampled at each transect. Riffle An ‘A’ frame kick net is positioned upright on the stream bed while a 1.5 x 1.0ft area upstream is physically disrupted using feet and/or hands. Multiple riffle samples collected at one transect reflect the variability in the riffle habitat. CPOM One CPOM collection is no more than 3 handfuls of CPOM. Rock/Log The surfaces of rocks and/or logs and sticks are washed into a kick net. The surfaces are vigorously brushed or rubbed to dislodge all attached fauna. One rock or log wash equals one sample collection. Root/bank A 1.5ft length jab (using a kick net) of cut bank with exposed roots equals one sample collection. The areas sampled reflect the variability in root/bank habitat by differing current regimes and location on the bank. Macrophyte Beds A 1.5 x 1.0ft area of macrophyte bed is physically disturbed. Then it is sampled using a sweeping motion with a kick net. Sand The area sampled is 1.5ft long and in differing flow regimes. The kick net is shuffled along the bottom with a shaky, scooping action approximately 2-3cm below the surface of the sand. Additional Information Required sit-on-top kayaks 2 paddles per boat 24 small sample containers for each boat Chain-of-Custody Form(s) 1 HA/PC form per boat 2 ‘A’ Frame Kick Nets per boat White labeling tape GPS and Sounding rod for each boat Bungee cords, rope, tie downs 100% Denatured Ethanol 2 Plastic Elutriation Trays per boat 2 #30 Sieves per canoe Camera 2 ropes per boat 2 life jackets per boat 1 clip board per boat Pencils, permanent markers 2 bags per boat for containers, sieves, and trays Macroinvertebrate Sampling Method in Alabama’s Non-wadeable Streams and Rivers A. Phillips and L. Huff 1 1 Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Montgomery, AL Determining Substrate Composition After collecting samples at a transect, each boat determines the substrate composition for that transect using a sounding rod. The substrate type, depth, habitat, and velocity are recorded at 5 intervals on each transect on the field data sheet. Habitat assessment/physical characterization (HA/PC) datasheets are always completed after the sample collection. After sampling a transect, each boat completes the substrate composition and habitat availability portions of the datasheet for that transect. When both boats have sampled all transects, a habitat assessment is completed while traveling downstream to the take out. The information on the field sheets from both boats is compiled and written on one field sheet for the bioassessment file. Figure 1. Macroinvertebrate sampling in Non-wadeable streams and rivers. Figure meter reach with six transects 100 meters apart. Sample Processing All samples are preserved in the field using 100% denatured ethanol. In the lab (approximately 2 days after sample collection and preservation), the ethanol is decanted from each sample container using a #30 sieve and is replaced with 90% denatured ethanol to preserve the fragile, soft bodied organisms. All samples for each habitat are kept separate for comparison to ADEM’s WMB-I method. The organisms are picked from each sample in the lab. If it is estimated that >100 organisms will be picked from a single sample, then the sample is subsampled. A taxonomist identifies the organisms to genus level (or lowest possible level). Figure 3. Macroinvertebrate sampling in Non-wadeable streams and rivers.