Analysis of Earthquake Risk Exposure for China Milan Simic, Benfield 3 June 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACTS OF NATURAL DISASTERS ON WATER, WASTE-WATER, AND WATER-DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of.
Advertisements

A magnitude 7.1 struck early Saturday off Japan's east coast. The quake hit at 2:10 a.m. Tokyo time about 170 miles from Fukushima, and it was felt in.
SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Charles SCAWTHORN Junji KIYONO Kyoto University Earthquake Risk Reduction 3- Mitigation and ERR Program Development 1. Concepts and Terminology 2. Hazard,
RISING AWARENESS ON NATCAT A GLOBAL UNDERWRITER’S VIEW Karachi, April 11, 2012 Andrew Brown.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
NOTABLE HISTORIC FLOODS IN CHINA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University.
EARTHQUAKES Week 2. EARTHQUAKES What to explore this week:  Predictablity  Linkages  Disastrous consequences  Impact of human activity  Minimizing.
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
Impact of the 1906 Bay Area Earthquake and San Francisco Fires USGS Forum on Catastrophe Preparedness David Keeton Swiss Re.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. THE PHILIPPINES
China Earthquakes Tangshan, Overview Earthquake in China Tectonic overview - Causes of Earthquakes –Damage –Recovery.
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
Outline: Lecture 4 Risk Assessment I.The concepts of risk and hazard II.Shaking hazard of Afghanistan III.Seismic zone maps IV.Construction practice What.
Earthquakes. Given information on Earthquakes, you will be able to describe, in writing: a) what an earthquake is; b) what the elastic rebound theory.
ASSESSING THE LOCAL EARTHQUAKE RISK Justin Czarka, Lehman College, CUNY – May 2013 Agung Swastika/AFP/Getty Images.
Private & Confidential MS Frontier Re Modeling Research Pte. Ltd. Catastrophic Risk – A Flood Perspective Kunal Jadhav 12 April 2012.
Earthquakes in China Eastern Sichuan province Near city of Chengdu 2:28 pm May 12, 2008.
EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT CITY BEING PLANNED FOR TOKYO A BACKUP IN CASE OF DISASTER Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction.
International Reinsurance Pricing and Challenges Casualty Actuarial Society Seminar on Ratemaking March , 2000.
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Making better reinsurance decisions… Measuring seismic risk in Turkey: Latest modelling techniques Karl Jones June 3, 2003 ©Copyright 2003 Willis Limited.
Earthquake Loss Estimation
World Bank Conference on Financing Disaster Risk, Washington, 2003 Catastrophe Risk Models for Asia from the User Perspective George Walker Head of Strategic.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Incorporating Catastrophe Models in Property Ratemaking Prop-8 Jeffrey F. McCarty, FCAS, MAAA State Farm Fire and Casualty Company 2000 Seminar on Ratemaking.
1 Risk comments including some Re-insurance issues (Socio-Economic Security)  Jorge A. Prieto, PhD. PEng.  Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey.
Missouri Geological Survey Joe Gillman The Central U.S. is Earthquake Country: The Science Behind Earthquakes Hazard Preparedness Response.
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Chapter 4 Earthquakes Map is from the United States Geological Survey and shows earthquake hazard for the fifty United States.
Earthquakes: an introduction. Hindu Mythology Japanese Mythology.
ASIA EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI December 26, 2004 OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON TO THE CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE Contributed by ASCE/TCLEE Reconnaissance Team members.
Systematically accounting and assessing disaster losses and impacts.
FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA.
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Shelley Jules-Plag & Hans - Peter Plag ARE BUILDING CODES CONSISTENT WITH OUR KNOWLEDGE OF GEOHAZARDS?
Balz Grollimund, PhD Swiss Re Cat Perils CAE Fall 2008 Meeting Can We Trust Nat Cat Models?
2004 CAS RATEMAKING SEMINAR INCORPORATING CATASTROPHE MODELS IN PROPERTY RATEMAKING (PL - 4) PRICING EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE DAVE BORDER, FCAS, MAAA.
MAGNITUDE 6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES TAIWAN (7:02 pm, October 31, 2013) Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING A COMMUNITY RESILIENT TO EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF IDENTIFYING AND ELIMINATING VULNERABILITIES TO EARTHQUAKES IN A COMMUNITY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for.
GIS APPLICATIONS IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: NORTHWEST TURKEY
NOAA Data & Catastrophe Modeling Prepared by Steve Bowen of Impact Forecasting September 16, 2015.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
EARTHQUAKES Week 2.
Earthquakes.
Using HAZUS-MH for Comprehensive Planning Bill Bohn, Tetra Tech June 20, 2007.
Earthquakes and Seismic Waves
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Actuarial role/ contributions/ challenges in Reinsurance
Earthquakes.
RECENT EARTHQUAKES. NEW ZEALAND
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS MEXICO PART 3: EARTHQUAKES
M7.1 RABOSA EARTHQUAKE 1:15 PM; September 19, 2017
Dr. Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction
Application of SASHA for Spain case: Area 3 (SE Spain)
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
Faults and Earthquakes
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Earthquake Risk Exposure for China Milan Simic, Benfield 3 June 2003

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 background what do we need to quantify earthquake risk? ­hazard ­exposure ­vulnerability ­loss calculation conclusions - way forward Presentation overview

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 third largest country in the world 2001 population ~1.3b GDP growth in excess of 7% a year 2001 joined WTO insurance premium statistics according to: ­CIRC – China Insurance Regulatory Commission ­Swiss Re Background – key facts

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Background – insurance premium ratio non-life to life premiums from 2:1 in early 1990s to 1:2-3 now Year CIRC total ($b) Swiss Re total ($b) CIRC increase (%) CIRC non-life ($b) Swiss Re non-life ($b) CIRC increase (%) n/a13

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Background – historic earthquakes historic earthquakes M>6 780BC to 1994AD 1556 Guanzhong, M= Shandong, M= Linfen, M= Ningxia, M= Haiyuan, M= Tangshan, M=7.8

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Background - fatalities historic earthquake fatalities (official) RGCER (Research Group on Chinese Earthquake Risk) and Munich Re YearNameMagnitudeRGCERMunich Re 1303Linfen8200, Guanzhong8830, Anxiang712,000150, Shandong8.550, Ningxia865,00050, Sichuan7.520,650300, Haiyuan8.5234,117235, Tangshan7.8242,769290,000

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Catastrophe model components insured loss location coverage portfolio exposure data location characteristics physical model location intensity damage function location type synthetic event generation location intensity parameters spatial temporal physical historic event catalogue location intensity probability distribution frequency severity loss hazard insurance coverage limits deductibles exposure vulnerability

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China physical background of hazard - tectonic setting 2 subduction zones under Eurasian plate and strong intra- plate deformation caused by complex stress fields

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China physical background of hazard - 7 regions and faults ­I – Xingjiang (compression faults) ­II - Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (subduction – strongest earthquakes) ­III - Northeast China (relatively quiet) ­IV - North China (normal and strike/slip faults) ­V - South China (relatively quiet) ­VI - Taiwan ­VII - South China Sea

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China geographical distribution of hazard collect historic catalogues and create synthetic ones basic catalogue information: time, source, depth, M major (M>6) earthquakes between 780BC and 1994AD CSB catalogues between 1831BC and 1979?

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 ground shaking (example of damage - soft storey collapse in 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake) shaking hazard measured either through intensity or instrumentally Earthquake hazard in China - shaking

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – shaking intensity intensity contours (1920 Haiyuan, M=8.5)

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – surface faulting ground failure (surface faulting in 1976 Tangshan, M=7.8 earthquake) failure by shear or extension identify surface faults in catalogue

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – landslides ground failure (landslide on Miyun reservoir dam in 1976 Tangshan, M=7.8 earthquake) collect or create landslide susceptibility maps

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – liquefaction ground failure (liquefaction in 1976 Tangshan, M=7.8 earthquake) collect or create liquefaction susceptibility maps

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – FFE estimate number of ignitions from floor area and PGA fire spread needs to be modelled fire suppression time needs to be obtained or calculated from building type and layout

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Earthquake hazard in China – tsunami tsunamigenic earthquakes to be identified in catalogue hazard measured through existing tsunami run- up and inundation maps

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 aggregation ­selection of appropriate aggregation unit (CRESTA may not be fine enough) ­administrative and/or postal boundaries specific portfolio information ­value ­LOB/coverage (generally commercial/industrial only) ­limits/deductibles ­age/style/construction type ­population/GDP as surrogate when insurance information scarce Exposure - aggregation

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Exposure – provinces 22 provinces + 5 autonomous regions + 4 municipalities (Beijing, Tianjing, Shanghai and Chongqing) = 31 + Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao old CRESTA zones were provinces aggregates still mainly provided at this level

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Exposure – CRESTA zones CRESTA zones declared as first 2-digit postcodes July 2002 aggregates rarely provided at this level

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 standard GUOBIAO codes State Statistical Bureau 31 provinces ~2,500 counties Exposure – administrative regions

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 administrative region hierarchy ­31 provinces ­~2,500 counties (XIAN) ­cities/municipalities (SHI) ­rural towns (ZHEN) } ~12,500 ­urban districts for 4 municipalities (QU) 1990 and 2000 census differences (~12,500 vs. ~ 25,000) significant mapping uncertainties (different sources and providers) Exposure – administrative regions

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield digit postcodes 4-digit postcodes (~counties) 6-digit postcodes (~cities, towns and urban districts) Exposure – postcodes

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 importance of resolution Exposure – resolution

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 relationship between ground shaking and damage ratio empirical approach ­observed loss data very limited ­mainly intensity based (MMI, JMA etc.) ­Seismic Intensity Zoning Map of China by CSB (1990) engineering approach ­design codes, construction practices and standards ­mainly instrument based (PGA, PGV, Sa etc.) ­Seismic Zoning Map of China by CSB (1999) whole or component/assembly approach Vulnerability

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Vulnerability MMI DrDr 50% 100% Dr (%) MMI Type 3 Type 2 Type 1 damage probability matrices available for China functions of ground shaking (MMI) to give damage ratio (Dr) building classification important

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 RGCER’s Atlas of Earthquake Risk Prediction in China 1995 RGCER’s loss modelling results based on GDP/population data historic experience long but potentially incomplete deterministic: analysis of postulated or historic events probabilistic: modelling of ‘synthetic’ events to capture full hazard potential financial/statistical component Loss calculation

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 RGCER’s expected building losses between 1995 and 2005 Loss calculation

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 Loss calculation - results loss ($) return period of loss (years) Model 3 Model 2 Model 1 loss exceedance curves uncertainty (best estimate, PML, upper bound…) several models model certification?

The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential. ©Benfield 2003 risk quantification (via catastrophe modelling) is the first step of any risk transfer cat models are relatively complex uncertainty needs to be measured and understood how many models are we going to see? is there a role for certification? government role in risk transfer? Conclusions - way forward