MICE VIDEO Conference 17 th December 2003 Report on AFCSWG Safety Review -- Future Plan By Wing Lau -- Oxford.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project Update for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (RAL) Mark Palmer Fermilab December 15, 2014.

Advertisements

MICE Superconducting Solenoids: Status and Update RAL: T W Bradshaw M Courthold J Rochford M Hills D Baynham Oxford: J Cobb W Lau S Yang MICE.

Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.

AFC engineering group meeting on the 26 th of Jan 2004 MICE Absorber Focus Coil work schedule for the next 6 months By Wing Lau, Oxford.

Agreement on scope of supply and extent of interface among different suppliers of the AFC module This talk covers the scope of supply on the Absorber Focus.

GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.

MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module work group report Wing Lau – Oxford.

Cooling Channel Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration.

MICE Safety Review Process and Schedule Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Columbia Meeting June 2003.

Paul drumm; 1 st December 2004; PM&TB Report 1 Project Management & Technical Board Reports.

paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Cost & Schedule Review I Terms of reference: –To review the Cost and schedule of the MICE Muon beam –To review.

MICE Engineering Integration Update August 13, 2003 Edgar L. Black IIT.

1 Subsystem Reviews Reviews this week: RFCC modules RF Power Infrastructure MICE Infrastructure LH2 system.

MICE Collaboration meeting at Berkeley 9 – 12 February 2005 Cooling Channel layout Presented by Stephanie Yang & Wing Lau.

Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.

MICE AFC Work Group meeting February 13, 2004 Introducing the Coat Hanger technique --- the Global reference system Wing Lau.

Paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Why? Goal: Ultimate (CCLRC defined) Safety & Design Review –How do we get there? We need a Process –What is needed?

MICE VIDEO CONFERENCE Cooling Channel/Detector Integration July 30, 2003 Edgar L. Black IIT.

MICE Collaboration Meeting 17 CERN 21 – 25 Feb 2007 Summary on Magnet & MICE Integration talks By Oxford University.

An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.

Report Writing Three phases of report writing Exploratory phase (MAPS)

The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.

Evitherm MTR 07 Sept 04 Phill Giles Thermal Technology Consulting (TTC) Evitherm project mid-term review Work Package 2 Phill Giles Thermal Technology.

Free Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Free Powerpoint Templates How do we do it? Class 7.

Tripartite Discussions 31st Oct – 1st Nov 2005, Beijing Quality control on new buildings - Role and authority of Class Speaker – Robert Smart LR IACS Council.

1 Configuration Management “The Cookbook Approach”

IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security

1 Preparation of the hydrogen test system Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones CCLRC Technology.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.

Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.

MICE Collaboration meeting (CM20) At RAL 10 – 13 Feb 2008 AFC Magnet – Status and Progress W. Lau, Oxford University.

12/2/04Module 2D1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part IV Engineering Management & Systems Engineering and Other.

Technical Board and Safety Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Compressor status AWAKE Technical Board meeting 19 August 2015.

1 MICE Collaboration meeting at Berkeley 9 – 12 February 2005 Integrated Design & Safety Review Presented by Wing Lau & Paul Drumm.

Delphi E&S Instructions for Submitting PPAP for Component Parts to the PPAP Dropbox on the Websitewww.delphisuppliers.com Revised.

MICE – MUON Interface meeting at Mission Inn, Riverside, California January , 2004 MICE Cooling Channel Integration Issues Wing Lau – Oxford & Steve.

Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.

ITER- TBM Planning and Costing Activity DCLL TBM Mechanical Design ( ) & TBM-Port Interface ( ) Presented by Mo Dagher December

European strategy on validation and recognition of non-formal learning within the context of YOUTH “YOUTH-PASS” Development and implementation of validation.

Design & Safety Review Work Group meeting 10 March 2005 Progress update Wing Lau, Oxford.

Validation Validation: A systematic study which ensures that systems, facilities and processes are working adequetly and precisely. Validation is an integral.

Hall clearance completed Revisiting Water & Cryo Plant Prepare for shutdown ’04 –beam tube –Contract hole cutting Negotiating with DF to help target work.

Paul Drumm, cm10, 27 Oct 2004 MICE Project Report Paul Drumm Collaboration Meeting 10 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory October 2004.

Length Mass Prepackages Health Environment Safety Trade Volumes Flow Energy Pressure Concentration Enforcement R. Schwartz, 46. CIML Acceptance.

Monitoring Activities Answer the Following Questions: What is being done? Scope How well is it being done? Quality Are we doing it on a large enough scale?

1 UK PM Report Costs & Schedule Alan Grant, STFC.

MICE – Video conference Alain Blondel, 17 December   MICE selected NEWS: Future meetings Safety review Study of controls Gateway I & Toward Gateway.

FEDIAF Guide to Good Practice for the Manufacture of Safe Pet Food TRAINING PACKAGE Module VII Purchasing and delivery for the Manufacture of Safe Pet.

12/2/04Module 2C1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part III Design Data, Fabrication, Assembly, and Installation Plans.

ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.

WBS ? Proposed by IPRP … –Preparation for a review –MICE Costs & Time Scales need to be more accurate & Justified –Technical Leaders arranged by technology.

The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.

Progress on Hydrogen R&D System Yury Ivanyushenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold Matthew Hills, Tony Jones MICE Collaboration.

Position Statement on Sealed Truss Placement Diagrams for the State of California (including Los Angeles) Overview.

Technical Board Summary Alan Bross MICE CM17 CERN February 25, 2007.

CLOSING REMARKS. Following the Review Charge Cryo-Design  Review and comment on the overall cooling circuit and overall cryo-design. u Temperature Margin.

1 paul drumm; Date; Title …project report …more comments paul drumm february 2005.

ANNUAL PRODUCT REVIEW Patchara Kootiratrakarn Independent consultant.

World Health Organization

Integration Group Summary

Position Statement on Sealed Truss Placement Diagrams for the State of Texas Overview Revised 3/23/2017.

Experience in Conformity Assessment of Products and Services for Russian NPPs and Overseas Nuclear Power Plant New Builds Yury Meltsov Aug

Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing

Planetary Protection at ESA

QPS EVALUATION SERVICES INC.

Guidance notes for Project Manager

Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.

Experimental equipment Edgar L. Black February 17, 2019

Presentation transcript:

MICE VIDEO Conference 17 th December 2003 Report on AFCSWG Safety Review -- Future Plan By Wing Lau -- Oxford

What next?.....the successful conclusion of the Safety Review allows us to enter into the second phase of the Conceptual Design and the initial phase for Detail Engineering & Design What remains in the second phase of the Conceptual Design? It consists of:- 1.Revising the existing design to take into account the comments and recommendations from the Safety Review 2.Defining the scope of supply and interface arrangements between the Absorber, Windows, Focus Coil, Coupling Coil and the Detector modules; 3.Continuation with the R&D programme and the HAZOP assessment; 4.Specification and arrangement of the control and monitoring instruments; The immediate future

Safety Review Engineering & Final Safety Review The Plan Note 1: Review of Safety issues, interface details etc System design & integration Integration review Instrumentation & control design / specification Set up Drawing system & change control QA procedures & manufacturing plans R & D Dimension & tolerance details Release for tender Release for manufacture Conceptual Design phase Detail design / engineering Manufacturing, inspection & expediting Acceptance & testing Yr 2004 Note 2 Final Operating Review See Note 1 Tender preparation Approval of Man. dwg Note 2: the above time scale is not linear

The next phase will emphasize on:- Agreement and clarity on interface details; The need to be more specific on design details, dimensions and manufacturing / installation tolerances The need to optimise design with cost effectiveness Setting out a QA procedure that is practical and meaningful; Setting up a drawing system that can “de-couple” local and interface details so as to avoid / minimise any “domino” effect when changes are made by the different package suppliers; Assuming that..... The existing design can be modified without any major change to accommodate the recommendation and remarks made by the Safety Review committee The R&D on window attachment will come to a satisfactory conclusion We should aim to have an Engineering Review, which is also our Final Safety Review, before manufacturing commences Our Focus

Future Absorber Focus Coil Module work group will include representative from each of these areas: Absorber; Windows; Coupling Coil module; Detector module; Instrumentation & Control; Hydrogen system and safety; Focus Coil module This work group will place strong focus on engineering details and therefore it is important that it receives advices from physicist members (Zisman & Cumming) to make sure that no physics requirements are being compromised. Where necessary, additional physicists will be co-opted into this work group. We shall also ask members from System Integration (Yuri and Ed) be co-opted into this work group. The group format

This group will report to the MICE Technical Board through Mike Zisman