Preparing for an oepa audit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume IX Monitoring Systems for Quality Curriculum and Instruction.
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.
Elementary School Counselor
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Office of Federal and State Accountability– State Side Darlene Prevatt, Team Leader
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Know your Contractual Rights By The United School Employees of Pasco.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Monitoring Definitions: Derived from Latin monere “to advise” Ineffective PracticeEffective Practice
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Berkeley County Schools
West Virginia Support for Improving Professional Practice (WVSIPP)
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Comparability Report. Access in WVEIS WOW New WVRFP – Office of Federal Programs Menu COMP.RPT.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
AdvancED Accreditation
OEPA STUDENT INTERVIEWS
N.J.A.C. 6A:30, Evaluation of the Performance of School Districts: New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Adoption Level Robert.
Preparing for an ROE Audit
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Roles and Responsibilities
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for an oepa audit Allen D. Brock, Coordinator West Virginia Board of Education Office of Education Performance Audits

What is gone The Five Day Notice The Lateral Files (or at least most of them) The 34 Verification Standards The Compliance Driven Mentality

What remains The Student Interviews The Teacher Interviews The Administrative Interviews The Classroom Observations Monitoring of the School Environment Verification of a Standards-Focused Curriculum Professional Development Verification Efficient and Effective Management of Personnel and Resources Various Policy/Code Compliance Regulatory Agency Reviews School Facilities Checklist

What should you prepare Condensed Master Schedule Daily Use Schedule/Elementary Classroom Schedules Bell Schedule Building Map (with teacher names on map) Directions to School From Central Office Facilities Evaluation Checklist Other Monitoring Reports (Financial Audit Report, Special Education Monitoring, Fire Marshal Report, Health Department Report, SBA report if applicable, Federal Programs Reports) Wireless passcode

The day of the audit The Team will arrive 30-45 minutes before the instructional day begins They will need to follow the school procedures of guests entering the building Please brief the Team as to changes in daily schedule and absent teachers Team breaks out to observe classrooms and interview students, staff, and administrators Prior arrangements may be requested by the Team leader for interview process for students and teachers The OEPA Team will have a consensus meeting at the end of the day Team Leader will meet with OEPA Coordinator School exit conference will take place at a later date

The School monitoring report RATING SCALE Distinguished – 4. Strong and Pervasive Characteristic. KEY WORD – ALL Accomplished – 3. Present but not Pervasive. KEY WORD – MOST Emerging – 2. Present in a few areas, but needs improvements. KEY WORD – SOME Unsatisfactory – 1. Rarely evidenced; needs significant improvement. KEY WORDS – FEW/NONE

S.M.R. SECTION ONE Must include input from entire staff Consensus must be reached on each function During consensus meeting, focus on ENTIRE function Fully utilize the school evidence column to verify rating PLEASE review school evidence column for spelling/grammar

Section one: SEVEn standards Standard 1: Positive Climate and Cohesive Culture. Standard 2: School Leadership. Standard 3: Standards-Focused Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments. Standard 4: Student Support Services and Family/Community Connections. Standard 5: Educator Growth and Development. Standard 6: Efficient and Effective Management. Standard 7: Continuous Improvement.

Section two: support needed Resource and/or Facility needs that would impact student performance and well being. Professional Development needs and capacity building needs to improve student performance and well being. **The OEPA Team may add needs under either section based on observations and interviews conducted.

Section three: best practices School Developed, or “Canned Program” that was dramatically modified to meet a specific need of the school School has data to show great positive impact on school Can be implemented in other schools to provide positive results

Section four: policy and code Criteria: Full Compliance: If the school can answer “Yes” to all questions under that specific code/policy Partial Compliance: If the school can answer “Yes” to more than 50% but less than 100% of the questions under that specific code/policy Noncompliance: If the school answers “Yes” to 50% or less of the questions under that specific code/policy

policy and code (continued) POLICIES: Policy 2320 – A Process for Improving Education: Performance Based Accreditation System Policy 2340 – West Virginia Measures of Academic Progress Policy 2510 – Assuring the Quality of Education: Regulations for Education Programs Policy 4373 – Expected Behavior in Safe/Supportive Schools CODES: W.Va. Code §18-2-7a – Physical Education W.Va. Code §18-5-18b – Counseling Services

policy and code (continued) OTHER MONITORING REPORTS: Policy 1224.1 – Accounting Procedures Manual for Schools Policy 2419 – Education of Students with Exceptionalities Fire Marshal Health Department School Building Authority Federal Programs

Common problems Failure to submit SMR on time Failure to complete the Facilities Checklist Misinterpreting the Function Over rating or under rating the functions School evidence insufficient or nonexistent Staff unaware of contents of SMR Listing of needs in Section 2 that do not impact student performance and well being Failure to provide required courses listed in Policy 2510 The required teams in Policy 2510 are not in place Physical Education not receiving required amount of time per programmatic level Guidance counselor(s) cannot verify 75% direct counseling with students Other Monitoring Reports: Findings not corrected and/or no plan in place to correct issues

The bottom line All decisions must be made in the best interest of the students All staff must be aware of the contents of the SMR There is no substitute for high quality instruction High expectations MUST be evident buildingwide ALL students must be challenged to perform at their highest level Instructional time is valuable and must be fully utilized EVERY student deserves a high quality education