POLITICAL PARTIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL PARTIES INTEREST GROUPS MASS MEDIA ALL PROMOTE UNITED STATES DEMOCRACY BY LINKING CITIZENS TO THE POLITICAL PROCESS

POLITICAL PARTIES

DEFINITION OF PURPOSE GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS WHO SEEK TO CONTROL GOVERNMENT BY SPONSORING CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE ELECT PEOPLE TO OFFICE GAIN CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT POLITICAL PARTIES AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE ISSUE OF POLITICAL PARTIES IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE CONSTITUTION

FUNCTIONS NOMINATORS POLICY MAKERS – “LINKAGE INSTITUTION” ORGANIZERS OF GOVERNMENT MACHINERY INFORMERS “APPROVERS” WATCHDOGS

PARTY SYSTEMS ONE PARTY – AUTHORITARIAN, DICTATORSHIP, “SOLID SOUTH” TWO PARTY – US, HISTORICAL, THIRD PARTIES HAVE CHALLENGES MULTIPARTY – SOME EUROPEAN NATIONS, CONTRIBUTES TO COALITIONS, OFTEN UNSTABLE DUE TO NO CLEAR MAJORITY

PARTY STRUCTURE MEMBERSHIP PARTY IN THE ELECTORATE PARTY STRUCTURE PARTY IN GOVERNMENT

PARTY STRUCTURE PARTY LEADER PARTY IN THE WHITE HOUSE BARACK OBAMA IS THE LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY REPUBLICAN LEADER? HIGHEST RANKING REPUBLICAN IN CONGRESS NOMINEE FOR 2016 CHAIR OF RNC

NATIONAL STRUCTURE NATIONAL CHAIRPERSON RNC: MICHAEL STEELE DNC: TIM KAINE NATIONAL COMMITTEE HANDLE CONVENTION, PARTY AFFAIRS CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE WORK TO GET PARTY MEMBERS ELECTED TO CONGRESS CONTROL DECISION MAKING COATTAIL EFFECT WHO ELECTS PRESIDENT IF NO CANDIDATE WINS MAJORITY IN ELECTORAL COLLEGE? 4 COMMITTEES NATIONAL CONVENTION PURPOSE: WRITE/ADOPT PLATFORM, NOMINATE PRESIDENT AND VICE- PRESIDENT

OTHER CHARACTERISTICS FEDERALISM: PARTIES ARE DECENTRALIZED! SEPARATE AND LARGELY INDEPENDENT PARTY ORGANIZATIONS EXISTS AT NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS INTRAPARTY RIVALRY IS REAL STATE AND LOCAL PARTIES: PURPOSE IS TO GET PARTY MEMBERS ELECTED TO STATE AND LOCAL POSITIONS IN GOVERNMENT

MODERATION  ATTRACT AS MANY VOTERS AS POSSIBLE  NOMINATE A “MODERATE” CANDIDATE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS HAVE BECOME MORE FOCUSED ON INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES  PLATFORMS HISTORICALLY ARE NOT DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT SINCE EARLY 1980S, REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY INFLUENCED BY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS DEMOCRATIC PARTY PLATFORM BECOMING INCREASINGLY INFLUENCED BY MINORITY GROUPS (2012 ELECTION- HISPANIC GROUPS, WOMEN)

ARE POLITICAL PARTIES BECOMING EXTINCT? INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF INDEPENDENTS SPLIT TICKET VOTING IS INCREASING RISING USE OF TECHNOLOGY MEDIA AND INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES INTEREST GROUPS INFLUENCE HAS INCREASED

PERSISTENCE OF POLITICAL PARTIES ELECTORAL COLLEGE: SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICT ELECTORAL SYSTEM DOMINATION OF THE LEGISLATURE BY TWO POLITICAL PARTIES FUNDING IS STILL HIGH PARTY UNITY SCORE IS HIGH PARTISANSHIP STILL THE BEST INDICATOR OF HOW SOMEONE WILL VOTE

THIRD PARTIES (MINOR PARTIES)  CHALLENGES  REP AND DEM CONTROL THE PROCESS THEREFORE THE MINOR PARTIES ARE LEFT OUT  “WASTED VOTE” IN THE MIND OF THE VOTER  EXCLUDED FROM THE POLITICAL PROCESS FUNDING DEBATES  ELECTORAL COLLEGE  INFLUENCE  FORCE ISSUES  ROSS PEROT AND BUDGET DEFICIT IN 1990S

THIRD PARTIES (MINOR PARTIES) CandidateElection YearPartyPopular Vote Electoral Vote Fillmore1856Know Nothings22%8 Breckinridge1860Secessionist18%72 T. Roosevelt1912Bull Moose27%88 LaFolette1924Progressive17%13 Wallace1968American Independent 14%46 Perot1992United We Stand 19%0

TYPES OF THIRD PARTIES BOLTER OR SPLINTER DOCTRINAL (IDEOLOGICAL) ECONOMIC PROTEST SINGLE ISSUE

THIRD PARTIES: SPLINTER PARTIES SEPARATES FROM MAJOR PARTY PROGRESSIVE PARTY IN 1912 (R) AMERICAN INDEPENDENT IN 1968 (D)

THIRD PARTIES: IDEOLOGICAL REJECT PREVAILING ATTITUDES/BELIEFS FAVOR A MORE ACTIVE GOVERNMENT SOCIALIST PARTY

THIRD PARTIES: ECONOMIC PROTEST CREATION BASED ON ECONOMIC CRISIS OR POLICY GREENBACK PARTY

THIRD PARTIES: SINGLE ISSUE FORMED TO PROMOTE ONE ISSUE RIGHT TO LIFE PARTY (PRO- LIFE) PROHIBITION PARTY

MINOR PARTIES Q: WHAT TENDS TO HAPPEN TO SINGLE ISSUE PARTIES? A: ISSUES MAY GET PICKED UP AND THEIR REASON FOR EXISTENCE IS ELIMINATED Q: WHICH TYPE OF MINOR PARTY HAS BEEN THE MOST SUCCESSFUL IN WINNING VOTES? A: SPLINTER Q: WHICH TYPE OF MINOR PARTY HAS BEEN THE LONGEST LIVED? A: IDEOLOGICAL

FAILURE OF ALTERNATIVE PARTIES NO VIABLE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN LIMITED FUNDRAISING INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES SINGLE MEMBER VOTING DISTRICT WINNER TAKE ALL SYSTEM IN ELECTORAL COLLEGE

WHAT ABOUT THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT? AIN;CONTENTBODY AIN;CONTENTBODY

REALIGNING ELECTIONS CRITICAL ELECTIONS ARE MOST ASSOCIATED WITH PARTY REALIGNMENT WHEN GROUPS OF VOTERS HAVE CHANGED THEIR TRADITIONAL PATTERS OF PARTY LOYALTIES

DEALIGNMENT: MOVEMENT IN WHICH VOTERS ABANDON BOTH PARTIES  FACTORS: LESS AND LESS IDENTIFYING WITH THE MAJOR PARTIES (1/3 INDEPENDENT)  EFFECTS ON CAMPAIGNS MODERATE STANCE TARGET INDEPENDENT OR SWING VOTERS FOCUS ON ISSUES THAT WILL DIFFERENTIATE PARTY AS ELECTIONS BECOME MORE CANDIDATE-CENTERED, POLITICAL PARTIES BECOME LESS IMPORTANT. NO ONE PARTY DOMINATES. THE COUNTRY IS EVENLY DIVIDED. VOTERS ARE MORE CYNICAL ABOUT POLITICS. CITIZENS INCREASINGLY ENGAGE IN SPLIT-TICKET VOTING

INTEREST GROUPS

DEFINITION GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES WHO HAVE A COMMON GOAL OF MAKING THE POLITICAL SYSTEM CHANGE POLICY WHICH IN TURN BENEFITS MEMBERS. FOCUS? AFFECT PUBLIC POLICY

TYPES OF INTEREST GROUPS  ECONOMIC - NAM  BUSINESS - FARM BUREAU  INCREASED IN NUMBER MOST SUBSTANTIALLY SINCE THE MID-1970’S  IDEOLOGICAL - CHRISTIAN COALITION  PUBLIC INTEREST - PUBLIC CITIZEN INC.  FOREIGN POLICY - PRO-ISRAEL GROUPS  GOVERNMENT - NATIONAL GOVERNOR’S ASSN.  PROFESSIONAL - ABA, AMA, NEA, ETC.  USE CAUTION, NAMES CAN BE DECEIVING

FUNCTIONS OF INTEREST GROUPS STIMULATE INTEREST REPRESENT MEMBERS MEANS OF PARTICIPATION PROVIDE DATA COLLECTIVE ACTION OR GRASS ROOTS EFFORTS CHECKS AND BALANCES; “WATCHDOGS” COALITION BUILDING- INTEREST GROUPS CAN JOIN TOGETHER TO INCREASE INFLUENCE

HOW DO INTEREST GROUPS PROVIDE DATA TO GOVERNMENT? LOBBYING PUBLICITY LITIGATION (CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS, AMICUS CURAIE BRIEFS WITH SUPREME COURT) SWAY REGULATIONS ELECTIONEERING

WHAT IS LOBBYING? THE COMMUNICATING OF IDEAS OR BELIEFS ABOUT GOVERNMENT TO A GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKER. OBJECTIVE IS TO INFLUENCE PUBLIC POLICY. QUALIFICATIONS? COMMON BACKGROUNDS? FORMER ELECTED OFFICIALS, LAWYERS, PR, JOURNALISTS JOB RESPONSIBILITIES? PAPERWORK, TESTIFY, GRASSROOTS EFFORTS, MEDIA, ENDORSEMENTS, PROVIDING LEGISLATORS WITH INFORMATION ON TECHNICAL ISSUES (THE MOST SIGNIFICANT!)

WHAT ARE THE CRITICISMS OF INTEREST GROUPS? “SPECIAL INTERESTS” TOO MUCH INFLUENCE IN RELATION TO SIZE HOW MANY ARE ACTUALLY REPRESENTED? DON’T REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THOSE THAT THEY CLAIM CORRUPTION PLURALIST SYSTEM VIOLATES THE MAJORITY POOR AREN’T REPRESENTED

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE PAC? POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE POLITICAL ARM OF AN ASSOCIATION- CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO GAIN ACCESS TO LEGISLATORS EFFECTS? $$$$$$ (INCUMBENTS?) REGULATED BY THE FEC FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WHAT IS A SUB-GOVERNMENT OR IRON TRIANGLE?

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN POLITICAL PARTIES AND INTEREST GROUPS POLITICAL PARTIES ELECTION POLICY GENERALIST- REPRESENT A BROAD ARRAY OF ISSUES INTEREST GROUPS ISSUE DO NOT NOMINATE POLICY SPECIALIST- MORE LIKELY TO FOCUS ON NARROW SET OF ISSUES