TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

Career Academy National Standards Of Practice. Partnering Organizations Career Academy Support Network (CASN) National Academy Foundation (NAF) National.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Northeast Region Group Planning Time July 11, : :30 The New Northeast Team.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
PRINCIPAL AND TEACHER EVALUATION OVERVIEW What’s Next for Counselors? Lois Kappler Project Manager.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
2010 Institute for Staff Development TIMELESS LEARNING Teaching Beyond the Classroom.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Linked Learning: Utilizing Data High School Teachers Council September 22, :00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Timberlane Regional School District
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Raising Achievement and Improving Graduation Rates: How Nine HSTW Sites Are Doing It Gene Bottoms Southern Regional.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
School Counseling Update Barbara Brady, PhD School Counseling Coordinator Office of Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Key messages related to quality assurance management Trust Tools Time
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Presentation transcript:

TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE

JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation

THEORY OF CHANGE Academy Outcomes Academy Outcomes Academy Students Academy Students Local Partners & Advisory Board NAF Funders & Partners Increased Capacity to Implement NAF Model Increased Capacity to Implement NAF Model Local Education Partners NAF Supports Student Outcomes Student Outcomes Community Benefits Community Benefits

PANEL DISCUSSION Research, Data and Evaluation

Moving Toward a Performance Measurement System

Where We Have Been: Creating Standards for High Fidelity Essential Data to Collect Including all Members of the Network in the Discussion Rich Dialogue Around Performance Measurement Where We Are Going: Clarifying What it Means to Be a NAF Academy Streamline Data Collection and Reporting Self-Assessment Tool revised based on feedback from Academies and additional input from experts Increase Opportunities For Teachers, Administrators, Parents, and Students Performance Measurement

Performance Measurement System Clearly Articulated Standards & Benchmarks System for Collecting Data For Those Indicators & Benchmarks System for Analyzing Reporting, Process for Using Indicator Data to improve student performance

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys

Context for Performance Measurement System

MDRC Random Assignment Study Most Definitive No Measurable Effects – Academic Achievement – Graduation Rates – Post-Secondary Education Outcomes Positive Effects On – Student Engagement – Career Related/Work-Based Learning Experiences – Long Term Earnings (Substantial Effects) Key Findings From Previous Research

Increased Premium on Rigorous Evaluation and Reliable Estimates of Program Effects Increased Attention to Career and College Readiness and Overlap Between the Two Early Indicators of High School Success Emphasis on Data-Driven Decision-Making Key Developments in Research and Evaluation

Impacts on Academic Outcomes, Post- Secondary Education Key Drivers of Positive Impacts Understanding Cross-Site Variation in Impacts NAF Specific Impacts Need For Additional Research

What does it mean to be a NAF Academy? What Experiences Should Students Have? What Outcomes Should Fully Implemented NAF Academies Achieve? What Data Are Required – To Evaluate NAF? – To Monitor Implementation? – To Maximize program Effectiveness? Key Research & Evaluation Questions for NAF

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys

Guiding Principles: Clearly articulate a tangible rubric on what defines a NAF Academy Demonstrate emerging and best practice along the rubric Develop a tool that allows Academies to reflect on their performance against the rubric Encourage and inform an exchange of best practices and lessons learned among Academies and between NAF and the Academies Development Process: Conducted three tier process: – 280 academies reviewed – Variance review, 5 in each region – Visit 15 sites Site visits conducted by a team of experts including MDRC, National Career Academy Coalition, and members of the Data Tracking Steering Committee to the 15 Academies that scored in the Leader/ Distinguished category or are AOEs Self-Assessment Tool revised based on feedback from Academies and additional input from experts Self-Assessment and Planning Tool Overview

Data Collection & Revision Professional Development Academy Leadership The Self-Assessment Tool has 4 key sections Academy Development Advisory Board Curriculum & Instruction Work-Based Learning & Internships Each Section outlines the core concepts in the rubric… …and drives each concept to a level of tangible detail Recruitment Length of Program Provides a WBL Program Internship Completion Students’ Career Goals Integration Instructional Practices Instructional Supports Board Membership Board Function Board Supports Cohort Scheduling Academy Decision-Making Cohort scheduling ensures that academy students experience NAF academy courses plus a minimum of two core subject at each grade level. Cohort scheduling ensures that students receive instruction in a personalized environment where every child is known by a caring adult. Cohort scheduling assumes a schedule where there is weekly common planning time for the academy team of at least three staff, so that integrated learning, student supports and individualized student assessment can occur.

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys

Why Student Data? Demographic At-Risk Poverty Discipline Attendance Program NAF Academy Model Services Support Learning Student Outcomes GPA SAT High School Exit

Why ConnectEDU?

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys

Provide NAF periodic snapshots of how academies and students are performing. Provide individual academies information to help inform their own growth and improvement. Fill in the gaps in the performance measurement system with data that can not be obtained using other data sources. Why Do Surveys?

Students Teachers Parents Employers Whom To Survey?

1.Focus on a student survey to measure behavior, attitudes and outcomes for which we don’t have measures in school records. 2.Select/create instrument or instruments. 3.Select a sample of academies that represent the network. 4.Survey all students in the sampled academies. 5.Conduct in-class or on-line student survey every two years to measure changes. Surveys: Next Steps

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys

Ensure Data Quality Organize for collaborative work Build assessment literacy and skill in data interpretation Preparation

Create data overview Dig into student data Inquiry

Examine policy and procedures and instruction Plan to assess programs Acting and assessing Move Beyond Data Analysis

Affiliate Program Member Academy Leader Academy Distinguished Academy Components of the NAF Performance Measurement System Self-Assessment & Planning Tool Student-level Data (ConnectEDU) Stakeholders Surveys Stakeholders Surveys