Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 5 th,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
Advertisements

Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to SEMCOG Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Detroit presented by Lance R. Grenzeback and Marwan.
Analysis of Multi-Modal Strategies on Interregional Traffic in the I-580 Corridor in Northern California ITE Western District Annual Meeting June 25, 2012.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Freight Transportation Economic Regulation Transportation Logistics Spring 2009.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Transportation in a Supply Chain
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
The Freight Village What it is What it does Feasibility in NYMTC region Howie Mann, Project Manager, NYMTC Presentation to December 15, 2010Talking Freight.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. An Integrated Travel Demand, Mesoscopic and Microscopic.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
An inland rail route between Melbourne and Brisbane? The North-South rail corridor study 14 June 2007 BTRE Transport Colloquium.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Innovative Approach to Transit On-board Data Collection.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Supply Chains and Private Sector Dynamics Major trends in freight logistics Supply chains basics Implications for planning Agenda.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. The Development of a Method to Estimate Changes in Freight Mode Share TRB Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 2010 Results today based primarily on three data sources… Seattle 2006 household travel survey (RP)
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Transportation.
Willingness to Pay for Reliability in Road Freight Transportation:
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 5 th, 2013 Sashank Musti Anurag Komanduri Kimon Proussaloglou Value of Time for Freight Transportation Single Point Estimate or a Range

Motivation and Goals Two independent studies to assess freight movements on Hudson River crossings and Los Angeles area freeways Freight moves majorly on trucks Forecasted growth in freight movements – 40 percent by 2030 for New York; 100% by 2030 for Port of Los Angeles Multimodal freight transportation investment critical »Reduce congestion »Support increased freight demand Market assessment for nonhighway modes Time-of-day shifts to reduce congestion 2

Approach “If we build it, they will come – won’t they?” »“Go with the gut” - not an option »“Do it once…and do it right“ – consensus building Market assessment for all options »Demand management options – truck rerouting and time-of-day switching »New Multimodal options – water and rail crossings »Related infrastructure investment – distribution centers Assess impacts – quantify benefits »Understand willingness to pay »Test adoption under alternative scenarios »Triple bottom line – people, planet and profit 3

Methodology 4 Long-Term Planning Model Demand Management Routing Models Time-of-Day Models Baseline Sensitivities for Truck LOS Inform Tolling and Other TDM Strategies (Revenue Analysis) Infr. Assessment Models Multimodal Options Mode Choice Models Quantify Preferences for New Modes Support Capital Investment Decisions (Cost Benefit Analysis) Assess Distribution Center Relocation Targeted Marketing to Improve Acceptance (Adoption Horizon) Quantitative Market Research SP Experiments Qualitative Market Research Focus Groups

Focus Groups Very successful – in-depth discussions Focus group findings »Slow is ok – but, we need reliable service »Last mile service works against rail + no control over routing »Distribution center locations prevent me from moving »Lot of time (and money) wasted in local moves »Safety, damage considerations are essential »Willing to pay for improved service »Cost, travel time & on-time performance critical Establishments willing to try other options 5

Stated Preference (SP) Surveys “Trade-off” questions »Truck route 1 vs. Truck route 2 »Truck peak vs. Truck off-peak »Truck crossing vs. Rail crossing vs. Water crossing Increasing order of difficulty in SP experiments »Demand management options »Multimodal options »Infrastructure impact options Tailored experiments »Adjusted for short vs. long movements »Adjusted for decision maker – carriers, shippers, service trucks, receiver carriers and shipper-carriers »Customized levels of service – grounded in reality 6

SP Experiment Route Choice – Demand Management 7 Suppose these were your transportation options to ship your goods from Randleman, North Carolina to Long Island City, New York Your choices are…Option AOption B You ship/receive your good in the New York Region on existing or new highways, tunnels, and bridges The key characteristic of this option are as follows You ship/receive your good in the New York Region on existing or new highways, tunnels, and bridges The key characteristic of this option are as follows Mode of TransportationTruck Crosses Hudson on…Existing bridges or new freight-only tunnel Transit Time (hours)2435 Transportation Cost (all inclusive)$332$167 Reliability (on-time delivery)95%93% Which of the two options above would you choose? (Please circle one) Option BOption A

SP Experiment Time-of-Day Choice – Demand Management 8 Suppose these were your transportation options to ship your goods for your regular shipment, new Truck-Only Express Lanes that provide faster, more reliable travel times may be constructed Your choices are…Option AOption BOption C Time of DayDuring Peak PeriodBefore Peak PeriodAfter Peak Period Distance60 miles Transit Time2 hours 48 minutes2 hours 12 minutes2 hours 15 minutes Reliability (on-time delivery)90%91%96% Total Toll$0$20$14 Option BOption A Option C Which of the three options above would you choose? (Please circle one)

SP Experiment Mode Choice - Multimodal Option 9 Suppose these were your transportation options to ship your goods from Seattle, Washington to Bay Shore, New York Your choices are…Option AOption BOption C You ship/receive your good in the New York Region on existing or new highways, tunnels, and bridges The key characteristic of this option are as follows You ship/receive your good in the New York Region on existing or new highways, tunnels, and bridges The key characteristic of this option are as follows You ship/receive your good in the New York Region on existing or new highways, tunnels, and bridges The key characteristic of this option are as follows Mode of TransportationTruckRail IntermodalTruck Crosses Hudson on…New freight-only tunnel on rail cars New freight-only tunnelExisting bridges or new freight-only tunnel Transit Time (hours) Transportation Cost (all inclusive)$2,660$1,114$2,200 Reliability (on-time delivery)90%80%97% Option B Option A Option C Which of the three options above would you choose? (Please circle one)

SP Information DC Relocation - Infrastructure Assessment Does the establishment use a DC in the study region? »Why? Why not? Who manages the DC operations? »Self managed – own/rent/lease »Customer managed – shipment specific How long has the DC been used? What operations are carried out? Would you consider relocating the DC? 10

SP Experiment Model Results - Multimodal Option 11 Time Spline (Applied if TT > 24 hours) Truck Truck Ferry Truck on Rail Cost Spline (Applied If Cost > $900) Truck Truck Ferry Truck on Rail Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat Time (hours) Truck Truck Ferry Truck on Rail Rail Rail Float Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat Constant Truck Ferry Truck on Rail Rail Rail Float Truck OnlyBase On-Time Reliability Low (<85% on time) Medium (85-90% on time) High (>90% on time)Base Shipment Cost by Commodity Agricultural Goods Metal and Mining Goods Construction Goods Chemical Goods Wood and Paper Goods Electronics Goods Transportation and Utility Goods Wholesale and Retail Goods Model FitValue Pseudo R2 (0)0.345 Pseudo R2 (c)0.149 Number of Observations1,093

What is Value of Time (VOT)? VOT is the $’s willing to pay to save time or the $’s to accept for lost time 12 Impedance Function (Composite cost: distance, travel time, toll, operating costs,..) Skims VOT Model Application & Traffic Assignment (Congestion, Delay, Emissions)

SP Experiment Multimodal Model Evaluation-Values of Time ($/hr) 13 Commodity Type TruckTruck FerryTruck on Rail Short Trips High CostLow CostHigh CostLow CostHigh CostLow Cost Agriculture$92.00$49.30$85.00$42.50$110.00$51.10 Metal and Mining$62.70$39.40$56.70$34.00$71.50$40.90 Construction$69.00$41.80$62.60$36.10$79.40$43.30 Chemical$43.10$30.70$38.40$26.40$47.70$31.80 Wood and Paper$60.00$38.30$54.10$33.10$68.10$39.70 Electronics$65.70$40.60$59.50$35.00$75.30$42.10 Transportation and Utility $106.20$53.10$99.20$45.80$130.00$55.00 Wholesale and Retail$60.00$38.30$54.10$33.10$68.10$39.70 Commodity Type TruckTruck FerryTruck on Rail Short Trips High CostLow CostHigh CostLow CostHigh CostLow Cost Agriculture Metal and Mining Construction Chemical Wood and Paper Electronics Transportation and Utility Wholesale and Retail SINGLE VALUE OF TIME

Demand Management Findings 14 “We will pay for better options” »High shipment costs + short trips = High willingness-to-pay »Low shipment costs + long trips = Large time savings required »Single value of time - oversimplification Impact of “congestion” pricing »Tolls > $60 – Most trucks will reroute »Tolls~ $30 – Short-haul trucks will pay »Tolls < $10 – No rerouting, but revenue generation Night-time delivery option – great interest »Local governance laws »Maintaining off-hour crew and facility

Multimodal Assessment Findings 15 Relocation of distribution centers & mode switching »Carriers interested in relocation – business efficiency »Tenants in their third or fourth year most likely to relocate »Large establishments unlikely to relocate Multimodal options »Low preference to switch from truck »Likely rail adopters are industries with low VoT (bulk) »Trucks on rail/ferry – greater chance of adoption Insight into freight decision-making »Travel time, cost, on-time performance – all critical »Vary by distance, industry/commodity, transportation cost »First step for agent-based modeling

Application of Model Results Draft EIS and Final EIS study underway Results integrated with planning model »Test impact on delay, emissions, peak congestion Several alternatives tested »Quantify “switching” from truck »Quantify “switching” time period »Cost-benefit analysis for each alternative »Identify most suitable options 16

Any Questions? 17

Choice Models Three unique sets of “choice” models »Disaggregate models »Segmented by industry Truck decision-making »Route preference – time, toll, on-time reliability »Day vs. night preference Multimodal decision-making »Truck vs. water vs. rail crossings Distribution center decision-making »Use – Yes/No »Relocate – Yes/No 18

Route Choice Model 19 Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat On-Time Reliability Low Reliability (<85% on time) Medium Reliability (85-90% on time) High Reliability (>90% on time) Base Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat On-Time Reliability Low Reliability (<85% on time) Medium Reliability (85-90% on time) High Reliability (>90% on time) Base Shipment Cost by Commodity Agricultural Goods Metal and Mining Goods Construction Goods Chemical Goods Wood and Paper Goods Electronics Goods Transportation and Utility Goods Wholesale and Retail Goods Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat On-Time Reliability Low (<85% on time) Medium (85-90% on time) High (>90% on time) Base Shipment Cost by Commodity Agricultural Goods Metal and Mining Goods Construction Goods Chemical Goods Wood and Paper Goods Electronics Goods Transportation and Utility Goods Wholesale and Retail Goods Cost Spline Applied if Cost > $ Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat Travel Time Time (hrs) Coefficient DescriptionValueT-Stat Time (hrs)Time Time Spline (Applied if TT>12 hrs) Agricultural Goods Metal and Mining Goods Construction Goods Chemical Goods Wood and Paper Goods Electronics Goods Transportation and Utility Goods Wholesale and Retail Goods Time Spline (Applied if TT>25 hrs) Time Model FitValue Pseudo R2 (0)0.415 Pseudo R2 (c)0.324 Number of Observations716

Route Choice Model – Values of Time ($/hr) Single point estimate = over simplification VoT short trips ( 24 hours) VoT for exp. shipments 2-3 times VoT for less exp. shipments 20 Commodity Type Low Cost ShipmentsHigh Cost Shipments Time<=12 hrsTime hrsTime>=25 hrs Time<=12 hrsTime hrsTime>=25 hrs Agricultural$29.63$7.69-$58.18$ Metal and Mining $33.68$15.47-$76.19$35.00$9.05 Construction$37.21$17.91$5.23$96.97$46.67$13.64 Chemical$34.78$18.91$7.07$82.05$44.62$16.67 Wood and Paper $29.36$15.05$5.05$57.14$29.29$9.82 Electronics$32.32$18.69$7.68$69.57$40.22$16.52 Transportation and Utility $53.33$ $8.57 Wholesale and Retail $47.06$21.47$5.44-$97.33$24.67