Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Program Evaluation. Overview and Discussion of: Objectives of evaluation Process evaluation Outcome evaluation Indicators & Measures Small group discussions.
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Performance management guidance
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
The EMR Internationalising Education China Project Introductions.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Beyond Primary Education: Challenges of and Approaches to Expanding Learning Opportunities in AfricaAssociation for the Development of Education in Africa.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 Tracer Study: University Graduates and Labor Market Project Manager Prof. Dr. Eng. Radu Mircea Damian University Graduates and Labor Market Romanian.
Primary Years Programme FLIBS PYP: PYP Chair: Sandy Wesson PYP Chair Elect: Rachel Goodnow PYP Secretary: Gayle Baisch Grants Committee: Cynthia Doyle.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
LINKS Evaluation. Why evaluate? Evaluation of the LINKS Advising Program is particularly important in this pilot year. It gives participating staff, students.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Evaluating Multilingual Education Programs Seminar on Multilingual Education Kabul, March 2010 Dennis Malone, Ph.D.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Key messages related to quality assurance management Trust Tools Time
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Building Organizational Capacity to Create Community Change
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
FPG Child Development Institute
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati

This three year project is funded fully by His Majesty Trust Fund under grant number (SR/EDU/TEC/14/01). The research team members would like to express their gratitude for the financial support of such a valuable project. Thanks and appreciation are also extended to SQU administration, in general, and the Deputy vice-chancellor for post graduate studies and Research (DVCPRS) and the Deanship of research, in particular, for their administrative support and efficient facilitation of the project implementation.

 Context of the problem  School effectiveness models  Long term & Short term goals  Methodology  Project major milestones and timeline  Achievement of the Project  Challenges & opportunities

School Effectiveness Innovation Sustainability Wheel (ISW) Al Barwani, T. A., and Osman, M. E. (2011).

Start & Stop Leadership ResearchVision Communication networks Accountability Resource mobilization Participation Professional Development Reward system Institutionalization Coordination Ownership Empowerment

Leadership ResearchVision Communication networks Accountability Resource mobilization Participation Professional Development Reward system Institutionalization Coordination Ownership Empowerment Start & Stop Innovation Sustainability Wheel (ISW) Al Barwani, T. A., and Osman, M. E. (2011).

This project aims to systemically activate and analyze the impact of all interrelated elements in the school system that promote the empowerment of student learning in the Sultanate of Oman. More specifically, it aims at furnishing the school system with a practical model for sustained improvement of the overall school performance.

 Extending the learning landscape through interactive learning environments for the purpose of achieving maximum empowerment of learners’ potential.  Maintaining the sustainability of educational innovations through informed mechanisms for closing the feedback loop among all interrelated subsystems.  Developing informed policies that are directly linked to return on investment.  Providing policy makers and practitioners with a research- based model for a long term future school improvement.

 Providing empirical evidence for theoretically-sound interventions that can maximize students’ learning potential.  Examining school leadership practices in improving the overall school efficiency.  Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the interrelated elements of the system at the school level.  Establishing a continuous evaluation and cyclical feedback system that is directly linked to measurable learning outcomes.  Improving students’ attainment in five subject areas : Science, Math, English and Arabic Language literacy, & IT.  Improving students’ attainment in critical thinking skills.

 Providing the educational system in Oman with a workable mechanism for identifying key areas of weaknesses and means of improvement.  Establishing a chain of actions for activating all interrelated elements that act as driving forces for sustainable change.  Creating a culture of collaboration, commitment and ownership of school improvement in the part of all concerned (stakeholders) in the educational system.

 Ensuring that the indicators of school improvement should include inputs, operational processes, and students’ learning outcomes.  Informing pre-service teacher education programs to prepare future teachers as change agents.  Contributing to the knowledge base in the area of school improvement with a research-based model that has potential implications for practitioners and policy makers.

Population and sample Research Design Procedures

Assessment measuresdata sources Ministry of Education exams (students’ literacy (Arabic and English), Math, Science and IT) Students Teachers Administrators Supervisors Parents School records (teachers and students demographics and attendance) Curriculum documents Critical Thinking, and Reading Literacy Tests (Arabic and English) Satisfaction survey (for teachers and parents) Teacher Collaboration Assessment Survey School self-evaluation reports and ISW Assessment Questionnaire. Supervisors’ reports Students’ attitudes towards schooling. Classroom Observation check lists Analysis of students’ work

TaskYear 1 Year 2Year 3 Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4 Phase 1 Review related literature. Identify and assign sample groups. Collect schools’ baseline data. Develop Research Instruments. Pilot Research Instruments Analyze pilot data. Conduct training needs assessment. Conduct training workshops. Administer pre- tests, and questionnaires. Develop Interventions Report Phase 2 Implement interventions Collect school performance data. Administer students’ performance tests. Re administer psychometric tests, and questionnaires. Conduct interviews. Analyze data. Report. Phase 3 Examine all elements of the school development model. Analyze data Develop policy documents Final Report

TaskYear 1 Q1Q2Q3Q4 Phase 1 Develop Interventions Report Review related literature. Identify and assign sample groups. Collect schools’ baseline data. Develop Research Instruments. Pilot Research Instruments Analyze pilot data. Conduct training needs assessment. Conduct training workshops. Administer pre- tests, and questionnaires.

TaskYear 1 Q1Q2Q3Q4 Phase 1 Develop Interventions Report Review related literature. Identify and assign sample groups. Collect schools’ baseline data. Develop Research Instruments. Pilot Research Instruments Analyze pilot data. Conduct training needs assessment. Conduct training workshops. Administer pre- tests, and questionnaires.

The Website Research Printed Materials The Forum Main Meetings The Project Orientation Workshop Schools Visit Schools Portfolio Procurements Surveys Project Administration Process Research Assistants Phase 1 Achievement

 Approval from MOE  Coordination with Schools  Budget

 Workshop Plans

Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati