The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Advertisements

Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Criminal Justice Sentencing Reform Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
HONORABLE PEGGY DAVIS ROLES AND BOUNDARIES OF SPECIALTY COURT SUPERVISION.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Introductions Agenda 10:00- 10:20am Introductions and Today’s Agenda 10:20- 10:40am Project Overview (large group) 10:40- 11:30am Definitions 11:30-
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
West Virginia’s Drug Courts: An Overview Division of Probation Services,
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Technology and the Courts: An Overview of Hard and Soft Technology Innovations Professor James Byrne Professor James Byrne Lecture: Thursday, Nov. 20,
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Criminal Justice Mental Health and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Housing Strategies Ellen Piekalkiewicz Department of Children and Families Florida.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Bureau of Drug and Alcohol Services (BDAS) /DHHS Presentation to the Gaming Study Commission March 16 th, 2010 Joe Harding – Director –
1 1 Bureau of Justice Assistance: Resources for Tribal Justice Systems October 19, 2012.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California)
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
6 Specialized Courts.
Addressing Substance Use Disorders Translating Science To Policy In The 2010 Drug Control Strategy.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
FAUQUIER COUNTY. OFFICE OF ADULT COURT SERVICES WHAT THE HECK IS IT ANYWAY?
And They All Come Home. Shawshank Redemption watch?v=KtwXlIwozog.
Technology and the Courts: An Overview of Hard and Soft Technology Innovations Professor James Byrne Lecture: Tuesday, November 16, 2010.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Many impacts at many levels Drugs and Society. How much does it cost? According to the NIDA substance abuse costs the nation a half a trillion dollars.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Presented by: Michael Kennedy, MFT Director. Psychiatric Emergency Services 24/7 availability Access to  Crisis Stabilization  Crisis Residential Services.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Juvenile Crime.  Juvenile: a person under the age of 18  Some states have it as 16, but regardless there are special laws that deal with juveniles who.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
3003CCJ Rehabilitating Offenders
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
Justice Division Strategic Planning
Problem-Solving Courts
Evidence-Based Programs What Every Sentencing Judge Needs to Know
Presentation transcript:

The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015

The Drug Court Movement Number of Drug Courts : As of June 2014, the estimated number of drug courts operating in the U.S. is over By comparison, in December 31, 2007, there were 2,147drug courts in operation. Capacity of Drug Courts: over 120,000 drug court clients are currently being served at any given time throughout the United States and its territories. President Obama’s FY 2012 Budget request included $101 million for drug, mental health,and other problem ‐ solving courts, including Veterans Treatment, Tribal Healing to Wellness, and Family Dependency Treatment Courts.

Drug Courts: Pre-Conviction vs Post-Conviction Strategies Old Strategies: the first generation of adult drug court programs, which tended to be diversionary or pre-plea models, New Strategies: Today only 7% of adult drug courts are diversionary programs compared to 59% which are strictly post conviction.

Separating Alcohol-Related Offenses From Other Drugs DWI Offenders: Recognizing that repeat DWI offenders pose a threat to society in a way very different from other offenders, many jurisdictions are establishing a distinct DWI court or a Hybrid DWI/drug court. DWI Courts: Unlike drug courts, however, DWI Courts operate only at the post- conviction stage.

Drug Court Purpose: Why Do we Need A Specialized Court? Drug Offenders pose a unique challenge to our court system; they are different than offenders who break other criminal laws. Traditional Court Systems focus on determination of guilt and sanctions, not the addiction problem. Judges need specialized training and courts need specialized services and supervision for drug offenders.

How Do Drug Courts Operate? Drug courts represent the coordinated efforts of justice and treatment professionals to actively intervene and break the cycle of substance abuse, addiction, and crime. Drug Courts are an alternative to less effective interventions, Drug courts quickly identify substance abusing offenders and place them under ongoing judicial monitoring and community supervision, coupled with effective, long-term treatment services.

What Happens in a Drug Court? A drug court participant undergoes an intensive regimen of substance abuse treatment, case management, drug testing, and probation supervision while reporting to regularly scheduled status hearings before a judge with specialized expertise in the drug court model. Drug courts also provide a wide array of ancillary services such as mental health treatment, trauma and family therapy, job skills training, and many other life-skill enhancement services.

What is the Drug of Choice for Drug Court Participants?

Drug Types Vary by Location Urban Drug Courts: cocaine/crack is the primary drug of choice for urban drug court clients, Suburban Drug Courts: marijuana is the primary drug of choice for suburban drug court clients, Rural Drug Courts: methamphetamine is the primary drug of choice for rural drug court clients.

Impact of Drug Courts: Do They Work? OVERALL Impact: According to over a decade of research, drug courts significantly improve substance abuse treatment outcomes, substantially reduce crime,and produce greater cost benefits than any other justice strategy

Research Findings: Drug Use, And Other Criminal Behavior: Drug Use: This is a difficult question to answer definitively. Criminal Behavior: Four independent meta-analyses have now concluded that drug courts significantly reduce crime rates an average of approximately 7 to 14 percentage points

What is the Cost Effectiveness of Drug Courts? California Researchers concluded that drug courts cost an average of about $3,000 per client, but save an average of $11,000 per client over the long term The Multnomah County Oregon Drug Court was found to cost less than business as usual for drug offenders, because probationers typically have multiple failed treatment experiences that are very expensive but elicit few gains.

Variations on a Theme: Emerging Models DWI Court Family Dependency Treatment Court Gambling Court Reentry Court Federal District Drug Court Juvenile Drug Court Mental Health Court

Drug Court Technology and Individual Offender Change Hard Technology Innovations: New Drug testing Devices, New Drug Treatment Strategies involving drug replacement. Soft Technology: New Classification Systems designed to target offenders amenable to treatment in a drug court setting, new information sharing protocols, and case management systems

Tipping Point: What is the Link Between formal and informal social controls? Why Do we use and abuse drugs and alcohol? Why are some drugs legal and others illegal? Can drug users be forced to change using the threat of sanctions and mandatory treatment?