Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Johnson John A. Dutton e-Education Institute Project Manager, Penn States e-Portfolio Initiative Glenn Johnson John A. Dutton e-Education Institute.
Advertisements

Technology Across the Curriculum Programs Keys to Success Beth Secrist, TAC Coordinator Copyright Beth Secrist, This work is the intellectual property.
While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.
Portfolio Assessment: Pleasure and Profit in Self-Evaluation Star A. Muir, Director Learning Support Services George Mason University MS 5E7, Fairfax,
Ubiquitous Distributed Learning and Global Citizenship Michael Sperling, Associate Provost for Interdisciplinary, Distributed and Global Learning Fairleigh.
TESL Ontario Conference October 28 & 29, Project Team Project Lead - Carolyn Cohen Research Lead - Antonella Valeo Research Consultants - Sheila.
Envisioning 21 st Century Learning: Results of Speak Up 2007 for School Leaders 13 th Annual CoSN K-12 School Networking Conference March 10, 2008 Julie.
Presenter Name TITLE, DISTRICT NAME Date Ten Things Everyone Should Know about Today’s Students and Digital Learning.
Presenter Title Date Digital Learning: Views of Students, Teachers, Parents and Administrators.
Beyond Basic Computer Skills: Implementing Technology Fluency Cynthia Edwards, Professor of Psychology Kristin Watkins, Computer Applications Specialist.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Faculty Conceptions and Misconceptions of Hybrid Education Courses Helen C. Wittmann, Ed.D. Elsa-Sofia Morote, Ed.D. Thomas Kelly, Ph.D.
Interactive Learning: Teaching Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with WebCT By: Andrew Clark University of Arizona Department of Geography and Regional.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
3/20/20071 IT Strategy and Leadership in Higher Education: Two Case Studies Case 1: Roberts Wesleyan College. Presented by Pradeep (Peter) Saxena, CIO.
Mellon Fellowship for Undergraduate Research: Ideas, Innovations & Impacts Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California,
BEST PRACTICES TO SUPPORT ONLINE LEARNING FOR STUDENTS AND EDUCATORS Online Learning.
Faculty and Student Expectations for Students’ Information Technology and Information Literacy Knowledge & Skills: One Institution’s Assessment Linfield.
Center for Instructional Technology James Madison University Strategies for Transitioning to the Age of Digital Media Sarah E. Cheverton James Madison.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
C AMPUS-WIDE E -PORTFOLIO I NITIATIVE: WHY DID IT HAPPEN, HOW DID IT WORK? : Monique Fuchs Learning Technology Solutions Project Lead – E-portfolio Initiative.
Haute Software: Juggling Open Source and Vendor Software Jeshua Pacifici, Manager, Learning Systems Kim Gausepohl, Assistant Manager, Online Course Systems.
The Right Mix: Virtual Learning Environments, E- texts, and Library/On-line Resources Copyright Gerald Benson, Durham Academy This work is the intellectual.
Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.
Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.
A step by step participation guide for schools and districts Enable, engage and empower the voices of your stakeholders Speak Up 2014.
© Project Tomorrow 2010 Educational Technology & Learning for Today’s Children Speak Up Perspectives from the field: K-12 Students, Teachers, Librarians,
Digital/e-Portfolios & Learning: From Mosaic to Kaleidoscope – Static to Dynamic EDUCAUSE 2005 Linda Ehley Alverno College.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
© Project Tomorrow 2011 Participating in Speak Up 2012: What / Why / Who / When / How Speak Up 2012! Participation Guide.
Inspiring the Next Generation of Innovators: Students, Parents and Educators Speak Up about Science Education National Report Release NECC – July 1, 2008.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Building the Integrated Learning Center Having the right people at the table Chris Johnson, Senior Consultant for Learning Technologies University of Arizona.
Voices of Experience: Top Ten Tips for Online Learning Environments NECC 2008 Julie Evans & Shana Glenzer July 1, 2008.
Leading Our Way Forward The Visionary Leader With Julie Evans.
Curricular Collaboration with Technology Report on a three-year inter-institutional program Scott E. Siddall Scott E. Siddall Denison University Granville,
Welcome to: Parents “Speak Up” About Technology and 21 st Century Skills NSBA T+L Conference 2007 Nashville, TN October 17, 2007 Julie Evans.
Addressing Our Long Tail Learners: Findings from the Speak Up National Research Project 13 th Annual CoSN K-12 School Networking Conference March 11, 2008.
Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Learning in the 21 st Century: A National Report of Online Learning National Release Breakfast Meetings NSBA T+L 2007 – Nashville October 17-18, 2007.
A Tale of Two Collaborators: Successful Collaboration Between IT and Library Services Pat Kohrman, Deena Morganti, John Shank Copyright Pat Kohrman, Deena.
Students, Educators and Parents “Speak Up” about Online Learning Advancing Online Learning Conference Nashua, New Hampshire April 10, 2008 Julie Evans.
An Assessment of the TA Web Certification Program: Four Years of Supporting the Use of Instructional Technology at the University of Minnesota Brad Cohen,
George Mason University Assessing Technology Support: Using Portfolios to Set Goals and Measure Progress Anne Agee, Star Muir, Walt Sevon Information Technology.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
A Strategy for Moving from Commercial to an Open Source Environment Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
(c) Project Tomorrow 2009 Engaging Parents’ Support for Emerging Technologies in the Classroom Key findings from Speak Up 2008 Julie Evans Chief Executive.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Creating an Agile and Responsive IT Organization Presented by Ohio University - Zanesville.
Copyright Linda Ehley & Kelly Talley, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Legal Issues in the “E-Learning Business” Jonathan Alger University of Michigan October 29, 2001 Copyright Jonathan Alger This work is the intellectual.
Policies for Success on the New Learning Object Frontier Veronica Diaz, University of Arizona Patricia McGee, The University of Texas at San Antonio Copyright.
Understanding Title I Programs: Annual Meeting An Overview for Parents.
© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.
Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Common Elements that Support Campus-Wide Innovation Copyright Andrea Nixon, A. Michael Berman, Christine Haile,
(c) Project Tomorrow 2009 Future of Education Interview Series February 11, 2009 Top Ten Things We Have Learned From K-12 Students About Educational Technology.
Taking the Pulse of eLearning Today: The Views of K12 Students, Educators and Parents Presenter Info.
Top 10 Things Teachers and Tech Leaders Should Know About Students and Digital Learning Presenter information.
A look at librarians teaching credit-bearing courses
Educause Learning Initiatives (ELI) January 20-22, 2009
Copyright Information
Everything you need to know!
Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)
Elicit Written Responses to an online text
Learning in the 21st Century: A National Report of Online Learning
Terry Coatta VP Development, Silicon Chalk
Presentation transcript:

Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators (c) Project Tomorrow 2013 Ohio “Speaks Up”

Annual national research project  Online surveys + focus groups  Open for all K-12 schools and schools of education  Institutions receive free report with their own data Collect ideas ↔ Stimulate conversations  K-12 Students, Teachers, Parents, Administrators  Pre-Service Teachers in Schools of Education Inform policies & programs  Analysis and reporting of findings and trends  Consulting services to help transform teaching and learning Speak Up National Research Project + 3 million surveys since 2003 (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

What are the expectations of Ohio’s K-12 students for online or blended learning? How does that student vision compare with the teachers’ & administrators’ reality? What is the unique parent perspective on online learning? How well are our K-12 schools meeting the expectations of students? Big Questions (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

K-12 Students364,233 Teachers & Librarians56,346 Parents (in English & Spanish)39,713 School/District Administrators6,011 About the participating schools & districts o 8,020 schools and 2,431 districts o 30% urban / 43% rural / 27% suburban o All 50 states + DC Honor Roll of States with highest participation: TX, CA, OH, IN, AL, NC, WI, AZ, FL, PA National Speak Up 2012 Participation: 466,303 (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

K-12 Students27,999 Teachers & Librarians17,974 Parents6,230 School/District Administrators1,631 Ohio Speak Up 2012 Participation: 53,834 (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

What can the Speak Up findings tell us about the future of learning? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

 Students function as a “Digital Advance Team”  Students regularly adopt and adapt emerging technologies for learning  Students’ frustrations focus on the unsophisticated use of technologies within education  Persistent digital disconnect between students and adults  Exacerbation of lack of relevancy in current education  Students want a more personalized learning environment Speak Up National Findings: (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

The New Student Vision for Learning Personalized Learning Social–based learning Un–tethered learning Digitally–rich learning (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Key Trends: Online and Blended Learning The New Student Vision for Learning (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Ohio districts are tapping into many types of online learning (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Who is learning online in Ohio? Types of online learning experiences Students: Gr 6-8 Students: Gr % online school4%7% Online self study class8%12% Teacher led online class9%10% Online class for personal interests 7% No experience but would like to take an online class 39%38% (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Why take an online class? For high school students, traditional reasons are important such as scheduling and college credit. For middle school students, it’s about changing the learning paradigm. For all students, potential for personalization of learning is highly valued. (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Why take an online class? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013 Benefits of taking an online class OH Gr 6-8OH Gr 9-12 Work at my own pace 60%57% Be in control of my own learning 56% Review class materials whenever I need to 48%44% Greater sense of independence 39%40% Easier for me to succeed 43%33%

Why take an online class? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013 OH Parents’ views: 1.Ability for my child to work at his/her own pace62% 2.Ability to review materials when needed 59% 3.Take class not offered at the school52% 4.Get college credit46% 5.Increase motivation in learning30%

Ohio parents have first hand experience with online learning I have taken an online class: For work or job training46% For an academic/college program27% To learn new skills19% To explore a hobby11% 25% who have not taken an online class would like to! (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Blended learning in Ohio – Principals’ View (c) Project Tomorrow 2013 “There is a lot of national discussion on the potential of "blended learning" to transform education. In general, the concept means that students are engaged to some degree in face-to-face instruction in a traditional classroom while also spending time driving their own learning online. There are several different models of blended learning. “ New Speak Up question – how we defined blended learning:

Blended learning in Ohio – Principals’ View Primarily F2F with online resource usage54% Mix of online and F2F on a regular schedule 7% Online curriculum in a school setting with teacher onsite13% Online course in a school setting with remote teacher7% Random online course by traditional school students9% Primarily online from home with online teacher5% None of the above27% (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

What’s holding back online learning in Ohio? 1.Creating online courses that are academically rigorous 2.Concern over quality of student-teacher interactions 3.Evaluating quality of online courses or curriculum 4.Lack of technology infrastructure 5.Students don’t have home internet access 6.Finding teachers interested or qualified to teach online courses Only 16% of Ohio teachers say they are interested in teaching online courses (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Looking to the future …. What skills are Ohio’s administrators looking for in the next generation of teachers? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013  Knowing how to differentiate using technology61%  Knowing how to find and use digital content61%  Experience learning in an online course54%  Experience teaching an online course43%

How often do you assign Internet-based homework? Ohio teachers and technology (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Comparing Ohio student and teacher values Students, how often do you access Internet content to help you with homework? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Evaluating the quality of online courses What Ohio administrators say is most important (c) Project Tomorrow 2013 Top Voter Getters:  Alignment to curriculum standards85%  Developed by organization with field expertise70%  Ease of use by students and teachers65%  Student achievement results49%  Includes embedded assessments40%

Imagine you are designing the ultimate school for today’s students, what technologies would have the greatest impact on learning? Do we have a shared vision for online and blended learning? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Do we have a shared vision for online and blended learning in Ohio? (c) Project Tomorrow 2013

Thank you. Julie Evans Project Tomorrow x15 Twitter: JulieEvans_PT SpeakUpEd Copyright Project Tomorrow 2013 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author. (c) Project Tomorrow 2013