Grading Group Projects Taryn Vian. Why do group projects? Increases student engagement through applied learning Allows us to give more complex assignments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forging Faculty Librarian Collaborations in Information Literacy Savannah State University October 1, 2010 Georgia Conference on IL.
Advertisements

Team work – what it is… Zsuzsanna Szabo, Ph.D. What is a Team Anyway? A team is a small group of people with complementary skills who are committed to.
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
FROM DIALOGUE TO SYNERGY: BUILDING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS Janet Salmons, Ph.D.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Peer assessment of group work using WebPA Neil Gordon Symposium on the Benefits of eLearning Technologies University of Manchester, in conjunction with.
Popsicle Stick Bridge Challenge Engineering 9
1 Learning from each other. 28-Jun-15Sandra Windeatt, Online Services, UNN2 What I used to do.
Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.
Managing Large Classes with Group Work
Carolyn Awalt University of Texas at El Paso Paul Resta
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Angela Uribe de Kellett, Dr Sandra Salin, Newcastle.
…improves student performance! “I use the LearnSmart modules within Connect Management to get students familiar with the material and engaged with the.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Chapter Extension 1 Improving Your Collaboration Skills.
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
Competency Area A: Communicating with Paraprofessionals.
Effective Team Management
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
Dr. Jessica Hirshorn Using the Intercultural Training Simulation “Rocket” to Build Intercultural Competency.
Learning Goal: To better understand the PLC process and how it works at Strathmore Secondary College.
Cooperative Teams. Essential Elements of Cooperative Teams-1 Positive interdependence Promotive interaction Individual accountability Learning and practicing.
Team Communication and Difficult Conversations Chapter 3.
ITIS 2110 Lab #13.  Work on Project  Turn in by end of this lab: ▪ Cover sheet ▪ Brief status ▪ May resubmit Project Proposal with updates for status.
Family Interview Nichole Salvador EEX 5051 June 29, 2009.
Interactive Notebooks and Portfolios What? Why? How?
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Colleen Taylor, Ph. D. Tongwen Wang, Ph. D. Department of Chemistry Virginia State University.
网络课程的小组学习项目设计 Group-Project Design for An Online Course Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D. Indiana State University.
Use of Google Documents Collaboration in Distance Learning Ann McNicol College of Education St. Petersburg College.
Writing Collaboratively Advantages  Greater knowledge & skills base  Better audience analysis and editing  Possibility for improving relationships w/in.
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Peer Review Sarah Klotz 6/27/2015.
Collaborative Projects in Hybrid and Online Classes Using Group Work to Enhance Student Interaction.
An essential part of workplace success!
WRITING A GOOD GROUP CONTRACT The Power of the Written Word.
Differentiation and challenge: Research and Development Group Cycle Meeting 1: selecting the issue.
SWRK 3150 & 4120 Mid-term Evaluation. Welcome Please take some time to review these PowerPoint slides. They contain important information for students,
Development of a Web-Based Groupwork Assessment Tool Groupwork and Assessment Methods Demonstration of Software Discussion Hannah Whaley David Walker
CM220 College Composition II Friday, January 29, Unit 1: Introduction to Effective Academic and Professional Writing Unit 1 Lori Martindale, Instructor.
Reflections on the Peer-to-Peer Learning Process Warren Van Wicklin (WBI consultant) December 1, 2009.
 1. Create the Team Norms  2. Create the Timeline  3.Decide on a Design Brief  4. Team Evaluations  5. Design Brief  6.Design a PowerPoint Presentation.
Embracing Servant Leadership A Summary of my 2014 Leadership Experience The Basics What: I implemented a leadership style of managing vs. leading my team.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP. Denis Duret School of Veterinary Science University of Liverpool Denis.
ITIS 2110 Lab #13.  Presentations  4/26: L02, L04  4/28: L05  5/2: L01, L03.
 Spring 2014 MCED 3430 Kelly Chaney.  Shared Group Grade o The group submits one product and all group members receive the same grade, regardless of.
Working in Groups * “People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defences, or the problems of modern society." Vince Lombardi.
UNDERSTANDING ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS Linda Williams Learnings Strategies Student Academic Success Services sass.queensu.ca Learning Strategies, Student.
Angela Kleanthous University of Cyprus May 20th, 2017
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Assessing Young Learners
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Working in Groups in Canvas
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Project Management Processes
How did WE work? Assessing Collaborative Projects in the Online or Hybrid Classroom
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Project Management Processes
Update from ECO: Possible Approaches to Measuring Outcomes
Assessment of Classroom Learning
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Working in Groups How to strategically Navigate Group projects to ensure a successful outcome. Janelle Pass Slide #1 Hello. My name is Janelle Pass and.
A Moodle-based Peer Assessment Tool
Assistive Technology Devices & Assistive Technology Services
Presentation transcript:

Grading Group Projects Taryn Vian

Why do group projects? Increases student engagement through applied learning Allows us to give more complex assignments because tasks can be shared Models the real-world, where we work on teams to complete projects ◦ Learn to set goals, divide up work, keep on schedule, mesh different work styles Less burden on grading (?)

Challenges of Group Projects Team members have different levels of ambition, tolerance for uncertainty, free time, skills and knowledge. Requires time and guidance to “storm and norm” to become a well functioning team. Danger of slackers and bullies Stronger students disadvantaged by weaker ones, and vice versa

A Few Grading Options 1. Shared grade ◦ Assign one grade for the project. All members get same grade ◦ Pros & Cons  Models real life: rewards for team work are unfair sometimes.  Some students don’t feel it is fair

Perceptions of quality Overall, I felt dissatisfied with the final product that my team put together for this paper, which was a frustrating experience. I was very surprised to be looking at the same document as my teammates the night before it was due and feeling like what I was seeing was far from finished but that they thought that it was just fine.

Perceptions of contribution Not all members contributed equally to drafting the final report... we are all equally as busy and every group member should have made an effort to make the final product as good as possible.

Language and cross-cultural issues I felt frustrated not being able to provide succinct, well-structured information to the discussion part. At a certain point, I felt that I was delaying the group instead of collaborating to an efficient work environment. Comment from international student

Grading Options 2. One grade + Peer assessment ◦ Partial grade for group product, partial grade for peer assessment ◦ Pros and cons  Peer assessment increases individual accountability  Need to decide/agree on assessment criteria  Takes added time  Grudges?

Example 1: IH773 Fundraising Group Project Create groups with mix of skills (financial analysis, fundraising experience, writing) Task: Choose an organization; plan and implement a fundraising activity (4 deliverables, can be re-submitted for higher grade) Class time spent on team building exercises (1 hour): discuss values, past experiences on teams. Develop team contract for behavioral norms

Example 1: IH773 Fundraising Group Project 20% of grade is group project 15% of this is the products of group (75 points) 5% is the peer assessment (25 points) Peer assessment is based on the team contract with behavioral objectives or agreed upon norms (5)

Sample contract objectives/norms Be respectful to all team members Respond to s within 24 hours Be forthright about issues which are affecting your ability to participate Follow through on commitments

Sample peer evaluation form

Peer Assessment Points

Another peer assessment tool

Example of open-ended feedback on this form: Student X gave each member score of “0” All members participated equally in development of the initiative and completion of the assignment. We divided work equally based on every member’s strengths and weakness. We met regularly and all were present at all meetings including online meetings. All of us were accommodating of each other’s schedules and prior commitments and were able to work around them smoothly. It was a great experience working with the team and I feel that we all got to learn something from each other.

Another example: Student A gave Students A, B +1, Students C,D -1 C was instrumental in coordinating our interviews and put in a lot of time, but the written part required extensive revisions and was unresponsive to assignment....D’s contributions also required significant editing and she did not take initiative to work on things by herself without being told exactly what to do. Although I rated C and D lower, it was, for the most part a great pleasure to work with them.