Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Advertisements

Open Access Dr Richard Masterman Director Research Innovation Services.
Data management, data sharing and the activities of the UKDA Managing research data well workshop London, 30 June 2009 Manchester, 1 July 2009.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL NERC Data Policy Why NERC considers data management an important activity. Mark Thorley.
ESRS Data Policy ESDS role in its successful implementation Kristine Doronenkova,
Data Sharing – an ESRC perspective Siân Bourne, Acting Head of Research Resources.
The transition to Finch: implications for the REF 29 November 2012 Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE.
Open Access, Research Funders and the Research Excellence Framework Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access What’s Happening? Nia Wyn Roberts, March 2015.
Open Access Open Access Team, Library
Title of presentation - Your name Audience – Date.
Data Management Planning Kerry Miller Digital Curation Centre University of Edinburgh DIY Research Data Management Training Kit for.
Researchers, Research Councils and the UK Information Infrastructure Dr Michael Jubb Director Research Information Network.
How to Write a Data Management Plan Gareth Cole, Data Curation Officer, Open Access Team.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J How can a Repository Contribute to University Success? APSR - The Successful Repository June 29,
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
Research Outcomes Project Darren Hunter - EPSRC Dale Heenan - ESRC.
UK funding councils: Data retention and access policies The following table outlines the policies of the main UK funding councils with regards to data.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 10/22/2009.
December 2008 MRC Data Support Services (DSS) Chris Morris 13 th February 2009 Sharing Research Data: Pioneers, Policies and Protocols The seventh cat.
Data-intensive research The RCUK Data Policy Mark Thorley
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
Open Exeter Project Team
1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)
ACCESS TO UK RESEARCH OUTPUTS The developing RCUK position
Vasco Vaz Departamento da Sociedade da Informação MedOANet Final Conference, Athens, Greece Open Access in Portugal and FCT´s Policy Proposal.
The importance of DART for funding agencies Dr. Ingrid Kissling-Näf.
Office of Science and Technology. The Sustainability of University Research: Consultation on Dual Support Reform Presentation to Professors and Heads.
Managing Research Data – The Organisational Challenge at Oxford James A J Wilson Friday 6 th December,
Open Access and Data Curation Team
DIY Research Data Management Training Kit for Librarians Data sharing Anne Donnelly Liaison Librarian College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine College.
OpenAIRE - supporting Open Access for FP7 and ERC funded projects Inge Van Nieuwerburgh – Ghent University Library.
The Scientific Publications System: A Key Factor for EU Research Policy Celina Ramjoué European Commission, Research Directorate-General Science, Economy.
The Research Information Network: what is it and what does it do? Stéphane Goldstein USTLG Summer meeting University of Liverpool, 22 June 2006.
Open Access & Research Assessment Dealing with UK Open Access Requirements in Practice Dominic Tate Scholarly Communications Manager Edinburgh University.
‘intelligent openness’ The common objective of an RCUK data policy Gregor McDonagh
Open Access and the Wellcome Trust: providing funds for open-access publishing Kathryn Lallu Grants Policy, Liaison and Support Manager Grants Administration.
Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs Mark Thorley
Vision for academic geographic data access Dr David Medyckyj-Scott GRADE Project Director EDINA.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
Open access- a funders perspective (or “What we want from institutions”) CRC/RLUK/ARMA/SCONUL meeting 27 th January 2011 Robert Kiley, Head Digital Services,
LIFE Conference 20 April 2006 The Researchers’ Perspective Michael Jubb Director Research Information Network.
It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications.
Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs Mark Thorley
Open Access and the Research Excellence Framework
Open Access - from a Library perspective Susan Ashworth, University of Glasgow Library.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL Roles, Rights and Responsibilities in Data Curation; The NERC Perspective JISC Data Cluster Consultation Workshop,
Research Outputs - Services for Staff and Students Valerie McCutcheon
{ OA Policy implementation: Chemical Sciences Ljilja Ristic MScChem PGLIS MCLIP Physical Sciences Consultant & Subject Librarian, RSL February 2016.
Implementing NIH Deposit Policies: Institutional Strategies at the University of Minnesota CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 7-8, 2008 Minneapolis, MN.
Using RMS to comply with Open Access Requirements Betsy Fuller Research Repository Librarian Information Services.
Ukpmc.ac.uk As a result of the mandates Research in the open How mandates work in practice 29 th May, 2009 Paul Davey, UK PubMed Central Engagement Manager,
Open Access and the ESRC New directions in scholarly communications in the social sciences.
Open Access: what you need to know This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.This work is licensed under a Creative.
Research Councils UK and the research funding landscape Name Job title Research Councils UK.
RCUK Policy on Open Access: Terms and Compliance Repositories Support Project Event London, May 2013 Mari Williams BBSRC.
NRF Open Access Statement
Open Exeter Project Team
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Research Outcomes Collection
Open Access and Research Data Management: An Overview for LLOs
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
An Introduction to Open Access and Research Data Management
Open access in REF – Planning Workshop
Research Data Management
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Open access in REF – Planning Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective from the UK Research Councils

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Overview The UK’s research councils Principles on access Access to research outputs Data management policies

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC UK Research Councils Arts & Humanities £97M Biotechnology & Biological£382M Engineering & Physical£721M Economic and Social£150M Medical£546M Natural Environment£367M Particle Physics & Astronomy£315M Central Laboratory£213M Estimate:2007/08. Source: Science and innovation investment framework 2004 – 2014: next steps. HM Treasury, March 2006.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Research Councils UK £2.8B

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC RCUK four key principles 1.Accessibility to publicly-funded research. Ideas and knowledge derived from publicly-funded research must be made available and accessible for public use, interrogation and scrutiny, as widely, rapidly and effectively as practicable.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC RCUK four key principles 1.Accessibility to publicly-funded research. 2.Rigorous quality assurance. Published research outputs must be subject to rigorous quality assurance, through effective peer review mechanisms.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC RCUK four key principles 1.Accessibility to publicly-funded research. 2.Rigorous quality assurance. 3.Efficient and cost-effective access. The models and mechanisms for publication and access to research results must be both efficient and cost-effective in the use of public funds.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC RCUK four key principles 1.Accessibility to publicly-funded research. 2.Rigorous quality assurance. 3.Efficient and cost-effective access. 4.Long-term preservation and accessibility of outputs. The outputs from current and future research must be preserved and remain accessible for future generations.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Access to research outputs Generic RCUK position on deposit in repositories applies to: –Published, peer-reviewed outputs only (eg. journal articles, conference proceedings); –New grants awarded after October 2006 (but encouraged for existing grants). RCUK ‘impacts’ study to report in 2008.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Access to research outputs CouncilRequirement to deposit AHRC(Mandate?) To confirm by end 2006 BBSRCMandate (If repository available) EPSRCStrongly committed to RCUK principles (Will review position after RCUK study) ESRCMandate MRCMandate NERCMandate PPARCMandate (If repository available) CCLRCStrongly encourages deposit

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Access to research outputs CouncilRequirementRepository AHRC(Mandate?)To confirm by end 2006 BBSRCMandate (If repository available) Use most appropriate repository EPSRCStrongly committed to RCUK principles ESRCMandateMust deposit in ESRC repository MRCMandateMust deposit in UK Pub-med Central NERCMandateUse most appropriate repository. If non-available, use NERC repository PPARCMandate (If repository available) Use most appropriate repository CCLRCStrongly encourages deposit Use CCLRC’s own repository

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Data management policies Policies and data management infrastructures have developed over time. Reflection of approaches to data management within differing scientific communities.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Data management policies AHRCDe facto policy - detailed in funding guidance. BBSRCData sharing policy and implementation guidelines. Endorsed by Council July EPSRCNo formal policy, does not overly intervene in the research dissemination process. ESRCFormal data policy. Current version dates from 2000, to be updated soon. MRCData sharing and preservation policy – applies to new grants awarded from January NERCData policy handbook – policy and guidance. New version due end PPARCData curation policy agreed in principle. April CCLRCA number of policies for the curation of CCLRC data on a per-project basis.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Obligations on researchers AHRCFor grants awarded where a significant product is the creation of an electronic resource, data and documentation must be offered to AHDS within 3 months. BBSRCResearch data to be made available with as few restrictions as possible in a timely and responsible manner. Data should be retained for 10 years. EPSRCEncourages PIs to manage primary data as the basis for publications securely and for an appropriate time in a durable form under the control of the institution of their origin. ESRCApplicants must carry out a data review to ensure funds not requested for data that are already available. Data must be offered to the Data Archive within 3 months of end of award. MRCFrom January 2006 applicants must produce a plan for data sharing and preservation and include costings in grant applications. NERCAll data must be offered to a NERC data centre to enable long-term management and re-use. PIs offered reasonable time for first use. PPARCPIs have to consider data curation and sharing activities.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Curation AHRCJoint JISC & AHRC supported Arts and Humanities Data Service (AHDS) BBSRCNo curation facilities supported as yet – however, recognise need for resources to support long-term, sustainable management. EPSRCData managed in a durable form under control of the institution of origin. ESRCJoint JISC & ESRC supported UK Date Archive, including the Economic and Social Data Service. MRCEncourages curation and long-term management and MRC will fund. Onus is on the PI and their institution. Considering data curation facilities. NERCLong-term commitment to managing and making available environmental data. Eight NERC Data Centres. PPARCSupports long-term curation of selected data sets. Driven by the science, data centres supported as projects. Not appropriate to maintain all data. CCLRCA number of curation activities – including the Atlas Data Store

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Generic issues Research outputs must be accessible to enable verification & exploitation. Research funders have a responsibility to ensure: –Accessibility of outputs; –Availability of long-term infrastructure. Dissemination is part of the research process and has to be paid for.

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Further information For further information please contact: Mark Thorley NERC Data Management Coordinator phone: +44 (0) web: /

Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC