An Introduction to General Plans and CEQA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Advertisements

Urban Sprawl and GHG Pollution—SB 375 NCEL Presentation Kip Lipper-CA Senate September 8, 2008 Portland, OR.
City Council Hearing March 3, 2008 SIERRA POINT BIOTECH PROJECT.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
1 LAFCO FEES The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
CEQA FUNDAMENTALS for LAFCo’s
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Planning Issues in Agriculture Laws and Regulations Lecture 6 Lecture 6.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Local Planning Process The General Plan SB 18 Training Program.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Douglas P. Carstens Chatten-Brown & Carstens LLP, Hermosa Beach L EGAL A SPECTS OF C LIMATE C HANGE & U SING CEQA TO S UPPORT B ETTER P ROJECTS.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
California's Global Warming Act Presented by: Jila Priebe Statewide Transit Planning & Research Branch Division of Mass Transportation California Department.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Temple City Housing Element City Council /Planning Commission Study Session September 27, 2012.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
1 Southern California Association of Governments Irvine, December 9, 2008 OCBC Infrastructure Committee SB 375 Presentation Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director,
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
CEQA Nuts and Bolts Adam U. Lindgren. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was passed in 1970 with numerous expressed legislative intents and.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
The California Environmental Quality Act and Greenhouse Gas Emissions SB97 and the Proposed Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines on Analyzing Greenhouse.
Planning & Community Development Department Conditional Use Permit #5029 and Other Land Use Entitlements: Final Environmental Impact Report and Statement.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
Sustainable Communities Strategies 101: An Introduction to California’s New Planning Law SCANPH conference October 1, 2010.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
City and County of San Francisco Scoping Meeting Environmental Impact Report (EIR) PURPOSE To solicit participation in determining the scope.
Regional and Local Land Use Planning Office of Planning and Research December 7, 2015.
CEQA 101 CEQA City of Sacramento Community Development Dept. March 2016.
Overview of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and Designation Process County of San Luis Obispo Office of the County Counsel January 8, 2015.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Environmental Scoping Meeting April 9, Meeting Outline Overview of the Proposed Project Purpose of the Scoping Meeting Environmental Review Process.
Planning Commission Meeting July 30, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
1 “Fair Argument” Test Triggering EIR: Friends of “B” Street v City of Hayward Facts & Issue Trial court: city abused discretion in adopting negative declaration.
1 Roles of the State and Regional Boards in the basin Plan Amendment Process.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Introduction to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Vista Verde Residential Project Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Meeting May 19, 2010 Michael Brandman Associates.
Proposed CEQA Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to General Plans and CEQA Seth Litchney, Planner Governor’s Office of Planning & Research

Overview of OPR Part of the Governor’s Office Statewide Planning and Land Use Agency CEQA Implementation & Technical Assistance Environmental Justice Policy research for Governor and Cabinet Advisor of Military Affairs, Tribal Consultation Training Permit Streamlining for Renewable Energy projects

Overview of Presentation General Plans and Zoning What is CEQA? Objectives of CEQA When Does CEQA Apply? CEQA Process NEW: SB 375 and SB 226 OPR’s Role

General Plans and Zoning

General Plan Basic Requirements Each county and city must adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city. The general plan acts as a “constitution for future development.” Lesher Communications v. City of Walnut Creek

Elements of the General Plan The seven mandatory elements Land Use Circulation Housing Conservation Open Space Noise Safety Optional elements may be included, but must be consistent with other elements.

Basic Requirements General Plan Consistency Equal status among elements CONSISTENCY Data, analysis, goals and policies within each element must be consistent with and compliment one another.

Content Typically the general plan consists of diagrams and text describing goals, objectives, policies and programs. The level of detail in each element shall reflect the needs of the community. The city or county may adopt any format appropriate, including combining elements.

Content of General Plans Goals, objectives, policies and programs. The level of detail in each element shall reflect the needs of the community.

Preparing a General Plan Adoption deadlines 30 months after incorporation Housing element Other elements updated as needed General Plan Guidelines (OPR, 2003) OPR to provide guidance for mandatory elements (§ 65040.2) OPR’s General Plan Guidelines is an advisory document utilized by planners, decision- making bodies, and the public for help preparing a general plan.

Adopting a General Plan Adoption by the local agency Recommendation made by planning commission (§ 65354) Adoption made by legislative body Notice and hearing (§ 65353 and 65355) Adopting or amending a General Plan is an action subject to CEQA

Implementation

Zoning City or county ordinance which divides a community into districts or zones and determines what can and cannot be built on land within those districts

Zoning Zoning districts usually include: Residential Agricultural Open Space Commercial Industrial Mixed Use

Zoning Zoning addresses: Restrictions on the use of land The use of a building in a zone The bulk, size and design of buildings Performance standards (parking, landscaping, energy use, etc.)

Zoning Example (City of Sacramento Zoning Map Book): R-1 Standard Single Family Zone: This is a low density residential zone composed of single family detached residences on lots a minimum of 52 feet by 100 feet in size. This zone may also include recreational, religious and educational facilities as the basic elements of a balanced neighborhood. Minimum lot dimensions are 52 feet by 100 feet interior, 62 feet by 100 feet corner, 7-8 units per acre. Maximum height is 35 feet; maximum lot coverage is 40%. C-3 Central Business District Zone-Special Planning District: The Central Business District applies to a 67-block portion of the Central City. The C-3 zone is the only classification which has no height limit and is intended for the most intense retail, commercial and office developments in the City. Residential uses are permitted by special permit. M-2 Heavy Industrial Zone: This zone permits the manufacture or treatment of goods from raw materials. Maximum height is 75 feet. There is no maximum lot coverage. The parking ratio for warehousing uses is no less than 1 space per 1000 square feet gross floor area and no more than 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area.

Zoning Zones can be amended through a legislative action. Zoning changes are subject to CEQA. The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the legislative body. The legislative body must hold one public hearing before approving the zone change.

CEQA

What is CEQA? The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is California’s most important environmental law. It requires state, local, and other agencies subject to the jurisdiction of California to evaluate the environmental implications of their actions. CEQA was enacted in 1970, one year after NEPA.

CEQA Foundations CEQA Statute CEQA Guidelines Caselaw Public Resources Code 21000-21177 CEQA Guidelines CCR Title 14, § 15000 et seq. Caselaw Court decisions interpreting and applying statute and guidelines to specific cases Public Agency Implementation

Objectives of CEQA To inform decision makers and the public To identify ways to avoid or reduce environmental damage. To prevent environmental damage by requiring implementation of feasible alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines Section 15002.

Objectives (Continued) To disclose to the public reasons for agency approval of projects with significant environmental effects. To foster interagency coordination in the review of projects. To enhance public participation in the planning process.

When does CEQA Apply? Discretionary activities proposed to be carried out or approved by California public agencies, including state, regional, county, and local agencies CEQA applies to private activities that require discretionary government approvals. P.R.C. § 21001.1, 21002, 21080; Guidelines § 15002(i)

DEFINITIONS “Project” CEQA applies to activities that are considered “Projects” Guidelines § 15378: “Project” means the whole of an action, which has the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and that is any of the following:

DEFINITIONS “Project” (continued) (A) An activity directly undertaken by a public agency. Examples include: Public works construction activities: Clearing or Grading Improvements to public facilities Planning Activities Enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances Adoption and amendment of local general plans

DEFINITIONS “Project” (continued) (B) An activity undertaken by a person which is supported, in whole or in part, through contracts, grants, subsidies, loans or other forms of assistance from one or more public agencies. (C) An activity that involves the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies.

DEFINITIONS “Discretionary” “Discretionary project” means a project which requires the exercise of judgement or deliberation when the public agency or body decides to approve or disapprove a particular activity, as distinguished from situations where the public agency or body merely has to determine whether there has been conformity with applicable statutes, ordinances, or regulations. Guidelines § 15375 Definition of discretionary - Johnson v. State of California (1968) 69 cal. 2d 782 Building permit may be a discretionary action - Friends of Westwood v. City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal. App. 3d 259

Examples of Discretionary Actions Zoning Variance Use permits Tentative Subdivision Map Combinations Non-Discretionary Building Permit* Business License Final Subdivision Map * Building permit may be subject to CEQA if the building approval process includes discretionary review, such as site plan or design review. A particular type of project or approval may be discretionary for one agency but ministerial for another. Example: New vineyard allowed by right under county ordinance. But WDR required - Board is lead. IF Discharge is covered under a general permit or waiver, CEQA is not triggered by either action.

Examples of “Non-Projects” Activities for which “it can be seen with certainty” that no environmental effect will occur. Proposals for legislation to be enacted by the State Legislature. Certain continuing administrative or maintenance activities.

DEFINITIONS “Lead Agency” “Lead Agency” means the public agency which has the principal responsibility of carrying out or approving a project. The Lead Agency will decide whether an EIR or a Negative Declaration will be required for the project and will cause the document to be prepared. Guidelines § 15367

DEFINITIONS “Responsible Agency” Public agency which proposes to carry out or approve a project for which a Lead Agency is preparing an EIR or Negative Declaration. Includes all state and local agencies other than the lead agency with discretionary approval power over the project.

DEFINITIONS “Trustee Agency” State agency with jurisdiction over resources held in trust for the people of California. Fish and Game State Lands Commission Parks and Recreation University of California Trustee agency may not necessarily have discretionary approval power over a project.

The Process under CEQA

Preliminary Review Submit application to lead agency. Determine whether project is subject to CEQA. Review for exemptions.

Statutory Exemptions Established through legislative action. A Project that falls within a statutory exemption is not subject to CEQA even if it has the potential to significantly affect the environment. A project that is statutorily exempt is entitled to a blanket exemption from all of CEQA’s procedures and policies. PRC § 21080; Guidelines § 15260-15285

Categorical Exemptions A Categorical Exemption is an exemption from CEQA for a class of projects that the Secretary for Resources determines generally will not have a significant effect on the environment There are 33 Categorical Exemptions Guidelines § 15300-15333 Notice of Exemption: When a lead agency determines a project is exempt they may file a Notice of Exemption (NOE).

Initial Study An Initial Study is a preliminary analysis to determine whether an EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration is required. Checklist of Potential Environmental Impacts

Conclusions of Initial Study Lead agency prepares one of the following : Negative Declaration (ND) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

Negative Declaration Negative Declaration: A Negative Declaration is a written statement by the lead agency briefly explaining why a project will not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore does not require the preparation of an EIR.

Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared when there are potentially significant effects on the environment, but revisions to the project (mitigation) will avoid or clearly reduce the effects to a less than significant level.

Environmental Impact Report An EIR is a detailed informational document that analyzes a project’s potential significant effects on the environment and identifies mitigation measures and reasonable alternatives to avoid significant effects. Notice Of Preparation: Helps determine the Scope of the EIR.

Contents of EIR Project Description Environmental Setting Environmental Impacts Direct Physical Effects Reasonably Foreseeable Indirect Effects Cumulative Effects Growth Inducing Effects Mitigation Measures Alternatives

Public Review of the EIR/ND -NOP: 30 days -EIR: 30 days, when submitted to SCH 45 days (state review) -Response to comments: 10 days to Public Agency ND or MND 20 days 30 days if submitted to SCH (state review)

Caltrans and CEQA A proposed project that may affect highways or other facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation if the meeting is requested by the department. The lead agency shall call the scoping meeting as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days after receiving the request from the Department of Transportation.

Adopting a ND/MND Prior to approving a project, the lead agency shall consider the proposed ND/MND together with any comments received during the public review process and find: On the basis of the whole record there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment, and The ND/MND reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the lead agency

Certifying an EIR/ND Prior to approving a project, the lead agency shall certify that: The Final EIR/ND has been completed in compliance with CEQA The Final EIR/ND was reviewed and considered by the decision making body The Final EIR/ND represents the Lead Agency’s independent judgement and analysis

Findings The lead agency must make one of these findings for each identified significant effect: Changes or alterations have been required or incorporated which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been, or can and should be, adopted by such agency. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations make the proposed mitigation infeasible.

Statement of Overriding Considerations Final EIR identifies significant effects, the lead agency shall state in writing the specific reasons supporting its actions. Guidelines Section 15093 PRC Section 21081 (b)

Mitigation Monitoring A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is required whenever the lead agency approves a project which requires mitigation (EIR or MND). Transportation information generated by the MMRP for a project of areawide importance shall be submitted to the transportation planning agency and Caltrans. Agencies may adopt standard MMRP policies.

Project Approval Lead Agency must approve or disapprove project after certification/adoption of the CEQA document. After project approval, Lead Agency shall file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the county clerk, and in some cases with OPR, within 5 days of project approval.

SB 375 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cars & Light Trucks ARB Targets for 2020 and 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Organizations: Prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of its Regional Transportation Plan ARB certifies whether or not the SCS meets the targets

Sustainable Communities Strategy Coordinates the regional housing needs allocation process with the regional transportation process. Housing element law synchronizes schedule to develop common land use assumptions for regional housing and transportation planning. Requires transportation funding be consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy. Federal and State funding

Sustainable Communities Strategy Identify the general location of uses, residential densities, and building intensities within the region; Identify areas within the region sufficient to house all the population of the region, including all economic segments of the population; Identify areas within the region sufficient to house an eight-year projection of the regional housing need for the region; Identify a transportation network to service the transportation needs of the region; Gather and consider the best practically available scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in the region; Forecast development pattern for the region which will reduce GHG from automobiles and light trucks to achieve the GHG reductions target If the SCS does not achieve the targeted reductions in GHGs, set forth the difference between the amount that the SCS would reduce GHGs and the target for the region.

SB 375 Local Governments CEQA Not required to adopt SCS, but receive benefits for compliance CEQA Exemption for “Transit Priority Projects” Transit Priority Project Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment/Limited EIR Limited Analysis for Mixed-Used Residential Projects

SB 375 MPO’s are adopting SCSs

SB 226 Adopted in 2011, required OPR to make CEQA Guidelines Revisions Additional streamlining tool for an even broader range of infill development Residential, Office, Commercial, Schools, Mixed-Use

SB 226 Development must be consistent with an SCS and occur in “Infill” parcels Unlike SB 375, project do not need to be located near transit Projects may be eligible for streamlining if they are located in areas with low VMT.

SB 226 Areas in green and yellow have less than average regional VMT

SB 226 Projects must also meet Performance Standards Project Type All Projects Consistent with SCS, and infill parcel, and (generally) in a city, plus clean up Residential ½ mile to transit, OR low VMT area, OR all affordable housing Commercial ½ mile to 1800 du, OR low VMT area, and < 50,000sf floor plate Office ½ mile to rail OR ½ mile to bus, OR low VMT area Schools Close to students OR ½ mile to transit Mixed Use Comply with predominant use

SB 375 and SB 226 Streamlining

OPR and CEQA Coordinates state review of environmental documents Receive CEQA documents from lead agencies Distribute to state reviewing agencies Establish state review periods Consolidate state agency comments Distribution of CEQA documents through OPR Draft EIR or ND where state agency is Lead, Responsible, Trustee, or has jurisdiction by law for a project. Projects identified as being of areawide, regionwide, or statewide significance. All Notices of Preparation

OPR and CEQA Provide CEQA/Planning Technical Assistance Prepares CEQA Guidelines for adoption by the Secretary of Resources (every 2 years) Assists in identification of state responsible and trustee agencies Resolve lead agency disputes Maintains a database of environmental documents Available online at www.ceqanet.ca.gov

OPR Technical Assistance Publications available on OPR Website www.opr.ca.gov Technical assistance series on planning Technical assistance series on CEQA State Clearinghouse Newsletter State Clearinghouse Handbook Planners’ Book of Lists (CALPIN)

Questions?? OPR Website www.opr.ca.gov (916) 445-0613 Seth.litchney@opr.ca.gov