Florida Department of Environmental Protection Standards and Assessment Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) Sampling Method October 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed Indicators for Ecological Health & Diversity of Rangelands Rod Heitschmidt, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Miles City, MT and Linda Joyce,
Advertisements

Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Planning for fish bearing waters between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead.
Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
The Florida Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Geodatabase A Cooperative Project between the Florida Forest Service and Florida Natural Areas Inventory.
Wetland Habitats: EMWMF Haul Road Remediation In 2005 a large haul road was constructed that resulted in loss of wetlands. To compensate for those losses,
Vegetation Soil, Landscape Hydrology Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition Vegetation Items.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Methodology Overview: Developing Marine Ecological Scorecards Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
Chapter Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM)
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Bioassessment and biomonitoring: some general principles.
Minnesota’s Depressional Wetland Condition Assessment (a.k.a. ‘Status & Trends of Wetland Quality in Minnesota’) John Genet 6 th Annual Minnesota Wetlands.
Measuring biotic components of a system
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Improving Restoration Using CVS-Designed Web-Based Tools 7 October 2009 M. Forbes Boyle University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
CHAPTER 18 Weighted Averaging From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon
NORTHERN IRELAND COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY AND HNV FARMLAND Richard Weyl and Mark Wright Biodiversity Unit Northern Ireland Environment Agency.
LeeAnna Young, Leanne Penry, Liz Montgomery, Johnathan Sutton, John Atkinson.
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Overview of MICS Tools, Templates, Resources, Technical Assistance.
Embracing Tree Health Monitoring. TREE HEALTH MONITORING PROJECT PARTNERS.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Introduction Larger streams and rivers in the Piedmont, Southwestern Appalachians, Ridge and Valley, and parts of the coastal plain ecoregions of Alabama.
The Development of the JAES LVI Calculator Version 3, rev 1a Concept, Development, Implementation, and Operation of the LVI Calculator By Jeff Darr (407)
Spatial Survey Designs Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541) Web Page:
An Ecosystem-Level Study of Florida’s Major Spring Systems Robert L. Knight, Ph.D. Jackson Blue Springs Working Group Tuesday, January 13, 2009.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Benjamin Blandford, PhD University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center Michael Shouse, PhD University of Southern Illinois.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survey Honors Biology
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.
The seeds are scattered – the terror grows!
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Multi-institutional collaborative program. Established in 1988 to document the composition and status of natural vegetation of the Carolinas. Provides.
AREAS OF CONSERVATION EMPHASIS ACE-II Photos courtesy of USFWS National Image Library Melanie Gogol-Prokurat California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Assessing Crayfish Habitat Dan O’Brien John Meredith Leroy Mims.
Measurement of Biological Diversity: Shannon Diversity Index and Shannon’s Equitability Comparing the diversity found in two or more habitats.
Gina Darin, Environmental Scientist CA Department of Water Resources Division of Environmental Services CA Natural Resources Agency GIS Day Sacramento,
Environmental Account Northern Agricultural Region (WA)
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Current Issues Station Multiple choice Matching 5 Tiebreaker Couple posters Oral.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Adapted by Project Greenscape Coordinator LITTORAL SHELF PLANTING Collier County Growth Management Division - Natural Resources Department 2800 North Horseshoe.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Subplot Information National Manual Version 1.55 Section 4.0.
Training Using EDDMapS
VOLUNTEER TRAINING FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE MONITORING
The CVS-EEP Partnership
Midwest Training Entering Data on the Website
The IPANE Project: Invasive Plant Atlas of New England
Vegetation + Macroinvertebrate Monitoring
Sampling Strategies and Quadrats
Sampling methods.
Local Habitat Sampling
EVPP 110 Lab Freshwater Streams 1-2 Diversity of Life 12
Sampling Strategies and Quadrats
Presentation transcript:

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Standards and Assessment Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) Sampling Method October 2012

Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) The Stream and River Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) is a rapid tool to document the plant community in a 100m stream reach. DEP SOP FS 7320 Conduct in conjunction with Stream and River Habitat Assessment (SOP FT 3100) and Rapid Periphyton Survey (RPS; SOP FS 7230)

LVS Method Overview Establish 100m reach of stream Place flags every 10m to create 10 sections m Upstream Downstream

LVS Method Overview For each section, record: – Plant taxa presence. Include submersed, floating, emergent plants within the wetted area of stream. – Note dominant or co-dominant taxa if any taxon is present with ≥ 1 m 2 coverage (can be in patches). – Estimate total area of plant coverage (see back of field sheet). – Collect unknown taxa for ID by expert.

LVS Datasheet – FD Backside has tool for estimating percent cover for section

LVS Datasheet – FD

Include submersed, emergent and floating plants

Include Macroalgae in LVS Macroalgae: CharaNitella Ok to note mosses, liverworts, but they do not have C of C scores Liverworts Fontinalis Sphagnum moss

Use for Numeric Nutrient Criteria When used to determine floral health associated with Ch , F.A.C.: – Perform the method only when the total area of macrophytes equals or exceeds two square meters within the wetted area of the 100 m sampling reach. – Do not include trees or shrubs – Calculate the mean Coefficient of Conservatism (C of C) and % FLEPPC taxa occurrences

Coefficient of Conservatism (C of C) Score of 0-10 assigned to a plant species based on its ecological tolerances/fidelity to pre- settlement condition Subjective assignment of scores by regional botanists with many years of experience with plants in their habitats Establishment of scores creates an objective, repeatable tool to assess the floristic condition; works to compare sites or monitor over time

Use for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Mean Coefficient of Conservatism (C of C) Mean C of C for LVS is weighted by taxon occurrence Presence of a taxon in a 10m segment is one occurrence; max. # of occurrences for a taxon within the 100m reach is ten For each taxon, multiply the C of C score by the number of occurrences Calculate the Mean C of C as the sum of these products divided by the total number of taxa occurrences in the 100 m reach. C of C scores found in Table LT 7600

Use for Numeric Nutrient Criteria FLEPPC Exotics FLEPPC is the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council Track and manage invasive exotic plants Keep lists of invasives that are displacing native species, and changing community structure and ecological function Categories 1 and 2 reflect the extent of the ecological damage caused

Use for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Percent FLEPPC exotics Calculate the percent invasive exotics as the number of occurrences of FLEPPC Category 1 or 2 in the 100 m reach divided by the total number of taxa occurrences in the 100 m reach. LT 7600 table contains nativity status; FLEPPC website has Cat 1 and 2 lists:

Example Calculations

Thickness Rank? Linear Vegetation Survey Use in support of numeric nutrient criteria implementation described in Section 2.7 of the Stream Condition Index Primer. Datasheet available on DEP website in pdf and Excel versions (change taxa list for ease of use) –