Advancing Competency-based Assessment in Entrepreneurship Michael H. Morris, Ph.D. Professor and N. Malone Mitchell Chair Head, School of Entrepreneurship.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entrepreneurial Learning in Europe
Advertisements

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS DRIVER OF B-SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY TRANSFORMATION Dr. Michael H. Morris Professor and N. Malone Mitchell Chair Dept. of Entrepreneurship.
Entrepreneurial Mind-Set
Entrepreneurship Presenter:Syed Tariq ijaz kaka khel MBA (Human Resource Management)
Authentic Performance Tasks
Consistency of Assessment
Engineering and Service-Learning: Improved Education, Improved Communities William Oakes EPICS Program Purdue University.
Training & Development Definition –“The systematic acquisition of attitudes, concepts, knowledge, roles, or skills, that result in improved performance.
Training. Training & Development Definition “The systematic acquisition of attitudes, concepts, knowledge, roles, or skills, that result in improved performance.
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
The Strategic Management Process
Competing for Advantage
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS EMPOWERMENT & TRANSFORMATION Michael H. Morris, Ph.D. George and Lisa Etheridge Professor Academic Director of Entrepreneurship Program.
15 April Fostering Entrepreneurship among young people through education: a EU perspective Simone Baldassarri Unit “Entrepreneurship” Forum “Delivering.
Human capital management
Enterprise & Entrepreneurship Education the new curriculum guidelines in Ireland and the UK ISBE 2012, Dublin 6 November Professor David Rae
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
What Should We Really Be Teaching : Competencies as a Focal Point for Entrepreneurship Education Michael H. Morris, Ph.D. George & Lisa Etheridge Professor.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Training for Improved Performance
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
LAUNCHING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING AND CASE METHOD APPROACHES IN CZECH BUSINESS CLASSES Eva Jarošová Martin Lukeš Department of Managerial Psychology and.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
ENTREPRENEURSHIP 6TH EDITION
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
5 Summary Innovation Strategies
Staff Development and the Change Process
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Competing For Advantage Part IV – Monitoring and Creating Entrepreneurial Opportunities Chapter 12 – Strategic Entrepreneurship.
A COMPETENCY APPROACH TO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Understanding by Design (UbD) The “backward design” model.
©2003 Southwestern Publishing Company 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Robert E. Hoskisson Chapter 13.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Competing For Advantage Part II – Strategic Analysis Chapter 4 – The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Training and Developing a Competitive Workforce 17/04/2013.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Blended Practices for Teaching Young Children in Inclusive Settings Jennifer Grisham-Brown, Ed.D. Mary Louise Hemmeter, Ph.D.
Competing For Advantage Chapter 4 – The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies.
The Nature and Importance of Entrepreneurship
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
©2004 by South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Chapter 12.
©2004 by South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Chapter 12.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
CREATED BY T.ALAA AL AMOUDI
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
CREATED BY T.ALAA AL AMOUDI
Management and Entrepreneurship
Lecture 1 Entrepreneurs – Who are they and what makes them tick?
Presentation transcript:

Advancing Competency-based Assessment in Entrepreneurship Michael H. Morris, Ph.D. Professor and N. Malone Mitchell Chair Head, School of Entrepreneurship Oklahoma State University

Assessment of What? (for us---student level, course level and program level) Integrated ‘E’ Programs Undergraduate Curriculum Scholarly Activity/Research Community-based Outreach Cross-Campus Initiatives Experiential Learning Campus-based Outreach Graduate Curriculum

Competency : definedCompetency : defined  Competence is a fuzzy concept useful in bridging the gap between education and job requirements (Boon and van der Klink (2002)  To have competencies is to possess the necessary attributes to perform competently (Burgoyne, 1988)  A characteristic of an individual that has been shown to drive superior job performance (Hartle, 1995)  Observable behaviors that superior performers exhibit more consistently than average performers (Klein, 1996) IMAGINE > BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Competency : defined Competency : defined  Competencies include knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, behaviors and characteristics that people need to do a job successfully (Bryant & Poustie, 2001)  They correlate with job performance, can be measured against standards, and can be improved with training (Bryant & Poustie, 2001)  One can contrast areas of competence (aspects of the job which an individual can perform) with competency (a person’s behavior underpinning competent performance)  Competencies are connected to activities & tasks, subject to learning and developmental processes, and tend to be interrelated (Bergevoet, Mulder and Van Woerkum, 2005) IMAGINE > BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Why teaching competencies matters…Why teaching competencies matters…  ‘competency’ is a term that allows for flexibility in adapting to diverse and changing organizational demands (Garman and Johnson, 2006)  From an hrm perspective, a competency is something that can be developed (Klarus, et al., 1999)

Management vs. EntrepreneurshipManagement vs. Entrepreneurship  Management: Getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives. It comprises PODSCORB  Entrepreneurship: Recognizing and exploiting opportunity through new combinations. But what does it comprise? IMAGINE > BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

The entrepreneurial experience…The entrepreneurial experience… Limited Sense of Control Loneliness AmbiguityDejection Stress Freedom Exhilaration Uncertainty ResponsibilitySelf-reliance Learning Adaptation Discipline Change IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Does the context matter? Does the context matter?  Start-up  Small or family business  Buying a business  Franchising  Corporate entrepreneurship  Social entrepreneurship  Public sector entrepreneurship  Entrepreneurship in a discipline (art, engineering) IMAGINE > BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Or is the behavior universal?Or is the behavior universal?  Innovative, risk-taking, proactive behaviors  Acting upon opportunity  Unique combinations  Creating something from nothing (or from something very different)  A mindset that is both attitudinal and behavioral …regardless of the context IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

And so…And so…  Perhaps the managerial requirements or competencies needed to succeed in social entrepreneurship or corporate entrepreneurship or new venture creation differ  But do the entrepreneurial competencies differ? Perhaps not! IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Stage 1 Methodology: Delineating Competencies  Two expert panels  Three waves  Survey Monkey  Produced total of 167 competencies  Split into two major groups: managerial and entrepreneurial  Eventually arrived at 13 core entrepreneurial competencies

The key competencies (note their inter- dependencies)  Recognizing Opportunity  Assessing Opportunity  Vision/Seeing the Future  Creative Problem-solving  Resource Leveraging/Bootstrapping  Mitigating and Managing Risk  Planning/Modeling When Nothing Exists  Innovation---Value-driven New Product and Concept Development  Building and Managing Networks  The Ability to Maintain Focus Yet Adapt  Action Orientation/Implementation  Tenacity/Perseverance  Ability to Learn from Experiences IMAGINE > BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Distinguishing Sample Competencies managerial  Organizing  Team building & Staffing  Communicating  Budgeting  Controlling  Motivating  Planning  Directing  Operating  Assessing entrepreneurial  Recognizing Opportunity  Assessing Opportunity  Creative Problem-solving  Resource Leveraging  Guerrilla Skills  Mitigating and Managing Risk  Planning When Nothing Exists  Innovation---Products, Services, Processes  Building & Managing Social Networks  Adaptation while Focusing  Implementation of Something Novel or New

So we are doing bothSo we are doing both  Developing managerial competencies in the business school  Developing entrepreneurial competencies in the entrepreneurship program  Both are needed for success in an entrepreneurial context, although the relative importance of a given competency will vary IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

How do we teach these competencies?How do we teach these competencies?  Lectures  define each competency  illustrate each  strategies for managing each  examples  relate to other competencies and learning points  repetition  Experiential learning in the classroom  Experiential learning outside the classroom

Teaching: experiential learningTeaching: experiential learning  Cases  Student incubators  Tech commercialization teams  Small business consulting projects  Entrepreneurial audits  Marketing inventions  Creativity field experiences (e.g., the Lowe’s experience)  Simulations  Entrepreneurs in the classroom  Interviews of E’s  Unique internships  Mentorships and job shadowing  Role plays (VC’s, family firms, etc.)  Business models  Business plans and competitions  Social entrepreneurship projects in the community

Linking experiential learning to outreachLinking experiential learning to outreach  Native American Entrepreneurship Academy  Community Microcredit Fund  Entrepreneurship Empowerment in South Africa  Inner City Engagement  Disabled Veterans Bootcamp  OSU Entrepreneur’s Bootcamp  Riata Business Plan Competition  Entrepreneurial Mentors Program  OSU Technology Commercialization Initiative  Dilemmas and Debates  Enterprise Creation Competition, a national business plan competition  Women Igniting the Spirit of Entrepreneurship  The Experiential Classroom  Riata Entrepreneurial Internships  Distinguished Lectures & Workshops  Commercial Test Kitchen

Connectivity is keyConnectivity is key ClassroomOutreach Experiential Learning

Integrate across the E curriculum ContextsCompetencies Start-up Ventures Early growth firms Family Businesses Rapid Growth Ventures Corporate Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship within Professions & Disciplines Non-Profit & Social Entrepreneurship Public Sector Cultural Entrepreneurship Academic Entrepreneurship Opportunity Identification Opportunity Assessment Resource Leveraging Guerrilla Techniques New Product- Service- Process Development Risk Management Creativity Adaptation Social Networking Implementation Skills Novel planning

Measuring competencies—some caveats Luken 2004; Le Diest and Winterton, 2005  the definition of a given competence is not a homogeneous definition  competencies are not stable  competence assessments are always subjective  competence assessments are based on individuals, whereas the definition of the competence concept tries to include the context as well  Competence or skill is tied to an individual, but the individual’s competence may vary depending on context  the competence concept includes capacity, whereas it is also important to look at actual performance

Sub-dimensions in mastering a competency  Knowledge and Understanding: what do you need to know about resource leveraging  Attitude/Affect and Self-Awareness: what do you need to think, believe and feel about resource leveraging?  Skills and Behaviors: what do you need to be able to do in terms of resource leveraging? These are all learning outcomes We can do more not just in terms of conveying knowledge, but in all three areas, especially to the extent that we stress experiential learning IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Each competency requires a definition and level of proficiency  Definition: What do we mean by the competency?  Level of Proficiency: What must the student be able to demonstrate in terms of knowledge, skills, capabilities and attitudes he competency to indicate mastery of the competency?

An illustrationAn illustration Example: Risk management Definition:The ability to identify relevant risks surrounding an entrepreneurial action and systematically mitigate those risks. Level of Proficiency: 1. Understands key types of risks 2. Can identify principle risks surrounding a given entrepreneurial action 3. Can prioritize risks based on magnitude and probability of loss 4. Is able to develop specific actions to -stage the risk -share the risk -reduce the risk IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Sample ways to break it downSample ways to break it down  Knowledge  Nature of risk versus uncertainty  Dimensions of risk  Categories of risk  General techniques for mitigating risk  Attitudes/values  Willingness to assume moderate levels of risk  Belief that risk is manageable  Sense of association between risk level and potential return  Behaviors/Skills  Ability to estimate risk  Ability to isolate risk  Ability to moderate level of risk

A second illustrationA second illustration Example: Opportunity identification Definition:The ability to specify unrecognized or unfilled gaps in the external environment creating an opening for a new product, service or process. Level of Proficiency: 1. Understands general sources of opportunity 2. Is capable of scanning the environment to identify emerging patterns & trends, competitor shortcomings, unutilized resources & unmet needs 3. Can connect an opening in the environment to a specific target audience with a need IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Sample ways to it down…Sample ways to it down…  Knowledge  Key sources of opportunity  Major types of opportunity  The nature of opportunities  Four ways in which opportunities are identified  Understanding of specific opportunity generation techniques  Attitudes/values  Curiosity about why things work a certain way  Value one places on being alert to opportunity  Openness to being exposed to diverse and changing situations  Behaviors/Skills  Ability to draw associations  Ability to grasp and hold onto ideas as they occur to us  Ability to assess customer needs  Response to a failure (e.g., elevator pitch loss)  # of opportunities generated  Novelty of ideas generated

Measurement approachesMeasurement approaches  Pre- and post- measures using rating scales  Judging experiential project portfolio  Behavioral event interviews  In class assessments tied to exercises  Student diaries or registers  Peer assessments  Self-assessments at end of program  Behavioral assessments after graduation (see also Bird, 1995) IMAGINE> BELIEVE > CREATE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Examples of existing scales that tie inExamples of existing scales that tie in  Innovativeness: Kirton Adaption Innovation Inventory  Networking: Hatala Network Accessibility Scale  Ambiguity Tolerance: Budner’s Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale  Adaptability: Haynie and Shepherd’s Cognitive Adaptability Scale

Setting the standard for a rubricSetting the standard for a rubric  Criterion-referenced evaluation: student performance is assessed relative to standards set by the discipline or entrepreneurship faculty  Norm-referenced evaluation: students are evaluated on the basis of comparisons to other students

Establishing normsEstablishing norms  We have no norms  Benchmarks must be established  Suggest we initially evaluate students relative to one another  Over time we might create benchmarks using successful entrepreneurs  But----are certain competencies more critical for success in certain types of contexts?  Is our focus less on achieving some absolute level on a competency ---- or more on showing improvement relative to where a student started?  Competency is a process of continual development through one’s life---not riding a bike---fades without practice

Sample template for scales (Mertler 2001) Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Exemplary 4Score Criteria #1 description Criteria #1 description Criteria #1 description Criteria #1 description Total Score = _______ Score at Program Outset _______ Average Student Score ________

Some other tipsSome other tips  Match measurement devices to instructional goals  Do not rely on a single measure of a competency  Teacher judgment is the primary means for assessing competency  Certify competency in progressive stages  Get the students on your side  Allow for easy adjustment of competency measures as content changes  Allow a feedback loop where measurement of competencies is used to modify course content and curriculum design -SeeTyo (1980)

“ Be the change you wish to see in the world.” -M. Gandhi