MTA Bus Time Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

MTA ETA. Product Description A real-time simulation system that estimates the expected time that it will take a certain bus to arrive at an end- users.
School Management Tracking Solutions
New Advances in Customer Communications Copyright © MV Transportation Technologies, Inc. Presenter: Marsha Moore Chief Information Officer MV Technologies.
T RANSPORTATION D ISADVANTAGED B EST P RACTICES & T RAINING W ORKSHOP “ Maximizing ITS investments to reduce operating costs and provide the best possible.
Matt’s Schedule. Headway Variation Estimated Load vs. Passenger Movement.
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
2005 NW ESRI Conference - City of Yakima, Washington Yakima Transit & Refuse AVL Client, Server and Web Applications Tom E. Sellsted Supervising Senior.
STRATEGIES FOR ORGANIZATION, VALIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS DATA Jonathan Wade Manager, Service Development Support.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
Multiple-operator Transit Traveler Information New York State Department of Transportation From TRIPS123 to 511 NY.
Mobile Transit Planning with Real Time Data Jerald Jariyasunant, Dan Work, Branko Kerkez, Eric Mai Systems Engineering Program, Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
Chapel Hill Transit Want to know where your bus is?
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
MTA ETA. Product Description A real-time simulation system that estimates the expected time that it will take a certain bus to arrive at an end- user’s.
Winter Operations GPS Truck Tracking and Material Usage Tom Clay Washington State Department of Transportation Western States Equipment Conference
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Managing Director/CEO
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
CS410 - BLUE GROUP Final Presentation communicate2Me.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
ShopKeeper was designed from the ground up to manage your entire fleet maintenance operations … from 1 user to 100, including full security features that.
“IF YOU CAN MANAGE IT, YOU CAN MEASURE IT” Robert Hudson, Performance Analyst Dept. Planning/Office of Research & Analysis.
THE MILESTONES OF MASS TRANSIT CS 410 Blue Group communicate 2Me.
Multi-Operator Transit Information for Operations and Planning Transit Service Information Portal (TSIP)
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
BusTracker: SmartPhone- based Mass Transit Tracking Steve Kopman 4/27/2011.
Department of Transportation Transit Rebranding New Brand Identity City Council November 4, 2013.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
U.S. DOT T3 Webinar Mobile Device Technology TCRP Synthesis 91 April 10, 2012 Case Study LeeTran – Lee County, FL Mike Horsting, AICP 1.
Using APC Data for NTD Reporting APC University, Houston, Texas 16 October, 2014 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning Federal Transit Administration.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
PI Data Archive Server COM Points Richard Beeson.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Open Transit Data: Meeting Customer Needs Or – Where the Data Meets the Road Dan Overgaard Supervisor, Systems Development & Operations King County Metro.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Improvements and changes for BOB SNIDEMILLER, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORATION TRANSPORTATION UPDATE.
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
Bus Detection Device For The Passenger Using GPS And Gsm Application Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology September 21, 2007 City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology.
Model Validation of Transit Ridership at the Corridor and Transit Route Level by Mark Charnews October 19, 2006.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Library Online Resource Analysis (LORA) System Introduction Electronic information resources and databases have become an essential part of library collections.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
1 Update on Transit in West Kelowna District of West Kelowna - November 12, 2013 Matthew Boyd – Senior Transit Planner Steve Harvard – Senior Regional.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY Dr. Shahram Tahmasseby Transportation Systems Engineer, The City of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, CANADA.
Office of Research and Information Technology CVSA and FMCSA SSDQ Performance Measures: Crash Timeliness Inspection Timeliness April , 2013 CVSA.
PPTA - April 2016 A CT 44 D ATA R EPORTING QC P LAN E LEMENTS, T HEMES AND O PPORTUNITIES.
MTA ETA. Product Description A real-time simulation system that estimates the expected time that it will take a certain bus to arrive at an end- user’s.
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Project Certification Close Out Phase November 16, 2015
M14A/D Select Bus Service
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

MTA Bus Time Implementation & New Applications Michael Glikin Senior Director Bus Schedules Operations Planning MTA New York City Transit Alla Reddy System Data & Research

Background MTA Regional Bus Company is comprised of two different operators in an integrated system New York City Transit (NYCT) 4,431 buses in fleet (2012) 224 routes across 5 boroughs 95 million revenue miles, 1.8 billion passenger miles (2012) Average 2012 weekday ridership of 2.1 million Up 1% from 2011 MTA Bus 1,264 buses in fleet (2012) 80 routes across 4 boroughs 26 million revenue miles, 343 million passenger miles (2011) Average 2012 weekday ridership of 0.4 million Up 2% from 2011 *2012 Estimates

Introduction MTA Bus Time introduced in Feb 2011 Automatic vehicle location (AVL) system that provides position of all equipped buses at 30 second intervals Nearly all Bronx and Staten Island buses installed in 2012 Citywide rollout expected to be completed by late 2014

MTA Bus Time Information Customer Information MTA Bus Time provides customers with bus location information via the web, smartphones, and SMS Internal Performance Monitoring GPS data is captured internally for tracking, performance monitoring, and schedule/ service improvement Publicly reported performance indicators based on processed MTA Bus Time data Historic performance and running time data used for planning and scheduling

Data Collection & Analysis before Bus Time Schedule Revisions Performance Indicators Running time data previously sampled by traffic checkers on a rolling quarterly basis Each route was monitored approximately every 2 to 3 years on weekdays 4+ years for weekends MTA Bus Time now provides a large dataset of actual running times used to adjust schedules more frequently Nearly immediately if there are problems Manually collected data sample from traffic checkers used to report route performance 42 of the 224 NYCT routes were sampled and reported Performance indicators were reported semi-annually to the NYC Transit Committee MTA Bus Time data now allows for next-day reporting of performance for service monitoring on any route

Performance Reporting with MTA Bus Time Real time Data in Cloud Bus Data Customer Information OP: SDR Processing and Analysis 5th Avenue B63 Route 4:55 4:59 Estimate 5:03 5:11 5:16 86th St 50th St 39th St Bay Ridge Parkway Bay Ridge Ave Raw Data from Bus Time Processed Data Route/Path Dest. Bus Run Time Latitude Longitude B63_0130 4630 325 105 4:55:56 40.62175 -74.02590 5:03:13 40.63376 -74.02081 5:11:37 40.64530 -74.01002 5:16:50 40.65148 -74.00357 5:27:22 40.66943 -73.98597 Matched with schedule & depot pullout data Stop Name Time 5 AV-86 ST 4:55:56 5 AV-BR AV 5:03:13 5 AV-50 ST 5:11:37 5 AV-39 ST 5:16:50 5 AV-9 ST 5:27:22 = PI Reports, Running Time Reports

System Design MTA as Systems Integrator using Open Interfaces and Open Source Easier to maintain & control Data available to all end users and external developers System Integration Schedules/routes/stops in GTFS format GPS and wireless communication onboard each bus Trip matching algorithm developed to include: Driver & pullout details to determine route, variant, schedule Roadcall information (In or Out of Service) Schedule information on route, direction, trip, day, season Matching time from AVL data to nearest Timepoint Ensures correct information is reported

MTA Bus Time Launch

Launch Preparation: Requirements Preparation of bus stop schedules and customer information Significant need for field inspections Accurate Geocoding (Lat/Long) Synchronizing multiple systems Schedule database, DOT bus stop database, Bus/depot systems Coordination between operations, management, others Implementation and feedback

Launch Preparation: Lessons Learned Constant tweaking, correcting, and updating Locating Bus Stops Shared bus stops with other operators Exact geocoding of stops based on sign & where drivers wait Confirming Itineraries Irregular or improper driver login or pullout detail Roadcalls, no pullout, broken/missing hardware, etc. Need for internal and full route running time modifications Many earlies uncovered, particularly overnight Lessons learned from Staten Island launch resulted in a smoother and simpler Bronx launch

Launch Implementation: Timeline MTA Bus Time rolled out aggressively, while coordinating with multiple departments and state/city agencies Spring 2010: MTA Bus Time Project Inception Jan 2012: Most Staten Island & Express buses installed Late 2013: Scheduled Manhattan Rollout Late 2014: Scheduled Queens Rollout (completes citywide rollout) Feb 2011: Pilot Study on B63 Nov 2012: Most Bronx buses installed Early 2014: Scheduled Brooklyn Rollout Architecture in place for MTA Bus Time based reporting to begin immediately after rollout July 2012: MTA Bus Time used for internal and public Staten Island route performance reporting Oct 2011: Following parallel testing, MTA Bus Time used for B63 public performance reporting Jan 2013: MTA Bus Time used for internal and public Bronx route performance reporting

MTA Bus Time User and Development Groups Bus CIS group (developers) and OP (Schedules and System Data & Research groups) extensively coordinated in a short time frame to fine-tune system before launch Adjustments and modifications are still ongoing Developers Users Hardware and Server/Software Vendors, Installers Developers & Testers Bus Customer Information Systems Group Schedules System Data & Research Operations Planning Operations Planning: Scheduling Planning Road Operations NYCT Sr. Management Customers

Utilizing the Data

Utilizing Data for Performance Improvement ORCA (Operations Research & Computational Analysis) reporting server implemented to generate performance reports based on Bus Time data Reports are custom built to user-defined routes, dates, days, times, etc. Daily and aggregate On- Time Performance (OTP) Running times to compare schedules with actual conditions based on large amounts of data Bus detail performance of buses or run/route Bus Bunching, Wait Assessment, and more

Performance Improvements B63 Route received MTA Bus Time in February 2011 Following parallel testing, performance has been reported using MTA Bus Time data since Q4 2011 Performance has been steadily improving over last 5 quarters Running times revised in April 2012

Tools for Service & Schedule Improvement: Running Times Large sample of running times show where schedules need to be adjusted to match actual conditions 7-10 AM 3-7 PM Observed running times are almost always higher than scheduled Scheduled running time Actual running times

Running Time Adjustments Actual running times based on large datasets to adjust schedules Point to point running times End to end running times Peak vs. Off-peak changes 15 min, ½ hr, 1 hr, or longer Data can be filtered by direction, location, trip type, date(s) to include/exclude, day(s) of week Mean, mode, median, or 90/95th percentile running times

Performance Improvement Examples Recurrent problem areas can be identified for operational and schedule improvements B63 consistently runs late in PM Peak X17 consistently runs early in PM Peak

Performance Improvements: Operations Profile distributions available by timepoint B63 delays in Sunset Park X17 excess running time to first timepoint

Highlighted buses are bunched Stringline Diagram Stringlines show performance of all buses in one direction over a day (or specific times) Identify problem times, bunching, etc. Highlighted buses are bunched

Corridor Comparisons Corridor analysis shows where schedules are inconsistent Different scheduled running times across routes over the same path Widely varying actual running times

Historic Route Performance Details Post-Sandy Drop Missing observations due to no GPS hardware or transmission, and excluding non-runs / roadcalls Daily On-Time Performance (internal) over long time periods tracks improvement or changes Post-Sandy Drop Daily Wait Assessment (publicly reported indicator)

Trip/Driver Details Driver detail reports help road operations monitor performance and add special training when necessary

Future Applications

Future MTA Bus Time Applications – Real-Time Improvements Ability to Change Schedules quickly and seasonably Customized on-demand performance reporting Real-time performance information to dispatchers to address changing field conditions Better enable corrective actions by road operations Spacing Short turns Rerouting, etc. Current and historic performance integrated with real- time information to identify outliers

Future MTA Bus Time Applications – Inferred Ridership Automatic Fare Collection (AFC) system stores the bus riders swipe onto but does not store location of boarding FTA-approved methodology used for systemwide NTD reporting Using MTA Bus Time data, boarding time can be matched with bus location to determine boardings at stop Experimental algorithm estimates alighting locations by tracking transfers, next swipe, and reverse direction swipes Early testing of max load point timepoint level ridership shows good match with ride check data Passenger-based ride time and wait time statistics can be calculated when coupled with MTA Bus Time data

Weekday Boarding/Alighting Inferred from AFC Data Data inferred for weekdays during the week of 3/6/13 - 3/12/13 (Currently Experimental)

Conclusions Aggressive development of a system integrated in- house by MTA HQ & Dept. of Buses enabled the successful launch of MTA Bus Time Extensive coordination and collaboration between groups within NYCT undertaken in a short time frame Significant steps taken to take advantage of the data by using it to improve bus performance Daily performance reports viewed and used by road operations and management Running times and historic performance used by planning/scheduling

Successes and Enhancements Customer satisfaction is higher due to MTA Bus Time Satisfaction with overall system is 14 percentage points higher among customers that use MTA Bus Time before arriving at their bus stop than for customers as a whole System performance has been improving due to data availability and its use to improve operations With MTA Bus Time rollout to all five boroughs imminent, entire bus system will be “online” and performance will continue to improve New developments are underway to use data from MTA Bus Time to provide real-time information and develop detailed ridership estimates

Questions?