So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma 2006. This work is the intellectual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright Policy Copyright Cathy O’Bryan This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Advertisements

A Web-based Bibliography Management Initiative: Collaborating for Classroom and Library Technology Integration Brian Nielsen, Academic Technologies Denise.
Copyright Princeton University This work is the intellectual property of Princeton University. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Supporting and Hosting Web- Based Learning Systems Educause 2001 Charlene Douglas – Director Kathryn Gomm - Training Manager Sharon McCarrager – Accessibility.
Seeing the Forest and the Acorns in the Decision Tree Sandy Burke Computing Center HelpDesk Manager Copyright Sandy Burke, This work is the intellectual.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
TESL Ontario Conference October 28 & 29, Project Team Project Lead - Carolyn Cohen Research Lead - Antonella Valeo Research Consultants - Sheila.
Innovation and Outcomes: Voices of Experience Purdue University Calumet Midwest Educause Conference Monday, March 13, 2006 Heather L. Zamojski: Course.
Flexible Information Literacy Alternatives for Independent Learners Suzanne Hayes March 17, 2003 Copyright Suzanne Hayes This work is the intellectual.
February 2006 copyright Michael Welch, Blinn College This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
1 Penn State/Napster 2.0 Trial Russell S Vaught Associate Vice Provost, Information Technology Copyright Russell S. Vaught This work.
The Student Experience in BroncoDirect-Take Two Rose Kukla – Enrollment Services, Project Manager Learning Outcome Results Context Method Next Steps Your.
Copyright 2008, Elizabeth A. Evans. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Providing and Managing Technology Training Providing & Managing Technology Training Susan McKibben The University of Akron.
Forever Access vs. Archiving Courses: Practical Limitations and Policy Allan Gyorke Penn State University.
Making the Pieces Fit Together Barbara Draude, Director, Academic and Instructional Technology Services Middle Tennessee State University Lisa Rogers,
Dr. Andrea Henne Dean, Online & Distributed Learning San Diego Community College District Real-World Strategies Changing your Course Management System.
Copyright Dong Chen, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
In An Online Course Using Wimba Voice Software Dr. Mary Jane Clerkin Berkeley College Coordinator of Online Faculty Support Raising the Level of Interaction.
How Collaboration Created an Online Help Desk and Knowledge Base for the Campus Community EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2008.
Copyright Shanna Smith & Tom Bohman (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Jumping Into the Frying Pan Lessons learned deploying and supporting Sakai in a liberal arts environment Mary P. Glackin & Julie Habjan Boisselle Mount.
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Darrel S. Huish Katherine J. Ranes Arizona State University Lessons Learned During the First Year of myASU, a Large Institution Portal Copyright Darrel.
Center for Instructional Technology James Madison University Strategies for Transitioning to the Age of Digital Media Sarah E. Cheverton James Madison.
Putting the We in… We are Penn State! Copyright [Carol Findley, Lisa Dibert] [2003]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.
Funding Strategic Initiatives in Academic Technology A Process for Identifying, Cataloging, and Categorizing IT Needs Campuswide Copyright© D. Tebbetts,
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Copyright notice  Copyright Victoria Mantor and Wangui Njuguna This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this.
Copyright © 2003, Scott Higgins and Marianne Hollis Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for.
Collaborative Course Development Educause Southeast Regional Conference 2002 Libby V. Morris, Associate Professor, UGA Wendy Bedwell, Project Coordinator,
Rice’s 3-in-1 Wiki February 22, 2008 Copyright Carlyn Foshee Chatfield, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
Sharing MU's SharePoint Experience 2005 Midwest Regional Conference Innovative Use of Technology: Getting IT Done Wednesday, March 23, 2005.
Stanford’s Patch Management Project   Ced Bennett May 17, 2004 Copyright Cedric Bennett This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.
Please Note: Copyright –David L. Snellman This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Megan Adams, Swarthmore College Mark Colvson, Bryn Mawr College January 17, 2003 Collaborative Virtual Reference Services: The Tri-College Libraries’ Experience.
Pay for Print vs. Print Conservation: It’s All in How You “Sell” It © Kathy Gervasi and Bill Thieke, This work is the intellectual property of the.
Center for Planning and Information Technology T HE C ATHOLIC U NIVERSITY of A MERICA ERP Systems: Ongoing Support Challenges and Opportunities Copyright.
ON TIME, ON-BUDGET, AND BEYOND: SUCCESSFUL ERP IMPLEMENTATION AND BUDGETING MODELS Nadine Stern Vice President for Information Technology and Enrollment.
CMC’s Journey of Migration from WebCT to Sakai X. Melissa Zhuo, Ben Royas CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE Copyright Claremont McKenna College, 2007.
March 21, 2006 NERCOMP 2006 Worcester, Massachusetts 1 Copyright Sunny Donenfeld, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
The FLORIDA VISTA IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT: Implications for CAMPUS I.T. professionals Learning Support Systems Office of Academic Technology.
Portal to the Rescue: First Year Information Copyright William P. Wilson This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
Closer to the Dream: Letting Pedagogy Transform Learning Management Systems Ryan Gjerde – Luther College Bob Puffer – Luther College Dan Beach – St. Olaf.
Project Management Plan HOW TO PROCESS SEARCHES AND NEW HIRE TRANSACTIONS FOR REGULAR FACULTY (HT-REG) Online Course Development Presented to: Dr. Nancy.
1 Copyright Carl Berger This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
Practice What You Preach: A Hybrid Orientation to Online Pedagogy Catherine Kelley, Ph.D. Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Considerations and Concerns When Moving from Commercial to Sakai Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Virtual Orientation: Personalized Communities with Market Appeal Marcus P. Robinson Brian A. Young Educause 2001 Indianapolis, Indiana.
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
My UW-Madison Enterprise Portal Migration to Open Source Framework Jim Helwig EDUCAUSE Midwest Regional Conference, Chicago March 23, 2005
Portals and Web Standards Lessons Learned and Applied David Cook Copyright The University of Texas at Austin This work is the.
A Strategy for Moving from Commercial to an Open Source Environment Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Mining User Data: Getting the Most out of your CMS John Fritz, UMBC.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
COUNTING NEW FORMS OF SCHOLARSHIP TOWARD TENURE AND PROMOTION Peter Angelos and Linda Deneen University of Minnesota Duluth October 2010 This work is the.
Improving Campus IT Accessibility Dr. Jonathan Lazar Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences Towson University Copyright Jonathan Lazar This work.
Chief Information Officer Effectiveness in Higher Education Wayne Brown, Ph.D. Copyright Wayne Brown This work is the intellectual property of the.
Choosing The Learning Management System for Miami University PROJECT UPDATE.
Defining an IT Workflow, from Request to Support
myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:
An App A Day Copyright Tina Oestreich and Brian Yuhnke This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
Presentation transcript:

So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author. Information Technology University of Oklahoma

Background Current product no longer supported Faculty dissatisfaction with performance and features of existing product Why the need for a new course management system? Provost-appointed task force –Upgrade or adopt new system Faculty survey – Pilot program Recommendation to purchase Desire2Learn and implement by Fall 2005 Selection Process

Expectations A fully operational Desire2Learn staging instance ready by April 4, Staging system to be used for training, developing summer intersession and fall courses, and course migrations from the current Blackboard 5.6 environment. (No mass migration.) This system was only to be used by faculty until summer intersession began. (No student access) This system will only be used for courses available through online enrollment on the Norman and Tulsa campuses. The project plan was built upon the following expectations:

Project Assumptions The budgetary estimate for hardware and software was approved. The Project Blueprint was approved. The Course Management System Task Force was the “owner” of this project and drove the timeline decision. This implementation only impacted the existing Blackboard environment. WebCT is still available.

Project Team Roles

Project Deliverables Staging System Plan – March 1 Staging System – April 4 Production System Plan – April 11 Train the Trainer sessions – April 11 & 12 External D2L Training Materials – April 11 Production System – July 8 Staging System becomes Test/Development System – July 8 Knowledge Base Articles – July 8 Support Staff Training – Summer Transition Plan - Summer

Project Risks Hardware not arriving on time Resource contention with other projects Shifts in timeline coordinated by CMS Task Force Delays with the Desire2Learn Team’s piece of the implementation

D2L Network Diagram

Training and Communications Training & Publicity coordinated through the Task Force –Point of Contact appointed from each of the 13 colleges Serves as trainer Provides initial support Distributes system updates Training Coordinator from Information Technology led the group in coordinating training efforts, developed materials and provided “overflow” training.

Training and Communications (cont’d) Training Plan –First meeting of college reps March 11 –Train the trainer training led by D2L April –Intensive training within colleges April 18 – 29 –Continue training as needed, determined by individual colleges May 1 – August 7 –Intensive training effort August 8 – September 2 –Training for support staff Summer

Training and Communications (cont.) Communications/Marketing –Provost sent announcement to faculty & published ads in the campus paper –College of Arts & Sciences prepared project website– –College contacts sent introductory & posted fliers providing contact information, training schedules, and project update –Login page of Blackboard changed, linking to project update site Concern with faculty on sabbatical who might have content in Blackboard

Project Milestones IT and D2L build Staging system –March 28 through April 4 Staging Environment Ready –April 4 Train the trainer training –April 11 & 12 Upload summer intersession and fall courses into D2L (spring intersession and summer courses will continue in Bb) –April 11 Training blitz –April 18 through April 29 Ongoing training –May through August D2L Production system ready –June 17

Project Milestones (cont.) D2L Production testing and data migration from Staging system –June 20 through July 1 D2L Production system finalized and launched –July 8 Summer intersession began on production system –August 2 Fall classes began on D2L –August 22 5,400 users accessed on day one 20,400 unique users in first two weeks with no performance issues encountered Blackboard service ended –September 30

Keys to Success Task Force was a collaboration of multiple academic and administrative units This paved the way for campus-wide buy-in, in part due to high level administrative support

Keys to Success Clear and Regular Communication –Documented meetings were essential –Knowledge is power – never too much communication to the faculty Distributed Training Team Work –Clearly defined responsibilities

Thank You!