1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Audit. Traditional use of audit relates to accounting: Analysis of gender budget Gender audit still evolving… -now used interchangeably with evaluation.
Advertisements

Floridas Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Technical Session LSTA Coordinators Annual Conference November 16-17, 2000.
Health Promotion.
GENDER RESPONSIVE BUDGETING Yerevan, 2008 Assessment mission workshop Elizabeth Villagómez International Expert and Consultant Almenara, Estudios Económicos.
Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
5.1.2 Situative Planning 1 Situative Planning - A Strategic Approach to Urban Planning UPA Package 5, Module 1.
ESRC/DfID Poverty Alleviation Conference 9/9/14
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Hivos | Toolkit “Sustainable Coffee Farming as a Family Business” Objective To motivate and help practitioners in integrating a gender and youth.
Contents of an M&E Plan An introduction A problem statement: define the public health problem at issue Conceptual framework Logical or results framework.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
 The objective was to provide the World Bank, the League of Arab States and CAWTAR with a better understanding of your needs and interests, and of how.
Community Sector Governance Capability Framework
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
The participants should have understood the following basic principles: Integrating gender considerations into project design and implementation Assessing.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
A presentation deck for training educators on the Project MASH problem-based learning process Full day version Dig Deeper with Problem-based Learning.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Impact Evaluation: Initiatives, Activities, & Coalitions Stephen Horan, PhD Community Health Solutions, Inc. September 12, 2004.
UNDP RBEC Regional Centre Engendering the Localizing Sustainable Development Projects in Western-Balkan Countries and CIS Dono Abdurazakova, Regional.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Basic Impact Evaluation Course Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) World Bank Institute Attacking Poverty Program.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
PADI Action Agenda for China(draft) History of Poverty Reduction in China History of Monitoring & Evaluation in Poverty Reduction Objectives.
Module 23 Environmental Safeguards Accreditation Training, January 21 – 25, 2013 Public Consultation.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
FIJI FLOODS 2012 Gender Integration in the FRCS Response.
UNDP-GEF Community-Based Adaptation Programme Anne-France WITTMANN CBA-Morocco Programme Manager (UNV) Tools & Tips to foster Gender Mainstreaming & Inclusion.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Expected Learning Objectives Participants should understand the following: The concepts of ‘gender’ and ‘sex’. The term ‘gender equality.’ The importance.
Independent Evaluation Group World Bank November 11, 2010 Evaluation of Bank Support for Gender and Development.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
(Suitable for constituency level) By Slyvia Chirawu National Coordinator WLSA Zimbabwe
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector 1.
Gender & Transport Module Two Gender Integration at the Project Level.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
The Curriculum Development Process Dr. M
Leading Practice 8.0 Learning in the team Date of presentation.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Gender Analysis and Frameworks Module C. Review of the BIG IDEAS from previous sections.
Ombudsman Western Australia Serving Parliament – Serving Western Australians Evaluation in the Western Australian Ombudsman’s Office Kim Lazenby & Jane.
10 August Inter-Regional Workshop on the Production of Gender Statistics New Delhi, India, 6-10 August 2007 Strengthening National Gender Statistics.
1 Module 1 Introduction: The Role of Gender in Monitoring and Evaluation.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Bringing gender back in to REDD+ decision processes: A case from Vietnam Pham ThuThuy, Moira Moeliono and Mai Hoang Yen.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
The Tipping Point Project’s Participatory Community Analyses : Successes and Lessons Learned April 01, 2015.
Part III Project/Program Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Project KA2-CBHE School-to-Work Transition for Higher education students with disabilities in Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro (Trans2Work)
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Telling Your SSIP Story
Project Name: Country:
Process Evaluation the implementation phase
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Ms. Viola Dasoberi Rural Enterprise Consultant,
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
GENERATING ISSUE-ORIENTED STATISTICS AND INDICATORS
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

1 Module 6 Putting It All Together

2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process by applying each step Use of the design matrix Gender issues in the overall process of monitoring and evaluation

3 Review of the M&E Process Phase 1. Specify model and select design 1.Define the problem 2.Specify the project (program) model 3.Determine your questions 4.Select the design 1

4 Review of the M&E Process (Continued) 5.Identify indicators and measures 6.Develop your data collection strategy 7.Identify analysis strategy Phase 2. Select measures and data strategy 2 2

5 Review of the M&E Process (Continued) 8.Define an integrated, effective dissemination strategy 9.Develop action plan to use findings 10.Monitor the action plan implementation Phase 3: Plan dissemination strategy and use of findings 3

6 Putting It All Together All pieces of your design should connect Make changes to earlier ideas and plans as you obtain new information Test all your data collection instruments and plans to make sure they work the way you expect them to

7 Putting It All Together (Continued) Pre-test every data collection instrument Pre-test in real settings Expert review Review by non-team member

8 Putting It All Together (Continued) Make sure data collection is error free It is hard to correct mistakes after the data has been collected It is worth the time planning and testing your plan

9 Design Matrix A tool that can help focus on all the details It is a visual tool focus is on content not writing style It is a living document planning is an iterative process This is a generic format change it to fit your style Turn to the Micro-credit Design Matrix

10 Checklist: Incorporation of Gender into M&E  Have the needs and opportunities for increasing women’s and men’s productivity and production, access to and control of resources, and access to and control of benefits been identified?  Have the cultural factors regarding the role of men and women in terms of obtaining health care and becoming health care providers been taken into account?

11 Checklist: Incorporation of Gender into M&E  Have the gender dimensions of policy interventions been identified for their potential impact?  Do the policy interventions address women’s and men’s needs?  Were different groups and organizations representing women’s and men’s interests consulted through the process of goal setting?

12 Checklist: Incorporation of Gender into M&E (Continued)  Were the views of men and women taken into account in the process of goal setting and program design and implementation?  Do the performance indicators reflect gender concerns? If not, how might they do so? Were/ will both women and men be involved in the participatory monitoring of these indicators?  Are measures being taken to build the gender analysis capacity of planning and implementing agencies?

13 Additional Costs & Time to engender data collection/analysis Minimum 2 person team plus 2-3 interviewers for a week for data collection 5 days analysis and report writing Studies can last much longer Participatory Rural Appraisal 4 researcher days per focus group plus travel and incidental costs Focus group interviews Half day workshop Possible gender consultant available to assist in the field during pilot testing of instruments Special training/ supervision of interviewers Small if it can be applied following survey Higher if separate interview required 10% - 15% incremental cost Administration of special modules to sub- samples