Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DESTINATION INNOVATION PROGRAM SAFE COORIDOR ENHANCEMENT (SCorE) Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
Advertisements

Gainesville ATMS: A Regional Success! October 29, 2012 Matthew Weisman, PE ITS Operations Engineer - City of Gainesville, Fl 2012 Transpo – Bonita Springs.
1. Green Lights Program Objectives Improve Quality of Synchronization in a Short Timeframe Noticeable Improvements to Motorists Appropriate Allocation.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Lineage Power - Total Efficiency TM Smart Grid A Telecom / Commercial consumer’s perspective Paul Smith – Technical Marketing Manager, Lineage Power
1. We can’t promise all green lights… …but we can minimize the number of red lights, stops and delays.
Transportation Operations Master Plan John Ward ITS-Pennsylvania Panel Discussion Vision for Achieving Regional Mobility through ITS November 23, 2010.
AVONDALE ROAD ITS 2006 COUNTYWIDE GRANT. AVONDALE ROAD ITS OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Location Location Avondale Road between Novelty Hill Road and NE 132 nd St.
A Better & Safer US Highway 90 along the Mississippi Gulf Coast By Mike Stokes Intelligent Transportation Systems Manager MDOT – Traffic Engineering.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT. PURPOSE Purpose: Foster understanding through development of educational outreach materials Illustrate benefits and basic techniques.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
Presented By: By: By: Web Address: Topic Number: Topic Number: Date: Date:
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Case Study Portable Wireless Network for Emergency Response.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
Melissa Ackert, E.I. FDOT Matt Wilson, P.E. Jacobs Engineering
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Illinois Department of Transportation Emergency Management I-74 Reconstruction Project Peoria, Illinois ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006.
Traffic Enforcement And Management System Malam-Team is Israel's largest systems integration organization, One of the most exciting solutions offered by.
ITS WORLD CONGRESS NYSDOT Transportation Management Summary of Major Transportation Management Program Activities.
Reggie Chandra, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Operation Green Light Manager of Traffic Operations, MARC.
FDOT District 1 ITS Project Update Katherine Duvall ITS Project Manager.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
2 Background Lake County –24 x 20 mi area –Population 690,000 –52 municipalities Congestion –No freeways –Limited 4-lane arterials –Transportation controversies.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
Jump Starting ITS Deployment in Los Angeles County using Wireless Communications Lessons Learned.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
CONTINUING INVESTIGATION OF ANONYMOUS WIRELESS ADDRESS MATCHING (AWAM) FOR TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION Darryl Puckett and Mike Vickich Houston, Texas ITS.
ITS Emergency Management Are You Prepared? Philip R. Mann, P.E. City of Gainesville, Florida Public Works Department.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in Kentucky ITS Mid- America Fall 2005.
CrossTown Traffic - “Braking News You Can Use” Steven W. Cummins, P.E. Traffic Signal Systems Manager Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division.
Georgia’s Regional Traffic Operations Program Christopher Barrow, E.I.T. Traffic Engineer II.
Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 1 – Student Guide.
ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEBRUARY 13, 2007.
Georgia’s Intelligent Transportation System
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
Success with Miami-Dade County’s ATMS Upgrade Success with EMBEDDED INTEGRATORS Presented at: ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, Texas May 4th, 2010 by.
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Bay County’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Keith C. Bryant, P.E., PTOE Public Works Director Bay County, FL 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYMPOSIUM November.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Traffic Management System Status Update February, 2008.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DONE S.DHARANI DHARAN S.JEEVAANANTH KONGU POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE.
The City of Calgary’s Intelligent Transportation Systems and Yeatland (Yeats) Wong, P. Eng. The City of Calgary Transportation Department.
Traffic Management System Real Time Motorist Information
Intelligent Transportation System
Project Overview – Phase 1
Intelligent Transportation Systems
2010 Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan: 2017 Progress Report on Implementation The Florida-Alabama, Okaloosa-Walton, and Bay County Transportation.
Traffic Signal Performance Measures in a Small Urban Area
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
ITE Midwestern District Conference June 20, 2017
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Gainesville Area Traffic Management System

Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville Urban Area.  A Computerized Traffic Signal System was installed in  Software runs in DOS and is not Windows Compatible utilizing 1200 baud phone dial-up phone lines (1.2 k/b).  Technologically, the equipment is out of date and does not provide for upward compatibility.

Traffic Management System

Regional Impact  The City of Gainesville maintains all of the traffic signals and flashing beacons in Alachua County including the other incorporated cities and the University of Florida. This project will encompass the traffic signals in the Gainesville Urban Area as well as the entire County.  In 1997, a feasibility study was performed to determine the future needs of the County. It was determined that a Traffic Management System was needed to meet our future growth.

What is a Traffic Management System?  Conventional traffic signal systems operate traffic signals.  TMS components include operating traffic signals, traffic monitoring, real time traffic operations, emergency vehicle control, enhanced mass transit, real time motorist information and effective incident management.  Some of these features are demonstrated in the following slides:

ITS - Signal Preemption

ITS - Signal Priority

ITS - Traffic Cameras  Pan Tilt Cameras:

ITS – Incident Management Traffic Crashes Malfunctioning Signals

Phasing Costs  Phase I  Phase II  Phase III  Phase IV  Total $ 7.5 million $ 5.8 million $ 4.1 million $ 820,000 $ 18.2 million Note: In 2006 Dollars

TMS – Phase I

TMS Project Build-out

Gainesville Advanced Traffic Operations & Responsive System

Annual Operating Costs  Annual operating costs:  Additional Staffing to operate and properly maintain the system to ensure maximum efficiencies are realized - $ 253,000/yr.  Funding to host a real-time traveler's information website, software upgrades and licensing, ITS equipment maintenance, specialized training and signal retimings - $240,000/yr.

Potential Benefits  An effective Traffic Management System helps reduce congestion. According to a TTI Study, reducing congestion can save motorists app. 10 gallons a fuel a year. In a city our size, that related to approximately $ 3.8 Million in annual savings in fuel. This does not include the reduction in lost time while in traffic. (Based on fuel cost of $ 2.00 / gallon)  This equates to $57 million in fuels savings over 15 years. Other savings include:  Reduced emissions;  Reduced loss time by motorists.

Potential Benefits  Enhanced emergency response for Fire-Rescue (GFR & ACFR) through system wide traffic signal priority control. Also available to law enforcement (GPD & ACSO).  Enhanced mass transit through system wide priority control.  Real time traveler information on incidents, congestion conditions and alternate routes.  Enhanced traffic signal coordination improvements through constant system-wide real-time monitoring and timing adjustments. This will reduce congestion and delay system-wide.  System-wide re-timing of all traffic signals.

Traffic Controller

Traffic Controller - Naztec

Communications

LED Installation

Pedestrian Traffic Signals

Traffic Signal Removal

Traffic Signal Shop

Maintenance Semi VS Signal Cabinet

Maintenance Mustang VS Mast Arm

Detection

Traffic Management Center

Current Status  TMS Software List Screen:

Status  GIS Map View:

Status  Green/Yellow/Red Monitoring:

Status  Controller Database Editing:

Status  Schedule Special Events:

Status  Automated Data Collection:

Status  Automated Data Collection:

Coming Soon  Public Access:

Currently  City maintains 229 traffic signals  106 intersections are currently online with the new system, more being added all the time  63 Cameras have been installed  Network architecture is IP-based Ethernet network. All traffic control devices will be IP addressable. Current network speed, 1 Gb/s, as compared to 1.2 kb/s.  Mixture of fiber optic cable and wireless being used for communications means

Special Cabinet  Checkout Gale Lemerand:

Special Cabinet Questions? Philip Mann Traffic Operations Manager Matt Weisman ITS Engineer