1. CONTINUING INVESTIGATION OF ANONYMOUS WIRELESS ADDRESS MATCHING (AWAM) FOR TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION Darryl Puckett and Mike Vickich Houston, Texas ITS World Congress Orlando, Florida October 19, 2011

2. Presentation Overview How we got here Application testing and results Deployments and alternatives Upcoming applications

3. Houston Experience Desire for expansion of existing travel time map Exploration of more cost effective alternatives (AVI equip +$50k per site) Demonstration of address matching technologies Assessment of feasibility Field deployments for arterial networks

4. Existing TranStar Website Award winning website experiences over 10 million page accesses/500,000 users per month on average Freeway travel times are very well received by the public Display of arterial travel times are desired by the public Existing AVI technology may not be cost effective for wide area deployment on arterials

5. Existing Technologies TranStar system currently utilizes a combination of RFID (Transcore) and radar (Wavetronix) for travel time and speed information (over 450 combined)

6. Why try anything else? Cost Bluetooth peripherals are becoming widespread Easier, non-intrusive field installation and maintenance

7. AWAM Concept

8. Sample Antenna Coverage

9. Ohio DOT Demo - Dayton

10. Arlington Virginia Demo

11. AWAM vs Toll Tags To benchmark performance, The Bluetooth-based AWAM system was installed alongside a probe-based toll tag (AVI) system. In this recent comparison, AWAM is collecting more data samples than the alternative technology. This effort repeated a previous examination where, the AWAM samples were ~ 85% of the AVI matches. Thus illustrating that the apparent number of Bluetooth enabled devices (in discoverable mode) are actually increasing, not decreasing. 11

12. IH-45 Deployment - Individual Matches with a rural incident impact on a 13 mile segment

13. West Houston Deployment Example Arterial Data (3 traffic signals between readers) Vehicles traveling within the Progression Band Vehicles which did not travel within Progression Band

14. University Transportation Center for Mobility (UTCM) Funding was obtained for experimentation to test field hardened components and antenna configurations Once identified, those components were deployed for further data comparisons Deployments have been accomplished with the cooperation of City of Houston and TxDOT

15. UTCM Field Deployments Total of 16 sites City of Houston – 10 TxDOT – 6 Traffax – 2

16. Benefits Low cost, standards-based, non- proprietary equipment and protocols. Easy, non-intrusive field installation and maintenance. Large penetration of field devices and data samples. Real-time summary calculations. Complete ownership of data by operating agency.

17. Based on our experience with AVI a new Bluetooth read & process method was desired to increase efficiency and accuracy Asynchronous I/O – the AWAM Advantage –As soon as a MAC address is read it is uniquely sent for processing and time stamped (or stored locally) –Enables more MAC address reads –Enables for more MAC address matches Field Software Enhancements –Duplicates can be identified and handled locally before sending back to host –Reduces bandwidth requirements (critical for cellular data transmission methods, particularly when paired with other ITS elements)

18. 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:31 22:00:00:DD:14:88 07:15:32 12:CD:AC:35:01:76 07:15:33 42:33:23:EE:AE:07 07:15:33 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:35 AE:42:39:00:01:06 07:15:38 07:33:CC:36:00:AE 07:15:40 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:40 22:00:00:DD:14:88 07:15:40 12:CD:AC:35:01:76 07:15:40 42:33:23:EE:AE:07 07:15:40 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:40 AE:42:39:00:01:06 07:15:40 07:33:CC:36:00:AE 07:15:40 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:40 HOST PROCESS (OR STORE LOCALLY) 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:31 22:00:00:DD:14:88 07:15:32 12:CD:AC:35:01:76 07:15:33 42:33:23:EE:AE:07 07:15:33 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:35 AE:42:39:00:01:06 07:15:38 07:33:CC:36:00:AE 07:15:40 00:56:AF:33:21:00 07:15:40 HOST PROCESS (OR STORE LOCALLY) AF:10:EE:07:21:56 07:15:33 23:00:00:00:AF:CC 07:15:38 CC:42:00:21:12:DD 07:15:40 Difference Between Synchronous and Asynchronous Travel Time Monitoring Application in Real-Time Synchronous: 8-10 second cycle (default process) Asynchronous – Exclusive to AWAM

19. Bluetooth Field Equipment (signal cabinet)

20. Bryan-College Station Deployments 24 units installed in existing signal cabinets Total coverage 36 directional miles

21. Current AWAM Deployments City of Houston 50 locations, consistent with planned ATM/WiMAX deployments

22. Current TranStar Speed Map

23. Real-Time Travel Times on 400 directional miles of rural/suburban Interstate With cameras for Hurricane Evacuation monitoring

24. H-45 Deployment for Hurricane Evacuation Monitoring Map Interface

25. IH-45 Deployment for Hurricane Evacuation Monitoring Bluetooth Sensor and Axis Camera installed on Luminaire Pole

26. IH-45 Deployment for Hurricane Evacuation Monitoring Bluetooth Sensor and Axis Camera installed on Solar Power

27. MAG Traffic Study Lee Engineering with TTI

28. TxDOT Planning Study – Brazos County

29. Current IH-35 Deployment Hillsboro to Georgetown 5 locations All solar BT only, deployed in 4 hrs

30. Current Orlando Deployment 4 locations In existing signal cabinets For ITS World Congress

31. Current Miami Deployment 7 temporary locations In existing cabinets For FDOT/FIU evaluation

32. Underway - Harris County 387 Intersections with Bluetooth Readers

33. Underway – Dallas ICM US 75 North of Dallas for Corridor Management

34. Current US1/I-95 Miami Demonstration

35. Upcoming Smart Corridor Deployment DFW to Laredo 150+ locations Mix of power and equipment

36. Upcoming California Border Crossing Study

37. Questions ? For more information: http://TTIHouston.tamu.edu/Bluetooth http://postoaktraffic.com