Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Sustainable, Affordable, Reliable, Available The Feedstock Challenge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Institute of Local and Global Consequence Future of Biofuels in Alabama Larry Fillmer Auburn University.
Advertisements

Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Forest Sustainability and Certification Systems Sam Hopkins Clean Water Partnership October 26, 2011.
Forest Products Markets in Western European Urbanized Society; the Dutch experience Nico A. Leek Consultant wood market IUFRO Division 5, Taiwan 2007.
LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS OF ESTONIAN WOOD FUEL SUPPLY Rauno Reinberg Vilnius, Lithuania.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Summary Remarks Economics and Policy Session Biofuels for Aviation Summit Moderator:
Mitch Mandich, CEO Range Fuels, Inc A Proven Conversion Process 2.An Abundant, Sustainable and Cost Effective Supply of Feedstock 3.Accessible.
Outlook for Australia’s forestry and forest products industry
Price Dynamics in Wisconsin Woody Biomass Markets.
Peter Ince U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WI.
The Crippling Effect of Survey Data Survey results lack credibility The real price industry pays Susceptible to manipulation Strains trading relationships.
Effects of Using Woody Biomass for Bioelectricity in the Southeastern U.S.: considerations and applications Christopher S. Galik Robert C. Abt Workshop.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
VT Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation Wood Energy in Vermont January 2005 VT Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation.
Risk Assessment and Economics of Forest Biorefinery Concepts USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
Available for download here:
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
1 Chapter 12: Decision-Support Systems for Supply Chain Management CASE: Supply Chain Management Smooths Production Flow Prepared by Hoon Lee Date on 14.
Economic Models of Biofuels and Policy Analysis John Miranowski,* Professor of Economics Iowa State University *With Alicia Rosburg, Research Assistant.
Module 1: Understanding Bioenergy Resources
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Food price volatility Survey of theoretical proposals.
The Future of Biomass Energy Energy Days 2012: Many Paths for Sustainable Energy.
Chapter 7 Profit Maximization and Competitive Market.
1 Economic Decisions and Systems 1-1 Satisfying Needs and Wants
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
A VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT TO PROTECT BIODIVERSITY AND HIGH-CONSERVATION VALUES IN FORESTS: THE CASE OF BEVERAGE CARTONS Christian Verschueren “European biodiversity:
1 JEFF PAQUIN Tsilhqot ’ in Power Project Phase II Call CEBC 2010.
Dominik Roser, Ph.D. Advanced Bioeconomy Feedstocks Conference June 9-10, 2015 New Orleans British Columbia and Biomass Availability.
Wood for Energy Experience of Coillte to date Presentation to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Marine, Communications and Natural Resources George McCarthy.
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
A States Perspective of Biomass Power. U.S. EPA 146 biomass energy projects* ◦ Independent Power Producers  Power only  CHP (IPPs) ◦ Industrial ◦ Commercial.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Woody Biomass for Energy Tax Incentives. Dr. Linda Wang National Forest Tax Specialist USDA Forest Service
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
1 Land in: Other Uses In Transition In Switchgrass Crop Lifetime Net SG Addition Of Acres Acres in Switchgrass Yield from Ag R&D Ave Yield in Established.
US Forest Service GHG and Energy Modeling Climate and Energy Policy: The Role of Forests Rob Doudrick US Forest Service Research and Development.
Spatial planning on county level in Estonia Peeter Muiste, Allar Padari, Hugo Roostalu.
Central Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Planning and National Development Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing Ministry of Environment and.
Forests: 11.4 By: Yadam Conde, Nahara Ramos, By: Yadam Conde, Nahara Ramos,
Potential for Biomass Energy Development in South Carolina Tim Adams Resource Development Director South Carolina Forestry Commission.
Spatial planning for biomass resource management in Põlva county, Estonia Peeter Muiste, Allar Padari.
Beyond Corn and Soybeans: Cellulose Feedstocks Marie E. Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Kim Jensen, and.
The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead Embassy Suites Airport, Orlando, FL 1.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
Margaret Loudermilk, Joshua Elliott, and Todd Munson Modeling Land-Use Changes and Other Indirect Effects of Biofuel Production in CIM-EARTH STEPPING FORWARD.
CH.10 CREDIT ANALYSIS AND DISTRESS PREDICTION
Wisconsin Biomass as a Sustainable Energy Resource Green Innovations Symposium 2009 Joe Kramer.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
Department of Forestry University of Kentucky John M. Lhotka (University of Kentucky) John M. Lhotka Wood Energy Harvesting and Woodlands.
Module – 5 Pricing.  PRICING OBJECTIVES Growth in sales Improve market share Profit level Control cash-flow Combat competition Maintaining the image.
SAF 3/3/09 1 Potential Biomass Demand Impact on Forest Markets and Resources Bob Abt NC State University
Sugar Beets as an Industrial Feedstock David Ripplinger May 3, 2014 Fargo, ND 2.
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being Luke’s and VTT’s joint research and innovation programme 2012–2016.
The Economics of Alternative Biomass Collection Systems David Ripplinger Transportation Research Forum March 14,
American Forest Foundation Forest Climate Opportunities for Family Forest Owners Robert S. Simpson Senior Vice President Center for Family Forests October.
AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER INTO A JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP WITH NTIS FOR DATA INNOVATION NTIS Information Session Department of Commerce Auditorium and Webcast.
BIOENERGY IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION
Determinants of Carbon Benefits for Transatlantic Wood Pellet Trade
Forest Certification and Wood-Based Bioenergy
Renewable energy supply chains
FOR 350 Silviculture.
Costs: Harvest and process: $20-$30 per dry ton.
Costs: Harvest and process: $20-$30 per dry ton.
Technical Report: Attribution of impacts to bioenergy production and use for the implementation of the GBEP Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy (GSI)
Stability of Monetary Unit and Corporate Financial Reporting
MARKET POWER, MARKET DEFINITION AND ENTRY BARRIERS
Skills in purchasing goods and product
Origin of the wood uded by forest industry in 2017
Presentation transcript:

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Sustainable, Affordable, Reliable, Available The Feedstock Challenge

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Sustainable, Affordable, Reliable, Available Woody Biomass is all of these – now and it can cost ½ of ag biomass

Unique Considerations in the Evaluation of Forest-Originated RFS2 Feedstock Stan Parton Manager – Bioenergy/Biochemicals Practice Forest2Market June 10, 2015

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. EPA Rules for RFS2 Qualified Materials Apparent intent to prevent unintended consequences. Prohibits: –Harvest from federal lands –Tree harvest of natural stands –Harvest in ecologically sensitive areas –Conversion of land (natural forest or agricultural) to plantations Allows feedstock from: –Natural Stands – slash and pre-commercial thinnings only –Plantation Stands – slash and thinnings Plantation must have been established by 12/19/2007 and actively managed since that time Establishment and management must be documented 5

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Forest Sourced RFS2 Qualified Feedstock 6 Forest Biomass Non-FederalPlantation Established prior to 12/19/2007 First Thinnings Tree Residue Slash Woody Mill Residue Biogenic Material Non-Biogenic Material Established after 12/19/2007 Natural Not ecologically sensitive or old-growth Pre- Commercial Thinnings Tree ResidueSlash Ecologically sensitive or old growth Federal

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Two ‘Practical’ Feedstock Types Pulpwood - First commercial thinnings from plantations Residue - Slash from natural or plantation stands 7

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Forest RFS2 Feedstock Market Realities RFS2 qualified material is currently available and moving in the existing wood supply chain. Existing users of this material are indifferent about using RFS2 versus non-RFS2 materials. Users are not paying a premium for RFS2 material. RFS2 material is not currently distinguished in the supply chain from non-RFS2 material. Acquiring RFS2 certified material will likely require an economic incentive above the current market price. –To cause existing users to vacate their demand –To provide certification required to secure RINs 8

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Critical RFS2 Supply Chain Questions 1 What will happen to the distribution of raw material feedstocks when new RFS2 feedstock demand enters the market? 2 As the existing users are indifferent about feedstock types, are there sufficient quantities of non-RFS2 material available to allow them to vacate their demand for RFS2-qualified material? 3 What is the capacity-to-pay for various competitors in the market including the new RFS2 user? 4 What price premium is necessary to prompt existing users to vacate their demand for RFS2 material? 5 What additional price premium will be required for the supply chain to distinguish, separate and certify RFS2 qualified material? 9 As woody biomass exists in the forest products supply chain -

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Analytical Requirements to Answer the Questions Determine current proportion of RFS2-qualified material in the market distinguished from non-RFS2 Assess likelihood that existing market participants’ demand for RFS2 material may be modified in response to demand for RFS2 material from the biofuels producer Estimate the resulting cost of RFS2 materials necessary to motivate traditional users to vacate their demand Analyze the future availability of RFS2 and non-RFS2 feedstock materials based on demand from all users 10

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Theoretical Supply Basin Analysis – How will supply redistribute? 11

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Reallocation of Forest Materials – Elements of Analysis Calculate the split of existing flow of materials in the market into RFS2 qualified and non-qualified materials 12 Analyze the historic and current roundwood supply and demand for feedstock in the proposed project’s supply basin Determine the amount of current supply that would be RFS2 eligible and how much is currently being used by competitors Calculate the split of existing and future inventory into RFS2 qualified and non- qualified materials Forecast feedstock supply and demand of RFS2 and non-RFS2 material utilizing econometric models of demand, forest growth and yield Determine if sufficient non-qualified feedstock exists to meet the demand of traditional users either within or outside the project supply basin Compare forecasted demand of users who do not require RFS2 material to the available non-RFS2 material within the project supply basin If necessary, compare the demand of users who do not require RFS2 material to additional available feedstock (RFS2 and non-RFS2) outside of the basin

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Reallocation of Forest Materials – Elements of Analysis Calculate the cost to existing users to vacate their demand of RFS2 qualified feedstock 13 Calculate the cost necessary to prompt traditional users to vacate RFS2 demand in favor of non-RFS2 material in the basin or for any material outside of the project supply basin Determine competitors’ “capacity-to-pay” and therefore ability to vacate RFS2 demand Compare competitors’ “capacity-to-pay” to that of the energy project’s Calculate the cost of RFS2 material to the energy project, including: Cost of existing users to secure non-RFS2 feedstock materials plus A premium to motivate the existing users to vacate their demand for RFS2 materials plus A premium for supply certification to secure RINs

Slide © 2014, Forest2Market, Inc. Conclusions-Forest Originated Feedstocks Great financial motives exist for using forest originated feedstock. However, in order to determine their availability, sustainability of supply and cost, analysis of the supply basin, existing users and market behavior must be employed. The diligence analysis is complex and relies on –detailed knowledge and date of the forest and forest products sector, its current and future demand –Utilizing advanced forest growth and yield models –Industry economic models 14

Forest2Market, Inc Brixham Hill Ave, Suite 550 Charlotte, NC Stan Parton