1 Application of Model to Sample Data Set / Data Review and Analysis Breakout Sessions © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Comparison of Half- and Full-Day Kindergarten on Kindergarten Achievement Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
First Sound Fluency & Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Phonemic Awareness
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
1 Next Steps District/School Expectations and Support Needs (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Action Planning Spring 2008 Statewide Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First.
1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.
Roland H. Good III University of Oregon
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D Coordinator, Oregon Reading First Center
Scott Baker, Ph.D. Michael Rebar, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.
Changing the World through Reading First Using an Outcomes-Driven Model Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.
Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Calling Ms. Cleo:What Can DIBELS Tell Us About the Future Ben Clarke, Scott Baker, and Ed Kame’enui Oregon Reading First Center February 3, 2004.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
School Improvement Specialist Meeting
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Instruction, Teacher Evaluation and Value-Added Student Learning Minneapolis Public Schools November,
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
Integrated Systems Model (ISM/OISM) Updates for District Leaders.
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
MCLASS Reading 3D: Class Summary Reports. Desired Outcomes Understand how to access and analyze Class Summary Reports for whole class and individual students.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Tallassee Elementary Summary of Effectiveness DIBELS Report Data Meeting May 9, 2012 Presenter: Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
1 RTI: Grade-Level Data Meetings for Elementary Literacy Data Analysis Oakland Schools Michele Farah, Joan Firestone, Diane Katakowski, and Susan Koceski.
Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
Data-Based Leadership
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
DIBELS Next Overview.
Systems Problem Solving
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 Application of Model to Sample Data Set / Data Review and Analysis Breakout Sessions © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

2 How Are We Doing?

3 How are we doing? Question 1 uDistrict: How are K-3 students performing in the middle of the year on essential components of beginning reading instruction within the district? uData Source: District Histogram (add to #3)

4

5 How are we doing? Question 1 uSchool: How are K-3 students performing in the middle of the year on essential components of beginning reading instruction within the school? uData Source: First Grade Histogram (#3)

6

7 How are we doing? Question 1 uProjectwide: How are K-3 students performing in the middle of the year on essential components of beginning reading instruction within the project? uData Source: Oregon Reading First Histograms

8 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Histogram Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

9 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Histogram Nonsense Word Fluency

10 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Histogram Oral Reading Fluency

11 Breakout Activity Review of District and School Data

12 How are we doing? Question 2 uDistrict: Within a district, what are the outcomes when examined school by school? uData Source: First Grade Distribution Report - Breakdown by School (#11)

13 District Level Distribution Reports By School By Race / Ethnicity By Gender By Free / Reduced Lunch By Special Education By Disability Status / Special Education Category / Services Provided By Additional Codes By DIBELS-Approved Accommodations

14

15

16 How are we doing? Question 2 uSchool: Within a school, what are the outcomes when examined class by class? uData Source: School Level Distribution Report (add to #11)

17 School Level Distribution Reports By Class By Secondary Class By Race / Ethnicity By Gender By Free / Reduced Lunch By Special Education By Disability Status / Special Education Category / Services Provided By Additional Codes By DIBELS-Approved Accommodations

18

19 How are we doing? Question 2 uProjectwide: Within the project, what are the outcomes when examined school by school? uData Source: Oregon Reading First: First Grade Distribution Report - Breakdown by School

20 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Distribution Summary

21 Breakout Activity Review of District and School Data

22 How are we doing? Question 3 uDistrict: Within a district, what are the outcomes when examined by subgroups of students? uData Source: First Grade Distribution Report - Breakdown by Demographics (#12)

23

24

25 How are we doing? Question 3 uSchool: Within a school, what are the outcomes when examined by subgroups of students? uData Source: School Level Distribution Report - Breakdown by Demographics (add to #12)

26

27

28 How are we doing? Question 3 uProjectwide: Within the project, what are the outcomes when examined by subgroups of students? uData Source: Oregon Reading First: First Grade Distribution Report - Breakdown by Demographics

29 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Distribution Summary Breakdown by Demographics - Race/Ethnicity

30 Oregon Reading First: Projectwide Distribution Summary Breakdown by Demographics - Race/Ethnicity (cont.)

31

32 Breakout Activity Review of District and School Data

33 How are we doing? Question 4 uDistrict: Is there a significant increase in the percentage of students reaching targets in the winter from year to year within the district? uData Source: Cross-Year Box Plot - Districtwide (#13)

34

35 How are we doing? Question 4 uSchool: Is there a significant increase in the percentage of students reaching targets in the winter from year to year within the school? uData Source: Cross-Year Box Plot - Schoolwide (add to #13)

36

37 How are we doing? Question 4 uProjectwide: Is there a significant increase in the percentage of students reaching targets in the winter from year to year within the project? uData Source: Oregon Reading First: Cross-Year Box Plot

38 Oregon Reading First: Yearly Box Plot Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

39 Oregon Reading First: Yearly Box Plot Nonsense Word Fluency

40 Oregon Reading First: Yearly Box Plot Oral Reading Fluency

41 Breakout Activity Review of District and School Data

42 How are we doing? Question 5 uDistrict: For each grade and essential component, what percentage of students starting at benchmark remained at benchmark? What percentage of students moved into benchmark from strategic and intensive? What percentage of students moved into strategic from intensive? uData Source: Summary of Effectiveness by District (#14)

43

44 How are we doing? Question 5 uSchool: 1. Are students in each class at each grade level on track (e.g., at grade level or benchmark) for successful reading outcomes and benefiting from the core reading program? What percentage of students made adequate reading progress from the beginning of the year to the middle of the year (fall to winter)? 2. Are students in each class at each grade level benefiting from additional instructional support, the supplemental reading program, and on track for successful reading outcomes? 3. Are student in each class at each grade level benefiting from substantial instructional support, the intervention reading program, and on track for successful reading outcomes? uData Source: Summary of Effectiveness by School (#15) and Summary of Effectiveness by Class (#16)

45

46

47 How are we doing? Question 5 uProjectwide: For each grade and essential component, what percentage of students starting at benchmark remained at benchmark? What percentage of students moved into benchmark from strategic and intensive? What percentage of students moved into strategic from intensive? uData Source: Summary of Effectiveness - Project Level

48 Oregon Reading First Project Level Summary of Effectiveness : Beginning of First Grade to Middle of First Grade

49 Breakout Activity Review of District and School Data