Day: Thursday 10 th November Session: 14.30am Coordinators: Ian Williamson & Stig Enemark Topic:Components of the vision- break out groups

Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9 th Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Report Back - Discussion European Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby Evaluate – Components of the vision

Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Report Back - Discussion Australian Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle Evaluate – Components of the vision Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10 th

Report Back - Discussion Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Day 3 – Friday Nov 11 th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel

The Paradigm 1.What is the vision for an ICT enabled LAS to support sustainable development? 2.Is a common understanding possible? 3.Is this “land management” or “land information management”?

Key Drivers 1.Rank in importance the key drivers 2.Is tax (in all its forms) a driver?

Key Components and Tools 1.Authentic registers? 2.The IT architecture to deliver the vision? 3.The spatial dimension- SDI? 4.Infrastructure to support trading in complex commodities?

Future Challengers, Issues & Improvements 1.Achieving a national system in a federated country 2.Achieving spatially enabled government 3.Should the land registry system contribute to SD? How? 4.Relationship between the land registry and spatial cadastre 5.Can international comparative monitoring be established? 6.Administration of restrictions and responsibilities 7.Is the land parcel still central to LA? 8.The role of buildings in land administration

Key Observations (1) How do we achieve spatial enablement of government? We need a new language to communicate to end users/ simple messages required We’re all trying to achieve the same thing Victoria’s sustainability focus message sells LA What is Land Management? Concise definition please… Buildings on cadastre: business cases? products? maintenance? Indicators/science not included in the model NOR are reporting and evaluation mechanisms ICT convergence unlocks value in existing systems and this is underplayed in the model Revise the model to reflect service provision in 2 ways: –Sustainable decision making by government –Services to citizens

Key Observations (2) Unbundling does not lead to coordinated decision making and management of land Evidence based policies are required- LAS can assist this

The Paradigm Change the paradigm to focus on user interests: 1.Sustainable Decision making BY GOVERNMENT 2.Service provision for CITIZENS 3.Focus on delivering good governance 4.Engaging citizens Assume land administration functions are spatially enabled We need to feed in monitoring and evaluation systems Model must remain visually simple ‘Land Administration’ is boring- What about Land Sustainability?

Key Drivers (today) 1.Ian Williamson 2.Environment Sustainability 3.Business Efficiency 4.Informed Decision Making 5.Technology 6.Security/ Anti-terrorism? 7.Community Expectations 8.Risk Management 9.Ian Williamson (again)

Key Components and Tools Web Services Standards/Shared Architectures Common understandings/Collaboration between institutions Government transparency- activities NOT institutions Spatially Enabled Interoperability (SDI)- technical, semantic, legal Cadastre (coordinated?) + other core land related information Authentic/ Authoritative Registers- non legislative though? Register of Interests/ Torrens System

Future Challenges, Issues & Improvements (1) Controlling the air conditioning system Engaging with the intended audience (citizens, politicians and NGOs) Consideration of the social dimension- equity in access, baby boomers have taken all the land Globalisation and business competition Professional culture clash Overcoming silo approach Land parcel is still central- coordinated/spatially referenced Maintenance costs International collaboration/monitoring/standardisation- The Grand Network of Excellencies and Generals Capacity Building of society 3D and 4D Cadastre