1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 1 – Part 1 Review - Lifelong Learning Fri. Feb. 2, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response Patrick Wesonga Louis Hironem.
Cross Cultural Research
Introduction to Action research
Dr Ronni Michelle Greenwood Autumn  Introduction  Method  Results  Discussion.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public.
Selection of Research Participants: Sampling Procedures
CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.
Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.
RESEARCH METHODS Introduction to Research Lecture 1:
IEEM552 - Human Computer Systems Week 2 - A usability study February 23, 1999 Dr. Vincent Duffy - IEEM
Research Paper Critical Analysis Research Paper Critical Analysis 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis.
1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 1 – Part 1 Review - Lifelong Learning Fri. Feb. 2, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design.
Risk Attitude Reversals in Drivers ’ Route Choice When Range of Travel Time Information is Provided Jin-Yong Sung Hamid Hussain.
MSc Applied Psychology PYM403 Research Methods Validity and Reliability in Research.
Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor Lecture 10: Research, Design & Evaluation Tues. Feb. 20, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II.
IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response Esteban.
Chapter 1 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 1 Nature and Purpose of Research.
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 1 – Part 1 Review - Lifelong Learning Fri. Feb. 2, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design.
1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 1 – Part 1 Review - Lifelong Learning Fri. Feb. 2, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design.
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
1 Writing the Research Proposal Researchers communicate: Plans, Methods, Thoughts, and Objectives for others to read discuss, and act upon.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
1 Lifelong Learning RIGARead Identify & Gather Analyze.
Developing a Global Vision through Marketing Research Chapter 8 McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics Covered Abstract Headings/Subheadings Introduction/Literature Review Methods Goal Discussion Hypothesis References.
©2007 Prentice Hall Organizational Behavior: An Introduction to Your Life in Organizations Chapter 19 OB is for Life.
The Research Process. Purposes of Research  Exploration gaining some familiarity with a topic, discovering some of its main dimensions, and possibly.
Inferential Statistics
I want to test a wound treatment or educational program but I have no funding or resources, How do I do it? Implementing & evaluating wound research conducted.
Writing a Research Proposal
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
READING A PAPER. Basic Parts of a Research Paper 1. Abstract 2. Introduction to Technology (background) 3. Tools & techniques/Methods used in current.
IEEM552 - Human Computer Systems Week 2 - An organizational perspective & research perspective February 9, 1999 Dr. Vincent Duffy - IEEM 552
Basic and Applied Research. Notes:  The question asked is either “basic” or “applied”  “Try again…” NEVER with the same data set  *data mining*  Literature.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Project Guidelines. Introduction Introduction should include support/justification “why” the research should be done. The focus is on the dependent variable.
Anatomy of an Article P152 Week 4. Three types of articles Reports of empirical studies Literature reviews/meta-analyses –Statistical reviewing procedure.
Chapter 16 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 16 Developing the Research Proposal.
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon advancing, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
Today: Our process Assignment 3 Q&A Concept of Control Reading: Framework for Hybrid Experiments Sampling If time, get a start on True Experiments: Single-Factor.
Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2014) Prepared by: Christopher J. L. Cunningham, PhD University.
Is research in education important?. What is the difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods?
 Rationale and Introduction  Literature Review  Methodology / Text Analysis (for translation and interpretation section only)  Data Analysis  Conclusion.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Research Design Explained 6th edition ; ©2007 Mark Mitchell & Janina Jolley Chapter 10 The Simple Experiment.
13. External Validity What is meant by the external validity of a research design? How is research limited in regard to generalization to other groups.
1 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY CHAPTER 3 PREPARED BY: MUKUNDA KUMAR.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
From description to analysis
Research Methods Ass. Professor, Community Medicine, Community Medicine Dept, College of Medicine.
Research Methods Chapter 2.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
 The goal is scientific objectivity, the focus is on data that can be measured numerically.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Psychology.
Assistant Instructor Nian K. Ghafoor Feb Definition of Proposal Proposal is a plan for master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation which provides the.
Lab Report. Title Page Should be a concise statement of the main topic and should identify the actual variables under investigation and the relationship.
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
Research Design. How do we know what we know? The way we make reasoning Deductive logic Begins with one or more premises, reasoning then proceeds logically.
Parts of an Academic Paper
Research Design: Terms to Know
Research Methodologies, Realities and Funding Sources: A Perspective
Writing a Research Proposal
THE RESEARCH PROCESS.
Learning Targets for Introduction to Physics
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
Presentation transcript:

1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 1 – Part 1 Review - Lifelong Learning Fri. Feb. 2, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II

2 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 1. research ideas/question -what is the purpose? v 2. what background support? - literature review v 3. theoretical basis for analyzing question/hypothesis? v 4. applicability-practical contribution? v 5. theoretical contribution? v 6. appropriate methodologies for carrying out study? (determining variables, data collection, method used to test hypotheses, validity of measures and reliability) v 7. appropriate statistical analyses and assumptions? v 8. presentation of results: what do they really mean? v 9. conclusions drawn: are they reasonable? v 10. future work/research directions: any possibilities?

3 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 1. research ideas/question -what is the purpose? v Conduct systematic research…cultural differences not so readily available. v Social norms…and transferrability across cultures (based on authors view: available?) v (gestures, pictures, translation of language – simpler communication) v For human-human & human-computer interaction v reciprocity

4 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 2. what background support? - literature review v Nass’ previous study re: how people treat technologies… (1996); other colleagues Fogg (1997) … v Reeves… v Social-psychology literature v How humans treat other humans v Go to this literature v Re-write hypothesis substituting computer v Redesign experiment to test v Done for over 100 social rules – reviews available in Nass and Moon v Reciprocity (section 2 citations back to 1960)

5 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 3. theoretical basis for analyzing question/hypothesis? v Reciprocity idea; differences (individualist vs. collectivist). v Computers as Social Actors paradigm

6 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 4. applicability-practical contribution? v Benefits; interfaces/international issues – software/marketing; awareness of what/how to focus development resources for products that may be used in different countries.

7 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 5. theoretical contribution? v Challenges those who may try to extrapolate results from one country to another, considering that this study demonstrates some of the cultural differences (as evidenced in behavior). v Methodology by which you can identify other social rules that can be considered in future studies v Showed how they did this study similar to others when establishing the CASA paradigm using U.S. participants

8 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 6. appropriate methodologies for carrying out study? (determining variables, data collection, method used to test hypotheses, validity of measures and reliability) v Validity of measures? ; reliability of measures? v Wonder how sample/participants were chosen? v ‘between subjects’ test…participants didn’t participate in all conditions. (different participants were identified to participate in certain conditions – for instance… v Appears to be lab experiment… v Limits to space.. v Obvious difference (p values) F test & compared to a critical value….alpha value (likely.05) v Type I error – likelihood that I didn’t find the result incorrectly

9 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 7. appropriate statistical analyses and assumptions? v Signifcant difference…. Which test? v F test…does this show (or allow them to draw conclusions) v Tukey/Posthoc test….

10 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 8. presentation of results: what do they really mean?

11 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 9. conclusions drawn: are they reasonable?

12 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis v 10. future work/research directions: any possibilities? v See p.1561 “It is possible that…” gives you some idea about authors view of what was/wasn’t done in their study. v The reference to ‘It is possible that…” could give idea about future work.