Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Regional Work & The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Sharing with ESC Providers September 22 nd, 2008.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
1 9/14/12. Core Principles of OIP (SPDG)  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership Team (district & building)
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.

To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Timberlane Regional School District
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht.
Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Building a Unified and Coherent Statewide System of Support
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance

Seven Core Principles of OIP 1. A focused plan aligns vision, mission, and philosophy. 2. The process is continuous and recursive, and the plan is a dynamic document. 3. The process relies on quality data interpretation. 4. All leadership teams use a collaborative, collegial process. 5. An efficient communication approach ensures all stakeholders are consistently informed of progress at each stage. 6. The process produces one focused, integrated plan that directs all work and resources. 7. The process expects substantive changes in student performance and adult practices as a result of implementing, monitoring and evaluating the process and plan.

Roles and Responsibilities: Principals in the OIP -Approve/support a single focused, data-driven, researched-based plan -Be the lead learner in the building by modeling the use and application of data to inform instructional effectiveness, as well as fostering a learning organization throughout the building -Ensure time for the BLT and TBTs to meet on a regular basis -Select the BLT; set direction and expectations for the BLT -Be present and model shared leadership with the BLT

-Prepare TBTs on their roles and responsibilities -Monitor and provide support for TBTs -Ensure data is shared across levels (DLT, BLTs, TBTs -Align resources to the school plan with a focus on improved instructional improvement for all students -Hold participants accountable for results Roles and Responsibilities: Principals in the OIP

The OIP: Four Stages of Continuous Improvement

STAGE 1: IDENTIFY CRITICAL NEEDS DATA -- ask essential and probing questions

STAGE 2: DEVELOP FOCUSED PLAN Produce one focused, integrated plan that directs all district/building work and resources Goals Strategies Action Steps Indicators

Outcomes of Stage 2 Develop a Focused Plan  Develop 2-3 SMART Goals  Composes Strategies for each Goal  Establish Adult Implementation and Student Performance Indicators for every Strategy  Create Action Steps  Develop Tasks needed to complete each Action Step  Review, revise, adopt Plan

Stage 3: Implement and Monitor Focused Plan Implementation Carry out the planned strategies and actions with fidelity Monitoring Ensure that both adults and students fulfill focused action plan expectations

Collaborative Leadership Team Structures in the OIP Shift focus from single individuals to teams that can function as purposeful communities Distribute key leadership functions Align work system-wide while focusing on a limited number of data-based district goals Ensure effective leadership is exercised at all levels of the system Engage in all four stages of the OIP for the long- term

Teacher Based Teams (TBTs / PLCs) Building Leadership Team (BLT) District Leadership Team (DLT) Division Based Teams (DBTs) Ohio Improvement Process Collaborative Structures in Columbus City Schools

Roles and Responsibilities: Teacher Based Teams  Collect and chart student performance data relative to plan indicators  Analyze student work  Establish expectations for implementing specific effective classroom changes relative to the data  Implement changes in all classrooms  Collect, chart and analyze post student performance data relative to plan indicators and determine effectiveness of practices  Make course corrections in the classroom  Report results to the Building Leadership Team (BLT)  Share work and celebrate successes

Roles and Responsibilities: Building Leadership Teams  Support the development, implementation, and monitoring of focused building improvement plans;  Build a school culture that supports effective data-driven decision making;  Establish priorities for instruction and achievement aligned with district goals;  Ensure conditions for, support and monitor Teacher Based Teams;  Monitor and provide effective feedback on adult implementation and student progress;  Make recommendations for the management of resources, including time, and personnel to meet district goals.  Report results to District/Division Leadership Team

Roles and Responsibilities: Division and District Leadership Teams  Set performance targets aligned with district goals;  Monitor performance against the adult implementation and student performance indicators;  Build a foundation for data-driven decision making on a system-wide basis;  Design system planning and focused improvement strategies; structures, and processes;  Facilitate the development and use of collaborative structures, i.e., Building Leadership Teams and Teacher Based Teams;  Broker or facilitate high quality PD consistent with district goals; and  Allocate system resources toward instructional improvement.

Stage 4: Evaluate the Improvement Plan and Process Identifies how lessons learned can be applied to ongoing improvement efforts Compares projected results with actual results Assesses which changes in adult practices impact student performance Identifies strategies and actions with the greatest impact Supports actions to institutionalize successes and eliminate unsuccessful practices

Benefits of the Ohio Improvement Process Reduces duplication of effort Focuses on student success not programs Streamlines processes and procedures Promotes shared leadership and collaboration at all levels Builds personnel capacity Develops and supports the entire system as a learning organization