NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U N I V E R S I T Y L a f a y e t t e OF LOUISIANA RockSat 2010 Team CajunSat Mark Roberts Dr. Andy Hollerman Department of Physics University of Louisiana.
Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
U of MN student team members Kyle Marek-Spartz (team lead), Seth Frick, Cait Mantych, Mary Pattison, Alana Gedrose, Alex Knutson-Smisek, Philip Hansen,
 Zachary Huffaker, Brian Plank, Audrey Dearien Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Will Holmes.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Charles Galey, Peter J. Jay, Nicholas Roder, William Ryan.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 University A University B Team # Logo 1 Logo 2.
Eric Marz Joe Mozloom Swati Maini Linda Mclaughlin Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD June 22, 2011 Drexel University RockSat1.
Joe Mozloom Eric Marz Linda McLaughlin Swati Maini Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD.
RockSat 2010 Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C Rocket Team Harding University Ethan Lilly, Eric Locke, Darah McDaniel, Ed Wilson June 22, 2011.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Critical Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
DUNLOP LUNAX-II Conceptual Design Review Star Mission to the Moon-X1 Dan Hawk, Dr Schmitt, Dr Konings-Dudin October 13, 2009.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Zero Tilt Frostburg State University Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz, Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
Northwest Nazarene University Chad Larson, Ben Gordon, Seth Leija, David Vinson, Drew Johnson, Zach Thomas June 1 st, 2012.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
Temple University Advisors: Dr. John Helferty & Dr. Chang-Hee Won Charles Wright Jinyan Chen Billy Cheng Brittany Gray 1.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Rocket Team Harding University 13 February Team Members.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
2016 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Launch Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
FRIDAY SLIDES TEMPLATE
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Presentation transcript:

NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review

Table of Contents Section 1: Mission Overview  Purpose  Theory  Benefits  Success/Concept of Operation  Expected Results Section 2: Design Overview  Design Overview  Block Diagram  Payload Layout  RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance  Shared Can Logistics

Table of Contents Section 3: Management  Team Organization  Budget  Schedule  Important Notes Section 4: Conclusions

Mission Overview Purpose: Study the feasibility of using superhydrophobic materials in the presence of high acceleration and vibrations for possible use on space missions. Run an experiment for American Semiconductor Inc.

Mission Overview: Theory When water is in contact with the superhydrophobic surface (diatomaceous earth) it is more attracted to its own surface tension than it is to the material. This is because the material works like a microscopic bed of nails. Diatomaceous earth is a new material developed by John Simpson at Oakridge National Laboratory and is exceptional due to its high contact angle with water and low price.

Mission Overview: Benefits The goal of this launch is to prove that this diatomaceous earth can survive a rocket launch and still be functional post-flight. This material could have many different benefits if it is shown to survive space travel. The SH material has already been shown to work in microgravity by NNU and NASA’s Reduced Gravity program. It is now being hypothesized that this material could reduce water entrapment in space craft piping or be able to separate liquids from gas without the need of moving parts.

Mission Overview: Success Minimum success criteria: For this mission to be considered a success, the SH material needs to be recovered and tested post-flight.

Mission Overview: Concept of Operations Due to most of the testing being done pre-flight and post-flight, during the flight the material just needs to stay contained. A g-switch will activate the accelerometers and American Conductor’s board which will both run for the entire duration of the flight.

Mission Overview: Expected Results It is hypothesized that the material will survive the high acceleration and vibrations and still be functional in post-flight testing.

Design Overview Hardware ObjectProvided by AccelerometersRockOn Hardware TemperatureRockOn Hardware Radiation LevelsRockOn Hardware/American Semiconductor Superhydrophobic Plates Aluminum plate coated by NNU with Diatomaceous Earth Plate CoverAluminum Cover sealed to plate.

Example FBD (electrical) 11 Microcontroller (American Semiconductors) Power G-SwitchRBF (Wallops) Flash Memory Z Accelerometer X / Y Accelerometer Power Data Power Data

Payload Layout

User’s Guide Compliance Predicted mass - 10lb Using Rocksat Workshop Plexiglas plate  Diameter – 9”  Height – 3” to 4.5” A g-switch will be used for activation Using deionized double contained water

Shared Can Logistics Have not contacted a team but will if not provided with one by Rocksat A weekly meeting between our communicator and theirs will be set up No ports are required

Team Organization Advisor: o Dr. Lawrence Team Leader: o Chad Larson  Physics/Engineering Physics  Industry:  American Semiconductor Inc. Team Members: Ben Gordon o Mechanical Engineering Seth Leija o Electrical Engineering David Vinson o Electrical engineering Zach Thomas o Mechanical Engineering Andrew Johnson o Mechanical Engineering

Budget ItemAmount Budgeted ($) ½ Can $ paid by American Semiconductors Superhydrophobic MaterialMade by NNU for less then $50.00 TravelFunded by Idaho Space Grant FacilitiesProvided by NNU

Preliminary Schedule In contact with American Semiconductor to find out exactly what they want to send up. The size of their plate will then determine exactly how much superhydrophobic material can be sent up. Construction will then begin.

Important Notes A double containment system will be used to make sure the pure water will not go into the rest of the canister Our work with American Semiconductors will determine the specifics of the superhydrophobic experiment

Conclusions Superhydrophic material is new and largely untested. The possible application for future space missions makes this experiment on a rocket very valuable. This experiment will not only provide valuable data on the superhydrophobic material but also help teach students how to do real research.