1 Forging the Future of Management Education Midwest Business Deans October 12, 2007 Jerry E. Trapnell, EVP & CAO AACSB International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Pakistan Services Roadmap ~ Implementation Priorities.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
College of Business Goals Academic Year Goal 1: Increase Awareness of Academic Programs and Centers Goal 2: Maintain AACSB Accreditation Goal.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
AACSB International Accreditation: An Overview
Purpose of the Standards
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
“Advancing Knowledge. Improving Life.” Strategic Planning Workshop Dean Stanley Lemeshow Strategic Planning Process Dean Stanley Lemeshow October 2007.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
SBAA 2009 Annual Meeting Savannah, Georgia November 10, 2009 Contours of Quality: Shaping the Future of Management Education Jerry E. Trapnell EVP & Chief.
Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Building Superior Membership and Accreditation Value MAACBA Annual Meetig New Brunswick, NJ October 17, 2014.
Intersectoral Collaboration An Initiative: Promoting collaboration among the three sectors of the social work profession.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Dr Opio C K (TM) Quality assurance at FOM Quality assurance committee.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
1 New Directions for Management Education SBAA Annual Meeting November 7-9, 2004 John Fernandes President and CEO AACSB International.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
NCAA Working Group on the Collegiate Model – Rules Overview March 2012.
CWRU Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Ministry of Education and Higher Education Quality Systems for Quality Teachers : Towards the Implementation of the National Strategy for Teacher Education.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
MISSION To promote excellence in nursing through transformational leadership in New York State VISION To be recognized as a catalyst for collaborative.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Strategy Summary Draft for Members Consultation.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
University Career Services Committee
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
District Improvement Plan June 26, 2017
Meeting of the Finance Committee September 14, 2012
Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Furthering the Field GROWING THE MOVEMENT
University of Nizwa.
Presentation transcript:

1 Forging the Future of Management Education Midwest Business Deans October 12, 2007 Jerry E. Trapnell, EVP & CAO AACSB International

2 The Journey Framing Our Issues and Challenges Determining Our Strategic Directions Increasing Our Impact Feedback and Discussion

3 Framing Our Issues and Challenges

4 Issues in Management Education Survey Short Term Faculty recruitment & retention 86% Financial resources63% Programs and curricula37% Assurance of learning22% Competition14% Research9% Long Term Faculty recruitment & retention 67% Programs and curricula57% Financial resources54% Competition23% Research22% Business & business schools 10% Assurance of learning3% Source: AACSB International Survey of AACSB International members about their most important short term and long term issues and challenges.

5 Focus on a Changing Environment Curricula –Ethics –Social responsibility –Technology –Global perspectives –Relevant skills – theory vs. practice Programs –Online and distance-learning –International partnerships and exchanges –Interdisciplinary programs

6 Thought Leadership Initiatives Priority score based on ratings of 5 (highest priority) or 4 (high priority)

7 Challenges Raised by Board Global growth in business schools has been outpacing growth in accreditation. Should accreditation focus only on elite schools or elevate quality more broadly?

8 Challenges Raised by Board The difference between AACSB membership and accreditation is not well-understood. External recognition of AACSB accreditation has not been sufficiently developed.

9 Challenges Raised by Board The value of business schools (education and research) is not fully understood and appreciated. How should AACSB be organized to respond to external trends and issues impacting business schools?

10 Determining Our Strategic Directions Membership and Accreditation

11 Strategic Directions Committee Charge Recommend strategies to… 1.More effectively differentiate accreditation and membership 2.Increase the value of accreditation globally 3.Ensure accreditation reflects the global management education landscape 4.Address important emerging environmental issues

12 The Timeline Appointed – Jan Initial conclusions – Sept Member feedback – Dec Final recommendations – Jan. 2008

13 Membership Strategy Maintain a single comprehensive organization for all members, but establish clear and enforceable policies to more effectively differentiate AACSB accreditation status from membership.

14 Tentative Recommendations: For Discussion Member-only institutions should be distinguished by an appropriate adjective, such as:  Associate member  Affiliate member  Non-accredited member Member-only institutions should not use the AACSB corporate logo. Staff shall monitor and manage against policies, with clear procedures for violations.

15 Accreditation Strategy Reassert and strengthen accreditation emphases on overall high-quality, mission-linked accreditation, and professional judgment.

16 Tentative Recommendations: For Discussion Enhance peer review training to ensure focus on mission-based philosophy, attributes, and professional judgment. Significantly enhance the external recognition and value of accreditation. Develop a clear strategy for regions where growth potential is significant.

17 Accreditation Standards Directions Maintain institutional scope of accreditation and emphasis on highly- qualified faculty, but specify guidelines that allow for deeper assessments of qualifications and professional judgment.

18 Tentative Recommendations: For Discussion Program exclusion criteria should reflect cultural, historical, and regulatory contexts. Standard 10 guidelines should allow schools to make the case for faculty qualifications beyond current categories, by:  Broadening the definition of professional qualification or  Introducing a new category of “mission-qualified” faculty with objective expectations as guidelines

19 Increasing Our Impact Thought Leadership and Advocacy

20 Building the Future of Research Report of the Impact of Research Task Force (Draft for Comments) – August 3 Task Force chaired by Joe Alutto Studied scholarship and research in business schools Examined value propositions and incentive structures Offered 7 recommendations to increase value and visibility of business school research

21 Building the Future of Research Recommendations for… Strengthening the alignment of research to the school’s mission. Increasing emphasis on measuring impact of research in accreditation. Building mechanisms to enhance collaboration among academics and practitioners. Conducting additional research on distribution channels and the interaction between research and management education.

22 Creating Post-Doctoral Bridge to Business Programs One of several initiatives to address growing doctoral faculty shortages. Transitions non-business doctorates to high-demand business fields. AACSB commitment to AQ status for five years. Five programs endorsed for implementation as early as Summer 2008.

23 Five New Programs InstitutionDiscipline Focus Initiation Date University of Florida ACC & FIN, MKT & MGT, IB, Entrepreneurship May 2008 Grenoble Ecole de Management MKT, FIN, ACC, Strategy Fall 2007 University of Toledo Supply Chain Management June 2008 Tulane University FIN (FIN, ACC), MGT (OB, Strategy, MKT) Summer 2008 Polytechnic Institute and State University MKT, FIN Summer 2008

24 Exploring the Impact of Business Schools New Task Force to “study and provide evidence of the impact of business schools.” Focus on economic and social impact of business schools. Strong global dimension linked to the importance for economic competitiveness. Deliverables include targeted documents for specific audiences and a plan for advocacy.

25 Moving from “Being Good” to “Doing Good” Consolidating efforts related to promote ethics, governance, and Peace Through Commerce education. Expanding Ethics and Governance Conference to include social responsibility and sustainability. Partnering globally to promote and foster responsible management education.

26 Principles for Responsible Management Education As a co-convener, AACSB endorses the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME). AACSB members are among the initial set of schools eligible to adopt the PRME. All schools will be eligible in the future. Annual reports are will demonstrate ongoing commitment to the PRME. AACSB will provide visibility to member schools that adopt the principles.

27