Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Stream Processing for Computer Generated Forces Kickoff Meeting Maria Bauer RDECOM-STTC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCESS FRAMEWORK Lecture - 3. Topics covered PROCESS FRAMEWORK PROCESS MODELS DIFFERENCE.
Advertisements

Program Management Office Department of Innovation & Technology City of Boston Kickoff Meeting.
Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) w/ Registrar’s Office (RO) Colin Bell Director, Enterprise Architecture, IST January 9, 2014.
Chapter 2 The Analyst As Project Manager In Managing Information Systems 2.3.
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
Chapter 12 INTERACTION DESIGN IN PRACTICE. Overview AgileUX Design Patterns Open Source Resources Tools for Interaction Design
Information Analysis Centers (IACs)
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Project Management.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project 3.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
Kick-off meeting Ayamonte, 17th and 18th October 2013.
Project Management October 2011 Inf Sys 3810 Information Systems Analysis Fall 2011 Understand Project Management principles.
Project Management April 2015 Understand Project Management principles.
Brook for GPUs Ian Buck, Tim Foley, Daniel Horn, Jeremy Sugerman, Kayvon Fatahalian, Mike Houston, Pat Hanrahan Stanford University DARPA Site Visit, UNC.
RBG 6/9/ Reactive Processing Jon Hiller Science and Technology Associates, Inc. For Dr. William Harrod DARPA IPTO 24 May 2005.
What is a project? Project Management Institute definition
02/22/ Manocha Interactive Modeling and Simulation using Graphics Processors Dinesh Manocha University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6/25/ MRM Computational Challenges for Modeling and Simulation Michael Macedonia Chief Technology Officer, US Army Program Executive Office for Simulation,
Centers for IBM e-Business Innovation :: Chicago © 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Project October 2005.
Acceleration on many-cores CPUs and GPUs Dinesh Manocha Lauri Savioja.
11/28/ Manocha Interactive CGF Computations using COTS Graphics Processors Dinesh Manocha University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Project Lifecycle Section 6 - Closeout. Project Manager’s Role During Project Close-Out  Ensure that all project deliverables have been completed and.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Managing the Information Systems Project 3.1 Chapter 3.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer.
Computer System Analysis
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F.
Project Requirements COP 4331 OO Processes for Software Development © Dr. David A. Workman School of EE and CS University of Central Florida March 22,
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Tuesday, Feb 27
GTRInewFormat.ppt-1 Electronic Systems Laboratory TMC Operator Requirements and Position Descriptions, Phase 2, Kickoff Meeting Presented by Dennis J.
Conquering Complex and Changing Systems Object-Oriented Software Engineering Art for Chapter 11, Project Management.
HPC use in Testing Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
CYBERSIM Dec Client: Information Assurance Center Advisor: Dr. Doug Jacobson Group Members: Ryan ApplegateCprE Saddam KhattakCprE Dan NguyenCprE/JLMC.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
Collaborative Mobile Robots for High-Risk Urban Missions Report on Timeline, Activities, and Milestones P. I.s: Leonidas J. Guibas and Jean-Claude Latombe.
Enterprise Systems Architectures EGN 5621 Enterprise Systems Collaboration (Professional MSEM) Fall, 2012.
Example Template for Project Presentation
© Bennett, McRobb and Farmer Avoiding the Problems Based on Chapter 3 of Bennett, McRobb and Farmer: Object Oriented Systems Analysis and Design.
Questions for ATLAS  How can the US ATLAS costs per SW FTE be lowered?  Is the scope of the T1 facility matched to the foreseen physics requirements.
Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval Annual Review Meeting - Introduction.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project 3.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design.
Information Systems System Analysis 421 Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project.
GUI For Computer Architecture May01-05 Team Members: Neil HansenCprE Ben JonesCprE Jon MathewsCprE Sergey SannikovCprE Clients/Advisors: Manimaran Govindarasu.
Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006
PRJ845 – Project Management and Implementation Presentation.
Self-Adaptive Embedded Technologies for Pervasive Computing Architectures Self-Adaptive Networked Entities Concept, Implementations,
Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Chapter 2 Managing the Information Systems Project 2.1.
United States Army Combined Arms Center A next generation simulation architecture supporting both Computer Generated Forces (CGF) and SAF operations Provides.
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Instructional slide to Partner: REMOVE BEFORE PRESENTING TO CUSTOMER
Software Subcontractor
The Systems Engineering Context
Air Force Airborne SIGINT Architecture & Analysis
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Computer-Generated Force Acceleration using GPUs: Next Steps
GPU-Accelerated Route Planning for Computer Generated Forces
Introduction To System Analysis and Design PART 2
Joint Application Development (JAD)
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Chapter 2 Managing the Information Systems Project
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Presentation transcript:

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Stream Processing for Computer Generated Forces Kickoff Meeting Maria Bauer RDECOM-STTC

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Agenda Project Summary Technical Information Team Members and Roles Schedule Deliverables Information needed Communication Upcoming Events

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Project Summary – GPU Research Customer: DARPA User: PM OneSAF Contract Type: Cost Period of Performance: 3/18/2004 – 12/18/2005 Subcontractor SAIC

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Technical Information - SOW Description Statement of Work (SOW) UNC shall develop new algorithms for real-time path and route planning in complex terrain and urban environments. UNC shall develop GPU-based visibility and line-of-sight (LOS) computations for real-time interaction and communication between very large numbers of entities (thousands). UNC shall develop GPU-based real-time collision detection for terrain simulation. UNC shall leverage early PCA program developments, including streaming architecture and streaming languages (e.g. Brook developed at Stanford) Developed algorithms shall be integrated with the OneSAF Objective System (OOS). UNC shall develop software libraries that can be distributed freely to DOD labs and also used for other applications. UNC shall deliver quarterly management reports. Each report shall cover progress attained during the reporting period, contract funds expended and contract funds remaining.

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Team Members Dinesh Manocha (UNC Chapel Hill) Ming C. Lin (UNC Chapel Hill) Michael Macedonia (PEO STRI) Maria Bauer (RDECOM) Audrey Rubel (RDECOM) Latika Eifert (RDECOM) Angel Rodriguez (RDECOM) Brett Butler (SAIC) Pat Hanrahan (Stanford)

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Program Players and Roles Task I: Use of GPUs to speed-up OneSAF computations Algorithm Development: UNC Experiment Design and Data Collection Plan: UNC/SAIC Integrate in OneSAF: UNC/SAIC Test & Performance Analysis:UNC/SAIC Final Report: UNC

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Program Players and Roles Task II: Use of Streaming Languages & Architectures for OneSAF Computation Development & Delivery of Brook: Stanford Redesign visibility, collision avoidance and route planning algorithms using Brook: UNC/Stanford OneSAF performance Evaluation using Brook: UNC/Stanford/SAIC Evaluating Brook and Streaming Architectures for Computer- Generated Forces: UNC/Stanford/SAIC Final Report: UNC/Stanford

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Deliverables Initial Report Report on experiment design and data collection plan Due 6 months after contract award Mid Report Detailed architecture of integrating routines into OOS. Performance of line-of- sight and collision computations using GPU’s Information regarding progress of language development for GPU’s Due 12 months after contract award Final Report: Will document the comparison of performance between the traditional (OOS) CPU centric solution versus a GPU centric solution for the terrain placement, collision detection and LOS services The final report will contain all information regarding use of Brook for CGF application Due 30 days before the end of the contract

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Schedule

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Schedule

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Upcoming Events GP 2 : Workshop on General Purpose computing on Graphics Processors August 7-8, 2004, Los Angeles Participants from computer graphics, computer architecture, simulation, high performance computing

Technology to the Warfighter Quicker Questions?